This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 12.96 07:08:12.55 +17:43:28.3
198.79936 11.58381 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 0 0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:12.55 +17:43:28.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:12.55 +17:43:28.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9581,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4581 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 13.50 06:43:04.40 +15:15:27.9
198.38028 5.08693 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis -0 -1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:04.40 +15:15:27.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:04.40 +15:15:27.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9581,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4581 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 13.28 07:04:59.79 +13:33:10.4
202.28987 9.09156 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.5 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.800 G 19.160 G 0.230759000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.85 Io -0 -1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:59.79 +13:33:10.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:59.79 +13:33:10.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248,2461267.9581,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248 20260815.4581 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 12.14 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4
206.05665 11.84186 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.890 V 14.400 V 2456598.00000 217.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3,2461267.9581,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3 20260815.4581 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 11.10 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5
205.13426 12.36084 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J072204+1226.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.380 V Y 0.520 V 2452779.30000 73.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072204+1226.8,2461267.9581,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072204+1226.8 20260815.4581 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4581 2461267.9581 10.99 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0
205.44202 12.42711 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J072250+1212.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.950 V Y 0.670 V 2452569.50000 72.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072250+1212.3,2461267.9581,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072250+1212.3 20260815.4581 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461267.95832148 15.08.2026 10:59:48.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24693
Objects passed selection criteria: 24628
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17913.5
Average stars matched: 17586.2 (98.1732 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:07:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461267.95832148 15.08.2026 10:59:48.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 59 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 167383
Objects passed selection criteria: 166946
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 131580
Average stars matched: 128604 (97.739 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 573260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:09:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.95780138
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00880 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ws6g7bxvxJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p0CY147vMa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4ppgOlHf7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0bC5GmaFEk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Ws6g7bxvxJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p0CY147vMa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A4ppgOlHf7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=574, bad_region=0, passed=9021
Got 9021 stars (including 8439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=6.924 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.051 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.197 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.500 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.475
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1547 n_q2=781 n_q3=1583 n_q4=864 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0bC5GmaFEk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=553, bad_region=0, passed=8782
Got 8782 stars (including 8226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8782 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=7.108 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.639 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.914 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.324 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.485 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.485 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1548 n_q2=791 n_q3=1575 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.47 +17:58:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31081_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31081_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.62 +12:58:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31090_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31090_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.60 +10:45:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31170_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31170_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.44 +13:56:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.37 +11:44:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.61 +10:01:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:46.603 +13:57:43.65
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:48.728 +13:57:36.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00880 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SUdRYZiIwI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZlzA4yPrm1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JIOdaPovRa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v3gvYd15Bi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SUdRYZiIwI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZlzA4yPrm1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JIOdaPovRa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4261, bad_region=3, passed=73128
Got 73128 stars (including 68760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=6.904 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.733 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.187 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.465 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.465 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1537 n_q2=771 n_q3=1579 n_q4=887 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v3gvYd15Bi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4297, bad_region=3, passed=73754
Got 73754 stars (including 69340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=7.242 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.634 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.316 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.454 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.562
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=1548 n_q2=794 n_q3=1543 n_q4=886 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_060348_TTUQ1b1x1_314651_K53rrLCz/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:22.12 +15:52:39.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:22.74 +13:12:07.3: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:01.58 +15:47:19.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:22.72 +16:39:21.5: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:33.35 +12:19:37.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:48.35 +15:48:06.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.0: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:01.58 +15:47:19.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:22.12 +15:52:39.6: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:22.72 +16:39:21.5: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:22.74 +13:12:07.3: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0105 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:01.58 +15:47:19.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9217 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:22.72 +16:39:21.5: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1118 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:22.74 +13:12:07.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3304 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:22.12 +15:52:39.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5382 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:21.03 +15:19:09.6: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:33.35 +12:19:37.3: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:48.35 +15:48:06.4: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.33 +16:15:50.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4989 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:33.35 +12:19:37.3: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0962 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:48.35 +15:48:06.4: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0577 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:21.03 +15:19:09.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:21.03 +15:19:09.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6386 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.09 +16:15:57.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:29.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.09 +16:15:57.5: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.09 +16:15:57.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4009 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:29.6: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.11 +14:15:29.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2162 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:36.66 +11:24:49.7: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:35:55.66 +14:11:48.1: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:38.53 +16:09:36.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:36.66 +11:24:49.7: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:36.66 +11:24:49.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9055 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:07.49 +16:09:33.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:09.26 +16:44:02.3: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:35:55.66 +14:11:48.1: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:38.53 +16:09:36.3: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:07.49 +16:09:33.4: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:09.26 +16:44:02.3: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:10.31 +11:00:11.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:07.49 +16:09:33.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6184 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:09.26 +16:44:02.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1857 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:55.66 +14:11:48.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0328 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:38.53 +16:09:36.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5977 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:10.31 +11:00:11.9: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:40.05 +13:12:35.4: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:10.31 +11:00:11.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7374 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:55.11 +11:38:50.7: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:40.05 +13:12:35.4: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:40.05 +13:12:35.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0683 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:39.36 +15:57:34.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:12.55 +17:43:28.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:55.11 +11:38:50.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:55.11 +11:38:50.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2312 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:59.79 +13:33:10.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:04.40 +15:15:27.9: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:39.36 +15:57:34.0: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:39.36 +15:57:34.0: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0411 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:12.55 +17:43:28.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:59.79 +13:33:10.