This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,6.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 6.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,8.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 8.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4065 2461267.9065 9.53 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6
117.87296 -57.49716 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -0 0 0 9.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,9.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 9.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,7.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 7.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,8.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 8.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4065 2461267.9065 14.16 00:44:36.61 +08:34:16.4
120.04130 -54.26220 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 0 0 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:44:36.61 +08:34:16.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:44:36.61 +08:34:16.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4065 2461267.9065 14.26 00:31:13.47 +03:14:47.2
113.03188 -59.23621 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -1 -0 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:31:13.47 +03:14:47.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:31:13.47 +03:14:47.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9065,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4065 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461267.90683699 15.08.2026 09:45:40.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6450
Objects passed selection criteria: 6447
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6051
Average stars matched: 5726.5 (94.6373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:53:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461267.90683699 15.08.2026 09:45:40.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30230
Objects passed selection criteria: 30156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28733
Average stars matched: 27423 (95.4408 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:55:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.90620293
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:27.073 +06:01:51.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:27.073 +06:01:51.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:29.397 +06:01:12.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:29.397 +06:01:12.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:27.073 +06:01:51.24
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:29.397 +06:01:12.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pYzUthZdH3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9kLRrbxMvv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MdF3ULoiTL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oq9HqhBmDq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
3.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
3.1 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.pYzUthZdH3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9kLRrbxMvv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MdF3ULoiTL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=262, bad_region=0, passed=6477
Got 6477 stars (including 6209 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=10.213 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.306 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.895 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.305 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.306
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1290 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oq9HqhBmDq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=0, passed=6510
Got 6510 stars (including 6232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=10.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.356 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.295 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.893 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.310 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.295
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.310 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1290 n_q2=1234 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-44-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_044947_TTUQ1b1x1_3051762_cESO4aII/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.3: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.4: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.8: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1280 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0268 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:06.93 +05:59:29.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0844 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.4: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0523 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.3: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0902 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:35.96 +07:49:01.2: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1590 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:45:11.61 +06:28:53.9: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.6: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:45:11.61 +06:28:53.9: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:11.61 +06:28:53.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1648 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.6: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.24 +04:52:55.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1518 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:34.92 +10:30:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20336_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20349_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20374_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.24 +00:53:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:40:31.70 +05:16:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32623_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32623_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32669_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32899_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32899_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33087_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33087_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33091_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:20.05 +04:06:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33145_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33145_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33161_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33161_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33162_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33162_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33172_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33172_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33191_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33191_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33195_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33195_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33202_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 33229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33241_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33241_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33258_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33261_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33264_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33264_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33276_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33276_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33282_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33294_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33294_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33296_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33296_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33297_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 33297_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33299_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33299_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33307_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33307_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33311_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33313_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33313_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33337_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33344_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33344_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33382_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33382_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33390_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33401_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33403_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33403_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33410_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33412_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33412_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33416_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33416_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33423_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33423_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:54.06 +01:26:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33433_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33433_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33436_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33436_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33442_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33442_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33449_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33451_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33451_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33481_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33491_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33491_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33495_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33495_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33504_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33504_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33506_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33506_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33517_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33535_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33535_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33548_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33548_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33551_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33567_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33567_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33572_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33584_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33591_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33595_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33595_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33613_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33613_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33629_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33629_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33634_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33634_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33639_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33639_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33696_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33696_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33701_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33701_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:46.58 +01:27:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33722_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33732_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33732_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-45-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
