This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4661 2461264.9661 11.79 05:54:29.97 +31:50:13.9
178.48977 3.13092 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 -0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:29.97 +31:50:13.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:29.97 +31:50:13.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9661,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4661 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4661 2461264.9661 11.76 06:34:47.69 +33:10:31.9
181.27567 11.27213 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 1 -0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:34:47.69 +33:10:31.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:47.69 +33:10:31.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9661,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4661 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4661 2461264.9661 12.09 06:18:37.73 +24:40:43.0
187.34218 4.30181 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 1 0 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:37.73 +24:40:43.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:37.73 +24:40:43.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9661,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4661 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4661 2461264.9661 13.52 06:04:21.73 +33:09:35.1
178.36554 5.59217 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:21.73 +33:09:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:21.73 +33:09:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9661,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4661 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461264.96642913 12.08.2026 11:11:29.477 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25264
Objects passed selection criteria: 25137
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18234.5
Average stars matched: 17715.8 (97.1551 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 06:15:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461264.96642913 12.08.2026 11:11:29.477 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193296
Objects passed selection criteria: 192743
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 136460
Average stars matched: 131324 (96.2364 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 06:17:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.96583295
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0710 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0794 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ek08BKuxZ5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y1NFt1qUyF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iUQWCaJxhU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OLX4vIvp8O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ek08BKuxZ5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y1NFt1qUyF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iUQWCaJxhU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, bad_region=0, passed=9741
Got 9741 stars (including 9233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5280)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=9.644 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.038 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4798 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4798 robust_rms_before=0.871 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.583 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.445
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.015 +29:55:37.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9741 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1699360.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.871 -> 0.381 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1113 n_q2=1204 n_q3=1442 n_q4=1039 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OLX4vIvp8O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, bad_region=0, passed=9245
Got 9245 stars (including 8758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5280)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=9.772 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.175 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.443 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=0.871 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.575 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.452
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:06.218 +29:55:15.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9245 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1699310.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.871 -> 0.363 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1111 n_q2=1202 n_q3=1445 n_q4=1043 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.089
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.234
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.17 +27:29:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.01 +28:29:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.78 +29:09:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.94 +28:18:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.85 +25:25:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.64 +31:24:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.00 +28:36:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.99 +31:35:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0710 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0794 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:03.018 +29:55:38.60
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:06.217 +29:55:16.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eXy0aIL5gp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TotWL7XUPN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zv2dVFfiID
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WTLi2ZJbUG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eXy0aIL5gp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TotWL7XUPN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zv2dVFfiID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3435, bad_region=1, passed=63237
Got 63237 stars (including 59738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1105 n_q2=1176 n_q3=1462 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WTLi2ZJbUG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3239, bad_region=1, passed=60206
Got 60206 stars (including 56895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60206 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1462 n_q4=1050 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-10-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_061223_TTUQ1b1x1_1625891_FhP0YWeS/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:05.18 +28:45:57.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:39.23 +28:33:33.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:15.56 +32:30:31.4: 11.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:34:47.69 +33:10:31.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:29.97 +31:50:13.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:39.23 +28:33:33.1: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:05.18 +28:45:57.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:39.23 +28:33:33.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1670 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.89 +26:16:28.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6392 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:05.18 +28:45:57.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1973 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:15.56 +32:30:31.4: 11.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:15.56 +32:30:31.4: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.6169 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:20.6: 12.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:47.69 +33:10:31.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:29.97 +31:50:13.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:37.73 +24:40:43.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:20.6: 12.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.92 +32:33:20.6: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1313 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.95 +30:53:55.6: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:37.73 +24:40:43.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:50.76 +31:24:44.9: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.95 +30:53:55.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.95 +30:53:55.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6377 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:50.76 +31:24:44.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:10.55 +33:54:28.7: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:50.76 +31:24:44.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5139 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:01.46 +33:16:01.8: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:10.55 +33:54:28.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:10.55 +33:54:28.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7960 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:07.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:01.46 +33:16:01.8: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:01.46 +33:16:01.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6663 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.5: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:07.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:07.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0068 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:01.60 +27:35:20.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.5: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9353 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:49.22 +30:37:21.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:01.60 +27:35:20.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:01.60 +27:35:20.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8952 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:49.22 +30:37:21.0: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:49.22 +30:37:21.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9001 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:07.50 +31:03:50.7: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:07.50 +31:03:50.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:07.50 +31:03:50.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9184 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:41.64 +34:39:41.9: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:21.73 +33:09:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.27 +32:08:03.4: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:41.64 +34:39:41.9: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:41.64 +34:39:41.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3516 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:21.73 +33:09:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.27 +32:08:03.4: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.27 +32:08:03.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7341 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.20 +32:23:06.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.20 +32:23:06.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.20 +32:23:06.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9705 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242446.