This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.62 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4
211.56822 -7.66994 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2048.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.21 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2
214.36701 -11.23198 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1838.9" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 12.76 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6
208.41918 -19.09844 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" TT Ori
Type: CTTS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 16.000 V K1ea
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6: 14.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6: 14.47 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.4541* 05 35 16.71 -04 45 44.6 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TT Ori,2461262.9541,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TT Ori 20260810.4541 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.76 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4
213.58002 -13.68439 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1071.4" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.63 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4
211.92588 -8.59446 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1881.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.4541* 06 18 59.35 -03 01 13.4 6.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.49 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8
214.36543 -11.23297 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1847.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.67 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7
214.28655 -11.99240 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1634.9" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.4541 2461262.9541 6.60 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4
214.45723 -7.78840 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2928.6" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461262.9541,6.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260810.4541 6.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.72204770 18.01.2026 05:19:34.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461058.72204770 18.01.2026 05:19:34.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461262.95449959 10.08.2026 10:54:18.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16399
Objects passed selection criteria: 16295
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10813.5
Average stars matched: 10499 (97.0916 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241596 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 05:57:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.72204770 18.01.2026 05:19:34.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461058.72204770 18.01.2026 05:19:34.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461262.95449959 10.08.2026 10:54:18.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 83
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 108940
Objects passed selection criteria: 108634
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74106.8
Average stars matched: 71099.8 (95.9423 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 505252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 05:59:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.95369630
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 888.2'x626.2' 14.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.57"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64
Second-epoch image center 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0666 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0878 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.12351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kGJoW2CSdZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EMK6c0HBIi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5hoC1lFaZ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ldcRYToaul
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0475 to 97.9278 deg, Dec -7.3113 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0475 to 97.9278 deg, Dec -7.3113 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 10355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7978 out of 8734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8734 out of 17390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0475 to 97.9278 deg, Dec -7.3113 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0475 to 97.9278 deg, Dec -7.3113 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 10355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7978 out of 8734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8734 out of 17390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 17459 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0408 to 97.9129 deg, Dec -7.3041 to +3.3364 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0408 to 97.9129 deg, Dec -7.3041 to 3.3364 deg
Loaded 10358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7982 out of 8733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8733 out of 17459 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.0 pix Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.1 mag. Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kGJoW2CSdZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1953, bad_region=0, passed=17390
Got 17390 stars (including 15414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1326 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1391 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EMK6c0HBIi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1921, bad_region=0, passed=17459
Got 17459 stars (including 15516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1323 n_q2=1089 n_q3=1400 n_q4=966 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5hoC1lFaZ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 888.2'x626.2' 14.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.57"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4361 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky630402.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=4361
Got 4361 stars (including 4014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 888.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 888.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012336 (44.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.009869 (35.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1996 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1417 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2113 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1619 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 20.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 19.32"
Excluding outliers - 1596 stars left (next iteration limit 1512)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1596 robust_rms=24.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=27.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1596 robust_rms=23.173 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=27.156 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1596 robust_rms=22.096 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=27.029 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 2
SIP_REFIT: order=2 matched=1596 robust_rms_before=28.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=16.603 arcsec robust_rms_after=24.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=22.762 worst_quadrant_rms_after=27.803
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 22.762 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=1596 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.027 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.941 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.524 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.201 n_q1=560 n_q2=192 n_q3=582 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ldcRYToaul (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=348, bad_region=0, passed=4373
Got 4373 stars (including 4020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.5 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 3797 stars left (next iteration limit 4175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3797 robust_rms=10.241 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3797 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.865 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3797 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3797 robust_rms_before=1.368 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.599 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.669
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.599 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits N_match=3797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=956 n_q2=820 n_q3=1049 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.234
ref2=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.214
new1=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits sigma_overall=8.027 worst_q_ratio=3.264
new2=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.349
reference average sigma_overall=0.3605 worst_q_ratio=1.224
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits) flagged: sigma=8.027 (ref avg 0.3605), ratio=3.264 (ref avg 1.224), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4166 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out684162.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out684162.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.4669 (2.30692e+12), 33 match, 0 conflict, 118 distractors, 194 index.
