This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 52 41.39 +23 37 53.1 6.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,6.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 6.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3921 2461261.8921 9.19 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0
186.65438 -1.98775 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 0 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 53 13.78 +22 12 27.0 9.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,9.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 9.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.0 9.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461261.8921,9.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260809.3921 9.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 52 41.39 +23 37 52.9 6.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,6.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 6.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 9.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461261.8921,9.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260809.3921 9.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3921 2461261.8921 11.98 05:37:55.32 +23:37:08.7
183.61346 -4.26761 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 1 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:55.32 +23:37:08.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:55.32 +23:37:08.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 37 55.32 +23 37 08.7 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3921 2461261.8921 13.37 05:42:19.87 +23:35:05.3
184.17730 -3.42799 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra 0 0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:19.87 +23:35:05.3: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:19.87 +23:35:05.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3921* 05 42 19.87 +23 35 05.3 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3921 2461261.8921 11.41 06:04:10.47 +22:54:30.3
187.30799 0.55173 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 1 -1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:04:10.47 +22:54:30.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:10.47 +22:54:30.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8921,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3921 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461261.89235598 09.08.2026 09:24:49.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20215
Objects passed selection criteria: 20101
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13508.5
Average stars matched: 13315.5 (98.5713 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 04:33:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461261.89235598 09.08.2026 09:24:49.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150375
Objects passed selection criteria: 149950
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104428
Average stars matched: 100998 (96.7152 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 04:34:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.89183880
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00921 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tPWsreaU0s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wXFLbuWoXL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3HIqkKx9pN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eYIdD1TzG7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tPWsreaU0s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wXFLbuWoXL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3HIqkKx9pN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=5213
Got 5213 stars (including 4947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4682 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4682 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4682 stars left (next iteration limit 5146)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4682 robust_rms=8.211 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4682 robust_rms=0.647 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.212 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4682 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4682 robust_rms_before=1.779 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.606 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.575
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.606 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits N_match=4682 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1065 n_q2=1202 n_q3=945 n_q4=1470 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eYIdD1TzG7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=261, bad_region=0, passed=5229
Got 5229 stars (including 4962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4752 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4687 stars left (next iteration limit 5151)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=8.299 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4687 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4687 robust_rms_before=1.812 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.474 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.589 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.607
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.589 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=4687 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1188 n_q3=950 n_q4=1500 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.244
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.470 worst_q_ratio=1.203
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (4682 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (4687 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:38.45 +23:38:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 30668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 30684_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 30689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.93 +21:13:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 07851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.79 +23:22:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.56 +17:54:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.82 +25:25:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:06.99 +23:15:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.395 +22:01:48.15
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:23.741 +22:01:42.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00921 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OeKyhvNBzj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SG0Aq3wPc7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dsrwooXB7I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0NKjREmwFN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OeKyhvNBzj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SG0Aq3wPc7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dsrwooXB7I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1605, bad_region=14, passed=44064
Got 44064 stars (including 42381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5190)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1137 n_q3=987 n_q4=1484 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0NKjREmwFN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1577, bad_region=14, passed=45072
Got 45072 stars (including 43422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4720 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=4720 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1137 n_q3=974 n_q4=1489 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_043052_TTUQ1b1x1_4117500_YvyBb9Hs/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:55.45 +18:06:41.9: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:35.18 +17:26:28.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:57:21.35 +22:24:36.1: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:56.11 +20:14:27.0: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:07.83 +24:54:33.0: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:13.71 +16:33:26.2: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:57:21.35 +22:24:36.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:56.11 +20:14:27.0: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:55.45 +18:06:41.9: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:35.18 +17:26:28.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:56.11 +20:14:27.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8949 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:21.35 +22:24:36.1: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3740 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:55.45 +18:06:41.9: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2272 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:35.18 +17:26:28.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6511 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:07.83 +24:54:33.0: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:07.83 +24:54:33.0: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4330 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:13.71 +16:33:26.2: 9.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:13.71 +16:33:26.2: ref_mag=9.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.2045 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:29.05 +16:37:21.8: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:57.10 +16:34:02.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:12.62 +16:40:33.2: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:35.58 +16:35:25.5: 9.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:29.05 +16:37:21.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:29.05 +16:37:21.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:57.10 +16:34:02.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:57.10 +16:34:02.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:40.38 +16:59:23.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:17.68 +17:03:32.1: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:49.69 +17:04:27.9: 9.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:12.62 +16:40:33.2: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:35.58 +16:35:25.5: 9.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:12.62 +16:40:33.2: ref_mag=9.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2310 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:35.58 +16:35:25.5: ref_mag=9.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9827 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:52.40 +16:54:19.5: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:40.38 +16:59:23.1: 9.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:40.38 +16:59:23.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:49.69 +17:04:27.9: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:49.69 +17:04:27.9: ref_mag=9.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4348 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:17.68 +17:03:32.1: 9.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:17.68 +17:03:32.1: ref_mag=9.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3961 delta=-0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:09.18 +17:05:15.0: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:52.40 +16:54:19.5: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:52.40 +16:54:19.5: ref_mag=9.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5469 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:56.01 +16:52:45.0: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:09.18 +17:05:15.0: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:09.18 +17:05:15.0: ref_mag=10.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7524 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:40.01 +17:00:06.5: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:59.12 +17:09:35.8: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:17.95 +16:44:38.5: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:56.01 +16:52:45.0: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:56.01 +16:52:45.0: ref_mag=10.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0568 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:21.19 +16:35:20.2: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:59.12 +17:09:35.8: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:40.01 +17:00:06.5: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.64 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:17.95 +16:44:38.5: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:59.12 +17:09:35.8: ref_mag=10.64 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2119 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:40.01 +17:00:06.5: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1524 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:17.95 +16:44:38.5: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1325 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:55.32 +23:37:08.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:21.19 +16:35:20.2: 10.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:21.19 +16:35:20.2: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3761 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:34.84 +17:04:56.2: 10.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:55.32 +23:37:08.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:15.94 +16:33:24.9: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:34.84 +17:04:56.2: 10.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.93 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:34.84 +17:04:56.2: ref_mag=10.93 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5096 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:15.94 +16:33:24.9: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:15.94 +16:33:24.9: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5548 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.61 +25:16:09.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:01.87 +16:37:41.