NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    12.60    23:51:41.77 -06:04:56.7   3403 5475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    12.53    23:51:41.75 -06:04:56.8   3409 5476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 10.3875  2461262.8875  12.56  23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8
 86.22952 -64.60813 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
113 Amalthea                -0     -0       0  12.4     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8:  15.45 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    12.47    00:10:59.81 -10:40:04.4   6437 2883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    12.53    00:10:59.77 -10:40:04.5   6444 2884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 10.3875  2461262.8875  12.50  00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4
 90.96163 -70.98523 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -1     -1       1  12.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4:  15.46 +/- 0.33  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.46 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.27    23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.6   2514 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.12    23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7   2521 3665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 10.3875  2461262.8875  13.20  23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7
 78.94294 -65.99200 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
530 Turandot                -0      0       0  13.2    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7:  15.45 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.60    23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.4   1028 4871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.66    23:35:43.14 -06:48:50.5   1034 4872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 10.3875  2461262.8875  13.63  23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0
 77.98185 -62.87454 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
442 Eichsfeldia             -0      0       0  13.6    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 867959 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 867959 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1931.2615 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 566.8003 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1936.8377 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 565.8442 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.52315 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T04:17:23.5228461' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T09:17:23.5228461' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.3870778009 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T09:17:33.4261352' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.3871924304 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.998281876714 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9995332098167 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.2383333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 174.297777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38335764919285 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits :) Spent 0.497670 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T04:18:20.7628818' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T09:18:20.7628818' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.387740301 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T09:18:30.6631250' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.387854896 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.998281788882 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9995332388688 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.2572222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 174.630555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38292261104732 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits :) Spent 0.508173 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.88719354 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0041 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dQkmDbEO7Z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Etmjt2s2Zo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GcRAtnX6h4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rxG9DYgY1F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dQkmDbEO7Z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Etmjt2s2Zo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GcRAtnX6h4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, bad_region=0, passed=3759 Got 3759 stars (including 3565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3759 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6383 through 0 to 8.1602, gap 8.1602 to 351.6383 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3475 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3474 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3474 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3759 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6376 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3475 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3473 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3759 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3473 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3759 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3473 stars left (next iteration limit 3821) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3473 robust_rms=11.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.685 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3473 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3473 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3473 robust_rms_before=1.386 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.349 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=3473 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=934 n_q2=814 n_q3=951 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rxG9DYgY1F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=190, bad_region=0, passed=3732 Got 3732 stars (including 3539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3732 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.0950, gap 8.0950 to 351.6382 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3450 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3448 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3448 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.0953, gap 8.0953 to 351.6376 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3451 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3449 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3449 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3732 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3449 stars left (next iteration limit 3792) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3449 robust_rms=11.640 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.527 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3449 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.409 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3449 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3449 robust_rms_before=1.018 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.364 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.352 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=3449 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=914 n_q2=814 n_q3=962 n_q4=759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.204 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.178 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (3473 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (3449 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    10.85    00:02:07.31 -14:40:29.9   5274 0397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.30 -14:40:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0041 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.195 -09:59:51.90 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.524 -09:59:57.