This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 12.87 20:44:04.78 +01:23:09.1
47.96206 -24.13398 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -0 -0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:04.78 +01:23:09.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:04.78 +01:23:09.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.7552,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.2552 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 12.99 20:13:05.30 -00:33:56.8
42.03982 -18.35453 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos 0 -1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:05.30 -00:33:56.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:05.30 -00:33:56.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.7552,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.2552 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 13.36 21:01:27.57 -01:05:49.3
48.05996 -29.13725 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia -0 -0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:01:27.57 -01:05:49.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:01:27.57 -01:05:49.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.7552,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.2552 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 14.31 20:43:00.57 -01:28:58.7
45.08165 -25.34170 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2000 Herschel 1 0 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:00.57 -01:28:58.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:00.57 -01:28:58.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.7552,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.2552 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 12.66 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5
46.48683 -20.97529 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J2030249+014826
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.253 R1 Y 0.798 R1 77.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2030249+014826,2461262.7552,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2030249+014826 20260810.2552 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 13.38 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2
44.26613 -20.40718 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J202420.00+001658.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.350 V 14.930 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J202420.00+001658.6,2461262.7552,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J202420.00+001658.6 20260810.2552 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.2552 2461262.7552 11.22 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3
39.37559 -27.12362 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" MQ Aqr
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 13.500 V 2453677.00000 75.300000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
MQ Aqr,2461262.7552,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
MQ Aqr 20260810.2552 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461262.75546532 10.08.2026 06:07:42.204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15173
Objects passed selection criteria: 15156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13658.8
Average stars matched: 13268.8 (97.1447 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 01:18:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461262.75546532 10.08.2026 06:07:42.204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 108535
Objects passed selection criteria: 108291
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 93238
Average stars matched: 89706 (96.2118 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 568264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 01:20:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.75485628
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0458 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01267 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g6FV1iDYdN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gvf4GAtPmS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MGzbhdPwRU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k51nLXPXfV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to +3.2706 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to 3.2706 deg
Loaded 10818 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8911 out of 9373 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9373 out of 15695 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g6FV1iDYdN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1089, bad_region=0, passed=15674
Got 15674 stars (including 14574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1231 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1299 n_q4=1139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gvf4GAtPmS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=0, passed=15695
Got 15695 stars (including 14640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5333)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1176 n_q3=1297 n_q4=1147 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MGzbhdPwRU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=11829
Got 11829 stars (including 11282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=9.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.979 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=0.792 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.411 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.361
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.855 -01:58:22.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11829 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky631411.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.792 -> 0.293 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1178 n_q2=1069 n_q3=1482 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k51nLXPXfV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=541, bad_region=0, passed=11800
Got 11800 stars (including 11246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=9.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.101 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.784 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.366
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:24.226 -01:58:45.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11800 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky631079.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.784 -> 0.300 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1074 n_q3=1482 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.441 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.188
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.216
reference average sigma_overall=0.4435 worst_q_ratio=1.1845
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4850 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4848 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (4831 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:08.54 -04:03:06.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:02.05 +03:08:24.1: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:15.57 +01:02:53.6: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:05:57.62 +01:52:49.9: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:03:51.70 -03:39:30.0: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:08.54 -04:03:06.6: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:15.57 +01:02:53.6: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:02.05 +03:08:24.1: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:05:57.62 +01:52:49.9: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:08.54 -04:03:06.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9018 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:15.57 +01:02:53.6: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1641 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:02.05 +03:08:24.1: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1871 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:57.62 +01:52:49.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1795 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:03:51.70 -03:39:30.0: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.70 -03:39:30.0: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9223 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21022_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21022_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21103_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21103_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.54 -06:36:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21240_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21240_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:15.10 -02:53:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21419_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21419_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21444_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21444_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21450_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21450_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21457_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21457_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:32.19 -02:58:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.03 -04:32:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.67 +00:56:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11708_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 11708_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.50 +00:50:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.77 +01:19:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0458 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:26.860 -01:58:22.15
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:24.230 -01:58:45.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01267 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZgZYzdyhy2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VUqQclnHCG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z9X3EeNfGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.noTozjPe59
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.557100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.557100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to +3.2723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to 3.2723 deg
Loaded 10830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7953 out of 9799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9799 out of 116829 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZgZYzdyhy2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=9969, bad_region=0, passed=116420
Got 116420 stars (including 106301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1207 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VUqQclnHCG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=10115, bad_region=1, passed=116788
