This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 10.93 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4
208.91745 -19.56571 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX21" [H97b] 3082
Type: TTS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.770 I Y 0.060 I
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.93 is 4.8 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.71 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4: 12.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4: 12.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.4605* 05 34 27.82 -05 23 36.4 10.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[H97b] 3082,2461267.9605,10.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[H97b] 3082 20260815.4605 10.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 11.06 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9
208.90885 -19.55620 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9: 12.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9: 12.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.4605* 05 34 28.98 -05 22 54.9 11.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461267.9605,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260815.4605 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 11.29 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9
222.42554 -10.46455 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J063047-1307.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.158 Ic Y 0.461 Ic 2452628.10000 114.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J063047-1307.8,2461267.9605,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J063047-1307.8 20260815.4605 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 12.65 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3
218.38306 -11.69187 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061913.37-100522.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.350 V 15.140 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061913.37-100522.8,2461267.9605,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061913.37-100522.8 20260815.4605 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 11.14 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9
218.08904 -11.53877 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSV 16828
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 V Y 0.600 V M8III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 16828,2461267.9605,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 16828 20260815.4605 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 13.15 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0
214.63236 -14.87949 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060108.81-081157.6
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.300 V 14.800 V 2457044.87600 1.907800000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060108.81-081157.6,2461267.9605,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060108.81-081157.6 20260815.4605 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4605 2461267.9605 12.56 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3
217.05574 -9.60716 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J062429.03-080005.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.950 V 14.420 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062429.03-080005.2,2461267.9605,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062429.03-080005.2 20260815.4605 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461267.96094911 15.08.2026 11:03:36.003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13506
Objects passed selection criteria: 13428
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9607
Average stars matched: 9329.75 (97.1141 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:10:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461267.96094911 15.08.2026 11:03:36.003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 84892
Objects passed selection criteria: 84675
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61877
Average stars matched: 59634.2 (96.3755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 499428 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:12:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.96014824
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 943.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zZJHAb7MEQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LpAya17brh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dHhcze5v1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Epp605R4zv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8169 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14284 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.6 pix fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
2.6 pix fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.0 mag. Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zZJHAb7MEQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1343, bad_region=0, passed=14264
Got 14264 stars (including 12900 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5333)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1365 n_q2=1038 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1077 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LpAya17brh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1364, bad_region=0, passed=14284
Got 14284 stars (including 12906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5336)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1375 n_q2=1037 n_q3=1367 n_q4=1072 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.341
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3dHhcze5v1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=5126
Got 5126 stars (including 4762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4621 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4591 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4591 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4624 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4594 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4593 stars left (next iteration limit 5050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4593 robust_rms=10.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4593 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.085 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4593 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4593 robust_rms_before=1.254 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.521 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.583
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.521 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4593 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1093 n_q2=1050 n_q3=1137 n_q4=1313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Epp605R4zv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, bad_region=0, passed=5033
Got 5033 stars (including 4645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4508 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4512 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4483 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4483 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4483 stars left (next iteration limit 4929)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4483 robust_rms=10.637 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.263 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4483 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.923 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4483 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4483 robust_rms_before=1.207 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.523 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.630
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4483 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1032 n_q3=1099 n_q4=1289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.287
ref2=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.341
new1=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.273
new2=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.271
reference average sigma_overall=0.3135 worst_q_ratio=1.314
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (4848 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (4851 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466_astrometric_residuals.png (4593 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467_astrometric_residuals.png (4483 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4: 12.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:39.57 -05:24:25.0: 11.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9: 12.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:39.57 -05:24:25.0: 11.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4: 12.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:39.57 -05:24:25.0: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.8426 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=10.9305 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9: 12.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.0594 delta=1.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21026.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 32s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20880_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20880_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:39.64 -04:51:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20882_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20882_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.43 -05:25:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20896_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20896_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:31.28 -05:25:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20906_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20906_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:09.97 -05:27:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20965_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20965_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:49.99 -05:18:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20974_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 20974_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21000_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 21000_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:43.68 -05:18:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21002_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 21002_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21007_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 21007_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21021_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 21021_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.21 -10:58:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21026_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 21026_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04662_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 04662_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:47.77 -07:54:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 34s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:34:27.82 -05:23:36.4
05:34:28.98 -05:22:54.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Image size: 943.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:08.306 -10:01:09.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:05.490 -10:01:46.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V8EZCdEqac
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lBUEXBuiKI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hax2Cq5MVF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h4G1hILkgf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.716150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.716150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 92267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Loaded 10804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7526 out of 9140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9140 out of 92267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.2 mag. Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V8EZCdEqac (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7576, bad_region=1, passed=92096
Got 92096 stars (including 84360 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1306 n_q2=1066 n_q3=1349 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lBUEXBuiKI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7571, bad_region=1, passed=92246
Got 92246 stars (including 84509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92246 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=1317 n_q2=1052 n_q3=1352 n_q4=1120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hax2Cq5MVF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1085, bad_region=2, passed=32724