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:04.40 +15:15:27.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:21:44.19 +11:24:39.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1285 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:22:03.62 +12:26:54.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0950 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:22:50.06 +12:12:20.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9872 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229308.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229789.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:22.61 +15:12:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.54 +13:25:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:54.86 +13:44:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227484_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.40 +17:52:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227488_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227488_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227489_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227489_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227503_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227503_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:32.24 +14:52:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227508_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:31.30 +13:59:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227509_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227517_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227517_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:53.99 +12:32:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227521_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227521_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227522_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:46.64 +17:48:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:28.85 +18:20:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227526_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227526_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:28.17 +18:45:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227528_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227528_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:32.16 +13:05:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227532_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:50.55 +12:12:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227533_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227533_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227535_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227535_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:11.00 +18:24:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227537_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.61 +12:35:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227538_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227538_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.45 +17:58:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.81 +16:09:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227855_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 227855_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.13 +13:15:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228005_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228005_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.64 +16:11:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228196_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228196_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.46 +12:07:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228254_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228254_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.48 +14:10:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228324_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:30.62 +16:25:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228335_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228335_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.43 +09:55:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228363_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228363_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.08 +16:04:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228412_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228412_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.38 +09:51:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228419_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228419_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.95 +16:27:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228438_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228438_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.46 +17:12:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:50.32 +10:37:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228525_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228525_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.73 +09:18:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228559_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228559_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.68 +16:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228572_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228572_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.66 +10:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228574_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228574_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:43.14 +15:59:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228638_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228638_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.08 +15:07:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228661_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:36.37 +09:05:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228701_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228701_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.98 +14:14:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228743_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228743_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228745_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228745_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.06 +12:33:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228797_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228797_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:19.32 +13:20:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.26 +17:27:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228849_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228849_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.02 +17:45:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228851_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:48.17 +10:42:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228865_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228865_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228872_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228872_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228886_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228886_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:58.08 +13:11:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228916_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228916_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.48 +10:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228919_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:28.00 +16:25:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228949_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228949_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228973_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 228973_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:07.37 +12:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229011_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229011_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.49 +16:33:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229022_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229022_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.00 +17:50:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229030_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229030_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.15 +11:24:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229045_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229045_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.72 +16:55:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229102_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229102_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.41 +10:59:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229118_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229118_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229119_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229119_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.12 +12:08:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229144_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229144_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:23.76 +15:19:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229147_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229147_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.51 +15:18:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229181_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229181_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.00 +09:46:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229208_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229208_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:50.53 +15:07:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229212_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229212_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:17.32 +09:01:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229253_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229253_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.04 +12:40:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.36 +14:14:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229287_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229287_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:41.43 +14:23:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229291_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229291_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.07 +14:13:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229295_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229295_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:43.56 +13:46:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229302_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229302_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 229308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229547_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229547_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.63 +15:48:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229556_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229556_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.29 +18:07:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229576_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.44 +13:57:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:28.22 +15:40:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229712_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229712_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:38.31 +10:55:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229789_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 229789_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229814_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 229814_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:21.24 +12:06:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.44 +13:56:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.37 +11:44:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220411_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 220411_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.14 +14:52:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.66 +13:18:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42575_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 42575_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.24 +16:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.63 +10:45:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 73357_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.56 +12:22:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-59-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