Got 116788 stars (including 106521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116788 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1214 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1202 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z9X3EeNfGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4241, bad_region=11, passed=70932
Got 70932 stars (including 66593 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70932 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4837 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=4837 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.noTozjPe59 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4260, bad_region=12, passed=71715
Got 71715 stars (including 67361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1117 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1514 n_q4=1130 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-06-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010955_TTUQ1b1x1_4050683_aeYs8mYp/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:57.41 +03:10:32.1: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:31:54.65 +00:12:45.2: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:29.28 -06:00:56.7: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:45:59.57 -02:40:03.5: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:03:21.29 -00:26:21.9: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:38.53 -02:25:47.5: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:16.36 +01:39:32.1: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:56:42.36 -02:45:26.4: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:57:26.64 -06:54:55.6: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:57:01.57 +02:31:46.3: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:31:54.65 +00:12:45.2: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:57:26.64 -06:54:55.6: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:45:59.57 -02:40:03.5: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:16.36 +01:39:32.1: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:38.53 -02:25:47.5: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:03:21.29 -00:26:21.9: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:57:01.57 +02:31:46.3: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:57.41 +03:10:32.1: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:29.28 -06:00:56.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:56:42.36 -02:45:26.4: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:54.65 +00:12:45.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3175 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:57.41 +03:10:32.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5278 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:59.57 -02:40:03.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0629 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:01.57 +02:31:46.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1011 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.28 -06:00:56.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8770 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:26.64 -06:54:55.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5928 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:38.53 -02:25:47.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8136 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:21.29 -00:26:21.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7192 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:16.36 +01:39:32.1: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1280 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:42.36 -02:45:26.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8233 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:16.81 -00:59:04.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:26.85 +01:51:53.9: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:26.82 +02:11:30.9: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:38:35.30 -01:27:29.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:28.66 +02:20:01.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:14:35.24 +03:00:35.6: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:09:46.26 +00:44:26.9: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:03:00.04 -06:09:40.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:25.35 +00:54:26.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:30.78 +02:53:37.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:16.81 -00:59:04.1: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:28.66 +02:20:01.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:14:35.24 +03:00:35.6: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:09:46.26 +00:44:26.9: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:03:00.04 -06:09:40.7: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:38:35.30 -01:27:29.2: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:00.04 -06:09:40.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:25.35 +00:54:26.1: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.81 -00:59:04.1: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2220 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:30.78 +02:53:37.6: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:26.82 +02:11:30.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:26.85 +01:51:53.9: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:28.66 +02:20:01.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6728 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:46.26 +00:44:26.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8252 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:35.24 +03:00:35.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9047 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:35.30 -01:27:29.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5278 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:25.35 +00:54:26.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8210 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:30.78 +02:53:37.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8286 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:26.82 +02:11:30.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6015 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:26.85 +01:51:53.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7813 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:00.27 -04:25:57.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:56.80 +02:58:06.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:06:49.85 +00:20:47.5: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:30.52 -02:03:42.2: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:00:19.83 -05:48:13.8: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:54.49 +02:23:11.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:54.29 +02:51:11.2: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:10:46.34 -02:17:15.7: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:02:15.68 -04:35:07.6: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:12.29 -05:04:58.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:00.27 -04:25:57.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.27 -04:25:57.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9470 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:56.80 +02:58:06.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:56.80 +02:58:06.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2703 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:06:49.85 +00:20:47.5: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:10:46.34 -02:17:15.7: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:00:19.83 -05:48:13.8: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:30.52 -02:03:42.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:54.29 +02:51:11.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:49.85 +00:20:47.5: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1733 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:46.34 -02:17:15.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0548 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:19.83 -05:48:13.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7827 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:30.52 -02:03:42.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2379 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:54.29 +02:51:11.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3821 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:54.49 +02:23:11.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:54.49 +02:23:11.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3931 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:02:15.68 -04:35:07.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:15.68 -04:35:07.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7189 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:12.29 -05:04:58.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:12.29 -05:04:58.7: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6719 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:02.07 +03:08:23.8: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:33.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:07.25 +00:31:52.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:20:00.09 +03:07:41.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:05:27.17 +02:22:58.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:14.69 -03:21:36.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:14:12.49 -00:01:38.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:05.79 -07:09:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:07.25 +00:31:52.5: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:20:00.09 +03:07:41.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:33.8: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:02.07 +03:08:23.8: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:05:27.17 +02:22:58.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.17 +02:22:58.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.25 +00:31:52.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4605 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:00.09 +03:07:41.6: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2219 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:58.85 +00:00:33.8: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8745 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:02.07 +03:08:23.8: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2475 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9086 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:29:40.91 +03:00:34.4: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:14.69 -03:21:36.2: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.69 -03:21:36.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3807 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:14:12.49 -00:01:38.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:12.49 -00:01:38.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5756 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:05.79 -07:09:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:05.79 -07:09:32.