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OkgyDHE97j Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oPy06BuNsB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rgo4oEoFiS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uUMb8RJ3cp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 2.7 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.OkgyDHE97j (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729 Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.oPy06BuNsB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Rgo4oEoFiS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=548, bad_region=25, passed=18534 Got 18534 stars (including 17935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18534 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6006 through 0 to 8.1640, gap 8.1640 to 351.6006 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18534 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5999 through 0 to 8.1642, gap 8.1642 to 351.5999 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18534 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18534 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1112 n_q3=1374 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.uUMb8RJ3cp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=566, bad_region=28, passed=18415 Got 18415 stars (including 17794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18415 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6002 through 0 to 8.1582, gap 8.1582 to 351.6002 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5996 through 0 to 8.1587, gap 8.1587 to 351.5996 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1197 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:11.92 -09:41:25.0: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:00.23 -09:52:27.1: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:24:53.59 -05:22:35.8: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.80 -05:52:34.7: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:27.95 -08:53:58.6: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4: 15.46 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.65 -07:36:48.6: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.2: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:11.92 -09:41:25.0: 13.22 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:00.23 -09:52:27.1: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:27.95 -08:53:58.6: 14.24 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.65 -07:36:48.6: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.80 -05:52:34.7: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:24:53.59 -05:22:35.8: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.33 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.4988 delta=2.96 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:11.92 -09:41:25.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1947 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.23 -09:52:27.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6401 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:27.95 -08:53:58.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1555 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.80 -05:52:34.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6166 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.65 -07:36:48.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2493 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:53.59 -05:22:35.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3397 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.2: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.89 -06:31:08.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4129 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.85 -06:55:28.8: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:35.44 -05:02:01.6: 14.40 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.83 -09:31:11.6: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:38:33.14 -05:07:41.7: 14.65 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.06 -10:20:05.4: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.22 -09:01:10.8: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.06 -10:20:05.4: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:35.44 -05:02:01.6: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.85 -06:55:28.8: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.06 -10:20:05.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9589 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:38:33.14 -05:07:41.7: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.83 -09:31:11.6: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.44 -05:02:01.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4073 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.85 -06:55:28.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4661 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:33.14 -05:07:41.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3344 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.83 -09:31:11.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7833 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.22 -09:01:10.8: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.22 -09:01:10.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0542 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:20.56 -05:47:41.6: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:06.7: 14.48 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:33.82 -05:05:14.5: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:46.20 -05:53:47.1: 15.17 +/- 0.34 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:44.12 -05:21:46.2: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:20.56 -05:47:41.6: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:20.56 -05:47:41.6: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2710 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:03.57 -05:44:27.5: 14.96 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:44.12 -05:21:46.2: 14.46 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:33.82 -05:05:14.5: 14.42 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:06.7: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:46.20 -05:53:47.1: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:44.12 -05:21:46.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3840 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:14.21 -04:49:06.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3094 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:33.82 -05:05:14.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3077 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:46.20 -05:53:47.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3292 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:03.57 -05:44:27.5: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:03.57 -05:44:27.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4084 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.5: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:32.45 -08:19:37.8: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:25.00 -06:14:32.4: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.5: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:53.94 -05:33:12.