NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    14.05    09:07:05.20 +80:13:51.4   9160 2312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.82    09:07:05.71 +80:13:46.6   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 07.2859  2461259.7859  13.94  09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0
132.51698  32.25113 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 675422 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 675422 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits

renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1280.6199 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 530.2612 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1284.6414 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 530.3125 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.93542 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-07T01:51:08.7023735' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-07T06:51:08.7023735' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61259.2855173843 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-07T06:51:18.6040392' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61259.2856319905 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7963183234976 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0211133776705 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1533333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.06694444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98513803143566 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :) Spent 0.841134 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-07T01:51:58.1962136' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-07T06:51:58.1962136' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61259.2860902315 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-07T06:52:08.1000625' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61259.286204861 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7963176676143 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0211134180084 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1655555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.0825 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98441502157416 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :) Spent 0.841713 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461259.78563312 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00136 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00136 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q2Wgn4hZRA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztTagAdha9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NsfodBcTEb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zTcCmBIkO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 3.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 3.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Q2Wgn4hZRA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096 Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ztTagAdha9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185 Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NsfodBcTEb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=8921 Got 8921 stars (including 8487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8921 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0295 through 0 to 179.9693, gap 179.9693 to 180.0295 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0261 through 0 to 179.9662, gap 179.9662 to 180.0261 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=9.219 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.047 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.323 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.322 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.323 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1131 n_q3=1358 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8zTcCmBIkO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=0, passed=8941 Got 8941 stars (including 8507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8941 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0301 through 0 to 179.9694, gap 179.9694 to 180.0301 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0264 through 0 to 179.9661, gap 179.9661 to 180.0264 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=9.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.169 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4913 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4913 robust_rms_before=0.857 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1427 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1350 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.112 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.106 reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:50.83 +83:18:52.4: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9268 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.09    04:13:05.83 +86:52:28.6   3936 4519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:13:05.59 +86:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21482_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 21482_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.00    06:23:25.69 +80:04:17.5   5521 0292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.64 +80:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 22192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.83    08:22:43.38 +86:04:51.3   6165 4352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 08:22:43.48 +86:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22319_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 22319_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.05    00:27:20.95 +86:54:59.4   2885 5955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 00:27:20.79 +86:54:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22396_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 22396_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    11.92    07:11:50.90 +83:18:52.3   6087 2435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.93    07:11:50.77 +83:18:52.4   6086 2436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    9.99    02:43:16.11 +81:08:13.4   0784 2596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.10 +81:08:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    10.69    04:55:34.54 +80:57:34.0   3383 0945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.56 +80:57:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:23.090 +84:58:00.37 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:25.469 +84:57:56.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00136 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00136 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0G4Ip6N2PW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jfdZ4vzgQR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ex9s13xKJF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d6lX761LWM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.0G4Ip6N2PW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560 Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.jfdZ4vzgQR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103 Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ex9s13xKJF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2004, bad_region=14, passed=46729 Got 46729 stars (including 44656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0001 through 0 to 179.9962, gap 179.9962 to 180.0001 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9919, gap 179.9919 to 180.0260 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1401 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1378 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.d6lX761LWM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1990, bad_region=17, passed=46492 Got 46492 stars (including 44423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46492 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0052 through 0 to 179.9915, gap 179.9915 to 180.0052 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0263 through 0 to 179.9933, gap 179.9933 to 180.0263 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1115 n_q3=1373 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:13.42 +83:19:04.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3406 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:50.36 +82:27:22.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0153 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:06.30 +84:22:22.6: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5032 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:23.69 +83:52:09.