This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 11.61 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1
145.06687 4.84161 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J040052.04+591835.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.950 V 13.380 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J040052.04+591835.2,2461262.6905,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J040052.04+591835.2 20260810.1905 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 13.01 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7
135.40799 2.45239 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 1849634
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.988 r Y 1.008 r 2451437.36000 305.491195000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.1905* 02 43 15.03 +62 35 02.7 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1849634,2461262.6905,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1849634 20260810.1905 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 12.91 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6
142.23155 3.41943 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J033620.60+595734.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.230 V 14.500 V 2457276.00000 610.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J033620.60+595734.5,2461262.6905,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J033620.60+595734.5 20260810.1905 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 12.74 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5
143.29322 3.49466 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J034325.81+592311.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.080 g Y 0.290 g 2458566.62900 83.430000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034325.81+592311.5,2461262.6905,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034325.81+592311.5 20260810.1905 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 12.48 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0
137.69794 7.34749 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0323276+654540
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.173 r Y 0.499 r 2458484.78150 187.507495000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0323276+654540,2461262.6905,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0323276+654540 20260810.1905 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 12.55 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4
139.90164 5.60650 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J033108.19+630522.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.880 V 14.020 V 2457784.80300 32.290000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J033108.19+630522.4,2461262.6905,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J033108.19+630522.4 20260810.1905 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 11.29 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1
138.97651 1.26181 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0305100+595405
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.091 g Y 0.326 g 2458387.16780 98.871034300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.1905* 03 05 10.45 +59 54 01.1 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0305100+595405,2461262.6905,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0305100+595405 20260810.1905 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 11.20 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2
145.39367 6.80806 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J041322.39+603234.6
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.370 V 13.120 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041322.39+603234.6,2461262.6905,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041322.39+603234.6 20260810.1905 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 11.15 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2
137.57448 1.21015 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0697 Cas
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 B 15.100 B
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.1905* 02 55 02.34 +60 31 09.2 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0697 Cas,2461262.6905,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0697 Cas 20260810.1905 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1905 2461262.6905 7.21 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9
137.99263 2.77440 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 466294295706341760 | 03:04:11.26 +61:42:09.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G2V 1935ApJ....81..187A HD 18757
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9: 8.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9: 8.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.18 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.1905* 03 04 12.51 +61 42 01.9 7.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 466294295706341760,2461262.6905,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 466294295706341760 20260810.1905 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461262.69085049 10.08.2026 04:34:39.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 29
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19952
Objects passed selection criteria: 19817
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13789
Average stars matched: 13357 (96.8671 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 23:42:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461262.69085049 10.08.2026 04:34:39.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 187
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 142386
Objects passed selection criteria: 141971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97811.5
Average stars matched: 92090.2 (94.1507 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 607324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 23:44:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.69022554
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0422 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0525 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ExRJ0EGXpf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KozSZ7vu4A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GuGgzTJi7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rym9B0XCAU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.961600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.961600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec +55.2344 to +67.5141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec 55.2344 to 67.5141 deg
Loaded 17774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9548 out of 10598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10598 out of 20729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ExRJ0EGXpf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2177, bad_region=0, passed=20929
Got 20929 stars (including 18725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1299 n_q2=1255 n_q3=1372 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KozSZ7vu4A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2180, bad_region=0, passed=20729
Got 20729 stars (including 18522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1379 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4GuGgzTJi7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, bad_region=0, passed=6870
Got 6870 stars (including 6580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=6.245 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=35.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=1.689 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.607 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.676
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.607 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1675 n_q2=722 n_q3=1587 n_q4=880 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rym9B0XCAU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, bad_region=0, passed=6935
Got 6935 stars (including 6641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=6.031 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=36.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.138 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.671 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=1.492 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.609 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.671
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.609 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1675 n_q2=722 n_q3=1585 n_q4=880 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.215
ref2=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new1=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.460 worst_q_ratio=1.384
new2=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.376
reference average sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.2355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (4864 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (4862 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31348_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 31348_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.74 +64:20:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:40.90 +58:23:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16177_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 16177_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.02 +62:32:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10156_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 10156_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:09.51 +61:13:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 19530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:24.32 +64:25:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:19.00 +61:49:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.71 +63:58:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16963_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 16963_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:46.54 +64:45:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.84 +60:44:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04612_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04612_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:31.97 +58:16:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06768_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 06768_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:43.23 +60:06:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15369_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 15369_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.19 +62:31:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.72 +59:02:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07549_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 07549_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:19.21 +59:29:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05863_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 05863_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:50.91 +58:56:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 12959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:48.67 +62:24:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08351_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 08351_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:25.12 +60:46:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:03.99 +59:56:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13154_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 13154_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:08.94 +63:12:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16290_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 16290_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:40.42 +64:35:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13462_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 13462_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.97 +63:20:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06195_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 06195_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.42 +59:58:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.56 +58:52:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12762_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 12762_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:25.01 +63:04:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08307_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 08307_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.81 +61:06:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17586_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 17586_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:30.76 +65:31:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01833_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 01833_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:08.08 +57:51:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08216_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 08216_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:47.50 +60:44:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04283_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04283_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:26.93 +59:09:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0422 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0525 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:31.385 +61:57:47.05
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:28.728 +61:57:13.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.grvUsD1PXV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ggaJ4tZDvo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ryXqDvkmC2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SOjTWixyIt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 154983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec +55.1748 to +67.5161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec 55.1748 to 67.5161 deg
