This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,6.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 6.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 9.07 05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2
187.13388 -0.96740 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 0 0 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4226* 05 58 04.98 +22 18 25.2 9.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,9.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 9.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 11.29 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3
188.11918 2.00307 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 1 -0 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 12.09 06:18:32.05 +24:40:45.1
187.33155 4.28308 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 -0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.05 +24:40:45.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:32.05 +24:40:45.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 13.06 06:05:56.15 +19:55:55.2
190.10373 -0.54877 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:56.15 +19:55:55.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:56.15 +19:55:55.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4226* 06 05 56.15 +19 55 55.2 13.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 13.07 06:34:49.30 +25:54:07.0
187.92529 8.11702 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:07.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:07.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4226 2461264.9226 13.51 06:26:41.78 +19:47:40.1
192.54624 3.68040 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 0 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:41.78 +19:47:40.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:41.78 +19:47:40.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9226,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4226 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461264.92291934 12.08.2026 10:08:50.231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18751
Objects passed selection criteria: 18690
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16063.5
Average stars matched: 13905 (86.5627 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 07:18:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461264.92291934 12.08.2026 10:08:50.231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 208
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 135159
Objects passed selection criteria: 134881
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 119006
Average stars matched: 107584 (90.402 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 565584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 07:19:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.92225625
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0830 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OSCu7GhH72
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9rOAD09zO2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YhFHVuUkNB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7hA5HPX37t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OSCu7GhH72 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=6704, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 19960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1455 n_q2=895 n_q3=1550 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9rOAD09zO2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=7092, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 22011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1428 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YhFHVuUkNB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=583, bad_region=1448, passed=10186
Got 10186 stars (including 8193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=5.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.113 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.508 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.647 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.576 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.508
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.467 +21:55:33.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10194 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2682971.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.647 -> 0.501 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=1586 n_q2=660 n_q3=1744 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7hA5HPX37t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=607, bad_region=1497, passed=10287
Got 10287 stars (including 8221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=5.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.518 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.610 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:41.274 +21:56:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10287 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2682970.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.518 -> 0.510 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=1589 n_q2=675 n_q3=1733 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.117
ref2=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.059
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.545 worst_q_ratio=1.063
reference average sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.118
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4827 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38622.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 38609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:23.75 +18:34:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38622_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 38622_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:58:04.98 +22:18:25.2
06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0830 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:43.364 +21:55:34.48
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:41.186 +21:56:16.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CNFZszTLIk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DSCuRKZrnt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TmDIao5H2k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ixv5mrTa4d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.723200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.723200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 152 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CNFZszTLIk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=31903, bad_region=37736, passed=206254
Got 206254 stars (including 141027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1462 n_q2=892 n_q3=1535 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DSCuRKZrnt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=29566, bad_region=30361, passed=188602
Got 188602 stars (including 132646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1389 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TmDIao5H2k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=5448, bad_region=9189, passed=83801
Got 83801 stars (including 69524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=1625 n_q2=665 n_q3=1662 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ixv5mrTa4d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5695, bad_region=9332, passed=86465
Got 86465 stars (including 71829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1611 n_q2=668 n_q3=1671 n_q4=826 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-07-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0436.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_071528_TTUQ2b1x1_2622556_Q5Ebj2pc/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:41.16 +20:24:06.1: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:05.26 +22:57:13.1: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:58.45 +22:21:47.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:14.66 +19:24:33.1: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:43.83 +19:06:04.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:58.45 +22:21:47.9: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:41.16 +20:24:06.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:05.26 +22:57:13.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:58.45 +22:21:47.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3902 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:05.26 +22:57:13.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6637 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:41.16 +20:24:06.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7211 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:00.47 +20:16:30.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:19.86 +24:55:42.8: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:14.66 +19:24:33.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:43.83 +19:06:04.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:14.66 +19:24:33.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1960 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:43.83 +19:06:04.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0159 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:00.47 +20:16:30.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:00.47 +20:16:30.5: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1339 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:19.86 +24:55:42.8: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:19.86 +24:55:42.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1704 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:36.48 +23:20:00.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:43.24 +23:42:34.0: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0746 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:21.5: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.49 +23:55:56.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:09.75 +19:32:34.0: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:27.59 +24:05:44.5: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:02.32 +22:25:49.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:36.48 +23:20:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:43.24 +23:42:34.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:36.48 +23:20:00.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8424 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:43.24 +23:42:34.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7967 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:21.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:21.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7628 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.49 +23:55:56.8: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:09.75 +19:32:34.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.49 +23:55:56.8: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2471 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:09.75 +19:32:34.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3301 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:25.00 +24:05:21.7: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:27.59 +24:05:44.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:27.59 +24:05:44.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4117 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:02.32 +22:25:49.9: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:02.32 +22:25:49.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3539 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:25.00 +24:05:21.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:25.00 +24:05:21.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3084 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:17.1: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:14.80 +25:21:39.4: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:54.39 +21:19:12.9: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.05 +24:40:45.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:41.32 +20:24:35.9: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:17.1: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:17.1: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4623 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:15.72 +18:46:38.5: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:14.80 +25:21:39.4: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:14.80 +25:21:39.4: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8458 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:54.39 +21:19:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:32.05 +24:40:45.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:54.39 +21:19:12.9: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1225 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:41.32 +20:24:35.9: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:41.32 +20:24:35.9: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9845 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:10.90 +25:24:58.0: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:15.72 +18:46:38.5: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:15.72 +18:46:38.5: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1614 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:10.90 +25:24:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:07.24 +22:04:01.4: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.90 +25:24:58.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7504 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:56.93 +20:32:38.3: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:24.20 +24:06:39.0: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:07.24 +22:04:01.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:07.24 +22:04:01.4: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9264 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.3: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4909 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:56.93 +20:32:38.3: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:24.20 +24:06:39.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:56.93 +20:32:38.3: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6531 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:24.20 +24:06:39.0: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8968 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:56.15 +19:55:55.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:43.07 +17:35:21.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:27.69 +17:41:51.5: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:16.20 +18:45:36.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:59.21 +19:27:02.8: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:56.15 +19:55:55.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:43.07 +17:35:21.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:43.07 +17:35:21.7: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1132 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:16.20 +18:45:36.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:10:27.69 +17:41:51.5: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:07.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:59.21 +19:27:02.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:37.26 +25:31:05.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:16.20 +18:45:36.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1289 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:27.69 +17:41:51.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1188 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:59.21 +19:27:02.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1824 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:07.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:01.58 +23:19:30.2: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:37.26 +25:31:05.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:37.26 +25:31:05.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9475 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:01.58 +23:19:30.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:10.79 +25:28:03.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:01.58 +23:19:30.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2538 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:12.46 +23:50:32.9: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:10.79 +25:28:03.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.79 +25:28:03.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2645 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:12.46 +23:50:32.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:12.46 +23:50:32.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2174 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:20.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:20.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:20.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1729 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.10 +20:15:37.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:13.10 +22:08:49.9: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:27.40 +23:46:33.2: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:41.78 +19:47:40.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.10 +20:15:37.7: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:13.10 +22:08:49.9: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.10 +20:15:37.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3477 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:13.10 +22:08:49.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4991 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:58.17 +19:10:19.6: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:27.40 +23:46:33.2: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:27.40 +23:46:33.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6322 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:41.78 +19:47:40.1: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:58.17 +19:10:19.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:58.17 +19:10:19.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5278 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:03.28 +23:20:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261053_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261053_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:29.47 +20:11:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:06.12 +23:38:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261061_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261061_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:06.08 +19:18:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261066_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261066_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.75 +20:11:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261069_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261069_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261072_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261072_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261085_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261085_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:06.36 +23:11:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261087_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261087_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:15.12 +22:50:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261089_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261089_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261090_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261090_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:03.21 +18:41:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261091_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261091_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:13.19 +23:47:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261093_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261093_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.46 +25:57:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261103_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261103_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:38.13 +21:00:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:14.85 +22:47:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261127_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261127_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.78 +20:31:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261139_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261139_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.35 +19:57:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261140_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261140_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:28.14 +20:45:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261149_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261149_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:01.87 +23:11:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261154_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261154_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:11.81 +24:55:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261157_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261157_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:48.70 +23:32:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261160_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261160_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:37.78 +22:09:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261164_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261164_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:01.80 +17:44:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261165_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261165_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:15.18 +20:38:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:18.96 +20:13:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:45.88 +22:01:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.63 +23:57:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:30.36 +24:19:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261178_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261178_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261179_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261179_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261180_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261180_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261181_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261181_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.35 +17:48:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261183_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261183_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:17.75 +18:59:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261186_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261186_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261187_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261187_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:02.22 +26:06:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261189_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261189_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.33 +17:47:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261199_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261199_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:28.60 +21:32:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261200_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261200_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:08.63 +25:14:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261201_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261201_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.93 +24:23:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261202_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261202_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:48.90 +17:48:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261204_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 261204_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:04.95 +22:18:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261227_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261227_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.70 +24:02:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261236_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261236_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.31 +22:32:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261248_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261248_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.50 +20:10:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261256_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261256_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261264_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261264_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261270_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261270_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.16 +22:53:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261278_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261278_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:57.81 +23:16:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261282_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261282_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.21 +21:52:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261290_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261290_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261291_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261291_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:35.50 +20:29:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261294_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261294_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.01 +24:26:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261296_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261296_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.65 +22:33:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261301_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261301_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261304_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261304_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.18 +20:55:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261307_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261307_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261320_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261320_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:47.64 +25:09:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261321_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261321_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261329_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261329_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.18 +25:47:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261331_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261331_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261332_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261332_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.94 +18:02:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261333_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261333_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.62 +23:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261335_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261335_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.58 +24:26:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261338_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261338_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.68 +22:41:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261340_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261340_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.33 +23:15:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261342_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261342_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.93 +21:10:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.47 +18:11:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261346_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261346_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.44 +20:35:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261351_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261351_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.52 +19:58:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.04 +25:01:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261358_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261358_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.32 +20:26:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261359_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261359_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.95 +22:43:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261361_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261361_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:10.09 +25:47:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261363_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261363_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.30 +26:08:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.51 +20:55:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261370_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261370_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.68 +24:51:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261372_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261372_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.64 +23:08:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261373_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261373_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.52 +24:36:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.54 +21:05:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261387_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261387_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261388_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261388_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.72 +25:52:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261389_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261389_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:44.98 +25:04:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261391_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261391_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.60 +23:06:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261393_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261393_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261396_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261396_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261397_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261397_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:21.06 +18:34:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261401_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261401_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261407_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261407_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.34 +22:57:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261409_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261409_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.47 +22:44:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261410_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261410_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:07.79 +20:03:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261414_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261414_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:54.06 +18:37:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261415_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261415_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:48.58 +21:26:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261416_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261416_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:23.64 +21:58:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.20 +23:17:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:57.06 +23:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.73 +22:43:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:51.72 +17:49:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261424_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261424_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261426_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261426_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.28 +22:10:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261429_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261429_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:48.23 +24:59:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261432_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261432_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:32.62 +25:04:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261435_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261435_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.44 +23:58:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261442_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261442_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.41 +19:25:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261453_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261453_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:03.71 +25:33:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261455_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261455_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:13.75 +20:56:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261458_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261458_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.44 +21:34:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261467_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261467_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261469_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261469_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:15.90 +26:02:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261470_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261470_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:07.26 +24:21:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:25.24 +23:49:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:14.84 +23:44:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261481_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261481_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.62 +24:56:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261485_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261485_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:37.28 +20:20:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.52 +19:46:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261489_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261489_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:45.79 +23:07:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:16.99 +19:37:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261496_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261496_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.77 +20:01:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261500_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261500_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:38.20 +20:20:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261502_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261502_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261513_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261513_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:10.07 +22:08:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261514_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261514_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261515_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261515_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:31.42 +23:28:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261516_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261516_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.96 +25:18:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261526_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261526_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:26.33 +25:43:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261528_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261528_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261543_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 261543_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:13.98 +21:08:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.45 +19:09:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.82 +18:15:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217231_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 217231_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0437 did not pass the final checks
