This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 12.55 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2
99.11561 7.82838 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J2115579+601839
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.797 r Y 0.416 r 2458373.45500 140.464863000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2115579+601839,2461258.8188,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2115579+601839 20260806.3188 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 12.52 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1
99.82485 11.69005 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2055124+632249
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.720 r Y 0.417 r 2458325.94960 220.774104300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2055124+632249,2461258.8188,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2055124+632249 20260806.3188 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 12.39 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4
98.17536 8.06084 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 3267531
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.950 R1 11.400 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 3267531,2461258.8188,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 3267531 20260806.3188 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 12.46 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1
95.64125 12.27988 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J203029.46+602613.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 13.950 V 2456983.70000 35.140000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203029.46+602613.0,2461258.8188,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203029.46+602613.0 20260806.3188 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 13.32 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3
96.99693 11.27374 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J204328.89+605601.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.780 V 15.310 V 2457532.00000 51.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204328.89+605601.8,2461258.8188,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204328.89+605601.8 20260806.3188 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 13.23 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3
99.29007 11.97245 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J205020.64+630840.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.710 g Y 0.780 g 2458239.89400 84.830000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205020.64+630840.0,2461258.8188,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205020.64+630840.0 20260806.3188 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 13.16 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2
97.48634 8.68759 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J2102130+594119
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.107 g Y 0.711 g 2458310.23140 129.956625300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2102130+594119,2461258.8188,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2102130+594119 20260806.3188 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 13.21 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8
104.70947 8.47844 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" RT Cep
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.900 V 16.700 V 2454020.00000 627.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RT Cep,2461258.8188,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RT Cep 20260806.3188 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 13.04 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1
99.26750 9.14037 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J210853.65+611838.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.900 g Y 0.670 g 2459328.01900 417.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J210853.65+611838.2,2461258.8188,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J210853.65+611838.2 20260806.3188 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.3188 2461258.8188 12.80 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4
97.37408 11.94220 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2040494+613743
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.126 r Y 0.365 r 2458357.81950 187.433838800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2040494+613743,2461258.8188,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2040494+613743 20260806.3188 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.91091210 13.07.2026 09:51:32.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461234.91091210 13.07.2026 09:51:32.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461258.81921381 06.08.2026 07:39:30.073 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20072
Objects passed selection criteria: 20019
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16266
Average stars matched: 15979.5 (98.2387 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 02:43:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.91091210 13.07.2026 09:51:32.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461234.91091210 13.07.2026 09:51:32.805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461258.81921381 06.08.2026 07:39:30.073 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128009
Objects passed selection criteria: 127663
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104881
Average stars matched: 101561 (96.8345 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 587752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 02:44:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.81831075
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30
Second-epoch image center 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30
Second-epoch image center 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0288 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eaR5B0J2gP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.itKAlZoQ7R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3D7IQ2d34T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vdwjWfcdlZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.2509 to 328.1475 deg, Dec +55.8693 to +67.2520 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.2509 to 328.1475 deg, Dec 55.8693 to 67.2520 deg
Loaded 17165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10557 out of 11305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11305 out of 22068 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.623800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.623800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.2509 to 328.1475 deg, Dec +55.8693 to +67.2520 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.2509 to 328.1475 deg, Dec 55.8693 to 67.2520 deg
Loaded 17165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10557 out of 11305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11305 out of 22068 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 20646 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.2096 to 328.1480 deg, Dec +55.8692 to +67.2833 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.2096 to 328.1480 deg, Dec 55.8692 to 67.2833 deg
Loaded 17206 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10535 out of 11246 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11246 out of 20646 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.3 pix Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.1 mag. Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eaR5B0J2gP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1774, bad_region=0, passed=22068
Got 22068 stars (including 20263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.652 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1446 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.itKAlZoQ7R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1675, bad_region=1, passed=20646
Got 20646 stars (including 18945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1105 n_q3=1127 n_q4=1451 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3D7IQ2d34T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=11857
Got 11857 stars (including 11275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=9.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.816 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.739 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.386
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1242 n_q2=861 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1474 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vdwjWfcdlZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=530, bad_region=0, passed=10913
Got 10913 stars (including 10370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10913 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=9.921 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=0.719 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.422 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.389
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.422 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1280 n_q2=855 n_q3=1479 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.198
ref2=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.516 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new1=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new2=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.248
reference average sigma_overall=0.53 worst_q_ratio=1.1825
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:18:39.09 +61:12:19.5: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:15:13.05 +57:33:38.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:18:39.09 +61:12:19.5: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:15:13.05 +57:33:38.3: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:39.09 +61:12:19.5: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2400 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:13.05 +57:33:38.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0443 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30810_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30810_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:15.19 +58:57:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30811_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30811_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30857_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30857_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:19:14.39 +58:38:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30917_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30917_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:11:39.67 +59:58:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30940_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30940_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:27:11.64 +59:45:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30954_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30954_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30980_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30980_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:16.32 +58:29:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30985_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30985_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:30.43 +57:59:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30206_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30206_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:30.47 +59:15:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30067_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 30067_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:53.68 +59:47:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30
Second-epoch image center 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:22.565 +61:59:04.30
Second-epoch image center 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0288 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:39.646 +61:59:50.04