RA,Dec = (89.9761,-1.92884), pixel scale 5.93323 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +----+----++----+---+----+-----+--------+-----+---++--------+----+----++---++---+----+----+----+----
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out684162.solved to indicate this.
Field: out684162.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (89.898626, -1.985093) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:59:35.670, -01:59:06.335).
Field size: 15.0904 x 10.6592 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 4.23894 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> 'fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 10 05:58 fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 10 05:58 out684162.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out684162.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out684162.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 14.8033 degrees of RA,Dec (89.8995,-1.98432)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-100).
Field: out684162.xyls
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
The second iteration of solve-field failed to solve the field for fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
ERROR solving the plate!
ERROR: cannot perform blind plate solution.
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits): sigma 8.027->8.027, ratio 3.264->3.264; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=8.027 -- 22.27x the reference average (0.3605); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.264 -- 2.67x the reference average (1.224); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (4777 matched stars from wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500_astrometric_residuals.png (1596 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 4.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501_astrometric_residuals.png (3797 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:34:25.13 -05:22:03.4: 10.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:34:25.13 -05:22:03.4: 10.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:25.13 -05:22:03.4: ref_mag=10.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.3532 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21080_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21080_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (502.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21081_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21081_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:01.15 -06:00:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21083_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21083_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.42 -05:25:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21084_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21084_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:31.38 -05:16:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21087_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21087_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:31.39 -05:25:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21095_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21095_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:09.80 -05:27:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21138_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21138_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:50.43 -05:28:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21151_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21151_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:50.00 -05:18:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21178_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21178_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21189_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21189_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1360.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21214_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21214_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:43.60 -05:18:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09270_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 09270_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13148_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 13148_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:01.31 -04:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15120_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 15120_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:21:38.55 -02:17:05.4
06:13:52.66 -06:21:16.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 888.2'x626.2' 14.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.57"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64
Second-epoch image center 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0666 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:50.877 -02:00:26.64
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0878 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:35.874 -01:59:03.55
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:03.174 -01:56:09.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.12351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mish1ZrRnZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sCDoFelYBO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIIvwMl5qb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ThluuSmp5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 119444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0442 to 97.9280 deg, Dec -7.3198 to +3.3299 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0442 to 97.9280 deg, Dec -7.3198 to 3.3299 deg
Loaded 10368 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6878 out of 8977 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8977 out of 119444 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.722250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.722250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 119444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0442 to 97.9280 deg, Dec -7.3198 to +3.3299 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0442 to 97.9280 deg, Dec -7.3198 to 3.3299 deg
Loaded 10368 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6878 out of 8977 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8977 out of 119444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 119578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 82.0331 to 97.9151 deg, Dec -7.3114 to +3.3365 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 82.0331 to 97.9151 deg, Dec -7.3114 to 3.3365 deg
Loaded 10376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6853 out of 8977 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8977 out of 119578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
1.9 pix Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.3 mag. Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mish1ZrRnZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=12731, bad_region=3, passed=119418
Got 119418 stars (including 106485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 119418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1344 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sCDoFelYBO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=12878, bad_region=1, passed=119539
Got 119539 stars (including 106457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 119539 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1264 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1352 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AIIvwMl5qb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1002, bad_region=8, passed=29627
Got 29627 stars (including 28566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 888.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 888.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012336 (44.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.009869 (35.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 470 (Dec -7.9 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2483 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 12.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1694 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 20.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 410 to 470 (Dec -7.9 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2639 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2013 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 20.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 20.22"
Excluding outliers - 1972 stars left (next iteration limit 1863)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=1972 sigma_overall_arcsec=7.762 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=28.137 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.080 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.501 n_q1=680 n_q2=224 n_q3=731 n_q4=337 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.625
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4ThluuSmp5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=985, bad_region=11, passed=29915
Got 29915 stars (including 28875 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4717 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1180 n_q2=967 n_q3=1317 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-53-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_055529_TTUQ1b1x1_600175_aE51g8Z7/wcs_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:34:24.20 -04:47:11.9: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:34:24.39 -05:26:12.1: 12.81 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:44:10.06 -02:29:26.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6: 14.43 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:34:24.20 -04:47:11.9: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:34:24.39 -05:26:12.1: 12.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:24.39 -05:26:12.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.0698 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:24.20 -04:47:11.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3054 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:44:10.06 -02:29:26.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:10.06 -02:29:26.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4608 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6: 14.47 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:35:16.71 -04:45:44.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.7361 delta=1.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-19-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:18:59.35 -03:01:13.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:39.46 -06:45:24.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:13:52.28 -06:21:12.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:10:59.71 -06:37:20.7: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-20-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:26:24.74 -04:53:28.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141006.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73262.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81076.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85780.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140212_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140212_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.10 +01:24:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140215_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140215_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2052.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140216_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140216_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:25.63 -04:06:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140218_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140218_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1387.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140220_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140220_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (194.