Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461259.7859,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260807.2859 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 675422 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 675422 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits

renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1280.6199
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 530.2612
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1284.6414
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 530.3125
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.93542
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-07T01:51:08.7023735' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-07T06:51:08.7023735' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61259.2855173843 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-07T06:51:18.6040392' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61259.2856319905 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 89.7963183234976 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0211133776705 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1533333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.06694444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98513803143566 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)
Spent 0.841134 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-07T01:51:58.1962136' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-07T06:51:58.1962136' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61259.2860902315 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-07T06:52:08.1000625' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61259.286204861 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 89.7963176676143 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 85.0211134180084 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1655555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.0825 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98441502157416 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)
Spent 0.841713 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits

fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461259.78563312
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37
Second-epoch second image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00136 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00136 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q2Wgn4hZRA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztTagAdha9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NsfodBcTEb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zTcCmBIkO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg
Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Q2Wgn4hZRA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096
Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ztTagAdha9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185
Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NsfodBcTEb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=8921
Got 8921 stars (including 8487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8921 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0295 through 0 to 179.9693, gap 179.9693 to 180.0295
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0261 through 0 to 179.9662, gap 179.9662 to 180.0261
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=9.219 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.047 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.322 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.323
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1131 n_q3=1358 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8zTcCmBIkO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=0, passed=8941
Got 8941 stars (including 8507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0301 through 0 to 179.9694, gap 179.9694 to 180.0301
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0264 through 0 to 179.9661, gap 179.9661 to 180.0264
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=9.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.169 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=0.857 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1427 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1350 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.112
new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.106
reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9268 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.09 | 04:13:05.83 +86:52:28.6 | 3936 4519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:13:05.59 +86:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21482_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 21482_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.00 | 06:23:25.69 +80:04:17.5 | 5521 0292 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 06:23:25.64 +80:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 22192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.83 | 08:22:43.38 +86:04:51.3 | 6165 4352 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 08:22:43.48 +86:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22319_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 22319_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.05 | 00:27:20.95 +86:54:59.4 | 2885 5955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 00:27:20.79 +86:54:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22396_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 22396_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 11.92 | 07:11:50.90 +83:18:52.3 | 6087 2435 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.93 | 07:11:50.77 +83:18:52.4 | 6086 2436 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 9.99 | 02:43:16.11 +81:08:13.4 | 0784 2596 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:43:16.10 +81:08:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 10.69 | 04:55:34.54 +80:57:34.0 | 3383 0945 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:55:34.56 +80:57:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37
Second-epoch second image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00136 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00136 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0G4Ip6N2PW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jfdZ4vzgQR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ex9s13xKJF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d6lX761LWM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0G4Ip6N2PW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560
Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jfdZ4vzgQR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103
Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ex9s13xKJF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2004, bad_region=14, passed=46729
Got 46729 stars (including 44656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0001 through 0 to 179.9962, gap 179.9962 to 180.0001
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9919, gap 179.9919 to 180.0260
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1401 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1378 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d6lX761LWM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1990, bad_region=17, passed=46492
Got 46492 stars (including 44423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0052 through 0 to 179.9915, gap 179.9915 to 180.0052
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0263 through 0 to 179.9933, gap 179.9933 to 180.0263