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:20.47 +16:33:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:40.10 +18:13:15.7: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:58.64 +17:03:46.2: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.61 +25:16:09.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.61 +25:16:09.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:01.87 +16:37:41.6: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:01.87 +16:37:41.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8980 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:29.33 +16:39:56.7: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:20.47 +16:33:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:20.47 +16:33:12.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.10 +18:13:15.7: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.10 +18:13:15.7: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3653 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:58.64 +17:03:46.2: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:58.64 +17:03:46.2: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9663 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:29.33 +16:39:56.7: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:29.33 +16:39:56.7: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0260 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:01:18.90 +16:32:40.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:24.98 +16:31:50.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:01:18.90 +16:32:40.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:18.90 +16:32:40.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:24.98 +16:31:50.3: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:24.98 +16:31:50.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:47.0: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:12:36.64 +25:12:16.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:29.84 +16:56:17.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0382 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:20.78 +16:52:14.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:47.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.38 +24:18:47.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8743 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:12:36.64 +25:12:16.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:36.64 +25:12:16.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0795 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:13.13 +20:07:34.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:20.78 +16:52:14.6: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:20.78 +16:52:14.6: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3015 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:13.13 +20:07:34.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:19.87 +23:35:05.3: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1645 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:13.13 +20:07:34.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9059 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:19.87 +23:35:05.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:04:10.47 +22:54:30.3: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:04:10.47 +22:54:30.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190895.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60395.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.95 +23:00:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.24 +18:20:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:36.22 +23:10:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:56.69 +17:08:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190590_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.91 +24:49:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190596_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.69 +17:48:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190602_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.94 +20:08:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190621_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:13.78 +22:12:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 190625_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190632_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190636_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:14.70 +16:55:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190640_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:06.51 +16:40:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190656_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190656_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190665_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190668_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.94 +26:19:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190676_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190676_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:26.07 +17:24:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190681_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.74 +17:12:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190701_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190701_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190712_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190718_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190718_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190737_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190737_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.04 +19:58:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190763_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190763_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:22.19 +17:11:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190805_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:24.14 +17:26:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190812_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:32.79 +16:48:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190832_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190843_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190843_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190848_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:43.42 +17:19:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.09 +22:38:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:03.62 +17:16:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190888_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190893_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.09 +17:02:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 190895_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.69 +22:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190948_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:46.03 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.86 +23:48:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:43.95 +16:56:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:15.03 +23:03:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191006_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191006_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.88 +26:45:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191009_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191019_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191019_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.98 +18:33:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191029_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.73 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191036_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191036_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.08 +23:18:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191063_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191063_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191065_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191071_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.71 +23:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.44 +18:37:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191107_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191107_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191112_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.84 +26:10:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191118_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191118_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.89 +25:05:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191141_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.82 +23:40:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191147_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191147_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191162_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.12 +17:39:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.78 +22:03:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191184_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191184_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.12 +23:12:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191191_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.71 +22:27:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.11 +20:26:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191210_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191210_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191214_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191214_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.09 +25:24:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.43 +18:33:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191251_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.60 +20:02:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191257_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191257_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.94 +20:10:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191262_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.80 +22:40:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191263_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191269_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.29 +18:59:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.48 +21:37:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.62 +25:09:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191316_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191316_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191319_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191319_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.65 +21:46:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191373_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191373_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.50 +22:22:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.67 +18:46:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 191454_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.34 +20:09:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 191455_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.08 +20:08:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.52 +25:57:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.46 +20:16:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.25 +22:50:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.81 +25:25:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.78 +23:22:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.93 +18:24:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.48 +20:22:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.52 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.86 +20:02:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.48 +19:30:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.38 +21:35:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.65 +21:45:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 10707_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 104863_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:33.02 +20:37:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.03 +20:53:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.10 +24:59:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.86 +23:10:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 127266_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:18.55 +18:20:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132175_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 132175_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 119182_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:21.53 +17:53:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60395_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 60395_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.28 +24:10:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.21 +17:07:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.73 +19:21:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.14 +17:59:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.20 +20:22:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 27363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.57 +25:17:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.16 +17:53:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.13 +21:51:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.39 +23:51:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.93 +21:13:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.46 +20:28:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.56 +21:08:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.30 +20:41:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.78 +18:35:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.79 +24:34:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.33 +17:03:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:06.98 +23:15:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.11 +17:43:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