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0676 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:00.04 +85:36:57.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5363 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.17 +84:02:25.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5779 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:19.80 +85:35:57.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8335 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.58 +83:35:19.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9894 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:25.94 +81:21:16.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9118 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:16.12 +81:52:38.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3130 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.62 +82:29:55.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2061 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.96 +83:23:52.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4991 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:55.57 +84:11:27.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3451 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:36.37 +83:37:53.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6035 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.23 +80:54:21.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6202 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:18.62 +84:31:14.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6376 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:21.89 +87:11:02.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7081 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:54.70 +83:52:15.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7982 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:50.90 +83:46:13.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7511 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:04.09 +83:27:36.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4899 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:07.16 +86:13:18.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7162 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:12.83 +82:02:46.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9034 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:33.41 +81:42:18.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:32.87 +85:13:14.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8543 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91164_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91164_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    14.45    01:56:13.45 +83:19:04.3   1261 4155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.27    01:56:13.38 +83:19:05.5   1260 4157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    14.44    00:31:07.58 +84:22:21.9   1364 5667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.59    00:31:05.02 +84:22:23.2   1364 5669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    14.08    00:47:24.24 +83:52:10.2   1117 5357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.06    00:47:23.14 +83:52:08.9   1117 5358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91178_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.93    02:08:50.46 +82:27:23.9   0947 3675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.15    02:08:50.25 +82:27:21.2   0946 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91179_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.58    06:08:21.93 +81:29:10.1   5074 1109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 06:08:21.79 +81:29:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.00    01:22:41.73 +85:18:50.5   2112 5149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 01:22:41.51 +85:18:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91182_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.27    02:29:03.80 +82:12:42.7   1074 3260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:29:03.90 +82:12:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.54    23:56:00.63 +85:36:58.2   2072 6200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.53    23:55:59.45 +85:36:56.0   2071 6201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.83    02:46:54.67 +84:36:26.9   2372 3986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:46:54.73 +84:36:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91941_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 91941_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    10.84    08:35:20.98 +80:11:56.8   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92351_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 92351_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.71    02:21:37.92 +89:03:01.6   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 92870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.16    00:27:21.04 +86:54:59.5   2885 5955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 00:27:20.86 +86:54:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93398_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 93398_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.25    05:07:50.45 +80:46:01.8   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 93870_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.54    05:59:00.00 +84:15:22.9   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93890_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 93890_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    12.60    03:13:28.30 +84:02:25.7   2429 3465   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.56    03:13:28.03 +84:02:24.7   2429 3466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 94073_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.79    23:41:08.45 +89:36:32.8   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 94531_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    12.84    07:09:19.61 +85:35:57.6   5596 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.83    07:09:19.99 +85:35:57.6   5596 3722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94736_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 94736_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    12.99    03:11:11.64 +83:35:19.8   2225 3280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.99    03:11:11.51 +83:35:19.5   2224 3281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94843_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 94843_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.76    08:26:05.10 +79:40:41.5   8593 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95037_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95037_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.16    00:45:10.57 +84:26:51.0   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95174_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.08    04:03:06.15 +81:13:04.3   2291 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:03:06.02 +81:13:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    12.92    09:36:25.77 +81:21:15.5   9062 3293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.90    09:36:26.11 +81:21:16.4   9061 3293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95387_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95387_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.08    04:27:23.30 +80:51:07.4   2722 1087   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:27:23.38 +80:51:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95433_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95433_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.06    05:19:01.61 +81:13:20.2   3952 0994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 05:19:01.44 +81:13:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95557_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.31    02:48:16.64 +81:52:37.7   1192 2823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.32    02:48:15.59 +81:52:39.9   1191 2825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95572_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.97    03:25:58.55 +87:25:25.