This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 10.46 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2
39.85795 -44.71693 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.354 Eleonora 0 -0 0 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4243* 21 44 43.76 -14 09 23.2 10.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 10.73 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8
37.12087 -40.15700 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.306 Unitas 0 -0 0 10.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 11.32 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9
43.96846 -36.10337 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria 0 -0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 12.59 21:16:25.45 -11:46:07.8
38.89102 -37.45641 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:16:25.45 -11:46:07.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:16:25.45 -11:46:07.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 13.23 21:17:34.30 -14:14:17.9
36.18064 -38.73207 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.558 Carmen 1 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:17:34.30 -14:14:17.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:17:34.30 -14:14:17.9: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 13.50 21:46:50.86 -10:11:46.2
45.12595 -43.43783 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.286 Iclea 0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:46:50.86 -10:11:46.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:46:50.86 -10:11:46.2: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4243* 21 46 50.86 -10 11 46.2 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 14.49 21:44:02.17 -09:32:34.7
45.46848 -42.51947 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1374 Isora -0 0 0 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:44:02.17 -09:32:34.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:44:02.17 -09:32:34.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4243* 21 44 02.17 -09 32 34.7 14.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4243 2461261.9243 14.49 21:14:38.93 -09:25:23.5
41.28204 -36.03436 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1780 Kippes 0 -0 0 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:14:38.93 -09:25:23.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:14:38.93 -09:25:23.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9243,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4243 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.88890352 18.06.2026 09:19:51.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
First image: 2461209.88890352 18.06.2026 09:19:51.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Last image: 2461261.92459455 09.08.2026 10:11:14.969 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8623
Objects passed selection criteria: 8612
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7285.75
Average stars matched: 7039.75 (96.6235 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 05:14:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461209.88890352 18.06.2026 09:19:51.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
First image: 2461209.88890352 18.06.2026 09:19:51.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Last image: 2461261.92459455 09.08.2026 10:11:14.969 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 194
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50262
Objects passed selection criteria: 50168
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47332.5
Average stars matched: 45450.5 (96.0239 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 272352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 05:15:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.92407074
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits'
wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66
Second-epoch image center 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66
Second-epoch image center 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00660 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CSvDPYqicF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GgoEIUOFG3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YK7UtBuOkN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IRzQg0Kyun
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8874 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3905 to 329.4911 deg, Dec -15.2504 to -4.7005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3905 to 329.4911 deg, Dec -15.2504 to -4.7005 deg
Loaded 6721 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5451 out of 5615 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5615 out of 8874 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.692700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.692700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8874 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3905 to 329.4911 deg, Dec -15.2504 to -4.7005 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3905 to 329.4911 deg, Dec -15.2504 to -4.7005 deg
Loaded 6721 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5451 out of 5615 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5615 out of 8874 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 9225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3619 to 329.4904 deg, Dec -15.2503 to -4.7004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3619 to 329.4904 deg, Dec -15.2503 to -4.7004 deg
Loaded 6736 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5526 out of 5688 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5688 out of 9225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
2.4 pix Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
14.9 mag. Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CSvDPYqicF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=515, bad_region=0, passed=8874
Got 8874 stars (including 8351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8874 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4740 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4741 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1329 n_q2=1012 n_q3=1266 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -region wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GgoEIUOFG3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=511, bad_region=0, passed=9225
Got 9225 stars (including 8705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4738 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4738 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5181)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1301 n_q3=996 n_q4=1318 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YK7UtBuOkN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, bad_region=0, passed=5641
Got 5641 stars (including 5260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4713 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4715 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4687 stars left (next iteration limit 5155)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=11.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.629 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4687 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.384 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.384 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4687 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1099 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1049 n_q4=1265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IRzQg0Kyun (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=5601
Got 5601 stars (including 5223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5601 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4714 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4682 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4682 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4716 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4683 stars left (next iteration limit 5150)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4683 robust_rms=11.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4683 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4683 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.378 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4683 robust_rms_before=0.906 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.391 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.378
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4683 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1095 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1050 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.239
ref2=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.362
new1=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.090
new2=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.145
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.3005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198_astrometric_residuals.png (4709 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444_astrometric_residuals.png (4687 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (4683 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20829.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20881.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20808_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 20808_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20829_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 20829_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20881_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 20881_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2
21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.8
21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66
Second-epoch image center 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:43.484 -09:59:39.66
Second-epoch image center 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:56.448 -09:57:01.71
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:54.842 -09:57:00.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00660 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vll1ParcHu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PpYEdJy7kS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZJr0HLLNZf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eSxqgooYPk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits and wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 53069 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3814 to 329.5453 deg, Dec -15.2618 to -4.6695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3814 to 329.5453 deg, Dec -15.2618 to -4.6695 deg
Loaded 6771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5405 out of 5966 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5966 out of 53069 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.562200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.562200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 53069 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3814 to 329.5453 deg, Dec -15.2618 to -4.6695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3814 to 329.5453 deg, Dec -15.2618 to -4.6695 deg
Loaded 6771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5405 out of 5966 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5966 out of 53069 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 51567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3495 to 329.5140 deg, Dec -15.2503 to -4.6788 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3495 to 329.5140 deg, Dec -15.2503 to -4.6788 deg
Loaded 6759 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5424 out of 5938 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5938 out of 51567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 181 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
2.3 pix Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
15.0 mag. Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vll1ParcHu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2577, bad_region=1, passed=53051
Got 53051 stars (including 50399 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53051 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4728 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4728 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1352 n_q2=1001 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -region wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PpYEdJy7kS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3043, bad_region=1, passed=51550
