This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,6.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 6.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 9.06 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6
187.60056 0.03130 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 0 1 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,9.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 9.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,7.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 7.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 11.19 06:18:29.81 +22:52:51.3
188.91872 3.43090 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:29.81 +22:52:51.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:29.81 +22:52:51.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 12.01 06:24:57.46 +24:37:08.1
188.06503 5.54794 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:57.46 +24:37:08.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:57.46 +24:37:08.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 12.90 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2
191.01388 0.62044 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 1 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2: 15.57 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.4150* 06 12 09.57 +19 42 08.2 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 13.71 06:31:14.90 +19:42:22.3
193.11859 4.59093 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 0 0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:14.90 +19:42:22.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:14.90 +19:42:22.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4150 2461267.9150 13.12 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3
188.62298 9.28316 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -2 1 2 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9150,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4150 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461267.91526765 15.08.2026 09:57:49.125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18880
Objects passed selection criteria: 18822
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16343
Average stars matched: 14182 (86.7772 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 05:05:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461267.91526765 15.08.2026 09:57:49.125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 279
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 119 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 135827
Objects passed selection criteria: 135556
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120890
Average stars matched: 109464 (90.5482 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 577880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 05:08:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.91482028
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0717 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0695 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00334 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mfbMTYHR1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qkz2hBLMSf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R17qsX3GtD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lAnXoLCyf9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.mfbMTYHR1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=6704, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 19960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1455 n_q2=895 n_q3=1550 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qkz2hBLMSf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=7092, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 22011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1428 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R17qsX3GtD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=648, bad_region=1662, passed=11089
Got 11089 stars (including 8824 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11089 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=5.762 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.799 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.646 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.559 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.547 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.623 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.588
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.623 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1574 n_q2=703 n_q3=1703 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lAnXoLCyf9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=693, bad_region=1705, passed=10936
Got 10936 stars (including 8596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=5.756 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=1.411 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.614 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.580
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.614 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=1578 n_q2=711 n_q3=1689 n_q4=814 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.117
ref2=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits sigma_overall=0.556 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.090
reference average sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.118
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4827 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38608_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 38608_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:48.95 +17:48:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38612_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 38612_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0717 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0695 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:36.684 +21:56:15.97
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:36.170 +21:56:25.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00334 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wZdGn8AMuI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LmK5JvodOK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AkdzKRMYgk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.429b1X18PS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.723200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.723200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 191 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wZdGn8AMuI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=31903, bad_region=37736, passed=206254
Got 206254 stars (including 141027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1462 n_q2=892 n_q3=1535 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LmK5JvodOK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=29566, bad_region=30361, passed=188602
Got 188602 stars (including 132646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1389 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AkdzKRMYgk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=6242, bad_region=10658, passed=88682
Got 88682 stars (including 72236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=5.960 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.310 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4774 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4774 robust_rms_before=1.564 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.534 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.617 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.603
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.617 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1609 n_q2=709 n_q3=1627 n_q4=829 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.429b1X18PS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=6253, bad_region=11056, passed=92624
Got 92624 stars (including 75784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=5.889 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.028 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.639 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.412 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.534 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.620 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.572
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.620 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=1622 n_q2=715 n_q3=1603 n_q4=835 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_050317_TTUQ2b1x1_301438_20YcmAeV/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:45:29.82 +23:41:01.5: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:54.46 +20:37:08.2: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:33.06 +19:12:22.3: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:45:26.13 +25:17:28.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:41.51 +24:44:38.2: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:55.68 +21:14:24.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:45:29.82 +23:41:01.5: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:45:26.13 +25:17:28.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:54.46 +20:37:08.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:33.06 +19:12:22.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:29.82 +23:41:01.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5234 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:54.46 +20:37:08.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7641 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:26.13 +25:17:28.5: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4382 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:33.06 +19:12:22.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4844 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:14.61 +24:33:49.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:41.51 +24:44:38.2: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:55.68 +21:14:24.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:55.68 +21:14:24.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3567 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:41.51 +24:44:38.2: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2036 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:45.73 +24:44:19.1: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:14.61 +24:33:49.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:14.61 +24:33:49.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4785 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:18.00 +25:01:12.4: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:49.52 +25:18:15.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:45.73 +24:44:19.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:45.73 +24:44:19.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4305 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:19.48 +24:25:03.4: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:18.00 +25:01:12.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:18.00 +25:01:12.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2923 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:49.52 +25:18:15.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:49.52 +25:18:15.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8479 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:06.11 +23:19:53.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:19.48 +24:25:03.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:19.48 +24:25:03.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2178 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:09.74 +19:32:32.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.6: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:54.59 +18:43:26.1: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:06.11 +23:19:53.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:06.11 +23:19:53.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7387 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:43.28 +23:42:33.7: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:02.28 +22:25:49.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:09.74 +19:32:32.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:09.74 +19:32:32.9: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4773 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2879 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:13:54.59 +18:43:26.1: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:54.59 +18:43:26.1: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5832 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:43.28 +23:42:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:02.28 +22:25:49.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:43.28 +23:42:33.7: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6547 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:02.28 +22:25:49.8: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4337 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:29.81 +22:52:51.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:57.46 +24:37:08.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:41.35 +20:24:36.0: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.4: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:29.81 +22:52:51.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:14.84 +25:21:39.7: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:15.67 +18:46:39.3: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:57.46 +24:37:08.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.9: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4460 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:41.35 +20:24:36.0: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:14.84 +25:21:39.7: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:41.35 +20:24:36.0: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9372 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.4: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1263 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:14.84 +25:21:39.7: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8734 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:15.67 +18:46:39.3: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:15.67 +18:46:39.3: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0806 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:10.80 +25:24:58.5: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.38 +21:52:44.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:10.80 +25:24:58.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.80 +25:24:58.