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140222_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140222_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:04.52 -00:21:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140223_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140223_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140224_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140224_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (507.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140226_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140226_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:01.06 -06:00:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140253_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140253_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2293.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140283_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140283_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:50.43 -05:28:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140369_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140369_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:22.91 -01:10:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140578_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140578_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:38.50 -02:34:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140596_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140596_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140668_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140668_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140675_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140675_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140676_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140676_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140724_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140724_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (499.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140778_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140778_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:44.84 -02:33:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140785_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140785_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140805_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140805_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1616.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140809_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140809_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (366.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140810_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140810_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2769.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140839_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140839_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:09.41 -00:50:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140864_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140864_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (420.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140878_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140878_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:46.15 +02:41:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140880_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140880_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140914_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140914_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:27.53 -04:25:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140945_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140945_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.19 +01:11:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140964_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140964_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:53.98 -00:05:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140977_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 140977_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1316.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141006_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 141006_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141013_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141013_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1489.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141034_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141034_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (296.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141049_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141049_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:32.18 -02:48:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141068_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141068_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (360.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141108_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141108_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:09.54 -01:10:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141188_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 141188_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1315.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131985_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 131985_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:15.82 -06:36:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 83360_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2800.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100189_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 100189_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (620.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115023_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 115023_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (383.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80448_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 80448_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2872.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25828_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 25828_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (331.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77889_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 77889_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1247.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100380_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 100380_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:19.41 -05:01:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23548_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 23548_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1520.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60291_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 60291_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:37.61 -01:54:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35716_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 35716_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1092.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47506_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 47506_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2375.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105032_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 105032_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (281.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50462_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 50462_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2079.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90400_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 90400_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1558.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09925_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 09925_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (758.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21248_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 21248_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1472.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63976_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 63976_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59423_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 59423_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (763.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65719_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 65719_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (139.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90262_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 90262_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:47.53 -05:57:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75690_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 75690_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58552_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 58552_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1205.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73104_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 73104_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.72 -02:49:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28338_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 28338_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1274.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97407_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 97407_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.39 -05:25:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60765_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 60765_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (785.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58477_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 58477_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1215.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74715_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 74715_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (567.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71470_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 71470_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (322.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41810_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 41810_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1895.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110997_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 110997_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (2797.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44056_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 44056_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (611.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65221_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 65221_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:38.35 -02:17:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105583_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 105583_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:01.29 -04:41:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52075_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 52075_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1354.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81076_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 81076_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73262_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
Preparing report for the candidate 73262_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33136_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501
The candidate 33136_fd_Ori-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_05-54-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0501 did not pass the final checks