Loaded 17915 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7797 out of 10804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10804 out of 154983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 180 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.grvUsD1PXV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17688, bad_region=2, passed=154936
Got 154936 stars (including 136983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1285 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ggaJ4tZDvo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=17825, bad_region=1, passed=154953
Got 154953 stars (including 136846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1226 n_q3=1354 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ryXqDvkmC2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1821, bad_region=14, passed=41957
Got 41957 stars (including 40061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.482 n_q1=1646 n_q2=706 n_q3=1597 n_q4=915 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SOjTWixyIt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1809, bad_region=18, passed=41745
Got 41745 stars (including 39850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41745 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1635 n_q2=712 n_q3=1600 n_q4=913 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.380
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-33-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_233542_TTUQ1b1x1_3991231_PWbibeRM/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:27:46.02 +60:04:21.9: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:20:34.85 +57:08:54.5: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:19:31.28 +56:53:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:32:56.05 +59:12:46.7: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:19:06.56 +57:05:22.6: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:23.01 +64:19:29.1: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:54.37 +63:00:16.7: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:20:33.84 +57:06:15.7: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:27:46.02 +60:04:21.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:19:06.56 +57:05:22.6: 9.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:23.01 +64:19:29.1: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:19:31.28 +56:53:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:31.28 +56:53:03.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:32:56.05 +59:12:46.7: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:20:34.85 +57:08:54.5: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:46.02 +60:04:21.9: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5500 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:06.56 +57:05:22.6: ref_mag=9.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6982 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:23.01 +64:19:29.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5298 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:56.05 +59:12:46.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4461 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:34.85 +57:08:54.5: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4103 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:20:33.84 +57:06:15.7: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:54.37 +63:00:16.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:33.84 +57:06:15.7: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7084 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:54.37 +63:00:16.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6439 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:21:06.67 +57:00:16.8: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:20:02.52 +56:57:08.2: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:19:34.16 +56:59:15.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:19:33.35 +56:56:39.5: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:21:06.67 +57:00:16.8: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:06.67 +57:00:16.8: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6821 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:19:34.16 +56:59:15.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:20:02.52 +56:57:08.2: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:34.16 +56:59:15.8: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7643 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:02.52 +56:57:08.2: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8011 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:53:52.84 +61:53:21.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:19:33.35 +56:56:39.5: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:33.35 +56:56:39.5: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8711 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:19:49.96 +56:52:43.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:20:29.30 +57:14:26.7: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:53:52.84 +61:53:21.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:53:52.84 +61:53:21.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9356 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:20:44.84 +57:06:07.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:19:49.96 +56:52:43.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:49.96 +56:52:43.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:20:29.30 +57:14:26.7: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:29.30 +57:14:26.7: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4576 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:20:44.84 +57:06:07.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:44.84 +57:06:07.4: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2387 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:00:52.07 +59:18:35.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6094 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:43:15.03 +62:35:02.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9966 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:36:20.70 +59:57:35.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9121 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:25.85 +59:23:11.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7250 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0: 13.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:23:27.44 +65:45:41.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4840 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:31:08.18 +63:05:21.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5205 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:05:10.45 +59:54:01.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2935 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:13:22.26 +60:32:34.2: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1937 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:55:02.34 +60:31:09.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1469 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9: 8.19 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9: 8.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 8.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:04:12.51 +61:42:01.9: ref_mag=8.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=7.2096 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114261.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47715.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57544.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99192.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179124_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179124_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:56.37 +61:08:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179125_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179125_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179130_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179130_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179147_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179147_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179169_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179169_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 179752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181012_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 181012_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182131_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182131_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182318_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182318_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.21 +58:13:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:17.88 +62:37:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182592_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182592_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:21.06 +65:39:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182826_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182826_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182877_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182877_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182945_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 182945_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:05.86 +58:50:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:15.84 +65:40:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183054_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183054_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:23.82 +63:36:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183073_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183073_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:26.99 +63:58:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183153_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183153_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.54 +62:41:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183184_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183184_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:22.15 +64:05:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183201_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183201_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183226_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183226_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183242_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183242_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:13.87 +60:26:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:36.08 +64:57:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183477_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183477_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:59:15.30 +60:33:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183647_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183647_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183786_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183786_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:21.16 +66:31:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183832_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183832_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:34.19 +63:01:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183908_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 183908_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184088_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184088_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:49.88 +62:54:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184126_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184126_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:42.89 +62:22:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184380_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184380_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:45.85 +62:35:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184648_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184648_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:21.49 +64:06:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184712_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184712_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:31.94 +63:22:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184713_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184713_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:29.43 +64:41:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184784_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184784_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:54.57 +64:21:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184878_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 184878_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:50.72 +59:19:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185136_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185136_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:36.79 +64:14:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185498_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185498_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:22.70 +65:38:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185644_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185644_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:12.03 +61:30:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185730_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185730_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185746_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185746_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185792_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185792_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:35.99 +62:22:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185922_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 185922_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:47.51 +66:07:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186264_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 