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:29:40.91 +03:00:34.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:40.91 +03:00:34.4: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8820 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:48.72 +02:01:21.0: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:12.30 -00:08:39.7: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:31.95 +01:40:23.6: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:42.57 +02:11:00.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:04.78 +01:23:09.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:05.30 -00:33:56.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:34.49 -02:33:12.3: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:41.10 +02:03:38.5: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:12.30 -00:08:39.7: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:48.72 +02:01:21.0: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.30 -00:08:39.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8700 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:31.95 +01:40:23.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.72 +02:01:21.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8223 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:05.30 -00:33:56.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:04.78 +01:23:09.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:42.57 +02:11:00.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:31.95 +01:40:23.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1615 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:42.57 +02:11:00.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1558 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:06:36.43 -04:23:49.5: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:04.2: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:34.49 -02:33:12.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.49 -02:33:12.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0974 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:41.10 +02:03:38.5: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:41.10 +02:03:38.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2263 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:04.2: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:04.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4061 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:06:36.43 -04:23:49.5: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:36.43 -04:23:49.5: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2103 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:07:11.21 -00:53:27.6: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.8: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:04:58.43 +01:49:29.0: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:14.71 +01:32:23.5: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:06.28 +00:22:30.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:07:11.21 -00:53:27.6: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:11.21 -00:53:27.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3701 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:04:58.43 +01:49:29.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.8: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:58.43 +01:49:29.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4585 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3232 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:14.71 +01:32:23.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:14.71 +01:32:23.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4786 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:06.28 +00:22:30.4: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:34.45 +01:19:31.1: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:06.28 +00:22:30.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3265 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:05:14.24 +00:40:52.3: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:15:20.47 -05:31:11.8: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:34.45 +01:19:31.1: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:34.45 +01:19:31.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6372 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:15:35.07 +02:51:49.6: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:03.75 -01:01:38.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:52:50.62 -00:35:32.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:05:14.24 +00:40:52.3: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:14.24 +00:40:52.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5411 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:15:20.47 -05:31:11.8: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:20.47 -05:31:11.8: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2903 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:01:27.57 -01:05:49.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:19:55.58 +02:37:27.8: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:15:35.07 +02:51:49.6: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:35.07 +02:51:49.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7890 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:03.75 -01:01:38.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:03.75 -01:01:38.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6286 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:52:50.62 -00:35:32.5: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:50.62 -00:35:32.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5774 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:19:55.58 +02:37:27.8: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:01:27.57 -01:05:49.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:55.58 +02:37:27.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6787 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:00.44 +01:58:31.5: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:05:02.15 +01:50:42.3: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:34.74 -01:18:05.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:00.44 +01:58:31.5: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.44 +01:58:31.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5780 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:04.01 +01:41:29.5: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:27.28 +02:58:51.8: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:35.74 +00:28:48.2: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:05:02.15 +01:50:42.3: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:02.15 +01:50:42.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6556 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:34.74 -01:18:05.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:34.74 -01:18:05.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5804 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:10:01.52 +02:11:46.7: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:04.01 +01:41:29.5: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:04.01 +01:41:29.5: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6826 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:27.28 +02:58:51.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:35.74 +00:28:48.2: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:27.28 +02:58:51.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9469 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.74 +00:28:48.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7834 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:10:01.52 +02:11:46.7: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:01.52 +02:11:46.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9530 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:10:29.81 +00:31:13.0: 13.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:13.78 -03:28:50.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:03:44.20 -03:22:11.9: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:10:29.81 +00:31:13.0: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:29.81 +00:31:13.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9778 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:23:06.23 +02:53:46.8: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:13.78 -03:28:50.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:03:44.20 -03:22:11.9: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:13.78 -03:28:50.8: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6666 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:44.20 -03:22:11.9: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5374 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:31:49.98 +03:06:19.6: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:14.66 +01:40:28.0: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:02.78 +02:32:03.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:23:06.23 +02:53:46.8: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:06.23 +02:53:46.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0437 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:31:49.98 +03:06:19.6: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:49.98 +03:06:19.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0327 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:14.66 +01:40:28.0: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:00.57 -01:28:58.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:14.66 +01:40:28.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0911 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:02.78 +02:32:03.0: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:02.78 +02:32:03.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2072 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:00.57 -01:28:58.7: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:13:16.03 -01:31:00.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:25.12 +01:48:27.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6671 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:13:16.03 -01:31:00.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:16.03 -01:31:00.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2264 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:24:20.01 +00:16:58.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3794 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:39:34.62 -06:50:02.3: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2227 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139961.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93717.