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4107 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:25.00 -06:14:32.4: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:32.45 -08:19:37.8: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:32.45 -08:19:37.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2942 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:25.00 -06:14:32.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2722 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32561.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32739.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32350_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32350_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.34    00:24:53.52 -05:22:35.5   8380 6190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.34    00:24:53.66 -05:22:36.1   8387 6192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32352_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.17    23:55:27.90 -08:53:59.1   4076 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.14    23:55:28.01 -08:53:58.1   4083 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    12.70    00:30:00.21 -09:52:26.3   9261 3488   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    12.59    00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.9   9268 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32526_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 Preparing report for the candidate 32526_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    12.66    23:59:45.80 -05:52:34.7   4604 5674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    12.58    23:59:45.80 -05:52:34.6   4611 5676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32542_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32542_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    12.60    00:05:10.82 -05:41:48.7   5417 5832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits **** FOUND 00:05:10.84 -05:41:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 Preparing report for the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32671_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32671_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.19    23:35:11.90 -09:41:24.6   1088 3125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.20    23:35:11.93 -09:41:25.4   1095 3126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32675_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32675_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.27    23:48:06.64 -07:36:48.9   2929 4516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.23    23:48:06.66 -07:36:48.3   2936 4517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32686_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 Preparing report for the candidate 32686_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32690_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32690_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.39    23:52:48.86 -06:31:08.8   3588 5222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.44    23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.6   3595 5223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32739_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 Preparing report for the candidate 32739_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32744_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.56    23:44:44.87 -06:55:27.9   2395 4898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.39    23:44:44.83 -06:55:29.6   2402 4899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32835_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32835_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.68    23:56:18.80 -09:31:10.6   4225 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.00    23:56:18.85 -09:31:12.7   4232 3450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32940_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32940_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.30    23:38:33.14 -05:07:43.4   1376 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.41    23:38:33.13 -05:07:40.0   1383 5927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32942_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32942_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.96    23:31:36.06 -10:20:04.0   0578 2691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    13.96    23:31:36.06 -10:20:06.7   0584 2692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32944_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32944_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.31    23:31:35.48 -05:02:01.2   0308 5912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.65    23:31:35.39 -05:02:02.0   0315 5913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32945_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32945_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    13.98    00:00:47.11 -09:01:12.3   4869 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.18    00:00:47.33 -09:01:09.3   4877 3791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32951_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32951_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.24    23:39:20.60 -05:47:41.9   1528 5528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.31    23:39:20.52 -05:47:41.4   1535 5529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32953_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32953_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.31    23:31:33.80 -05:05:14.9   0307 5879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.31    23:31:33.85 -05:05:14.2   0314 5880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32960_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32960_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.31    23:35:14.22 -04:49:06.9   0856 6081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.31    23:35:14.19 -04:49:06.5   0862 6083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32972_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32972_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.33    23:36:44.20 -05:21:45.7   1111 5764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.46    23:36:44.05 -05:21:46.7   1118 5766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32984_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32984_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.31    23:37:46.11 -05:53:47.8   1294 5450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.35    23:37:46.28 -05:53:46.5   1301 5452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32996_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32996_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.37    23:40:03.60 -05:44:27.6   1634 5568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.47    23:40:03.54 -05:44:27.5   1641 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.38    23:41:53.97 -05:33:12.8   1904 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.46    23:41:53.92 -05:33:12.2   1911 5702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33007_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 33007_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.28    23:41:25.00 -06:14:32.7   1863 5277   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.27    23:41:25.01 -06:14:32.1   1870 5279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.38719    2461262.88719    14.24    23:44:32.46 -08:19:38.2   2426 4050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-17-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    14.39    23:44:32.45 -08:19:37.3   2432 4051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 10.38786    2461262.88786    10.76    00:02:07.30 -14:40:29.6   5274 0397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042156_TTUQ1b1x1_824544_9C9FfYRj/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-18-20_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.30 -14:40:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0 ################################################################################### 23:51:41.76 -06:04:56.