This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3968 2461261.8968 10.22 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3
184.16295 3.24660 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.405+/-0.042 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461261.8968,10.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260809.3968 10.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3968 2461261.8968 11.73 06:28:36.01 +33:16:18.6
180.61908 10.14457 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:36.01 +33:16:18.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:36.01 +33:16:18.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8968,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3968 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3968 2461261.8968 12.53 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6
180.83798 7.56871 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8968,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3968 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3968 2461261.8968 11.57 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3
177.66999 1.69900 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 2 -0 2 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8968,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3968 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461261.89710031 09.08.2026 09:31:39.467 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25197
Objects passed selection criteria: 25023
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16414.2
Average stars matched: 15906.5 (96.9067 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 04:35:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461261.89710031 09.08.2026 09:31:39.467 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 141
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193316
Objects passed selection criteria: 192729
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 132442
Average stars matched: 127276 (96.0998 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 04:37:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.89640671
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00943 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZvzPZsimBB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TzrF15k8DA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yyUHv5A36s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gu84aGow6A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZvzPZsimBB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TzrF15k8DA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yyUHv5A36s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=5838
Got 5838 stars (including 5487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=7.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.042 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.617 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.634 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.540
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 945.8'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.390 +30:00:57.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky158737.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.617 -> 0.387 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1272 n_q2=842 n_q3=1743 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.426
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gu84aGow6A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, bad_region=0, passed=5918
Got 5918 stars (including 5539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5918 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=7.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.799 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.794 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.527 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.576 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.552
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.576 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=1259 n_q2=852 n_q3=1751 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.432
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.426
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.432
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (4785 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.29 +34:48:47.2: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.29 +34:48:47.2: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.29 +34:48:47.2: ref_mag=9.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3264 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 31934_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 31977_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.25 +27:29:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.85 +25:25:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.72 +31:24:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.04 +31:35:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:07:47.69 +26:57:59.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:05.269 +30:00:59.31
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.678 +30:00:54.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00943 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.daoREkEI0G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pStc1aJBHA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UdUzyjRwc4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KKrMZoRztF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 117 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.daoREkEI0G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pStc1aJBHA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UdUzyjRwc4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2195, bad_region=11, passed=53421
Got 53421 stars (including 51124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1285 n_q2=833 n_q3=1726 n_q4=934 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KKrMZoRztF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2243, bad_region=12, passed=53797
Got 53797 stars (including 51450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1278 n_q2=844 n_q3=1730 n_q4=939 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-30-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0414.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_043250_TTUQ1b1x1_87868_ETerBfF3/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:33.31 +27:23:13.1: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:58.91 +32:18:01.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:10:49.45 +33:56:02.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:05.98 +25:42:55.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:57:01.73 +29:37:11.4: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:58.91 +32:18:01.3: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.95 +29:01:22.1: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:05.98 +25:42:55.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:01.73 +29:37:11.4: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:58.91 +32:18:01.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9448 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:05.98 +25:42:55.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0024 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:01.73 +29:37:11.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5863 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.14 +32:31:06.1: 11.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:49.45 +33:56:02.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:49.45 +33:56:02.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5382 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5483 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:33.31 +27:23:13.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:33.31 +27:23:13.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6828 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.95 +29:01:22.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.95 +29:01:22.1: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1403 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:14.61 +32:34:51.9: 11.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.14 +32:31:06.1: 11.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.14 +32:31:06.1: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6713 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:16.66 +32:31:37.6: 11.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:14.61 +32:34:51.9: 11.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:14.61 +32:34:51.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4845 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:34:43.9: 10.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:18.06 +32:31:14.7: 11.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:47.1: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:16.66 +32:31:37.6: 11.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.66 +32:31:37.6: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1002 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:10.28 +24:24:56.2: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:16.61 +32:34:43.9: 10.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:16.61 +32:34:43.9: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8905 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:18.06 +32:31:14.7: 11.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:18.06 +32:31:14.7: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2062 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:47.1: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:47.1: ref_mag=9.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4267 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:10.28 +24:24:56.2: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:10.28 +24:24:56.2: ref_mag=10.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4627 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:36.01 +33:16:18.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.9: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:57.77 +24:24:30.4: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:36.01 +33:16:18.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.9: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.18 +25:41:03.9: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0034 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:57.77 +24:24:30.4: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:50.77 +31:24:45.2: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:57.77 +24:24:30.4: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5470 delta=-0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:36.99 +25:05:44.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:52.06 +29:59:32.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.6: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:40.64 +24:45:13.7: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:50.77 +31:24:45.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:50.77 +31:24:45.2: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3704 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:36.99 +25:05:44.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:36.99 +25:05:44.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3996 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:52.06 +29:59:32.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:52.06 +29:59:32.9: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4751 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:24.70 +24:29:17.9: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:40.64 +24:45:13.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.91 +30:53:55.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:40.64 +24:45:13.7: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9795 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:48.06 +35:04:24.6: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9134 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:13.25 +34:25:20.1: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:24.70 +24:29:17.9: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:24.70 +24:29:17.9: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6891 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.91 +30:53:55.7: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.91 +30:53:55.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7257 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:53.19 +24:25:03.7: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:13.25 +34:25:20.1: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:13.25 +34:25:20.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1919 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:17.53 +34:30:08.