186264_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186352_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 186352_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:17.58 +60:00:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.58 +58:52:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.99 +63:20:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.69 +63:58:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:18.97 +61:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:06.93 +59:46:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:43.25 +60:06:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:56.48 +62:56:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34871_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 34871_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96956_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 96956_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:21:21.28 +62:45:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.27 +62:31:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:26.01 +60:39:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:25.09 +58:41:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:49.43 +60:54:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:45.27 +60:25:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:40.63 +60:24:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 73530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:29.79 +61:32:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62885_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 62885_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:44.00 +60:25:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 96629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:15.95 +63:01:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147494_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 147494_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:09.62 +63:37:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 69134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:23.57 +61:16:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136356_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 136356_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:26.70 +64:25:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145559_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 145559_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08981_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 08981_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:08.19 +57:30:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47715_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 47715_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140218_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 140218_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:41.03 +64:09:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68832_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 68832_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:00.79 +62:02:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130922_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 130922_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:07.00 +64:47:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11038_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 11038_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 125600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:52.05 +64:59:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 36818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 167098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:39.42 +59:55:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.71 +64:20:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:15.30 +61:33:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.17 +58:31:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 99192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33995_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 33995_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:43.71 +59:05:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:25.95 +63:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:19.70 +59:05:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.10 +62:48:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31144_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 31144_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:02.99 +58:56:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:02.30 +62:17:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41883_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 41883_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:56.77 +65:19:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:10.44 +59:20:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75986_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 75986_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:49.21 +61:36:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 15857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:40.51 +57:55:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.76 +60:15:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130398_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 130398_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:44.39 +64:24:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:10.12 +61:55:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.12 +58:14:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 78119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:05:09.27 +61:14:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:09.87 +59:40:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:29.96 +59:19:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:28.91 +57:43:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:15.64 +62:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:40.03 +58:17:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:48.70 +62:24:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83313_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83313_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:19.34 +60:55:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:38.80 +58:42:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:05.40 +59:34:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:08.34 +60:05:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:41:05.23 +62:17:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76912_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 76912_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:33.12 +61:33:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143016_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 143016_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:11.21 +63:52:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57544_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 57544_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:24.41 +64:25:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.01 +62:32:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:11.70 +60:22:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 57662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71980_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 71980_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.92 +57:38:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:00.88 +63:49:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 27793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:23.84 +58:48:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82899_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82899_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:33.12 +60:42:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:25.10 +60:46:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:36.15 +62:50:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:45.95 +60:22:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.92 +58:40:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120433_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 120433_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76925_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 76925_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:09.52 +61:13:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70852_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 70852_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:30.11 +60:53:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 80092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:12.32 +60:56:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:41.62 +60:54:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:46.53 +64:45:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.84 +60:44:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:40.48 +61:05:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 97541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:57.17 +62:51:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:07.54 +57:52:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61907_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 61907_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:16.61 +60:35:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:56.18 +59:35:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:33.41 +63:58:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:39.66 +60:07:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12078_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 12078_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:57.48 +57:40:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85323_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 85323_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:08.56 +62:16:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84253_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 84253_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:21:19.05 +61:59:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144845_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 144845_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:38.62 +63:42:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 84662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:23.60 +60:15:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92093_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 92093_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:54.29 +62:23:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 89098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:48.02 +62:38:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:00.81 +60:02:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40003_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 40003_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:32.51 +59:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:04.00 +59:56:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55131_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 55131_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:00.15 +60:20:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:09.05 +63:12:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:11.00 +59:21:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:40.43 +64:35:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.44 +59:58:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 98818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:36.35 +63:17:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:31.83 +58:45:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133753_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 133753_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:19.10 +64:03:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:10.52 +59:38:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84691_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 84691_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:57.81 +61:31:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:25.06 +63:04:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115277_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 115277_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:59.32 +65:39:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.83 +61:06:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125702_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 125702_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:24.83 +64:19:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:30.77 +65:31:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84802_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 84802_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:50.28 +62:19:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85343_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 85343_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:43.70 +62:20:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:27.53 +59:54:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:43.53 +57:58:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120872_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 120872_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:38.86 +65:31:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.70 +57:27:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:47.51 +60:44:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124333_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 124333_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:40.03 +65:08:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 73101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:39.68 +61:26:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:26.95 +59:09:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:08.09 +57:51:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78594_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 78594_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-34-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