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1115 n_q3=1373 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3406 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0153 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5032 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0676 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5363 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5779 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8335 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9894 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9118 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3130 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2061 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4991 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3451 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6035 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6202 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6376 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7081 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7982 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7511 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4899 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7162 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9034 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8543 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91164_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91164_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 14.45 | 01:56:13.45 +83:19:04.3 | 1261 4155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.27 | 01:56:13.38 +83:19:05.5 | 1260 4157 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 14.44 | 00:31:07.58 +84:22:21.9 | 1364 5667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.59 | 00:31:05.02 +84:22:23.2 | 1364 5669 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 14.08 | 00:47:24.24 +83:52:10.2 | 1117 5357 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.06 | 00:47:23.14 +83:52:08.9 | 1117 5358 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.93 | 02:08:50.46 +82:27:23.9 | 0947 3675 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.15 | 02:08:50.25 +82:27:21.2 | 0946 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.58 | 06:08:21.93 +81:29:10.1 | 5074 1109 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 06:08:21.79 +81:29:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.00 | 01:22:41.73 +85:18:50.5 | 2112 5149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 01:22:41.51 +85:18:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.27 | 02:29:03.80 +82:12:42.7 | 1074 3260 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:29:03.90 +82:12:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.54 | 23:56:00.63 +85:36:58.2 | 2072 6200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.53 | 23:55:59.45 +85:36:56.0 | 2071 6201 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.83 | 02:46:54.67 +84:36:26.9 | 2372 3986 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:46:54.73 +84:36:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91941_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91941_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 10.84 | 08:35:20.98 +80:11:56.8 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92351_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 92351_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.71 | 02:21:37.92 +89:03:01.6 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 92870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.16 | 00:27:21.04 +86:54:59.5 | 2885 5955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 00:27:20.86 +86:54:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93398_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93398_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.25 | 05:07:50.45 +80:46:01.8 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.54 | 05:59:00.00 +84:15:22.9 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93890_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93890_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 12.60 | 03:13:28.30 +84:02:25.7 | 2429 3465 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.56 | 03:13:28.03 +84:02:24.7 | 2429 3466 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.79 | 23:41:08.45 +89:36:32.8 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 12.84 | 07:09:19.61 +85:35:57.6 | 5596 3721 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.83 | 07:09:19.99 +85:35:57.6 | 5596 3722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94736_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94736_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 12.99 | 03:11:11.64 +83:35:19.8 | 2225 3280 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.99 | 03:11:11.51 +83:35:19.5 | 2224 3281 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94843_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94843_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.76 | 08:26:05.10 +79:40:41.5 | 8593 1326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95037_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95037_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.16 | 00:45:10.57 +84:26:51.0 | 1452 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.08 | 04:03:06.15 +81:13:04.3 | 2291 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:03:06.02 +81:13:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 12.92 | 09:36:25.77 +81:21:15.5 | 9062 3293 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.90 | 09:36:26.11 +81:21:16.4 | 9061 3293 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95387_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95387_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.08 | 04:27:23.30 +80:51:07.4 | 2722 1087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:27:23.38 +80:51:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95433_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95433_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.06 | 05:19:01.61 +81:13:20.2 | 3952 0994 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 05:19:01.44 +81:13:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.31 | 02:48:16.64 +81:52:37.7 | 1192 2823 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.32 | 02:48:15.59 +81:52:39.9 | 1191 2825 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.97 | 03:25:58.55 +87:25:25.0 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95595_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95595_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.28 | 02:36:37.30 +81:39:20.4 | 0919 2919 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:36:37.36 +81:39:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.46 | 23:45:11.60 +88:51:23.0 | 4039 6258 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 23:45:11.93 +88:51:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.21 | 04:39:25.43 +82:29:55.5 | 3309 1935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.20 | 04:39:25.81 +82:29:54.7 | 3308 1936 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.50 | 00:22:28.94 +83:23:51.3 | 0751 5719 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.50 | 00:22:28.98 +83:23:53.1 | 0751 5721 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.30 | 02:36:30.58 +89:12:56.9 | 4372 5923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:36:38.30 +89:12:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.32 | 03:26:11.21 +81:26:26.2 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.32 | 05:16:55.77 +84:11:27.9 | 4184 2770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.38 | 05:16:55.38 +84:11:28.0 | 4184 2771 