This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 7.73 01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7
152.04889 -57.68831 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4 Vesta -0 -0 0 7.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3666* 01 51 46.16 +01 43 55.7 7.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,7.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 7.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 13.62 01:24:46.18 +02:54:14.2
139.20980 -58.91036 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:24:46.18 +02:54:14.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:24:46.18 +02:54:14.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 13.81 01:23:37.59 +06:13:45.4
137.24583 -55.74533 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia 1 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:23:37.59 +06:13:45.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:23:37.59 +06:13:45.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 13.76 01:56:42.70 +04:00:31.7
152.26646 -55.10155 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.622 Esther 0 1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:56:42.70 +04:00:31.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:56:42.70 +04:00:31.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 14.07 01:44:12.14 +08:15:48.8
144.63985 -52.37014 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.329 Svea -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:44:12.14 +08:15:48.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:44:12.14 +08:15:48.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 14.35 01:52:01.80 +10:21:47.2
146.36546 -49.73169 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.167 Urda 0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:52:01.80 +10:21:47.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:52:01.80 +10:21:47.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3666 2461262.8666 12.44 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2
143.37582 -49.93428 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste -2 2 3 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8666,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3666 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.63853609 09.01.2026 03:19:19.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
First image: 2461049.63853609 09.01.2026 03:19:19.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Last image: 2461262.86685899 10.08.2026 08:48:06.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6339
Objects passed selection criteria: 6328
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5568.75
Average stars matched: 5455.5 (97.9663 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 03:56:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.63853609 09.01.2026 03:19:19.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
First image: 2461049.63853609 09.01.2026 03:19:19.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Last image: 2461262.86685899 10.08.2026 08:48:06.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 154
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33236
Objects passed selection criteria: 33169
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28258.5
Average stars matched: 27458.8 (97.1699 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 03:57:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.86635933
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49
Second-epoch image center 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49
Second-epoch image center 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00526 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zQKZKmHz6B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LEZkB9kfU8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r9KuBeL4pR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JSDRZcMUtf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec +0.7082 to +11.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec 0.7082 to 11.2853 deg
Loaded 4460 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3785 out of 6596 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec +0.7082 to +11.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec 0.7082 to 11.2853 deg
Loaded 4460 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3785 out of 6596 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6518 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7253 to 33.6950 deg, Dec +0.6952 to +11.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7253 to 33.6950 deg, Dec 0.6952 to 11.2758 deg
Loaded 4461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3569 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 6518 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
2.0 pix Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zQKZKmHz6B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=487, bad_region=0, passed=6596
Got 6596 stars (including 6101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.240 n_q1=1229 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LEZkB9kfU8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=500, bad_region=0, passed=6518
Got 6518 stars (including 6013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6518 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1217 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1230 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -region wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r9KuBeL4pR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, bad_region=0, passed=4632
Got 4632 stars (including 4392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4276 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4277 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4272 stars left (next iteration limit 4699)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4272 robust_rms=11.219 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4272 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4272 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.327 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4272 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.302 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.327
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits N_match=4272 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1089 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1043 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JSDRZcMUtf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=234, bad_region=0, passed=4668
Got 4668 stars (including 4427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4316 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4317 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4311 stars left (next iteration limit 4742)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4311 robust_rms=11.140 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4311 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4311 robust_rms=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4311 robust_rms_before=0.933 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.250 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.288 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits N_match=4311 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1109 n_q2=1042 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.283
ref2=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.332
new1=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.127
new2=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits sigma_overall=0.251 worst_q_ratio=1.132
reference average sigma_overall=0.2775 worst_q_ratio=1.3075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (4867 matched stars from wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (4867 matched stars from wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (4272 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387_astrometric_residuals.png (4311 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 20293_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05218_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 05218_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:38.39 +02:52:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01475_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 01475_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.86 +08:55:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:51:46.16 +01:43:55.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49
Second-epoch image center 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:42:52.061 +05:59:58.49
Second-epoch image center 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:47.006 +06:03:20.31
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:47.819 +06:03:05.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00526 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBD7JeCU05
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aqBxtCLAT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zPh6bazAQ5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ghl1RnUhwM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits and wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec +0.7049 to +11.2866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec 0.7049 to 11.2866 deg
Loaded 4462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 3869 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3869 out of 34861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec +0.7049 to +11.2866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7251 to 33.6950 deg, Dec 0.7049 to 11.2866 deg
Loaded 4462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 3869 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3869 out of 34861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 35044 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7253 to 33.7129 deg, Dec +0.6952 to +11.2770 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7253 to 33.7129 deg, Dec 0.6952 to 11.2770 deg
Loaded 4464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3471 out of 3871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3871 out of 35044 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
1.9 pix Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vBD7JeCU05 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1454, bad_region=1, passed=34850
Got 34850 stars (including 33348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34850 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1228 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aqBxtCLAT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1474, bad_region=5, passed=35030
Got 35030 stars (including 33485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1205 n_q3=1241 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits -region wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zPh6bazAQ5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=683, bad_region=29, passed=22015
Got 22015 stars (including 21269 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1299 n_q4=1223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ghl1RnUhwM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=684, bad_region=31, passed=21916