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6963 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.38 +21:52:44.8: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.38 +21:52:44.8: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4220 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2: 15.57 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:09.57 +19:42:08.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.9081 delta=2.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:47.79 +22:44:55.6: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:47.79 +22:44:55.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:47.79 +22:44:55.6: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8143 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:52.14 +23:27:00.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:59.27 +19:27:03.2: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:59.27 +19:27:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:52.14 +23:27:00.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:59.27 +19:27:03.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2086 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:52.14 +23:27:00.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2070 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:01.70 +23:19:31.1: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:01.70 +23:19:31.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:01.70 +23:19:31.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2706 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:12.47 +23:50:33.5: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:46.23 +22:44:45.4: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:45.20 +21:11:42.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.66 +19:26:21.8: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:12.47 +23:50:33.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:12.47 +23:50:33.5: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3838 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:46.23 +22:44:45.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:46.23 +22:44:45.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9993 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:45.20 +21:11:42.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:45.20 +21:11:42.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0571 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.66 +19:26:21.8: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.66 +19:26:21.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2118 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.17 +20:15:38.5: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:31.07 +22:39:20.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.17 +20:15:38.5: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.17 +20:15:38.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2256 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:44.83 +19:53:33.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:49.23 +22:53:06.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:31.07 +22:39:20.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:31.07 +22:39:20.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0728 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:44.83 +19:53:33.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:44.83 +19:53:33.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3544 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:49.23 +22:53:06.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:49.23 +22:53:06.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3563 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:29.76 +22:33:47.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:53.76 +19:22:22.7: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:29.76 +22:33:47.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:29.76 +22:33:47.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6789 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:53.76 +19:22:22.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:53.76 +19:22:22.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3764 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:14.90 +19:42:22.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:28.94 +18:57:31.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:14.90 +19:42:22.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:28.94 +18:57:31.7: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:28.94 +18:57:31.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4110 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3: 15.51 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:40:49.44 +25:47:36.3: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.1208 delta=2.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out179666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:35.18 +20:53:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:30.22 +22:24:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261047_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261047_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:53.94 +24:12:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:46.22 +21:34:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261065_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261065_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261067_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261067_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261068_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261068_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:34.22 +17:52:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261075_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261075_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261076_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261076_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:31.34 +21:35:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261084_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261084_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:31.11 +19:38:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261091_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261091_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:06.14 +19:18:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261096_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261096_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:35.28 +23:07:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261102_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261102_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261104_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261104_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:55.76 +24:04:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261114_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261114_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:59.86 +26:02:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261123_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261123_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:14.86 +22:47:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261124_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261124_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261129_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261129_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:06.30 +17:52:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261133_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261133_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:55.28 +21:11:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:22.58 +23:23:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261145_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261145_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:38.08 +21:00:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261147_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261147_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.69 +20:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261149_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261149_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261161_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261161_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:37.79 +22:09:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.43 +18:39:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:01.31 +23:11:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261176_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261176_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:45.89 +22:01:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:19.01 +20:13:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.56 +23:57:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261183_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261183_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:01.60 +17:44:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:15.10 +20:38:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261190_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261190_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.30 +17:48:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261192_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261192_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:36.79 +21:41:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261194_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261194_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261195_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261195_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261196_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261196_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261198_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261198_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:32.86 +21:26:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261207_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261207_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:02.13 +26:06:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261208_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261208_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.30 +17:47:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261213_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261213_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:08.76 +17:59:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261214_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261214_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.59 +18:25:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261215_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261215_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:34.16 +20:32:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261216_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261216_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:28.57 +21:32:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261217_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261217_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.89 +24:23:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261218_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261218_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:08.63 +25:14:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261221_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261221_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:45.89 +20:46:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261223_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 261223_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261224_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261224_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.07 +22:23:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261239_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261239_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261246_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 261246_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261248_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261248_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.29 +22:21:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261252_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261252_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.71 +24:02:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261264_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261264_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261270_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261270_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.51 +20:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261280_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 261280_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261282_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261282_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261283_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261283_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261284_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261284_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261298_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261298_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:40.65 +23:17:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261305_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261305_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261307_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261307_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261312_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261312_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.19 +21:52:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.98 +24:26:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261328_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261328_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261332_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261332_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.18 +20:55:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261346_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261346_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.68 +22:33:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261347_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261347_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:56.75 +25:01:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261350_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261350_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:12.29 +24:17:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261352_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261352_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.59 +22:41:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261353_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261353_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.44 +19:19:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261355_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261355_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:35.29 +25:11:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.15 +18:15:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261375_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261375_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.25 +23:15:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261377_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261377_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:40.91 +18:02:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:47.52 +25:09:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261384_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261384_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.51 +19:58:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261386_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261386_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.93 +21:10:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261387_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261387_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.64 +24:26:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261388_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261388_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:49.45 +18:26:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.69 +23:08:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261397_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261397_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.85 +22:43:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261398_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261398_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.50 +23:06:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261399_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261399_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.50 +23:37:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261402_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261402_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:46.01 +22:43:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.25 +22:10:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:09.93 +25:47:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261405_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261405_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.58 +24:36:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261406_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261406_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.95 +18:02:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261413_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261413_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:21.04 +18:34:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.25 +25:47:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.38 +26:08:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.02 +25:01:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.35 +20:26:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261422_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261422_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.52 +18:11:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261427_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261427_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:23.34 +21:28:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261431_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261431_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261432_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261432_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261435_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261435_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.67 +18:55:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261437_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261437_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.48 +20:55:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261439_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261439_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:58.02 +24:09:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261440_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261440_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.42 +22:44:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261441_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261441_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.17 +18:42:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261446_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261446_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261448_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261448_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261450_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261450_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:56.88 +21:28:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261457_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261457_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:40.94 +18:32:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261460_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261460_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261462_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261462_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:51.73 +17:49:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261476_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261476_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.42 +23:58:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261477_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261477_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.31 +22:57:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261479_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261479_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:48.69 +21:26:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261482_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261482_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261485_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261485_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261486_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261486_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.20 +23:17:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261487_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261487_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.43 +21:34:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:47.54 +19:10:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261490_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261490_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261492_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261492_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:16.90 +19:37:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261493_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261493_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:21.63 +26:07:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261494_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261494_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261499_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261499_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.36 +19:25:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261503_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261503_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261509_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261509_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.65 +21:05:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261511_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261511_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261515_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261515_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:25.81 +18:51:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261521_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261521_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.66 +19:46:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261525_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261525_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.93 +25:18:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261527_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261527_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:39.48 +18:19:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261529_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261529_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:11.58 +24:36:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261530_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261530_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.80 +20:01:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261531_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261531_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261532_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261532_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:25.22 +24:31:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261540_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261540_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261545_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261545_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:37.29 +20:20:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261546_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261546_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261548_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261548_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261550_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261550_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261557_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261557_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.32 +22:12:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261558_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261558_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261569_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261569_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:38.17 +20:20:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261570_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261570_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261573_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261573_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261583_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261583_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261587_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261587_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.61 +24:56:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261590_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261590_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:00.90 +23:37:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261593_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261593_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:15.33 +19:59:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261597_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261597_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261598_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261598_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:16.95 +21:41:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261601_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261601_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:58.59 +17:52:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261602_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261602_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:14.02 +21:09:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261616_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261616_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261618_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261618_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:51.05 +19:32:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261619_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261619_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261620_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 261620_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261621_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261621_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:02.27 +22:52:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261626_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261626_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:25.09 +21:10:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261628_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261628_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261635_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261635_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261641_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261641_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:57.46 +21:36:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261645_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 261645_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45035_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 45035_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.40 +19:09:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.81 +18:15:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 23141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179666_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
Preparing report for the candidate 179666_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.83 +21:50:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184402_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 184402_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
