This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3994 2461258.8994 11.26 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0
152.88593 5.90383 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HM Cam
Type: M:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V < 15.100 V 331.000000000000 C(N)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HM Cam,2461258.8994,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HM Cam 20260806.3994 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3994 2461258.8994 9.01 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3
157.19821 3.91492 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" AU Aur
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.000 V 14.000 V 2454521.00000 400.500000000000 C6-7,3e(N0e)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AU Aur,2461258.8994,9.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AU Aur 20260806.3994 9.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3994 2461258.8994 13.05 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3
148.76467 5.62702 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 2110062
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.248 r Y 0.832 r 2458469.08330 216.626609100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2110062,2461258.8994,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2110062 20260806.3994 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461258.89972940 06.08.2026 09:35:26.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16184
Objects passed selection criteria: 16131
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12507
Average stars matched: 12212.2 (97.6433 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 04:38:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461258.89972940 06.08.2026 09:35:26.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126862
Objects passed selection criteria: 126528
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 96651.8
Average stars matched: 93288 (96.5197 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 529952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 04:39:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.89912319
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64
Second-epoch second image center 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01155 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5mSOg6ZmO9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5UEiI28jmd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gVRo1ICl8s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u1GwvvF1UG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.947200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.947200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8036 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5mSOg6ZmO9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1702, bad_region=1, passed=17373
Got 17373 stars (including 15651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1403 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5UEiI28jmd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=0, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1225 n_q4=1409 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gVRo1ICl8s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=0, passed=7802
Got 7802 stars (including 7372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=10.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.318 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.918 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.449 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.403
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:58.011 +53:59:46.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7802 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3634744.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.918 -> 0.322 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u1GwvvF1UG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, bad_region=0, passed=7834
Got 7834 stars (including 7411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=10.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.172 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.875 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.466 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:56.461 +53:59:07.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7834 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3632501.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.875 -> 0.322 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1416 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1201 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.317
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.252
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.29
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0065 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2544 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 03408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.54 +56:10:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06542_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 06542_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13038_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 13038_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13241_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 13241_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.17 +50:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:46:25.08 +54:28:51.0
04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0268 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:13:57.983 +53:59:47.64
Second-epoch second image center 04:13:56.430 +53:59:08.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01155 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fmTZ2iJy5v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9tm5ncCoRD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MUwljlSUYo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C6ifYJlVeI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fmTZ2iJy5v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=14794, bad_region=2, passed=140659
Got 140659 stars (including 125608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9tm5ncCoRD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, bad_region=1, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MUwljlSUYo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2450, bad_region=2, passed=54241
Got 54241 stars (including 51710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54241 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1431 n_q2=1163 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1090 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C6ifYJlVeI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2441, bad_region=3, passed=54256
Got 54256 stars (including 51738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54256 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1424 n_q2=1171 n_q3=1201 n_q4=1090 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-34-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_043604_TTUQ1b1x1_3504851_njLkLlyh/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:40:10.67 +50:46:14.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:31.34 +52:30:17.4: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:52:53.73 +53:55:51.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:38:25.37 +50:34:24.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:22:42.49 +53:07:48.2: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:38:25.37 +50:34:24.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:42.49 +53:07:48.2: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:53.73 +53:55:51.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:40:10.67 +50:46:14.8: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:31.34 +52:30:17.4: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:42.49 +53:07:48.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3116 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:10.67 +50:46:14.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9472 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:53.73 +53:55:51.7: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6409 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:31.34 +52:30:17.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4893 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:25.37 +50:34:24.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9769 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:26:53.11 +51:58:59.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:26:53.11 +51:58:59.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.11 +51:58:59.4: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4315 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:23:48.03 +54:33:59.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:15:09.65 +50:40:22.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:40:04.73 +48:56:47.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:40:43.26 +58:13:28.8: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:21:30.44 +53:41:35.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:23:48.03 +54:33:59.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:40:43.26 +58:13:28.8: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:21:30.44 +53:41:35.3: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:40:04.73 +48:56:47.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:15:09.65 +50:40:22.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:48.03 +54:33:59.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9558 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:43.26 +58:13:28.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9733 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:30.44 +53:41:35.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7500 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:04.73 +48:56:47.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8898 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:09.65 +50:40:22.4: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8495 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 05:11:51.45 +57:22:16.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 05:08:58.34 +55:55:59.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:47:01.97 +51:42:10.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 05:11:51.45 +57:22:16.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:51.45 +57:22:16.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9211 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 05:08:58.34 +55:55:59.2: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:58.34 +55:55:59.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9228 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:47:01.97 +51:42:10.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:01.97 +51:42:10.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9613 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:18.06 +53:28:28.8: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:28:33.77 +53:54:30.0: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:01:40.55 +53:50:13.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:46:38.08 +52:36:48.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:15:12.04 +53:43:57.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:40:15.83 +53:28:19.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:18.06 +53:28:28.8: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:18.06 +53:28:28.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1628 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:32.63 +52:38:02.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:10:38.66 +57:50:51.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:01:40.55 +53:50:13.1: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:40.55 +53:50:13.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2210 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:28:33.77 +53:54:30.0: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:33.77 +53:54:30.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2635 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:10:31.10 +57:49:29.9: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:46:38.08 +52:36:48.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:15.83 +53:28:19.5: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:15:12.04 +53:43:57.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:38.08 +52:36:48.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3778 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:15.83 +53:28:19.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1619 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:12.04 +53:43:57.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3460 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:32.63 +52:38:02.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.63 +52:38:02.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3541 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:10:38.66 +57:50:51.1: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:38.66 +57:50:51.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3944 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:10:31.10 +57:49:29.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:31.10 +57:49:29.