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:10:59.79 -10:40:04.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:44:56.68 -08:58:31.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:35:43.13 -06:48:51.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.88719354 -observatory V36 08:11:57.91 +20:07:35.5 Mercury (-0.8mag) 12:10:21.94 -02:05:57.8 Venus (-4.4mag) 05:55:34.00 +23:39:10.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:44:53.43 +18:34:01.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:15.14 +03:13:43.7 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:58.49 +20:57:35.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:58.33 +00:12:13.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:56.08 -23:31:00.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 07:11:42.16 +25:34:30.5 Moon (-8.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 10 04:24 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.88719354: 08:44:49.19 +18:34:20.7 Io (6.0mag) 08:44:44.83 +18:34:40.4 Europa (6.3mag) 08:44:51.94 +18:34:06.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:45:17.74 +18:32:19.1 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:42:25.10 +18:34:43.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:44:52.56 +18:34:05.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:41:58.47 +18:32:49.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:49:01.20 +18:12:29.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:47:55.65 +18:44:46.7 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:02.20 +03:13:41.1 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:10.70 +03:13:51.0 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:30.41 +03:12:54.6 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:05.46 +03:13:15.0 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:34.79 +03:06:37.6 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 10 04:24 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.88719354: 19:11:24.27 -21:52:59.7 JWST 10:24:48.05 +35:57:59.4 Chandra 11:04:52.69 -59:44:51.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 10 04:24 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.88719354 -observatory V36 03:16:06.93 +17:33:28.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:01:13.08 -34:36:47.3 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:55:47.88 -68:58:55.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:23.33 +33:02:21.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:50:05.11 +38:35:15.0 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:36:50.80 +31:18:54.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:45:38.16 +26:30:13.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:23:34.40 +28:22:20.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:30:18.87 +05:18:22.4 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:50.44 -12:22:11.9 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:07:53.18 +65:46:11.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:45:43.22 -13:08:18.3 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:10:31.34 +31:26:38.8 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:37.39 +15:36:01.8 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:00:25.05 +43:12:05.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:07:31.14 +49:20:05.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:16:52.13 -12:56:39.4 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:57:38.06 +23:46:30.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:31:43.34 -16:26:31.6 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:35:54.91 +20:46:07.2 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:59:26.24 +02:12:21.7 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:02:50.44 +77:37:28.8 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:08:14.47 +46:13:45.1 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:48:34.71 +08:46:39.0 17.3mag A/2026 E1 22:00:42.12 -28:11:33.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:30:15.54 -03:31:57.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:41:54.70 +32:38:48.6 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:12:06.42 +03:55:57.5 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:54:03.89 -05:31:51.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:40:27.74 +20:39:33.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:36:00.29 -23:46:24.3 17.7mag 84P/Giclas 03:02:50.71 +13:51:00.5 16.7mag 88P/Howell 08:01:25.55 +27:21:57.0 16.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:12:25.72 +17:42:52.0 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:03:38.84 +30:04:35.1 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:23:38.12 +26:16:54.3 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:48:02.86 -11:05:57.1 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:39:45.20 +21:10:17.2 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:32:13.43 +18:47:42.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:01.29 +03:23:04.4 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:19:24.79 -19:05:34.4 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:23:39.14 +37:54:44.4 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:29:49.35 +41:36:05.4 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 02:46:56.67 +09:32:30.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:42:44.27 -10:14:47.7 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR 20:20:59.11 -52:47:19.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:28:26.52 +26:04:55.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:11:54.96 +37:39:50.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:11:11.31 +02:54:01.1 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 09:02:51.94 +18:16:12.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 10 04:24 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 10 04:24 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 10 04:24 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:39:15.220 +00:06:49.34 AT 2026whe 2026-06-09.63 21.79 18:23:56.902 +64:26:54.45 AT 2026whd 2026-07-03.22 20.6933 00:47:50.467 -12:27:20.17 AT 2026whc 2026-07-19.42 19.815 12:17:49.656 -30:16:45.76 AT 2026whb 2026-07-27.37 18.93 19:03:11.080 +34:21:18.37 AT 2026wha 2026-07-21.36 20.5677 15:02:41.202 -40:07:42.45 AT 2026wgz 2026-07-25.81 18.304 19:21:07.943 +43:53:03.37 AT 2026wgy 2026-07-23.41 18.625 02:21:34.482 -74:52:07.44 AT 2026wgx 2026-07-25.04 18.848 04:37:07.068 -62:47:36.38 AT 2026wgw 2026-07-25.10 18.938 00:33:43.233 -65:47:43.74 AT 2026wgv 2026-07-25.01 18.502 04:50:07.913 -58:03:54.94 AT 2026wgu 2026-07-25.10 19.077 00:12:08.725 +26:08:55.67 AT 2026wgt 2026-07-25.53 18.991 02:33:53.173 -32:54:04.43 AT 2026wgs 2026-07-26.16 19.224 13:02:32.070 -25:25:26.94 AT 2026wgr 2026-07-27.36 19.26 12:39:11.802 -30:15:31.31 AT 2026wgq 2026-07-27.36 19.66 13:46:27.172 -27:34:31.34 AT 2026wgp 2026-07-27.37 18.88 13:14:57.178 -26:39:33.67 AT 2026wgo 2026-07-27.37 19.1 13:27:05.151 -31:35:28.50 AT 2026wgn 2026-07-27.37 19.19 12:06:50.757 -36:16:06.67 SN 2026wgm 2026-07-27.38 19.48 18:51:49.362 +64:34:26.30 AT 2026wgl 2026-07-23.41 19.8497 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 10 04:24 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 67 C