This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 11 58.80 +20 57 35.5 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8517,7.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3517 7.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 11 58.79 +20 57 35.6 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8517,7.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3517 7.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3517 2461262.8517 11.99 04:09:23.61 +24:15:35.6
170.40605 -19.86013 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:23.61 +24:15:35.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:23.61 +24:15:35.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 09 23.61 +24 15 35.6 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8517,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3517 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3517 2461262.8517 13.60 04:14:34.00 +23:48:54.2
171.61176 -19.31007 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:34.00 +23:48:54.2: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:34.00 +23:48:54.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 14 34.00 +23 48 54.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8517,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3517 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3517 2461262.8517 13.03 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5
178.86298 -19.96783 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" XZ Tau
Type: CTTS/ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 15.200 V 3.240000000000 G5V-M3(T)e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 31 39.94 +18 13 57.5 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
XZ Tau,2461262.8517,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
XZ Tau 20260810.3517 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3517 2461262.8517 11.84 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8
177.22194 -19.75816 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0428121+193324
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.522 R1 Y 0.449 R1 109.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 04 28 11.92 +19 33 24.8 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0428121+193324,2461262.8517,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0428121+193324 20260810.3517 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3517 2461262.8517 11.87 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6
181.83912 -10.90194 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 9548423
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.849 g Y 0.475 g 2458536.55070 358.279863400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3517* 05 09 46.59 +21 24 44.6 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 9548423,2461262.8517,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 9548423 20260810.3517 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461262.85197388 10.08.2026 08:26:40.543 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10718
Objects passed selection criteria: 10666
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7399
Average stars matched: 7288.5 (98.5066 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 03:42:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461262.85197388 10.08.2026 08:26:40.543 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 75814
Objects passed selection criteria: 75650
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52600.5
Average stars matched: 51194.8 (97.3275 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 296516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 03:43:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.85146090
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0325 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0346 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00778 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fgFsv5M9eb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SVy98wW8ny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rsulUAzl0z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tP71GGCpow
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fgFsv5M9eb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SVy98wW8ny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rsulUAzl0z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=173, bad_region=0, passed=3377
Got 3377 stars (including 3202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3116 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3116 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3106 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3106 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 3106 stars left (next iteration limit 3413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3106 robust_rms=10.130 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3106 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3106 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3106 robust_rms_before=1.746 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.533 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.520
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.533 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits N_match=3106 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=839 n_q2=623 n_q3=919 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tP71GGCpow (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=159, bad_region=0, passed=3400
Got 3400 stars (including 3238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3151 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3151 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3141 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3141 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 3141 stars left (next iteration limit 3450)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3141 robust_rms=10.214 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3141 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.737 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3141 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3141 robust_rms_before=1.633 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.508 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.513
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits N_match=3141 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=843 n_q2=646 n_q3=911 n_q4=741 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.120
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (3106 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (3141 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 20364_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 20366_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.48 +20:15:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01705_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 01705_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:18.51 +25:31:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.25 +17:32:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0325 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0346 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:37:03.430 +21:58:41.07
Second-epoch second image center 04:37:04.662 +21:59:03.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00778 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f9i56var8X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.utCfsyyc9Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TPgZ59qw9v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4dWoXKsNNg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 139 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.f9i56var8X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.utCfsyyc9Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=5759, bad_region=1, passed=80631
Got 80631 stars (including 74709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TPgZ59qw9v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=620, bad_region=22, passed=22474
Got 22474 stars (including 21793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22474 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5314)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=1258 n_q2=917 n_q3=1486 n_q4=1175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4dWoXKsNNg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=765, bad_region=23, passed=22486
Got 22486 stars (including 21664 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=1250 n_q2=938 n_q3=1471 n_q4=1181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-25-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0362.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_034005_TTUQ1b1x1_3366025_CRs4VcWk/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:04.12 +22:13:51.9: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:09:23.61 +24:15:35.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:04.12 +22:13:51.9: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:04.12 +22:13:51.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0508 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:09:23.61 +24:15:35.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.84 +21:18:39.4: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.84 +21:18:39.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.84 +21:18:39.4: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4369 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:14:34.00 +23:48:54.2: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:14:34.00 +23:48:54.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:31:39.94 +18:13:57.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0206 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8: 12.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:28:11.92 +19:33:24.8: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8399 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:46.59 +21:24:44.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8623 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101696.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47142.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101183_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101183_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101184_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101184_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.78 +24:18:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 101187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101227_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101229_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101254_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101254_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101257_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.69 +19:10:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101274_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101274_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101277_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101277_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101278_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 101278_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101294_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101294_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101302_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101302_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101333_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101333_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101355_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101369_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101376_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101376_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101405_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101413_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101413_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 +26:55:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101424_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101424_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101428_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101434_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101436_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101436_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101439_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.84 +18:26:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101441_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101445_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101445_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101446_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101446_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.48 +22:42:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101455_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101455_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.11 +22:48:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101459_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101459_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101461_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101461_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101462_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101462_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:09.74 +22:55:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101463_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101463_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101467_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101470_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101470_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101481_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101481_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:16.84 +23:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101485_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101485_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101490_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101490_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101498_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101501_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101501_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:10.86 +22:49:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101520_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101520_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101523_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101523_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101532_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101532_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101552_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101563_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101563_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101564_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101565_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101565_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101569_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.04 +23:18:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101600_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101600_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101601_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101603_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101609_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:18.03 +23:01:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101622_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.09 +24:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101623_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101623_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101630_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101630_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.55 +23:44:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101641_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101641_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101646_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.72 +21:00:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101647_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101647_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.98 +23:58:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101650_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101650_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101654_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101654_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101657_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101657_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101658_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101659_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101659_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101660_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101660_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101664_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101664_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101670_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101670_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101674_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101679_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101690_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101690_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101693_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101693_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101694_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101694_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101695_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101696_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 101696_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101697_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101697_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101708_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101708_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101722_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101722_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101728_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101728_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101729_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101729_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101740_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101740_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101742_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101746_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101746_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101748_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101752_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101754_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101754_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101757_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101757_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101759_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101759_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101766_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101766_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101768_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101768_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101769_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101769_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 101774_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32507_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 32507_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.60 +22:57:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.11 +25:01:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12112_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 12112_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:18.52 +25:31:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 52280_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.05 +21:09:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97547_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 97547_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 70213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.10 +17:16:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 76772_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 11554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:18.09 +25:33:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.83 +20:57:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 70750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:45.95 +18:22:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 36988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:31.87 +22:41:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12488_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 12488_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:59.89 +25:28:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11186_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 11186_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.18 +25:24:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 11541_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.92 +25:22:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61612_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 61612_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:21.57 +22:50:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34484_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 34484_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 70782_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47142_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
Preparing report for the candidate 47142_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26073_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 26073_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:13.45 +23:30:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.07 +26:08:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 18339_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:37.03 +24:23:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.51 +20:15:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.27 +25:58:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45865_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 45865_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:00.05 +21:37:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.22 +17:32:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 08495_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.47 +26:06:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 34519_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:55.36 +22:58:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 36875_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 77066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:37.41 +19:10:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74794_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 74794_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.46 +18:50:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 67423_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:29.79 +17:55:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57740_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 57740_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:22.33 +17:09:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45218_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 45218_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:05.74 +21:35:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 62221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:48.31 +20:25:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 74631_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:28.17 +18:38:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363
The candidate 59421_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_03-26-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363 did not pass the final checks