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4736 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:35:18.01 +55:44:27.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:14:04.91 +51:49:44.4: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:12.19 +57:05:37.7: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:35:18.01 +55:44:27.9: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:18.01 +55:44:27.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5607 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:14:04.91 +51:49:44.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:04.91 +51:49:44.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3247 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:12.19 +57:05:37.7: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:36:12.19 +57:05:37.7: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4956 delta=1.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:26:31.02 +52:22:07.0: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:26:31.02 +52:22:07.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:31.02 +52:22:07.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3435 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:25:20.27 +57:20:29.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0509 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out163947.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22810.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:36.60 +49:41:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163549_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163549_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:38.22 +53:00:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163550_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163550_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:51.95 +57:10:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163554_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163554_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163558_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163558_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:44.89 +49:41:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163566_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163566_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:27.71 +51:12:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163570_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163570_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:02.44 +51:28:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:29.86 +55:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163649_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163649_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.42 +58:31:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163657_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163657_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:20.18 +53:27:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163688_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163688_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:33.56 +51:41:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:43.97 +49:51:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163695_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163695_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:02.72 +51:01:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.27 +56:19:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163710_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163710_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:29.28 +51:37:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163717_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163717_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:27.02 +51:22:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:04.21 +52:35:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163757_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163757_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.33 +51:10:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163758_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163758_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.55 +57:55:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163768_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163768_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:05.36 +56:55:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163770_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163770_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163777_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163777_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163781_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163781_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:57.46 +49:08:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163786_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163786_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163791_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163791_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163797_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163797_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:42.99 +50:26:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163798_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163798_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163801_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163801_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:52.28 +56:44:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163802_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163802_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:46.66 +49:33:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163803_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163803_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:39.88 +51:19:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163808_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163808_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163817_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163817_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:33.16 +55:19:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163828_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163828_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:45.62 +58:00:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163834_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163834_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:28.40 +49:46:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163838_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163838_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:20.48 +53:40:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163842_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163842_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:31.46 +57:10:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163845_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163845_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:22.94 +57:40:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163850_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163850_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:12.69 +51:33:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163858_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163858_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:16.03 +52:52:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163866_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163866_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163868_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163868_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163879_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163879_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163880_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163880_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163887_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163887_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163889_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163889_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:11.38 +57:55:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163891_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163891_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163894_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163894_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163904_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163904_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:40.82 +54:47:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163919_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163919_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163933_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163933_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:11.44 +56:29:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163934_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163934_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163940_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163940_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:36.83 +55:54:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163946_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163946_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163947_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163947_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:12.19 +57:05:37.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.742 277523812956766720 069.05044539836 +57.09388973505 12.8823 10.7481 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.742#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163955_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163955_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:48.60 +56:21:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163977_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 163977_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:29.24 +50:06:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164000_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 164000_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:26.86 +53:59:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:11.03 +49:01:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:35.78 +55:41:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.26 +52:49:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:21.94 +53:06:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.73 +52:48:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:35.23 +49:37:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.61 +51:18:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:27.13 +52:56:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:57.56 +57:16:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114196_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 114196_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:04.87 +50:10:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:49.07 +54:53:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.54 +55:55:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75079_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 75079_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:27.65 +53:27:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116513_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 116513_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:28.09 +50:40:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:32.34 +54:40:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.82 +50:14:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86559_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 86559_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 63742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:10.97 +54:21:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:31.53 +51:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.53 +56:10:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:47.11 +53:00:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 129439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:03.11 +51:41:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.07 +54:28:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.61 +57:24:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:34.71 +50:15:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 117439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:28.17 +50:37:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:28.44 +50:27:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.38 +58:13:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.09 +51:43:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
Preparing report for the candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.79 +51:13:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:27.52 +52:39:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:14.84 +49:54:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.18 +50:37:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383
The candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_04-35-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks