This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,6.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 6.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 20.0 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461264.9441,9.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260812.4441 9.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4441 2461264.9441 9.04 05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5
187.13732 -0.96017 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -0 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 58 07.05 +22 18 27.5 9.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,9.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 9.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,7.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 7.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.2 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461264.9441,9.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260812.4441 9.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4441 2461264.9441 13.15 05:01:51.21 +22:46:44.6
179.61643 -11.59725 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 -0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:51.21 +22:46:44.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:51.21 +22:46:44.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 01 51.21 +22 46 44.6 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4441 2461264.9441 13.86 05:42:38.09 +22:05:09.1
185.49375 -4.15345 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia 1 -1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:38.09 +22:05:09.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:38.09 +22:05:09.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 42 38.09 +22 05 09.1 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4441 2461264.9441 14.31 05:28:02.52 +22:16:23.0
183.52106 -6.90891 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia 1 -0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:02.52 +22:16:23.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:02.52 +22:16:23.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4441* 05 28 02.52 +22 16 23.0 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9441,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4441 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461264.94440029 12.08.2026 10:39:46.185 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20575
Objects passed selection criteria: 20540
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18162
Average stars matched: 17890.2 (98.5037 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 05:42:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461264.94440029 12.08.2026 10:39:46.185 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 162
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 151923
Objects passed selection criteria: 151577
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 126654
Average stars matched: 122867 (97.0098 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 05:44:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.94376359
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0653 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01463 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2JqT3a6qVt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Avekybk5j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0aOE9wqifv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ngaMlOyn4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2JqT3a6qVt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4Avekybk5j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0aOE9wqifv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=827, bad_region=0, passed=14660
Got 14660 stars (including 13823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14660 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4734 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4734 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=8.970 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=31.912 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4734 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4734 robust_rms_before=0.839 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.550 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.372
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.504 +21:56:47.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14660 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2165671.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.839 -> 0.294 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=4734 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=907 n_q2=1525 n_q3=733 n_q4=1569 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8ngaMlOyn4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=740, bad_region=0, passed=14551
Got 14551 stars (including 13795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=8.867 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=33.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=0.861 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.544 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.384
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:25.593 +21:56:17.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 14552 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2165619.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.861 -> 0.296 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=904 n_q2=1520 n_q3=741 n_q4=1562 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.238
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326_astrometric_residuals.png (4734 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:06:46.82 +19:35:27.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:06:46.82 +19:35:27.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:46.82 +19:35:27.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4925 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 30669_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 30687_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 30688_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 30928_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.61 +19:28:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 31041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.79 +20:10:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.47 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.80 +25:25:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:58:07.05 +22:18:27.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0653 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:22.508 +21:56:48.57
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:25.592 +21:56:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01463 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GUrooS50OC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TjnDcSQ2yj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eFiZYzAdvB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TVRUiNSVG4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GUrooS50OC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TjnDcSQ2yj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eFiZYzAdvB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=6263, bad_region=17, passed=89412
Got 89412 stars (including 83037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=922 n_q2=1459 n_q3=758 n_q4=1569 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TVRUiNSVG4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6167, bad_region=23, passed=89309
Got 89309 stars (including 83000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4765 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 588 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4703 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=4703 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=909 n_q2=1452 n_q3=760 n_q4=1582 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-38-51_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_054029_TTUQ1b1x1_2147386_QW7OLEHh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:46.31 +20:00:52.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.22 +19:22:17.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:15.47 +23:56:05.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:31.58 +21:16:34.1: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:02:50.70 +23:56:23.9: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:39.42 +18:12:14.2: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:00:08.51 +24:45:25.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:46.31 +20:00:52.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.22 +19:22:17.4: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:39.42 +18:12:14.2: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:02:50.70 +23:56:23.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:46.31 +20:00:52.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7084 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:30.22 +19:22:17.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6653 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:39.42 +18:12:14.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9164 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:50.70 +23:56:23.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8327 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:15.47 +23:56:05.7: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:15.47 +23:56:05.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5702 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:31.58 +21:16:34.1: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:31.58 +21:16:34.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0159 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:00:08.51 +24:45:25.1: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:08.51 +24:45:25.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7171 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:30.56 +19:19:21.3: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:14.47 +20:39:01.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:30.56 +19:19:21.3: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:30.56 +19:19:21.3: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5377 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:14.47 +20:39:01.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.47 +20:39:01.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2447 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2879 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.93 +21:52:55.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3293 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.65 +25:16:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:49.71 +26:44:16.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.65 +25:16:11.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.65 +25:16:11.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:49.71 +26:44:16.2: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:49.71 +26:44:16.2: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2973 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:23.46 +26:25:51.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:51.21 +22:46:44.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:23.46 +26:25:51.6: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:23.46 +26:25:51.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8621 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:51.21 +22:46:44.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:34.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:09.6: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:34.7: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:25.43 +24:24:27.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.75 +22:34:34.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1446 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:09.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:23.23 +25:24:09.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3086 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:48.64 +25:09:12.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4044 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:25.43 +24:24:27.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:25.43 +24:24:27.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4168 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3376 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:39.97 +22:58:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:39.97 +22:58:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:39.97 +22:58:28.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4455 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:20.37 +25:08:59.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:20.37 +25:08:59.4: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:20.37 +25:08:59.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5685 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:31.61 +20:45:39.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:08:09.16 +17:05:43.8: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:04:46.74 +22:17:21.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:31.61 +20:45:39.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:31.61 +20:45:39.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4786 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:04:46.74 +22:17:21.3: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:08:09.16 +17:05:43.8: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:46.74 +22:17:21.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7987 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:09.16 +17:05:43.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5964 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.86 +21:33:02.2: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:47.79 +22:09:00.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:04.20 +21:09:54.0: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.86 +21:33:02.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.86 +21:33:02.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8322 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:05:07.29 +24:21:39.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:47.79 +22:09:00.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:47.79 +22:09:00.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8589 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:04.20 +21:09:54.0: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:04.20 +21:09:54.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7953 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:38.16 +22:58:43.8: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:05:07.29 +24:21:39.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:07.29 +24:21:39.0: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6681 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:38.09 +22:05:09.1: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:38.16 +22:58:43.8: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:38.16 +22:58:43.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7699 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:38.09 +22:05:09.