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95595_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95595_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.28    02:36:37.30 +81:39:20.4   0919 2919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:36:37.36 +81:39:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.46    23:45:11.60 +88:51:23.0   4039 6258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 23:45:11.93 +88:51:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95672_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.21    04:39:25.43 +82:29:55.5   3309 1935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.20    04:39:25.81 +82:29:54.7   3308 1936   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.50    00:22:28.94 +83:23:51.3   0751 5719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.50    00:22:28.98 +83:23:53.1   0751 5721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95776_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.30    02:36:30.58 +89:12:56.9   4372 5923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:36:38.30 +89:12:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.32    03:26:11.21 +81:26:26.2   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.32    05:16:55.77 +84:11:27.9   4184 2770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.38    05:16:55.38 +84:11:28.0   4184 2771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95954_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 95954_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.50    08:17:19.37 +80:16:14.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96016_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96016_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.46    02:59:25.29 +85:11:50.7   2742 4121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:59:25.52 +85:11:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96071_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96071_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.21    01:05:35.17 +82:14:10.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96237_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.45    03:53:06.26 +83:43:36.5   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96434_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96434_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.57    02:45:36.67 +83:37:54.8   1929 3594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.64    02:45:36.07 +83:37:51.9   1928 3595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96659_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.62    02:55:08.88 +82:23:39.2   1516 2945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:55:08.35 +82:23:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96668_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.32    09:05:26.21 +80:14:26.4   9126 2284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 09:05:26.25 +80:14:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96833_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96833_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.36    02:50:39.30 +81:13:10.9   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 96857_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.61    03:47:58.98 +80:54:20.1   1888 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.64    03:47:59.48 +80:54:22.9   1887 1529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.79    01:24:18.50 +84:31:14.1   1676 4942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.54    01:24:18.74 +84:31:15.0   1676 4943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97103_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.86    01:26:15.88 +81:49:08.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.93    01:16:18.66 +87:07:15.1   3104 5613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 01:16:18.79 +87:07:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97135_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97135_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.72    03:12:22.03 +87:11:03.6   3636 4929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.70    03:12:21.76 +87:11:02.3   3636 4930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97155_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.86    00:01:54.94 +83:52:15.7   1007 6091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.76    00:01:54.46 +83:52:16.1   1007 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97199_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.76    01:54:50.24 +83:46:14.8   1485 4316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.75    01:54:51.56 +83:46:11.3   1485 4317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97337_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97337_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.57    10:00:04.44 +83:27:36.3   8214 4361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.43    10:00:03.74 +83:27:36.0   8214 4361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97364_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97364_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.02    01:50:37.05 +81:42:04.6   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97416_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97416_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.84    01:08:05.79 +86:13:15.4   2567 5495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.64    01:08:08.53 +86:13:21.7   2568 5496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97448_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.91    01:14:13.18 +82:02:45.2   0201 4553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.90    01:14:12.49 +82:02:47.5   0201 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97455_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97455_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.79    02:55:33.75 +82:06:23.4   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97926_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 97926_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.03    00:38:15.84 +83:21:18.6   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.53    09:45:34.18 +81:26:22.3   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98079_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.83    02:42:29.70 +81:06:52.7   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98107_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.38    08:16:24.45 +84:04:37.4   6818 3333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 08:16:24.63 +84:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.67    08:25:31.77 +88:36:18.2   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98282_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.89    04:10:33.02 +81:42:18.5   2574 1712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.54    04:10:33.80 +81:42:18.6   2573 1713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98325_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 07.28563    2461259.78563    13.86    07:57:34.87 +85:13:13.7   6218 3762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.85    07:57:30.88 +85:13:15.4   6217 3762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98375_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98375_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.17    01:09:25.31 +84:46:39.6   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.03    03:03:08.46 +81:06:26.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.62    23:50:36.77 +84:30:55.5   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98796_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 98796_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.74    01:16:15.74 +87:13:05.1   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99027_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99027_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.16    07:57:49.75 +81:22:52.3   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99328_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99328_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    13.97    04:02:46.31 +86:23:22.5   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99395_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99395_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.36    06:38:57.54 +82:56:10.4   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99503_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 Preparing report for the candidate 99503_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99516_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99516_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.29    08:18:39.01 +80:43:01.7   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99561_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.48    00:48:10.03 +87:34:03.0   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99746_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99746_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.07    