Got 51550 stars (including 48424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4720 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4720 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4700 stars left (next iteration limit 5170)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=4700 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1278 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZJr0HLLNZf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1495, bad_region=26, passed=43055
Got 43055 stars (including 41448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4715 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4690 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4716 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4691 stars left (next iteration limit 5159)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4691 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1123 n_q2=1294 n_q3=1029 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eSxqgooYPk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1496, bad_region=24, passed=43083
Got 43083 stars (including 41473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43083 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4688 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4688 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4714 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4687 stars left (next iteration limit 5156)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4687 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1119 n_q2=1296 n_q3=1032 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-10-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_051152_TTUQ1b1x1_1806780_0rMUqOTh/wcs_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:29:11.51 -10:39:24.9: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:28:53.84 -09:46:09.7: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:01:45.31 -04:48:38.1: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:22:28.75 -05:22:36.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:06:56.65 -12:14:53.1: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:22:17.96 -11:12:19.2: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:32:03.56 -08:28:30.4: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:26:26.31 -10:04:13.0: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:27:27.76 -06:40:32.2: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:21:36.05 -08:37:04.4: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:26:26.31 -10:04:13.0: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:32:03.56 -08:28:30.4: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:22:28.75 -05:22:36.9: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:28:53.84 -09:46:09.7: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:01:45.31 -04:48:38.1: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:29:11.51 -10:39:24.9: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:22:17.96 -11:12:19.2: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:06:56.65 -12:14:53.1: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:26.31 -10:04:13.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0343 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:03.56 -08:28:30.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2073 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:27:27.76 -06:40:32.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:53.84 -09:46:09.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1406 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:28.75 -05:22:36.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2341 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:45.31 -04:48:38.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9677 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:11.51 -10:39:24.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4926 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:56.65 -12:14:53.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8535 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:17.96 -11:12:19.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0811 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:21:36.05 -08:37:04.4: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:27.76 -06:40:32.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9175 delta=-0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:36.05 -08:37:04.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8859 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:27:56.83 -10:52:04.1: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:18:19.27 -13:00:32.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:37:12.88 -05:55:32.5: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:48:45.21 -07:24:17.2: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:18:31.71 -12:12:47.2: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:32:36.56 -05:00:14.2: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:35:51.09 -08:33:47.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:33:18.38 -07:01:41.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:23:51.59 -08:45:21.0: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:03:57.93 -08:40:39.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:27:56.83 -10:52:04.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:56.83 -10:52:04.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8243 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:18:19.27 -13:00:32.7: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:19.27 -13:00:32.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7231 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:48:45.21 -07:24:17.2: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:35:51.09 -08:33:47.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:37:12.88 -05:55:32.5: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:45.21 -07:24:17.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7467 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:18:31.71 -12:12:47.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:32:36.56 -05:00:14.2: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:33:18.38 -07:01:41.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:51.09 -08:33:47.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8859 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:23:51.59 -08:45:21.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:12.88 -05:55:32.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8949 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:31.71 -12:12:47.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7349 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:36.56 -05:00:14.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5387 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:18.38 -07:01:41.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6346 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:51.59 -08:45:21.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7562 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:03:57.93 -08:40:39.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:57.93 -08:40:39.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3206 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:11:02.06 -05:44:06.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:33:28.14 -14:11:52.0: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 20:57:56.20 -08:21:39.1: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:56:23.45 -11:50:52.0: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:49:32.54 -06:07:59.9: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:05:33.52 -06:34:34.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:51:04.03 -07:54:02.3: 9.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:11:02.06 -05:44:06.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:02.06 -05:44:06.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3254 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:33:28.14 -14:11:52.0: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:28.14 -14:11:52.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1552 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 20:57:56.20 -08:21:39.1: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:56.20 -08:21:39.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1355 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:56:23.45 -11:50:52.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:49:32.54 -06:07:59.9: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:56:23.45 -11:50:52.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5402 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:32.54 -06:07:59.9: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2599 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:51:04.03 -07:54:02.3: 9.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:05:33.52 -06:34:34.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:04.03 -07:54:02.3: ref_mag=9.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3816 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:33.52 -06:34:34.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0388 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:55:51.29 -06:26:58.8: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:00:49.24 -05:23:55.9: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:16:25.45 -11:46:07.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:55:51.29 -06:26:58.8: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:51.29 -06:26:58.8: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5455 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:00:49.24 -05:23:55.9: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:49.24 -05:23:55.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7027 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:16:25.45 -11:46:07.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:13:40.17 -14:39:07.3: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:17:34.30 -14:14:17.9: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:13:40.17 -14:39:07.3: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:40.17 -14:39:07.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0806 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:33:29.15 -13:26:49.5: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:01:25.97 -07:25:44.0: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:17:34.30 -14:14:17.9: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:09:44.60 -11:22:05.7: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:00:28.75 -05:46:34.8: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:46:50.86 -10:11:46.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:33:29.15 -13:26:49.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:29.15 -13:26:49.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4164 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:01:25.97 -07:25:44.0: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:09:44.60 -11:22:05.7: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:25.97 -07:25:44.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3701 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:44.60 -11:22:05.7: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4545 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:00:28.75 -05:46:34.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:28.75 -05:46:34.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4881 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:02:22.15 -09:41:24.7: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:46:50.86 -10:11:46.2: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:02:22.15 -09:41:24.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:22.15 -09:41:24.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4709 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:22:23.07 -06:35:25.0: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:22:23.07 -06:35:25.0: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:55:02.58 -14:39:03.0: 14.55 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:23.07 -06:35:25.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7110 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:55:02.58 -14:39:03.0: 14.38 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:02.58 -14:39:03.