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95954_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95954_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.50 | 08:17:19.37 +80:16:14.5 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96016_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96016_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.46 | 02:59:25.29 +85:11:50.7 | 2742 4121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:59:25.52 +85:11:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96071_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96071_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.21 | 01:05:35.17 +82:14:10.7 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.45 | 03:53:06.26 +83:43:36.5 | 2845 2949 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96434_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96434_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.57 | 02:45:36.67 +83:37:54.8 | 1929 3594 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.64 | 02:45:36.07 +83:37:51.9 | 1928 3595 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.62 | 02:55:08.88 +82:23:39.2 | 1516 2945 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:55:08.35 +82:23:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.32 | 09:05:26.21 +80:14:26.4 | 9126 2284 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 09:05:26.25 +80:14:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96833_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96833_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.36 | 02:50:39.30 +81:13:10.9 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.61 | 03:47:58.98 +80:54:20.1 | 1888 1528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.64 | 03:47:59.48 +80:54:22.9 | 1887 1529 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.79 | 01:24:18.50 +84:31:14.1 | 1676 4942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.54 | 01:24:18.74 +84:31:15.0 | 1676 4943 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.86 | 01:26:15.88 +81:49:08.9 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.93 | 01:16:18.66 +87:07:15.1 | 3104 5613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 01:16:18.79 +87:07:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97135_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97135_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.72 | 03:12:22.03 +87:11:03.6 | 3636 4929 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.70 | 03:12:21.76 +87:11:02.3 | 3636 4930 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.86 | 00:01:54.94 +83:52:15.7 | 1007 6091 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.76 | 00:01:54.46 +83:52:16.1 | 1007 6092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.76 | 01:54:50.24 +83:46:14.8 | 1485 4316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.75 | 01:54:51.56 +83:46:11.3 | 1485 4317 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97337_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97337_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.57 | 10:00:04.44 +83:27:36.3 | 8214 4361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.43 | 10:00:03.74 +83:27:36.0 | 8214 4361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97364_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97364_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.02 | 01:50:37.05 +81:42:04.6 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97416_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97416_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.84 | 01:08:05.79 +86:13:15.4 | 2567 5495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.64 | 01:08:08.53 +86:13:21.7 | 2568 5496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.91 | 01:14:13.18 +82:02:45.2 | 0201 4553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.90 | 01:14:12.49 +82:02:47.5 | 0201 4555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97455_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97455_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.79 | 02:55:33.75 +82:06:23.4 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97926_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97926_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.03 | 00:38:15.84 +83:21:18.6 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.53 | 09:45:34.18 +81:26:22.3 | 9133 3495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.83 | 02:42:29.70 +81:06:52.7 | 0762 2600 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.38 | 08:16:24.45 +84:04:37.4 | 6818 3333 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 08:16:24.63 +84:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.67 | 08:25:31.77 +88:36:18.2 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.89 | 04:10:33.02 +81:42:18.5 | 2574 1712 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.54 | 04:10:33.80 +81:42:18.6 | 2573 1713 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 07.28563 | 2461259.78563 | 13.86 | 07:57:34.87 +85:13:13.7 | 6218 3762 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.85 | 07:57:30.88 +85:13:15.4 | 6217 3762 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98375_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98375_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.17 | 01:09:25.31 +84:46:39.6 | 1744 5196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.03 | 03:03:08.46 +81:06:26.1 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.62 | 23:50:36.77 +84:30:55.5 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98796_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98796_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.74 | 01:16:15.74 +87:13:05.1 | 3159 5634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99027_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99027_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.16 | 07:57:49.75 +81:22:52.3 | 7420 1780 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99328_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99328_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 13.97 | 04:02:46.31 +86:23:22.5 | 3725 4297 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99395_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99395_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.36 | 06:38:57.54 +82:56:10.4 | 5576 2058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99503_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
Preparing report for the candidate 99503_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99516_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99516_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.29 | 08:18:39.01 +80:43:01.7 | 8054 1715 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.48 | 00:48:10.03 +87:34:03.0 | 3302 5882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99746_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99746_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.07 | 06:35:47.04 +82:15:00.1 | 5595 1640 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99761_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99761_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.47 | 05:08:13.31 +81:25:21.6 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99797_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99797_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 14.77 | 07:15:26.22 +83:58:31.2 | 6005 2830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 12.49 | 04:21:48.51 +84:46:14.6 | 3512 3321 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:21:48.76 +84:46:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.06 | 06:23:25.63 +80:04:17.6 | 5521 0292 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13644_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 13644_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 11.82 | 08:22:43.32 +86:04:51.3 | 6165 4352 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 08:22:43.43 +86:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 10.14 | 02:43:16.13 +81:08:13.4 | 0784 2596 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 02:43:16.12 +81:08:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 07.28621 | 2461259.78621 | 10.71 | 04:55:34.59 +80:57:34.1 | 3383 0945 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits |
**** FOUND 04:55:34.58 +80:57:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0
########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0
###################################################################################
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461259.78563312 -observatory V36
07:51:49.62 +20:22:58.8 Mercury (-0.5mag)
11:59:28.62 -00:35:16.6 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:46:32.99 +23:34:39.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:42:05.90 +18:44:25.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:29.03 +03:16:03.9 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:37.39 +20:56:40.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:09.26 +00:13:32.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:13.85 -23:29:49.3 Pluto (14.4mag)
03:50:11.54 +24:44:20.7 Moon (-10.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 7 01:53 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461259.78563312:
08:42:04.68 +18:44:32.4 Io (6.0mag)
08:42:00.17 +18:44:51.4 Europa (6.3mag)
08:42:16.42 +18:43:43.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:42:02.31 +18:44:44.8 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:39:40.57 +18:43:13.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:42:10.43 +18:44:06.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:39:11.92 +18:41:56.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:46:12.37 +18:24:19.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:45:20.50 +18:54:29.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:21.90 +03:16:29.6 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:26.21 +03:15:49.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:35.72 +03:14:37.6 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:14.22 +03:16:07.4 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:52.68 +03:09:22.1 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 7 01:54 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461259.78563312:
18:59:19.75 -23:31:39.2 JWST
19:08:41.70 +07:03:31.4 Chandra
03:47:31.13 +57:51:54.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 7 01:54 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461259.78563312 -observatory V36
03:12:37.15 +17:17:56.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:04.14 -34:38:03.8 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:52:54.93 -68:51:57.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:09:34.37 +32:58:25.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:40:57.68 +37:14:23.0 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:39:24.55 +31:30:19.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:42:33.21 +26:33:26.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:20:41.98 +28:30:42.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:28:13.95 +05:17:56.0 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:18.81 -12:14:54.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:11:59.25 +66:07:13.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:48:47.09 -12:50:56.3 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:07:02.71 +31:18:13.0 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:06.37 +15:36:48.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:04:18.62 +43:01:49.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:12:06.68 +49:09:01.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:14:23.28 -12:58:46.4 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:55:37.37 +24:19:18.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:30:25.20 -16:00:38.9 17.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:35.47 +20:57:54.6 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:57:33.82 +02:24:45.8 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:03:17.95 +77:55:18.8 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:07:09.08 +46:10:06.4 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:46:00.87 +08:26:55.7 17.3mag A/2026 E1
21:57:18.84 -26:54:36.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:28:23.78 -03:20:26.9 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:38:05.30 +32:21:39.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:05:46.73 +04:56:55.2 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:54:16.17 -05:24:53.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:33:25.76 +20:42:55.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:38:49.48 -23:25:00.5 17.8mag 84P/Giclas
02:59:49.16 +13:37:20.8 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:53:30.56 +27:47:17.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:03:41.47 +16:30:28.7 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:53:23.45 +30:24:42.7 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:16:16.54 +26:48:33.7 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:41:50.71 -09:54:29.5 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:35:10.69 +21:11:03.3 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:26:55.08 +18:56:49.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:33.06 +03:24:57.6 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:17.48 -19:42:31.0 13.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:12:56.18 +37:45:16.6 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
15:31:01.98 +40:19:07.7 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
02:41:17.86 +09:29:53.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:41:06.17 -10:01:14.5 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR
20:22:59.47 -52:50:54.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:19:23.06 +24:46:26.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:02:33.31 +37:44:14.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:10:10.24 +03:14:33.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
09:00:01.93 +18:25:20.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 7 01:54 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 7 01:53 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 7 01:53 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:34:33.379 -13:40:57.83 AT 2026vtz 2026-04-22.30 20.87
17:46:27.198 +16:14:44.66 AT 2026vty 2026-05-25.55 21.43
14:56:46.917 -03:48:35.10 AT 2026vtx 2026-06-19.29 21.49
17:22:45.609 +22:50:07.57 AT 2026vtw 2026-05-14.43 21.36
12:21:04.077 -04:01:32.77 AT 2026vtv 2026-02-12.60 20.93
08:14:22.938 +42:27:50.51 AT 2026vtu 2026-01-16.42 20.75
13:48:52.546 -14:32:34.25 AT 2026vtt 2026-05-12.35 21.06
12:45:12.544 +30:35:49.54 SN 2026vts 2026-07-23.20 19.5187
15:54:43.153 +77:05:59.01 AT 2026vtr 2026-07-14.23 20.7687
18:39:56.576 +36:55:41.65 AT 2026vtq 2026-07-15.29 21.179
18:20:04.654 +51:48:07.73 AT 2026vtp 2026-07-12.34 20.506
02:21:08.216 +53:58:20.22 AT 2026vto 2026-07-12.58 18.923
19:18:15.750 -28:25:14.27 AT 2026vtn 2026-07-19.42 19.037
06:18:40.102 -63:52:11.78 AT 2026vtm 2026-07-22.15 18.964
01:25:20.341 +54:04:44.58 AT 2026vtl 2026-07-21.55 18.936
00:31:18.789 +26:35:38.20 AT 2026vtk 2026-07-11.13 18.674
19:17:17.916 -52:23:30.97 AT 2026vtj 2026-07-20.03 18.733
21:18:22.563 -55:04:03.54 AT 2026vti 2026-07-07.91 19.06
13:14:42.843 +01:11:46.35 AT 2026vth 2026-07-07.04 19.288
22:44:00.748 -67:12:53.39 AT 2026vtg 2026-07-22.03 19.382
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 7 01:53 tns_transients_list.txt