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:12.15 +25:35:32.5: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:37.22 +23:38:01.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:02.52 +22:16:23.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 04:59:29.13 +25:05:47.1: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:37.22 +23:38:01.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:12.15 +25:35:32.5: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:02.52 +22:16:23.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:37.22 +23:38:01.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9802 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:12.15 +25:35:32.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2374 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:43.00 +24:07:37.0: 15.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 04:59:29.13 +25:05:47.1: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:29.13 +25:05:47.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5645 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:43.00 +24:07:37.0: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:43.00 +24:07:37.0: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7178 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191469.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192584.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190591_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190610_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.75 +23:46:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190617_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190622_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.24 +19:47:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190626_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.39 +18:25:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.73 +25:17:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190634_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:45.48 +16:53:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190635_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.09 +18:20:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 190646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190653_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.69 +16:41:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 190664_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:07.02 +22:18:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190763_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190763_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.96 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190976_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 190989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191037_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.72 +22:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191150_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191190_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.98 +25:05:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191217_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191217_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.72 +23:02:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191222_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191222_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.74 +19:34:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191228_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.25 +18:59:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191284_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191284_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.90 +26:10:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191287_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.98 +20:10:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191334_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191334_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:02.21 +25:15:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191337_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191337_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.75 +25:24:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191343_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:55.78 +24:36:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.80 +18:25:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191371_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191371_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.97 +23:48:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.38 +23:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.28 +25:47:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191456_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191456_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.22 +23:00:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191469_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 191469_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191476_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.02 +18:34:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191496_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191496_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.18 +23:12:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191519_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191519_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191531_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191531_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.21 +17:24:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191534_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.81 +22:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191540_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.43 +26:25:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191544_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.42 +20:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191550_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191550_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.64 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191558_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.21 +20:53:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191562_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191608_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.71 +19:32:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191611_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191611_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.66 +21:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191638_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191643_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.02 +17:11:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.75 +23:11:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191686_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.20 +18:11:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:56.24 +26:13:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191713_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191713_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191731_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191731_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:45.26 +16:35:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191735_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.61 +20:05:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191748_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191748_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.36 +24:22:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191769_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191769_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.14 +18:44:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191777_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.38 +20:56:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191791_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.23 +24:57:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191810_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.50 +18:29:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.05 +20:15:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.66 +25:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.40 +24:25:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191885_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:01.50 +21:49:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191886_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.28 +23:07:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191890_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191890_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.37 +20:09:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191906_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.49 +17:24:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191910_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.61 +22:45:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191916_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.23 +24:24:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191920_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191920_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.53 +25:40:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191941_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:52.63 +24:33:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:33.66 +20:28:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191971_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.60 +21:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.01 +24:22:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:36.35 +18:28:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 191995_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.10 +21:59:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:57.31 +25:53:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.52 +26:44:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192011_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192014_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192022_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192022_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.51 +20:26:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192033_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:39.43 +21:57:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192067_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:58.81 +25:07:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192076_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192076_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.05 +25:18:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.68 +22:39:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.02 +19:49:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192117_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192117_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.95 +20:00:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192122_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192122_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.89 +24:21:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192129_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.70 +19:23:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192136_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.05 +24:06:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192166_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192173_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192193_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:07.61 +26:46:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.40 +22:29:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:49.90 +25:55:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.30 +25:19:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192242_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192243_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192243_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:28.43 +26:15:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192245_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192245_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:52.80 +19:50:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192260_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192260_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.88 +24:22:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.55 +21:24:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:44.62 +19:53:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 192291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192294_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.00 +24:06:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:21.85 +17:17:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:20.88 +23:52:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.36 +22:27:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192451_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192451_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:48.58 +25:21:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192458_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192458_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:42.11 +22:49:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192492_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192492_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192523_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192523_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:48.47 +16:42:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192574_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:59.01 +23:04:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
Preparing report for the candidate 192584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192605_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 192646_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.42 +20:22:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.69 +22:47:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.46 +21:25:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.52 +21:35:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.49 +21:45:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.44 +26:13:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.13 +24:10:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.91 +20:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.11 +17:59:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.09 +20:22:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.49 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.15 +17:53:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.08 +21:51:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.79 +25:25:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.80 +21:13:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-39-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0327 did not pass the final checks
