This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 9.31 20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3
16.93979 -31.75602 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 2 9.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1982* 20 26 53.37 -26 38 45.3 9.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461259.6982,9.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260807.1982 9.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 12.42 20:42:14.51 -25:35:42.0
19.32271 -34.75773 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:42:14.51 -25:35:42.0: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:42:14.51 -25:35:42.0: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1982* 20 42 14.51 -25 35 42.0 12.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461259.6982,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260807.1982 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 8.30 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0
13.07084 -25.67878 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J195611-2802.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.710 V Y 0.600 V 2452333.80000 121.681419000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0: 9.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.30 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195611-2802.4,2461259.6982,8.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195611-2802.4 20260807.1982 8.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 11.62 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7
13.72470 -28.01469 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.590 V 13.070 V
The object was found in astcheck.2353 Alva 511 158 535 15.2 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8,2461259.6982,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8 20260807.1982 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 12.22 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4
17.33691 -24.83347 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J195818.37-240709.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.160 V 13.780 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4: 13.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195818.37-240709.2,2461259.6982,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195818.37-240709.2 20260807.1982 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 10.59 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5
18.06167 -28.48170 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J201422-2443.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.750 V Y 1.020 V 2452366.80000 121.681419000000
The object was found in astcheck.6879 Hyogo 393 -303 496 17.3 0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1982* 20 14 22.03 -24 43 16.5 10.6 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201422-2443.3,2461259.6982,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201422-2443.3 20260807.1982 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1982 2461259.6982 9.89 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9
9.96325 -22.73468 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASAS J193916-2946.3
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 V 12.300 V 2452465.00000 67.770000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193916-2946.3,2461259.6982,9.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193916-2946.3 20260807.1982 9.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461259.69856256 07.08.2026 04:45:45.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6008
Objects passed selection criteria: 6002
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5542
Average stars matched: 5309.75 (95.8093 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 23:52:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461259.69856256 07.08.2026 04:45:45.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 101
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48011
Objects passed selection criteria: 47928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40652.8
Average stars matched: 38656.5 (95.0895 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 23:53:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461259.69782221
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QELXvxkixA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aTnwVMVBzb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pr3BdjlEPA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EmXgFta4A4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.364800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.364800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5072 out of 5182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5182 out of 6163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QELXvxkixA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=0, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 5421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1090 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aTnwVMVBzb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1323 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pr3BdjlEPA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=214, bad_region=0, passed=5143
Got 5143 stars (including 4925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5143 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=10.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.561 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4816 robust_rms_before=0.958 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.594 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.594 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1148 n_q2=830 n_q3=1595 n_q4=1243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EmXgFta4A4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, bad_region=0, passed=5187
Got 5187 stars (including 4960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=10.244 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.591 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.530
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:31.109 -25:59:30.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5187 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1118232.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.932 -> 0.403 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1146 n_q2=840 n_q3=1612 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.182
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.202
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.390
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.384
reference average sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (4855 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:03.54 -24:24:09.6: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.7: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:44:03.52 -25:13:16.7: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:41.8: 11.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:42.49 -23:51:21.5: 11.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:18.52 -24:56:11.2: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.7: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:03.54 -24:24:09.6: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.7: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8282 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:41.8: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:03.54 -24:24:09.6: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9558 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:24.88 -25:13:41.8: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1913 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:44:03.52 -25:13:16.7: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:42.49 -23:51:21.5: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:03.52 -25:13:16.7: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1330 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:42.49 -23:51:21.5: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2094 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:03.95 -22:06:49.0: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:45:24.36 -23:42:14.4: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:42.63 -21:36:34.9: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:18.52 -24:56:11.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:18.52 -24:56:11.2: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0063 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:03.95 -22:06:49.0: 11.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:03.95 -22:06:49.0: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1816 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:45:24.36 -23:42:14.4: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:42.63 -21:36:34.9: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:24.36 -23:42:14.4: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2406 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:42.63 -21:36:34.9: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2613 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:04:28.47 -21:06:38.1: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:21.26 -21:24:43.1: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:04:28.47 -21:06:38.1: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:28.47 -21:06:38.1: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2604 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:21.26 -21:24:43.1: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:21.26 -21:24:43.1: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2412 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20570_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20671_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20688_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20688_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20695_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.49 -23:10:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20696_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20698_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:43.71 -21:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20701_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20701_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.13 -22:06:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20721_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20721_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20728_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20731_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20731_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20735_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20735_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20741_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20741_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20744_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20744_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20746_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20746_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20749_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:30.37 -22:16:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:32.63 -20:55:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20122_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20122_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.05 -22:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:26:53.37 -26:38:45.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:28.583 -25:58:50.42
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:31.090 -25:59:29.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01436 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GuNvplTy2s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QHkMFGAlBE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LMeQQeva7P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.olPNF2AiXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.169250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.169250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 52342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Loaded 9484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7577 out of 8158 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8158 out of 52342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GuNvplTy2s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2048, bad_region=0, passed=49554
Got 49554 stars (including 47427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1344 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1185 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QHkMFGAlBE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2212, bad_region=1, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 50038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LMeQQeva7P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1239, bad_region=1, passed=30899
Got 30899 stars (including 29618 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30899 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1216 n_q2=894 n_q3=1556 n_q4=1228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.olPNF2AiXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1296, bad_region=1, passed=31260
Got 31260 stars (including 29924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1209 n_q2=902 n_q3=1546 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-44-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_234713_TTUQ1b1x1_974321_kaLVPCgp/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:28:28.65 -24:45:06.9: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:19:05.78 -28:05:07.3: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:20:37.91 -23:29:45.2: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:18.1: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:44:19.52 -20:59:27.4: 13.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:40:29.35 -21:32:07.5: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:37:19.71 -24:19:02.9: 12.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.4: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:12.91 -21:48:29.7: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:52.09 -20:50:40.5: 10.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:40:29.35 -21:32:07.5: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:20:37.91 -23:29:45.2: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:18.1: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.4: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:12.91 -21:48:29.7: 13.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:19:05.78 -28:05:07.3: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:44:19.52 -20:59:27.4: 13.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:28:28.65 -24:45:06.9: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:37:19.71 -24:19:02.9: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.35 -21:32:07.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0053 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:05.78 -28:05:07.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6210 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:08.48 -20:55:18.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6499 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:37.91 -23:29:45.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7000 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:12.91 -21:48:29.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3321 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:28.65 -24:45:06.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3835 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.02 -22:15:44.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5487 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:19.52 -20:59:27.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6284 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:19.71 -24:19:02.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0872 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:52.09 -20:50:40.5: 10.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:52.09 -20:50:40.5: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2893 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:05.07 -21:00:56.3: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:42:14.51 -25:35:42.0: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.7: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:14.9: 12.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:39.39 -21:09:34.9: 12.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:00.12 -22:22:57.0: 12.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:24.96 -24:25:21.5: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:50.62 -24:22:09.4: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:36:46.60 -25:37:51.0: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:05.07 -21:00:56.3: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.7: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:43:05.07 -21:00:56.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.0395 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:42:14.51 -25:35:42.0: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:14.90 -22:46:11.7: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7571 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:39.39 -21:09:34.9: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:00.12 -22:22:57.0: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:14.9: 12.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:39.39 -21:09:34.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7258 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:00.12 -22:22:57.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8035 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:14.9: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5342 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:15.41 -22:18:32.1: 13.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:50.62 -24:22:09.4: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:24.96 -24:25:21.5: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:50.62 -24:22:09.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.0425 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:24.96 -24:25:21.5: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7963 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:36:46.60 -25:37:51.0: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.60 -25:37:51.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5584 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:15.41 -22:18:32.1: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:15.41 -22:18:32.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2472 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:39.30 -21:19:32.0: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:36.68 -23:00:02.9: 13.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:26:57.24 -22:33:43.4: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:39:55.13 -21:36:15.5: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:26.90 -21:44:12.3: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:40:58.22 -21:33:18.8: 13.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:51.47 -21:11:26.6: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:39.30 -21:19:32.0: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:39.30 -21:19:32.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4098 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:36.68 -23:00:02.9: 13.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:26:57.24 -22:33:43.4: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:39:55.13 -21:36:15.5: 13.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:36.68 -23:00:02.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3231 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:57.24 -22:33:43.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8855 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:55.13 -21:36:15.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4689 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:26.90 -21:44:12.3: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:40:58.22 -21:33:18.8: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:26.90 -21:44:12.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4207 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:58.22 -21:33:18.