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137257_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137257_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137260_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137260_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137261_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137261_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137266_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137266_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137269_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137269_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137281_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137281_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137284_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137284_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137292_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137292_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137296_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137296_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137300_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137300_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137302_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137302_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137304_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137304_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137309_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137309_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137312_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137312_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137317_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137317_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137318_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137318_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137319_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137319_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137320_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137320_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137322_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137322_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137323_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137323_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:36.23 +01:37:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137324_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137324_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137326_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137326_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:20.26 +02:37:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137327_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137327_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137328_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137328_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137330_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137330_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137331_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137331_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137333_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137333_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137336_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137336_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.25 +01:38:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137339_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137339_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137340_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137340_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:10.66 +01:45:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137341_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137341_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137342_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137342_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137343_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137343_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137525_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137525_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137577_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137577_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137861_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137861_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:35.56 +00:43:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137988_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 137988_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138012_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138012_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138053_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138053_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138201_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138201_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138212_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138212_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 138270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 138294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138449_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138449_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138454_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138454_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138538_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138538_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:37.41 -02:27:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138544_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138544_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138582_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138582_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138586_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138586_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138599_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138599_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138619_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138619_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138658_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138658_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:17.04 +01:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138706_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138706_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138770_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138770_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138827_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138827_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:05.58 +02:17:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138838_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138838_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:55.87 -02:29:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138877_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138877_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:39.49 -00:56:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138923_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138923_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138952_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138952_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138975_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 138975_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139035_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139035_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139071_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139071_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139117_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139117_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139128_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 139128_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139146_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139146_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139149_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139149_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139158_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139158_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139203_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139203_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139228_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139228_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139271_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139271_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139273_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139273_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139348_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139348_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139386_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139386_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139395_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139395_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.53 -05:42:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139435_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139435_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139575_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139575_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.64 +00:55:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139662_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139662_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139677_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139677_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139805_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 139805_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139961_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 139961_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60909_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 60909_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28984_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 28984_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:02.96 -04:17:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05043_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 05043_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.53 -06:36:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43457_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 43457_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:32.20 -02:58:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:23.87 -00:49:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.06 -04:32:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44265_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 44265_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:15.08 -02:53:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03608_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 03608_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.76 +01:19:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.65 +00:56:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103557_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 103557_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.48 +00:50:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-07-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