Got 32724 stars (including 31594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=9.947 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.015 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.579 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4826 robust_rms_before=1.225 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.508 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.579
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=1167 n_q2=1029 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h4G1hILkgf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1069, bad_region=2, passed=32314
Got 32314 stars (including 31186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=10.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.653 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.890 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=1.176 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.525 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.619
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.525 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1157 n_q2=1033 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1381 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-02-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0466.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_060753_TTUQ1b1x1_546789_0qDoj8Vz/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:57:53.03 -09:23:19.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:37:31.22 -10:19:30.2: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:56:30.20 -07:56:09.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:47:07.22 -12:47:46.2: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:36:06.92 -13:48:51.0: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:38:43.32 -12:55:58.9: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:20:02.48 -07:51:12.7: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:25.72 -08:12:26.8: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:37:31.22 -10:19:30.2: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:47:07.22 -12:47:46.2: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:57:53.03 -09:23:19.3: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:56:30.20 -07:56:09.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:07.22 -12:47:46.2: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0759 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:53.03 -09:23:19.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3628 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:31.22 -10:19:30.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2450 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:30.20 -07:56:09.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9210 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:59:55.78 -08:07:17.1: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:10:06.56 -07:06:30.1: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:38:43.32 -12:55:58.9: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:25.72 -08:12:26.8: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:20:02.48 -07:51:12.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:36:06.92 -13:48:51.0: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:25.72 -08:12:26.8: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5345 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:43.32 -12:55:58.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5905 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:02.48 -07:51:12.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3695 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:06.92 -13:48:51.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5530 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:59:55.78 -08:07:17.1: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:55.78 -08:07:17.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6913 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:10:06.56 -07:06:30.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:06.56 -07:06:30.1: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5821 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:34:15.03 -06:52:10.4: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:51:57.17 -08:04:23.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:01.94 -07:35:27.5: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:17:42.56 -07:53:19.9: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:51:57.17 -08:04:23.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:57.17 -08:04:23.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8766 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:34:15.03 -06:52:10.4: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:15.03 -06:52:10.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0840 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:36:53.36 -10:04:13.4: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:01.94 -07:35:27.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:17:42.56 -07:53:19.9: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:01.94 -07:35:27.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9860 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:42.56 -07:53:19.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5703 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:36:53.36 -10:04:13.4: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:53.36 -10:04:13.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3017 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:30:46.43 -13:07:49.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2969 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:19:13.36 -10:05:24.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.6457 delta=1.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:19:16.28 -09:45:50.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1430 delta=1.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:08.73 -08:11:57.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1494 delta=1.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:24:28.96 -08:00:06.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5094 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75108.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109789_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109789_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109791_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109791_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109793_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109793_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109795_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109795_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:19.93 -13:26:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109796_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109796_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:21.01 -07:43:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109798_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109798_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:10.89 -07:10:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109807_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 109807_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.45 -05:25:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110017_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110017_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:16.75 -07:05:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110221_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110221_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:49.15 -10:37:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110274_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110274_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110321_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110321_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110423_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110423_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110435_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110435_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:45.92 -05:58:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110444_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110444_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110457_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110457_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110483_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110483_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:03.09 -07:54:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110491_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110491_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110512_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110512_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110522_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:29.58 -06:19:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110544_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110544_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110551_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110551_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110571_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110571_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:55.60 -06:15:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110599_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110599_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.46 -12:12:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110604_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110604_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110630_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110630_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:19.01 -06:41:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110670_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110670_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110674_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110674_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:32.33 -07:00:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110733_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110733_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:32.91 -10:15:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110775_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 110775_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75108_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 75108_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47023_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 47023_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05925_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 05925_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.78 -05:25:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18408_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 18408_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:41.48 -06:41:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15616_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 15616_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:15.75 -06:36:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.18 -10:58:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77755_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 77755_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.72 -13:04:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44116_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 44116_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65191_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 65191_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:00.59 -10:57:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60166_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 60166_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:03.74 -14:21:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77241_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 77241_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:46.02 -13:06:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
Preparing report for the candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29122_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 29122_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:42.69 -08:09:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:35.75 -10:01:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28703_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 28703_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:47.75 -07:54:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15553_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467
The candidate 15553_fd_Mon-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-03-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0467 did not pass the final checks