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8625 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 20:57:37.11 -05:15:34.9: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:55:44.22 -05:17:20.6: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:23:57.72 -04:58:36.2: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:52:16.65 -12:02:12.0: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:56:40.43 -05:42:12.7: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 20:57:37.11 -05:15:34.9: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:37.11 -05:15:34.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1272 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:56:01.52 -08:30:03.6: 14.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:55:44.22 -05:17:20.6: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:44.22 -05:17:20.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3632 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:23:57.72 -04:58:36.2: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:57.72 -04:58:36.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3353 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:52:16.65 -12:02:12.0: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:56:40.43 -05:42:12.7: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:16.65 -12:02:12.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1741 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:56:40.43 -05:42:12.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4043 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:56:01.52 -08:30:03.6: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:56:01.52 -08:30:03.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2499 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:44:02.17 -09:32:34.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:10:02.50 -05:49:32.1: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 20:59:19.94 -05:37:34.0: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 20:57:30.00 -06:16:56.2: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:44:02.17 -09:32:34.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:10:02.50 -05:49:32.1: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:05:53.54 -05:41:02.8: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:02.50 -05:49:32.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4382 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 20:59:19.94 -05:37:34.0: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:13:38.03 -06:09:32.0: 15.10 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:19.94 -05:37:34.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4370 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 20:57:30.00 -06:16:56.2: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:30.00 -06:16:56.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3092 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:13:38.03 -06:09:32.0: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:05:53.54 -05:41:02.8: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:38.03 -06:09:32.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4438 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:53.54 -05:41:02.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3200 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-19-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits at 21:14:38.93 -09:25:23.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_03-50-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits at 21:14:38.93 -09:25:23.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69063.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69156.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69948.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68130_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68130_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68132_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68132_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68137_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68137_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68139_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68139_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68143_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68143_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68145_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68145_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68147_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68147_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68148_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68148_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68149_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68149_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68151_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68151_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68154_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68154_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68155_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68155_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68159_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68159_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68160_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68160_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68161_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68161_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68163_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68163_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68164_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68164_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68165_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68165_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68167_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68167_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68168_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68168_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68169_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68169_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68170_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68170_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68171_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68171_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68173_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68173_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68174_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68174_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68175_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68175_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68177_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68177_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68181_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68181_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68183_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68183_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68185_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68185_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68241_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68241_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:44:43.76 -14:09:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68248_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68248_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68260_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68260_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:09.52 -14:08:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68292_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68292_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68294_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68294_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68314_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68314_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:57.14 -07:31:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68325_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68325_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68350_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68350_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68411_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68411_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68428_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68428_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68438_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68438_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68444_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68444_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68455_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68455_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68458_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68458_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68488_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68488_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68550_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68550_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68551_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68551_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68556_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68556_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68562_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68562_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68636_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68636_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68638_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68638_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68642_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68642_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68649_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68649_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68650_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68650_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68656_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 68656_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68670_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68670_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68671_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68671_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68678_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68678_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68701_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68701_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68702_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68702_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68703_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68703_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68714_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68714_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68726_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68726_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68731_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68731_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68758_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68758_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68759_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68759_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68760_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68760_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68773_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68773_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68775_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68775_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68815_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68815_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68821_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68821_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68852_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68852_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68875_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68875_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68879_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68879_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68889_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68889_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68903_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68903_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68907_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68907_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68920_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68920_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68923_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68923_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68936_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68936_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68937_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68937_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68946_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68946_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68948_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68948_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68957_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68957_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68970_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 