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4177 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:51.47 -21:11:26.6: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:51.47 -21:11:26.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5103 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:41.40 -20:57:03.7: 13.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:10.72 -21:26:26.4: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:46.18 -20:47:07.6: 14.00 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:07.74 -22:07:36.3: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:44:55.22 -22:19:14.5: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:26.26 -20:36:09.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:41.40 -20:57:03.7: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:41.40 -20:57:03.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5908 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:15:59.20 -21:23:20.2: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:44:04.62 -21:53:52.7: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:14.84 -21:36:58.9: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:10.72 -21:26:26.4: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:07.74 -22:07:36.3: 14.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:46.18 -20:47:07.6: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:44:55.22 -22:19:14.5: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:10.72 -21:26:26.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5721 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:26.26 -20:36:09.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:26.26 -20:36:09.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:07.74 -22:07:36.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5925 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:55.22 -22:19:14.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4065 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:46.18 -20:47:07.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5666 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:15:59.20 -21:23:20.2: 13.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:59.20 -21:23:20.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3884 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:44:04.62 -21:53:52.7: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:04.62 -21:53:52.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6415 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:14.84 -21:36:58.9: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:14.84 -21:36:58.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6112 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:17.28 -21:00:03.9: 13.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:45:44.60 -21:10:47.1: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:01.00 -21:39:19.0: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:11.82 -20:59:48.2: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:31.17 -21:03:15.7: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:39:23.38 -22:16:16.3: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:26.69 -21:20:40.1: 13.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:06.18 -21:37:40.2: 14.54 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:43.14 -20:57:29.3: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:45:44.60 -21:10:47.1: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:31.17 -21:03:15.7: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:17.28 -21:00:03.9: 13.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:01.00 -21:39:19.0: 13.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:11.82 -20:59:48.2: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:44.60 -21:10:47.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6252 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:17.28 -21:00:03.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6376 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:31.17 -21:03:15.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6504 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:39:23.38 -22:16:16.3: 13.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:01.00 -21:39:19.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6800 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:11.82 -20:59:48.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6625 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:23.38 -22:16:16.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6109 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:26.69 -21:20:40.1: 13.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:26.69 -21:20:40.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6638 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:06.18 -21:37:40.2: 14.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:43.14 -20:57:29.3: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:43.14 -20:57:29.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8110 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:06.18 -21:37:40.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7034 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:37:55.10 -21:05:30.3: 13.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:04.98 -24:33:22.3: 13.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:29.61 -20:43:34.0: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:04.14 -22:12:32.8: 14.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:31.15 -21:00:57.9: 14.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:20:53.04 -21:10:45.1: 14.44 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:58.99 -21:19:50.2: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:20.42 -20:57:45.1: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:30.49 -21:20:52.3: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:37:55.10 -21:05:30.3: 14.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:04.98 -24:33:22.3: 13.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:55.10 -21:05:30.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7554 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:29.61 -20:43:34.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:29.61 -20:43:34.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:04.14 -22:12:32.8: 14.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:04.98 -24:33:22.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4626 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:31.15 -21:00:57.9: 14.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:20:53.04 -21:10:45.1: 13.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:04.14 -22:12:32.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6638 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:31.15 -21:00:57.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8285 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:53.04 -21:10:45.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6671 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:58.99 -21:19:50.2: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:58.99 -21:19:50.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5669 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:30.49 -21:20:52.3: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:30.49 -21:20:52.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7982 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:20.42 -20:57:45.1: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:20.42 -20:57:45.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8033 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:49:00.41 -21:55:42.9: 14.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:38.42 -21:20:16.6: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:16.85 -22:10:57.1: 14.44 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:43.88 -22:05:08.5: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:09.54 -21:58:00.6: 14.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:04.63 -23:46:51.3: 14.46 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:49:00.41 -21:55:42.9: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:38.42 -21:20:16.6: 14.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:00.41 -21:55:42.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7395 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:38.42 -21:20:16.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8180 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:16.85 -22:10:57.1: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:43.88 -22:05:08.5: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:16.85 -22:10:57.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8593 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:43.88 -22:05:08.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7311 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0: 9.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:09.54 -21:58:00.6: 14.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:09.54 -21:58:00.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8335 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:04.63 -23:46:51.3: 14.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:04.63 -23:46:51.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8194 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0: 9.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:10.96 -28:02:25.0: ref_mag=9.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.2990 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4: 13.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:04.59 -28:12:25.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.6189 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:18.32 -24:07:10.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2208 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:45:32.62 -23:15:36.4: 13.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:22.03 -24:43:16.5: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5810 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:39:16.00 -29:46:15.9: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.8981 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:45:32.62 -23:15:36.4: 13.