Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 09.2807  2461261.7807  11.66  23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3
 73.73955 -73.02312 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  12.0     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3:  14.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -crosshair 4488.41797 4724.02686 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -crosshair 4481.44727 4729.90039 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28069 23 58 25.08 -15 26 36.3          11.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28024 23 58 25.09 -15 26 36.3          11.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28115 23 58 25.07 -15 26 36.2          11.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 09.2807*  23 58 25.08 -15 26 36.3  11.7 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.7807,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.2807 11.66CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 09.2807  2461261.7807  12.69  00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1
 76.78714 -73.87661 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -1      0       1  12.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1:  14.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1:  14.86 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -crosshair 5221.03418 4748.62061 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -crosshair 5214.08887 4754.27588 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28069 00 03 28.06 -15 28 28.1          12.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28024 00 03 28.06 -15 28 27.3          12.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 09.28115 00 03 28.05 -15 28 29.0          12.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 09.2807*  00 03 28.06 -15 28 28.1  12.7 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.7807,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.2807 12.69CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461261.78114779 09.08.2026 06:44:41.169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2455
Objects passed selection criteria:  2454
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2249.75
Average stars matched: 2198 (97.6997 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   229488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Aug  9 01:58:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461261.78114779 09.08.2026 06:44:41.169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  14706
Objects passed selection criteria:  14669
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 13922.8
Average stars matched: 13393.5 (96.1987 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Aug  9 01:59:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 309908 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 309908 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3581.5333
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 916.0785
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3571.8838
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 917.9899
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.55682
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-09T01:43:22.5718420' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-09T06:43:22.5718420' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61261.2801223495 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-09T06:43:32.4764351' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61261.2802369907 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.998044067865 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9996684840592 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =               23.765 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             134.1825 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.46906121887469 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29532 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29532 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits :)

Spent 0.517864 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-09T01:44:41.1699704' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-09T06:44:41.1699704' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61261.2810320486 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-09T06:44:51.0745427' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61261.2811466898 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.998043937469 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9996685184518 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     23.9588888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     134.447222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.45047434602272 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29532 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29532 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits :)

Spent 0.516137 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.78023809
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01493 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K5OgtGRmnU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UHGITilUZl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C20grhwz0T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BLl8fO1P4X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.382900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.382900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.2)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.8 (SNR )  10.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K5OgtGRmnU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 2249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4415, gap 8.4415 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2170 stars left (next iteration limit 2387)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=2170 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=568 n_q2=534 n_q3=534 n_q4=534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UHGITilUZl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 2246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2168 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2170 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 2166 stars left (next iteration limit 2380)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=2166 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=569 n_q2=535 n_q3=549 n_q4=513 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C20grhwz0T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=160, bad_region=0, passed=2068
Got 2068 stars (including 1905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3078, gap 8.3078 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3087, gap 8.3087 to 351.2425
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 1830 stars left (next iteration limit 2013)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1830 robust_rms=10.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.072 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1830 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1830 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.378 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1830 robust_rms_before=1.137 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.331 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.378
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits N_match=1830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=508 n_q2=408 n_q3=500 n_q4=414 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BLl8fO1P4X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=163, bad_region=0, passed=2078
Got 2078 stars (including 1912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2078 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2429 through 0 to 8.3034, gap 8.3034 to 351.2429
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2424 through 0 to 8.3035, gap 8.3035 to 351.2424
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 1834 stars left (next iteration limit 2016)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1834 robust_rms=10.854 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.155 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1834 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1834 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1834 robust_rms_before=1.120 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.329 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.383
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.329 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=1834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=507 n_q2=403 n_q3=507 n_q4=417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.194
ref2=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.098
reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.2155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (2170 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (2166 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260_astrometric_residuals.png (1830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261_astrometric_residuals.png (1834 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:51.776 -18:00:33.01
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:54.475 -18:01:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01493 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qS83JMTOSF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QorugFbHMN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2fJYONWP8X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GXO2qg5Mn9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.255300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.255300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.21

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.21

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 13.9 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
 13.9 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.9 (SNR )  13.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qS83JMTOSF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=477, bad_region=0, passed=14962
Got 14962 stars (including 14469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4413, gap 8.4413 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QorugFbHMN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=621, bad_region=0, passed=15161
Got 15161 stars (including 14519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4408, gap 8.4408 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2fJYONWP8X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=324, bad_region=0, passed=12933
Got 12933 stars (including 12586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12933 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3143, gap 8.3143 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2424 through 0 to 8.3151, gap 8.3151 to 351.2424
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5333)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1376 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GXO2qg5Mn9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, bad_region=1, passed=13005
Got 13005 stars (including 12645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2429 through 0 to 8.3211, gap 8.3211 to 351.2429
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2422 through 0 to 8.3219, gap 8.3219 to 351.2422
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1277 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1380 n_q4=1112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:02.00 -15:05:27.8:  13.79 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:38:36.04 -13:44:14.7:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1:  14.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:58.67 -13:18:33.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:04.42 -23:10:43.7:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3:  14.90 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:25:34.18 -18:52:21.8:  11.52 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:30.61 -20:08:36.5:  12.92 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:42.5:  13.95 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:22.03 -14:52:51.7:  13.58 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:38:36.04 -13:44:14.7:  13.69 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:58.67 -13:18:33.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:58.67 -13:18:33.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:25:34.18 -18:52:21.8:  11.53 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:30.61 -20:08:36.5:  12.97 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:02.00 -15:05:27.8:  13.85 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:04.42 -23:10:43.7:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:04.42 -23:10:43.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1:  14.86 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:36.04 -13:44:14.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6346 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:34.18 -18:52:21.8: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8355 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.61 -20:08:36.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9203 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:02.00 -15:05:27.8: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3506 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:42.5:  13.83 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:42.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6295 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:22.03 -14:52:51.7:  13.69 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:22.03 -14:52:51.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4951 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:25:10.35 -13:51:53.5:  13.99 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:31:03.78 -15:42:23.0:  13.78 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:31:03.78 -15:42:23.0:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:25:10.35 -13:51:53.5:  13.90 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:03.78 -15:42:23.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7506 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:10.35 -13:51:53.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6598 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21395.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21272_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21272_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    12.81    00:28:30.56 -20:08:36.5   8936 2069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.12    00:28:30.66 -20:08:36.4   8929 2075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    11.80    00:25:34.22 -18:52:21.8   8494 2831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    11.87    00:25:34.15 -18:52:21.7   8487 2837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21291_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21291_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    8.97    00:31:58.67 -13:18:33.7   9377 6243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    9.01    00:31:58.66 -13:18:33.6   9370 6249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21395_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 21395_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21477_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21477_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    12.37    23:39:41.63 -14:14:12.8   1696 5263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

**** FOUND  23:39:41.71 -14:14:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21531_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21531_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    12.69    23:34:55.77 -15:14:47.9   1052 4593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

**** FOUND  23:34:55.73 -15:14:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21551_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 21551_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21729_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21729_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.37    00:15:04.39 -23:10:42.5   7087 0179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.35    00:15:04.44 -23:10:44.9   7081 0185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21739_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21739_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.57    23:38:36.12 -13:44:15.7   1515 5547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.75    23:38:35.96 -13:44:13.8   1508 5553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21754_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21754_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.44    00:30:02.03 -15:05:27.4   9102 5144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.29    00:30:01.97 -15:05:28.2   9095 5150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21767_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21767_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.48    00:30:22.02 -14:52:53.2   9149 5273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.51    00:30:22.03 -14:52:50.3   9142 5280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21770_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21770_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.62    00:31:52.40 -14:33:42.8   9371 5475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.64    00:31:52.35 -14:33:42.1   9364 5481   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21774_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21774_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.75    23:31:03.75 -15:42:22.8   0517 4258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.76    23:31:03.80 -15:42:23.2   0510 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21788_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21788_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 09.28024    2461261.78024    13.61    00:25:10.37 -13:51:52.3   8365 5869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-43-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    13.72    00:25:10.33 -13:51:54.7   8357 5874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 09.28115    2461261.78115    11.91    00:22:30.86 -18:32:45.2   8040 3023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_015626_TTUQ1b1x1_1065697_Ssvtml9n/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_01-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits

**** FOUND  00:22:30.90 -18:32:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3
00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1
########### Completed Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3
00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1
###################################################################################
23:58:25.08 -15:26:36.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:03:28.06 -15:28:28.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461261.78023809 -observatory V36
08:04:26.37 +20:15:43.7 Mercury (-0.7mag)
12:06:29.98 -01:33:39.6 Venus (-4.4mag)
05:52:21.15 +23:37:46.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:43:53.69 +18:37:45.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:20.52 +03:14:36.1 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:51.16 +20:57:16.2 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:16:02.34 +00:12:42.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:02.40 -23:30:35.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
05:58:08.11 +27:15:51.7 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug  9 01:58 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461261.78023809:
08:43:57.27 +18:37:31.3 Io (6.0mag)
08:43:58.86 +18:37:22.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:44:06.25 +18:36:48.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:44:09.82 +18:36:39.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:41:26.35 +18:37:46.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:43:58.32 +18:37:25.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:40:59.01 +18:36:05.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:48:01.06 +18:16:43.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:47:00.35 +18:48:15.2 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:07.69 +03:14:46.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:23.71 +03:14:37.1 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:32.82 +03:13:33.2 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:07.67 +03:14:17.9 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:41.59 +03:07:38.7 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  9 01:58 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461261.78023809:
19:07:14.96 -22:30:36.2 JWST
17:52:05.77 +32:43:57.9 Chandra
03:47:00.13 +57:54:49.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  9 01:58 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461261.78023809 -observatory V36
03:14:52.99 +17:28:00.5 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:29.94 -34:37:18.1 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:54:46.38 -68:56:22.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:06.13 +33:00:56.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:46:52.93 +38:07:34.0 16.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:37:45.99 +31:23:07.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:44:32.55 +26:31:23.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:22:32.77 +28:25:19.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:29:34.26 +05:18:14.8 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:38.55 -12:19:34.1 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:09:20.35 +65:53:57.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:46:46.82 -13:02:07.7 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:09:17.30 +31:23:37.2 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:47.02 +15:36:21.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:01:47.62 +43:08:43.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:09:10.06 +49:16:24.2 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:15:59.45 -12:57:20.3 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:56:55.47 +23:58:14.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:31:16.13 -16:17:10.0 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:21.76 +20:50:22.3 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:58:45.52 +02:16:50.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:02:53.12 +77:44:01.3 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:07:52.96 +46:12:30.8 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:47:39.45 +08:39:42.7 17.3mag A/2026 E1
21:59:31.38 -27:44:33.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:29:35.39 -03:27:49.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:40:33.47 +32:32:42.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:09:50.92 +04:17:42.8 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:54:09.54 -05:29:16.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:37:57.57 +20:40:54.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:37:00.72 -23:38:51.2 17.7mag 84P/Giclas
03:01:47.74 +13:46:16.2 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:58:37.02 +27:31:06.8 16.2mag 93P/Lovas
04:09:17.60 +17:16:58.2 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:59:59.48 +30:12:07.1 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:21:00.68 +26:28:19.3 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:45:49.57 -10:40:30.6 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:38:07.64 +21:10:37.6 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:30:20.30 +18:51:02.4 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:13.72 +03:23:52.0 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:19:52.09 -19:08:22.5 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:19:50.46 +37:51:40.3 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:52:29.01 +41:22:17.9 12.1mag 169P/NEAT
02:44:57.56 +09:31:48.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:42:07.94 -10:09:55.9 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR
20:21:40.76 -52:49:12.8 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:25:12.56 +25:37:05.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:08:34.86 +37:41:37.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:10:48.70 +03:01:22.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
09:01:51.26 +18:19:28.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  9 01:58 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  9 01:58 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  9 01:58 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
02:27:10.045 +36:08:07.18  AT 2026wen  2026-07-22.43 20.04
01:17:11.858 +43:13:46.93  AT 2026wem  2026-07-03.45 20.3459
20:51:08.964 +18:09:10.80  AT 2026wel  2026-07-21.37 20.276
22:08:07.720 -53:03:58.03  AT 2026wek  2026-07-24.88 18.736
14:52:41.154 -38:57:24.25  AT 2026wej  2026-07-24.81 18.497
21:24:57.173 +01:23:35.53  AT 2026wei  2026-07-21.60 20.35
02:03:17.642 -30:45:34.31  AT 2026weh  2026-07-24.56 18.896
01:05:30.285 -23:04:46.16  AT 2026weg  2026-07-24.51 18.833
12:18:53.701 +49:05:35.94  AT 2026wef  2026-07-24.89 18.37
00:31:47.490 -16:38:50.31  AT 2026wee  2026-07-25.19 20.36
00:41:24.189 +40:49:02.51  AT 2026wed  2026-07-24.39 19.4
18:33:30.559 +21:17:13.86  AT 2026wec  2026-07-21.23 20.6788
16:41:26.073 +03:58:26.03  AT 2026web  2026-07-22.18 20.4272
14:59:20.616 +53:48:39.79  AT 2026wea  2026-07-23.21 20.1637
00:02:07.519 -27:50:29.82  AT 2026wdz  2026-07-24.52 19.356
00:56:54.422 -35:55:30.03  AT 2026wdy  2026-07-24.54 18.247
23:52:29.687 -30:57:24.57  AT 2026wdx  2026-07-24.52 18.847
19:36:24.748 -08:19:41.57  AT 2026wdw  2026-07-16.31 20.836
21:30:37.788 -00:05:34.60  AT 2026wdv  2026-07-22.36 20.43
21:28:36.386 +12:07:45.35  AT 2026wdu  2026-07-24.55 20.86
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug  9 01:58 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Aug  9 01:58:18 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 26s (0.43 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 42s (0.70 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 8s (0.13 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 26s (0.43 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q1b1x1: 81s (1.35 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 97s (1.62 min)
Finished: Sun Aug  9 01:59:55 CDT 2026