06:35:47.04 +82:15:00.1   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99761_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99761_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.47    05:08:13.31 +81:25:21.6   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99797_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 99797_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    14.77    07:15:26.22 +83:58:31.2   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    12.49    04:21:48.51 +84:46:14.6   3512 3321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:21:48.76 +84:46:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.06    06:23:25.63 +80:04:17.6   5521 0292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13644_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 13644_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    11.82    08:22:43.32 +86:04:51.3   6165 4352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 08:22:43.43 +86:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    10.14    02:43:16.13 +81:08:13.4   0784 2596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.12 +81:08:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 07.28621    2461259.78621    10.71    04:55:34.59 +80:57:34.1   3383 0945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-07_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_015233_TTUQ1b1x1_2666804_hKgoyCT6/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-07_01-51-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.58 +80:57:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 ################################################################################### 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:07:05.46 +80:13:49.0 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461259.78563312 -observatory V36 07:51:49.62 +20:22:58.8 Mercury (-0.5mag) 11:59:28.62 -00:35:16.6 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:46:32.99 +23:34:39.4 Mars (1.3mag) 08:42:05.90 +18:44:25.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:29.03 +03:16:03.9 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:37.39 +20:56:40.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:09.26 +00:13:32.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:13.85 -23:29:49.3 Pluto (14.4mag) 03:50:11.54 +24:44:20.7 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 7 01:53 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461259.78563312: 08:42:04.68 +18:44:32.4 Io (6.0mag) 08:42:00.17 +18:44:51.4 Europa (6.3mag) 08:42:16.42 +18:43:43.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:42:02.31 +18:44:44.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:39:40.57 +18:43:13.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:42:10.43 +18:44:06.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:39:11.92 +18:41:56.5 Elara (17.7mag) 08:46:12.37 +18:24:19.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:45:20.50 +18:54:29.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:21.90 +03:16:29.6 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:26.21 +03:15:49.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:35.72 +03:14:37.6 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:14.22 +03:16:07.4 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:52.68 +03:09:22.1 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 7 01:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461259.78563312: 18:59:19.75 -23:31:39.2 JWST 19:08:41.70 +07:03:31.4 Chandra 03:47:31.13 +57:51:54.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 7 01:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461259.78563312 -observatory V36 03:12:37.15 +17:17:56.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:04.14 -34:38:03.8 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:52:54.93 -68:51:57.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:09:34.37 +32:58:25.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:40:57.68 +37:14:23.0 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:39:24.55 +31:30:19.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:42:33.21 +26:33:26.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:20:41.98 +28:30:42.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:28:13.95 +05:17:56.0 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:18.81 -12:14:54.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:11:59.25 +66:07:13.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:48:47.09 -12:50:56.3 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:07:02.71 +31:18:13.0 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:06.37 +15:36:48.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:04:18.62 +43:01:49.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:12:06.68 +49:09:01.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:14:23.28 -12:58:46.4 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:55:37.37 +24:19:18.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:30:25.20 -16:00:38.9 17.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:31:35.47 +20:57:54.6 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:57:33.82 +02:24:45.8 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:03:17.95 +77:55:18.8 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:07:09.08 +46:10:06.4 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:46:00.87 +08:26:55.7 17.3mag A/2026 E1 21:57:18.84 -26:54:36.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:28:23.78 -03:20:26.9 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:38:05.30 +32:21:39.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:05:46.73 +04:56:55.2 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:54:16.17 -05:24:53.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:33:25.76 +20:42:55.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:38:49.48 -23:25:00.5 17.8mag 84P/Giclas 02:59:49.16 +13:37:20.8 16.7mag 88P/Howell 07:53:30.56 +27:47:17.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:03:41.47 +16:30:28.7 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:53:23.45 +30:24:42.7 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:16:16.54 +26:48:33.7 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:41:50.71 -09:54:29.5 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:35:10.69 +21:11:03.3 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:26:55.08 +18:56:49.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:33.06 +03:24:57.6 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:21:17.48 -19:42:31.0 13.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:12:56.18 +37:45:16.6 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 15:31:01.98 +40:19:07.7 12.2mag 169P/NEAT 02:41:17.86 +09:29:53.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:41:06.17 -10:01:14.5 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR 20:22:59.47 -52:50:54.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:19:23.06 +24:46:26.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:02:33.31 +37:44:14.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:10:10.24 +03:14:33.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 09:00:01.93 +18:25:20.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 7 01:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 7 01:53 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 7 01:53 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 11:34:33.379 -13:40:57.83 AT 2026vtz 2026-04-22.30 20.87 17:46:27.198 +16:14:44.66 AT 2026vty 2026-05-25.55 21.43 14:56:46.917 -03:48:35.10 AT 2026vtx 2026-06-19.29 21.49 17:22:45.609 +22:50:07.57 AT 2026vtw 2026-05-14.43 21.36 12:21:04.077 -04:01:32.77 AT 2026vtv 2026-02-12.60 20.93 08:14:22.938 +42:27:50.51 AT 2026vtu 2026-01-16.42 20.75 13:48:52.546 -14:32:34.25 AT 2026vtt 2026-05-12.35 21.06 12:45:12.544 +30:35:49.54 SN 2026vts 2026-07-23.20 19.5187 15:54:43.153 +77:05:59.01 AT 2026vtr 2026-07-14.23 20.7687 18:39:56.576 +36:55:41.65 AT 2026vtq 2026-07-15.29 21.179 18:20:04.654 +51:48:07.73 AT 2026vtp 2026-07-12.34 20.506 02:21:08.216 +53:58:20.22 AT 2026vto 2026-07-12.58 18.923 19:18:15.750 -28:25:14.27 AT 2026vtn 2026-07-19.42 19.037 06:18:40.102 -63:52:11.78 AT 2026vtm 2026-07-22.15 18.964 01:25:20.341 +54:04:44.58 AT 2026vtl 2026-07-21.55 18.936 00:31:18.789 +26:35:38.20 AT 2026vtk 2026-07-11.13 18.674 19:17:17.916 -52:23:30.97 AT 2026vtj 2026-07-20.03 18.733 21:18:22.563 -55:04:03.54 AT 2026vti 2026-07-07.91 19.06 13:14:42.843 +01:11:46.35 AT 2026vth 2026-07-07.04 19.288 22:44:00.748 -67:12:53.39 AT 2026vtg 2026-07-22.03 19.382 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 7 01:53 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C