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.71 +28:40:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242166_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:17.53 +31:49:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:44.74 +33:30:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.19 +34:11:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.08 +33:47:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.53 +33:48:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.53 +34:57:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.18 +25:28:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:31.10 +29:01:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.50 +35:01:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.82 +32:31:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242339_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242339_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.27 +32:03:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242382_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242382_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.66 +28:29:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242388_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242388_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.50 +34:26:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242421_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242421_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.32 +32:35:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242446_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 242446_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.62 +27:35:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.85 +34:55:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242524_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242524_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.96 +25:55:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242542_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242542_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.58 +32:30:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242565_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242565_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.25 +28:37:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242580_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 242580_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242582_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.73 +34:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242668_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.49 +32:41:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242675_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242675_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.66 +30:30:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242682_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242682_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.91 +24:55:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242705_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242705_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242710_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242710_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.17 +34:48:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.63 +31:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242717_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242717_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.01 +25:05:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242726_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.32 +31:39:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242739_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242739_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242747_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242747_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.35 +34:30:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.80 +34:15:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242751_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242751_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.98 +33:00:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:55.02 +32:52:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242756_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242761_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242761_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.60 +26:00:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242775_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242775_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.98 +31:09:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242776_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242776_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.84 +29:32:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.30 +32:48:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242800_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.85 +32:33:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242813_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242813_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242821_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242821_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.08 +33:56:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242823_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242823_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.69 +32:45:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242827_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242827_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242856_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242856_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.14 +33:06:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.06 +29:29:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:56.98 +26:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.25 +32:06:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242895_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242895_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242896_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242896_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.06 +29:00:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.83 +30:30:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242906_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242906_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.47 +31:10:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242917_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242917_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.49 +28:37:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242920_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.43 +25:47:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:30.11 +32:40:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.53 +27:47:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:33.12 +34:49:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242974_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242974_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:00.12 +34:55:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242983_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242983_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.46 +26:13:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242998_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 242998_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.67 +30:42:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243009_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243009_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.74 +31:04:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243048_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243048_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.88 +32:30:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243093_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243093_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.85 +30:45:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243132_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243132_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.59 +32:59:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243141_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 243141_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243151_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 243151_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.79 +28:18:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.42 +27:56:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.97 +29:09:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.70 +30:53:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.31 +32:13:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.46 +33:45:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.63 +29:51:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.47 +25:40:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 175224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:34.93 +26:03:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.18 +27:36:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.79 +32:22:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.08 +29:24:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.88 +28:00:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.17 +27:47:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.71 +34:35:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.43 +29:32:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.19 +29:27:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.54 +30:45:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.97 +32:01:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30997_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 30997_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.15 +25:59:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.34 +28:40:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.37 +31:03:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.31 +33:40:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.33 +30:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:16.99 +28:29:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.90 +31:25:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.31 +25:12:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.36 +27:23:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.68 +30:56:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:13.64 +29:53:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.03 +28:36:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.44 +34:41:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.08 +29:02:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.06 +32:03:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.79 +25:25:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:37.12 +31:42:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.92 +31:35:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.37 +29:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.55 +29:22:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.14 +27:29:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_06-11-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks