This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2088 2461261.7088 13.51 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1
140.11772 9.55274 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461261.7088,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260809.2088 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2088 2461261.7088 12.19 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1
146.60664 17.84843 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053908.86+661735.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.110 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053908.86+661735.7,2461261.7088,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053908.86+661735.7 20260809.2088 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2088 2461261.7088 13.18 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0
139.89288 18.96297 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0515082+722445
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.107 g Y 6.210 g 2458554.98930 311.279573400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0515082+722445,2461261.7088,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0515082+722445 20260809.2088 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2088 2461261.7088 10.74 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3
143.89869 15.91911 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 0.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J050846.49+673323.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.690 V 12.010 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050846.49+673323.5,2461261.7088,10.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050846.49+673323.5 20260809.2088 10.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461261.70904267 09.08.2026 05:00:51.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14168
Objects passed selection criteria: 14114
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10312.8
Average stars matched: 10000.8 (96.9746 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 00:06:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461261.70904267 09.08.2026 05:00:51.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99287
Objects passed selection criteria: 99011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72932.2
Average stars matched: 70086 (96.0974 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 495908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 00:07:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.70854860
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0720 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00133 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00133 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jr7LvgQ7dr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Krl9hHOFbr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Ww5rtR0o1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nl6XR6dylS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec +62.8761 to +75.4908 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec 62.8761 to 75.4908 deg
Loaded 14321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7671 out of 8229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8229 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jr7LvgQ7dr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, bad_region=0, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 13659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1320 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Krl9hHOFbr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, bad_region=0, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 13753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1325 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Ww5rtR0o1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, bad_region=0, passed=5783
Got 5783 stars (including 5538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=7.733 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.889 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.064 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.477 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.534
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.477 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1226 n_q2=891 n_q3=1582 n_q4=1187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nl6XR6dylS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, bad_region=1, passed=5833
Got 5833 stars (including 5572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=7.728 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.052 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.074 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.502 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.521
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1227 n_q2=879 n_q3=1590 n_q4=1170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.343
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.368
reference average sigma_overall=0.3705 worst_q_ratio=1.2375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4915 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4916 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 21013_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.94 +67:25:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21072_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 21072_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:16.89 +66:08:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13822_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 13822_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.27 +65:12:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 14603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:05.69 +65:13:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14342_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 14342_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.82 +64:52:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12046_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 12046_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:19.88 +66:51:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 10051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:19.23 +68:04:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02355_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 02355_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:28.58 +73:34:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12941_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 12941_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:50.72 +64:52:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07904_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 07904_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:17.40 +69:27:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12276_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 12276_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.93 +66:20:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0720 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:12.829 +69:58:16.42
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:13.696 +69:58:18.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00133 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00133 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VsA1QSPOe9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FYEHWL6fxb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K0mGOGEPRF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tGcqyezjDK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec +62.8267 to +75.5092 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec 62.8267 to 75.5092 deg
Loaded 14512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6694 out of 8433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8433 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 117 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VsA1QSPOe9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=48, blended=8978, bad_region=3, passed=107709
Got 107709 stars (including 98548 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1319 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FYEHWL6fxb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8926, bad_region=5, passed=108230
Got 108230 stars (including 99117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1142 n_q2=1339 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K0mGOGEPRF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1445, bad_region=8, passed=38586
Got 38586 stars (including 37071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1194 n_q2=859 n_q3=1627 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tGcqyezjDK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1397, bad_region=9, passed=39150
Got 39150 stars (including 37687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1188 n_q2=855 n_q3=1628 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_000417_TTUQ1b1x1_1368747_jrvl7iGz/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:35.64 +70:50:10.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:59.33 +68:33:53.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:55.78 +68:00:19.7: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:59.33 +68:33:53.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:55.78 +68:00:19.7: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:35.64 +70:50:10.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:59.33 +68:33:53.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9083 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:55.78 +68:00:19.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5151 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:35.64 +70:50:10.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9215 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:54:54.39 +70:13:00.7: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:54:54.39 +70:13:00.7: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:54.39 +70:13:00.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9495 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:55:13.85 +66:04:59.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:08.79 +66:17:36.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1839 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:15:08.04 +72:24:42.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1333 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:08:46.35 +67:33:23.3: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7390 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out128859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127471_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127471_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:16.12 +73:34:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127480_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127480_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:16.12 +68:38:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127481_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127481_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127482_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127482_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127483_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127483_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127485_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127485_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:14.67 +71:15:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127486_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127486_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:20.54 +72:25:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:48.11 +65:17:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127586_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127586_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127610_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127610_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.06 +66:08:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127684_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127684_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127696_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127696_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127717_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127717_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127808_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127808_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127889_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127889_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127942_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127942_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127965_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127965_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:19.79 +66:10:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:27.64 +68:34:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 127999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:25.04 +67:32:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:22.03 +66:31:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128091_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128091_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128125_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128125_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:46.99 +73:40:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128158_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128158_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.26 +66:57:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128196_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128196_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128207_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128207_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:33.78 +68:11:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128208_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128208_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.71 +72:09:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:40.96 +74:39:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128229_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128229_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.33 +71:07:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:58.02 +72:49:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128282_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128282_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.80 +66:49:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128307_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128307_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:14.23 +72:51:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:55.82 +75:06:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128316_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128316_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128318_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128318_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.32 +68:12:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128333_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128333_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.89 +66:22:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128350_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128350_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:31.13 +69:21:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128354_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128354_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.70 +69:04:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:47.45 +72:59:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128406_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128406_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:06.69 +72:35:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:06.20 +66:30:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128481_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128481_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:45.79 +71:17:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128494_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128494_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128557_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128557_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128570_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128570_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.15 +67:29:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128593_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128593_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:38.08 +70:38:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128628_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128628_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128631_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128631_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:00.99 +73:22:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128635_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128635_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:17.70 +73:02:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128672_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128672_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128712_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128712_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:28.87 +71:45:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.41 +65:39:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128734_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128734_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:47.49 +71:41:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128743_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128743_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128763_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128763_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128801_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128801_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:45.58 +70:46:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128809_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128809_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128859_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 128859_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128869_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128869_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128907_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128907_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128913_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 128913_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33408_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 33408_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.36 +70:53:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:48.86 +69:31:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95669_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 95669_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:06.37 +66:40:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119628_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 119628_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.35 +71:13:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23549_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 23549_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 91228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.70 +66:34:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 55893_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:22.70 +69:56:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 87163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:48.76 +66:23:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 41575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:21.28 +70:57:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82250_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82250_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:59.40 +65:59:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:08.66 +71:22:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64663_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 64663_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:30.67 +68:59:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:32.33 +68:35:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72159_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 72159_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:22.42 +64:49:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:39.27 +68:54:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:36.65 +66:45:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99504_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 99504_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:33.27 +67:33:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11858_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 11858_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.82 +64:14:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 88510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:49.48 +66:41:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.94 +67:25:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69107_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 69107_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:57.18 +65:19:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 69571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:46.02 +64:26:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:39.20 +66:55:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73502_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 73502_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:40.71 +67:24:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57821_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 57821_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:02.55 +68:13:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84349_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 84349_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:03.82 +65:55:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91170_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 91170_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:19.88 +66:51:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 74495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:19.24 +68:04:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 106426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:19.71 +66:35:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62771_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 62771_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:43.44 +67:21:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 72855_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:50.72 +64:52:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57544_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 57544_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:17.42 +69:27:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102424_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 102424_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 69092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:05.68 +65:13:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94377_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 94377_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.29 +65:12:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67504_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 67504_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.83 +64:52:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 15174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:28.59 +73:34:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 18310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:00.30 +73:29:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:20.29 +69:51:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86380_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 86380_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:29.17 +65:03:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:09.58 +68:45:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104192_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 104192_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:13.30 +68:10:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88581_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 88581_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.94 +66:20:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 85042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:26.34 +65:41:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66857_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 66857_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:40.47 +65:08:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 70988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_00-00-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