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:32.62 -23:15:36.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0114 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56823.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04998.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13627.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47992.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56132_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56132_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56163_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56163_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56167_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56167_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56170_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56170_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56192_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56192_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:53.38 -26:38:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56216_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56216_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56400_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56400_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56435_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56435_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.41 -23:25:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56621_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56621_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56667_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56667_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56772_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56772_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56799_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56799_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.85 -21:31:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56805_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 56805_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56823_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56823_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:05.07 -21:00:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.861 6868154049249241472 295.77018477852 -21.01502263956 11.9674 10.1575 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.861#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56824_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56824_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:35.38 -21:49:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56907_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56907_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56922_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56922_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56966_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56966_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:10.31 -22:28:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56991_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 56991_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57015_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57015_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57033_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57033_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57034_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57034_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57076_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57076_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57077_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57077_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57088_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57088_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57092_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57092_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57101_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57101_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:55.41 -22:26:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57104_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57104_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57127_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57127_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57140_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57169_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57169_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57201_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57201_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57204_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57204_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57211_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57211_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57218_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57218_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57221_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57221_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57223_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57223_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57237_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57237_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57238_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57238_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57239_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57239_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57247_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57247_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57259_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57259_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57267_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57267_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57269_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57269_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57272_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57272_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57276_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57276_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57288_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57288_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57303_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57303_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57309_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57309_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57319_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57319_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57328_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57328_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57364_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57364_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:48.44 -22:22:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57374_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57406_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57406_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:52.09 -22:34:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57407_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57407_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57431_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57431_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:12.90 -23:48:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57494_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 57494_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13627_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 13627_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07549_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 07549_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:38.90 -29:25:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:38.18 -27:10:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 17617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:40.42 -27:15:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 13191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:09.50 -28:08:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45960_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 45960_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.14 -22:06:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.25 -26:40:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 13363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:48.56 -22:28:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:25.81 -25:06:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 50365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:44.87 -22:40:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.60 -30:10:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47992_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 47992_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35526_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 35526_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:30.36 -22:16:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08796_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 08796_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:46.76 -29:00:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04998_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 04998_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03128_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 03128_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:51.56 -30:25:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08375_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 08375_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:00.36 -28:55:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44879_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 44879_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_23-45-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