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:08.2: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:20.80 +32:38:56.1: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:53.19 +24:25:03.7: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:53.19 +24:25:03.7: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9899 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:08.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:17.53 +34:30:08.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:20.90 +34:43:08.2: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0224 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:17.53 +34:30:08.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7327 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:07.55 +31:55:27.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5164 delta=2.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:20.80 +32:38:56.1: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:20.80 +32:38:56.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6239 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:30.21 +24:37:11.5: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:59.31 +24:31:57.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:30.21 +24:37:11.5: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:59.31 +24:31:57.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:30.21 +24:37:11.5: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3786 delta=-0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:59.31 +24:31:57.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2821 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:03.83 +28:27:29.1: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:03.83 +28:27:29.1: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:03.83 +28:27:29.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3407 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:29.77 +24:52:02.8: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:12.32 +24:54:41.1: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:44.08 +31:48:34.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5724 delta=1.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:29.77 +24:52:02.8: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:29.77 +24:52:02.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2174 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:12.32 +24:54:41.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:12.32 +24:54:41.1: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1069 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:28:32.54 +25:02:26.0: 11.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:32.54 +25:02:26.0: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:32.54 +25:02:26.0: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4237 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:52.86 +26:27:36.9: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:52.86 +26:27:36.9: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:52.86 +26:27:36.9: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7247 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242527.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242819.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:50.26 +29:01:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242165_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:34.15 +32:04:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242170_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242170_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:50.82 +25:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.43 +29:35:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.86 +27:35:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.60 +34:57:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.75 +34:19:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:56.98 +33:47:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.17 +25:28:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.79 +32:31:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.82 +32:34:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.56 +29:29:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242340_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242340_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242487_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242487_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.88 +34:55:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242490_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.46 +35:01:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242519_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242519_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.64 +27:35:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242526_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242526_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.79 +30:10:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 242527_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242536_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242536_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.73 +28:29:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.61 +34:23:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.24 +28:37:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242555_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242555_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.80 +25:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242605_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242605_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.69 +30:30:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242622_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.38 +28:38:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.46 +32:41:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.10 +34:48:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242677_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242677_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:54.99 +32:52:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242681_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242681_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:33.99 +31:12:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242684_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.39 +31:39:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242702_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242702_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.01 +31:09:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242708_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242708_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242719_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242721_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242721_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.65 +32:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242743_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242743_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242744_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242744_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.77 +24:56:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242752_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242752_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242784_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242784_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242805_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242805_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:11.71 +34:09:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242814_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242814_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242819_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 242819_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242827_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242827_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242871_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242871_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.65 +28:37:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242874_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242874_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242885_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242885_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.58 +27:47:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242886_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242886_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.57 +30:42:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242894_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242894_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.11 +32:06:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242898_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242898_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.09 +33:06:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242922_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242922_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.79 +29:00:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242951_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.47 +29:22:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242962_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.81 +31:57:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242972_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242972_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.71 +26:42:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242986_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 242986_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.72 +30:30:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243006_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 243006_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.62 +31:04:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243030_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 243030_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243042_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 243042_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 243081_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.91 +30:45:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 243155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.42 +27:03:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.39 +29:29:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.24 +27:29:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.88 +25:25:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.57 +25:17:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:20.99 +28:36:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.43 +27:23:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.41 +25:12:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.36 +33:40:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.72 +34:38:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 68216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.94 +28:00:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 210318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 209157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.18 +27:36:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.79 +32:22:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.22 +29:24:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.63 +34:35:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.40 +29:32:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.04 +32:01:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.69 +29:51:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.45 +31:03:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45591_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 45591_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 212442_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.37 +30:50:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.03 +28:29:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.72 +31:25:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.33 +32:13:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 191724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.73 +30:53:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.71 +30:56:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.76 +25:26:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.12 +27:45:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.09 +29:02:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.98 +29:09:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.05 +32:03:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.97 +31:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-31-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0415 did not pass the final checks