68970_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69036_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69036_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69037_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69037_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69063_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 69063_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69076_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69076_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69078_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69078_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69088_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69088_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69093_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69093_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69094_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69094_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69095_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69095_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69103_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69103_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69117_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69117_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69126_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69126_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69128_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69128_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69130_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69130_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69133_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69133_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69140_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69140_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69153_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69153_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69154_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69154_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69156_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 69156_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69164_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69164_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69178_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69178_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69207_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69207_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69223_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69223_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69250_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69250_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69257_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69257_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69274_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69274_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69293_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69293_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69303_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69303_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69306_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69306_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69308_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69308_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69309_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69309_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69314_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69314_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69317_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69317_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69319_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69319_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69327_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69327_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69333_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69333_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69353_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69353_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69356_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69356_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69358_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69358_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69363_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69363_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69373_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69373_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69407_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69407_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69413_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69413_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69440_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69440_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69447_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69447_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69454_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69454_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69456_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69456_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69463_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69463_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69465_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69465_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69477_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69477_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69478_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69478_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69481_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69481_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69495_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69495_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69513_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69513_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69528_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69528_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69532_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69532_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69564_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69564_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69584_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69584_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69600_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69600_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69632_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69632_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69633_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69633_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69641_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69641_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69642_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69642_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69652_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69652_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69678_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69678_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69696_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69696_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69699_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69699_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69702_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69702_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69704_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69704_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69708_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69708_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69711_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69711_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69715_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69715_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69731_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69731_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69768_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69768_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69774_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69774_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69775_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69775_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69777_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69777_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69786_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69786_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69797_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69797_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69802_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69802_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69809_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
Preparing report for the candidate 69809_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69817_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69817_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69827_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69827_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69847_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69847_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69856_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69856_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69858_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69858_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69863_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69863_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69873_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69873_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69875_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69875_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69881_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69881_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69921_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69921_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69925_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69925_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69926_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69926_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69927_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69927_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69942_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445
The candidate 69942_fd_Aqr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_05-11-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445 did not pass the final checks