Got 21916 stars (including 21173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1123 n_q3=1299 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_035400_TTUQ1b1x1_4135530_rkVupKqI/wcs_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:21:29.92 +03:46:27.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:19:55.54 +02:43:02.8: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:31:07.01 +07:42:05.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:19:55.54 +02:43:02.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:21:29.92 +03:46:27.4: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:29.92 +03:46:27.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0514 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:55.54 +02:43:02.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3539 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:13:56.44 +05:08:22.9: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:31:07.01 +07:42:05.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:31:07.01 +07:42:05.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8777 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:53:17.17 +07:00:54.6: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:13:56.44 +05:08:22.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:56.44 +05:08:22.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3345 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:23:49.80 +06:29:04.9: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:24:46.18 +02:54:14.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:53:17.17 +07:00:54.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:17.17 +07:00:54.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4623 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:23:37.59 +06:13:45.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:56:42.70 +04:00:31.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:24:46.18 +02:54:14.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:23:49.80 +06:29:04.9: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:49.80 +06:29:04.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6108 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:23:37.59 +06:13:45.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:56:42.70 +04:00:31.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:44:12.14 +08:15:48.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:44:12.14 +08:15:48.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:52:01.80 +10:21:47.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:52:01.80 +10:21:47.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-19-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-20-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0092.fits at 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:44:22.02 +10:49:29.2: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4355 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52839.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52856.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52364_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52367_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52371_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:46.15 +01:43:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52448_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52452_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52452_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52460_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:20.75 +06:07:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52481_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52481_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52497_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52531_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:14.15 +09:13:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52545_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52550_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52563_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52573_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52588_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52613_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52626_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52628_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52630_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52634_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52635_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52638_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52642_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52655_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52668_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52682_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52684_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52689_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52694_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52695_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52702_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52705_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52711_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:17.20 +08:10:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52716_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52717_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52720_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52722_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52725_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52726_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52731_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52734_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52740_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52744_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52752_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52762_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52762_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52779_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52786_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52789_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52790_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52800_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52802_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52807_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:57.05 +07:26:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52810_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52812_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52814_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52816_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52826_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52827_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52828_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52830_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52838_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:36.50 +10:04:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52839_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52845_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52850_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52856_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52856_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52860_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52861_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52866_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52870_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52881_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52887_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52895_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52908_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52917_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52919_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52926_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52927_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52928_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52929_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52931_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52936_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52939_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52941_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:55.66 +08:52:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52943_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52948_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52951_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52952_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52959_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52977_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52980_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52983_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52986_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52993_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52997_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:03.09 +06:24:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53000_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53010_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53012_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53014_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53020_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53025_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53026_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53028_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53030_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53038_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53040_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53044_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53045_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 53046_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53047_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53054_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53056_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53058_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53060_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53064_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53068_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53070_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53073_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53074_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53075_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53077_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53078_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53080_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53083_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53089_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53092_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53095_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53100_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53102_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50793_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 50793_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:56.15 +09:45:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01551_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 01551_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29199_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 29199_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:38.38 +02:52:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07477_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 07477_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.86 +08:55:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29420_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 29420_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07335_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 07335_fd_Psc-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-48-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