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:37.290 +61:59:09.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.agiZOyh5IA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kCjD11irO5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GEQJ9dIxCl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ES6hj53uvI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 142777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.2330 to 328.1848 deg, Dec +55.8503 to +67.2520 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.2330 to 328.1848 deg, Dec 55.8503 to 67.2520 deg
Loaded 17231 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9036 out of 11548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11548 out of 142777 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.483000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.483000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 142777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.2330 to 328.1848 deg, Dec +55.8503 to +67.2520 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.2330 to 328.1848 deg, Dec 55.8503 to 67.2520 deg
Loaded 17231 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9036 out of 11548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11548 out of 142777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 137805 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 289.1527 to 328.1772 deg, Dec +55.8692 to +67.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 289.1527 to 328.1772 deg, Dec 55.8692 to 67.2869 deg
Loaded 17253 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9159 out of 11625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11625 out of 137805 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.3 mag. Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.agiZOyh5IA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=15238, bad_region=0, passed=142715
Got 142715 stars (including 127295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.659 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1395 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kCjD11irO5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=63, blended=14147, bad_region=1, passed=137742
Got 137742 stars (including 123425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.577 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1157 n_q3=1085 n_q4=1416 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GEQJ9dIxCl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4549, bad_region=12, passed=73939
Got 73939 stars (including 69289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73939 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1221 n_q2=893 n_q3=1297 n_q4=1481 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ES6hj53uvI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3833, bad_region=15, passed=68008
Got 68008 stars (including 64074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68008 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1264 n_q2=868 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-38-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_024038_TTUQ1b1x1_4004162_DkEi8SEr/wcs_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:29:16.09 +64:59:14.8: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:59:13.09 +57:18:33.4: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:01:41.50 +56:59:12.3: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:57:02.41 +66:28:49.5: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:22:40.11 +60:32:13.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:43:56.78 +56:59:21.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:31:20.70 +60:39:47.1: 13.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:22:40.11 +60:32:13.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:29:16.09 +64:59:14.8: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:57:02.41 +66:28:49.5: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:59:13.09 +57:18:33.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:01:41.50 +56:59:12.3: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:40.11 +60:32:13.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3811 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:16.09 +64:59:14.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2995 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:02.41 +66:28:49.5: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8315 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:41.50 +56:59:12.3: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5745 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:13.09 +57:18:33.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4045 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:44:34.93 +59:37:49.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:30:21.78 +64:47:08.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:16:04.03 +57:45:22.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:43:56.78 +56:59:21.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:31:20.70 +60:39:47.1: 13.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:20.70 +60:39:47.1: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2361 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:56.78 +56:59:21.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2335 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:44:34.93 +59:37:49.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:34.93 +59:37:49.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1027 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:30:21.78 +64:47:08.1: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:16:04.03 +57:45:22.9: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:21.78 +64:47:08.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5942 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:04.03 +57:45:22.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1626 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:46:54.79 +56:46:14.3: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:06:05.61 +59:16:48.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:22.45 +57:18:08.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:49:57.34 +64:56:19.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:46:54.79 +56:46:14.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:06:05.61 +59:16:48.6: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:54.79 +56:46:14.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9900 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:05.61 +59:16:48.6: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9322 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:22.45 +57:18:08.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:22.45 +57:18:08.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5778 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:01:35.61 +64:46:57.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:49:57.34 +64:56:19.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:57.34 +64:56:19.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:21:26.55 +63:27:24.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:37:43.91 +60:46:46.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:01:35.61 +64:46:57.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:35.61 +64:46:57.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0220 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:38:13.97 +58:58:26.4: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:20:23.61 +56:29:55.3: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:35:33.04 +61:31:49.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:21:26.55 +63:27:24.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:37:43.91 +60:46:46.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:26.55 +63:27:24.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4213 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:43.91 +60:46:46.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5610 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:00:11.99 +61:28:37.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:39:41.05 +59:34:36.2: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:38:13.97 +58:58:26.4: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:13.97 +58:58:26.4: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6619 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:20:23.61 +56:29:55.3: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:23.61 +56:29:55.3: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0051 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:16:07.55 +56:24:36.9: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:35:33.04 +61:31:49.7: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:33.04 +61:31:49.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8588 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:00:11.99 +61:28:37.0: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:39:41.05 +59:34:36.2: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:11.99 +61:28:37.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8913 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.05 +59:34:36.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0076 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:16:07.55 +56:24:36.9: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:45:14.12 +56:45:29.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:07.55 +56:24:36.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1291 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:30:16.90 +61:03:18.9: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:50:11.91 +56:47:13.8: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:27:59.81 +59:16:10.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:30:24.97 +61:42:55.4: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:45:14.12 +56:45:29.7: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:30:16.90 +61:03:18.9: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:14.12 +56:45:29.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9908 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:16.90 +61:03:18.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8245 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:32:04.20 +63:06:14.1: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:33:32.15 +59:01:23.9: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:50:11.91 +56:47:13.8: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:11.91 +56:47:13.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0597 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:50:09.89 +56:47:53.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:27:59.81 +59:16:10.3: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:59.81 +59:16:10.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0690 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:08:09.01 +61:02:22.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:30:24.97 +61:42:55.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:24.97 +61:42:55.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1742 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:32:04.20 +63:06:14.1: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:33:32.15 +59:01:23.9: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:04.20 +63:06:14.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7870 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:32.15 +59:01:23.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2365 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:50:09.89 +56:47:53.1: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:09.89 +56:47:53.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2981 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:53:50.75 +61:45:57.5: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:08:09.01 +61:02:22.2: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:09.01 +61:02:22.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2101 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:36:15.26 +59:11:40.6: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:01:10.95 +56:47:58.3: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:53:50.75 +61:45:57.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:50.75 +61:45:57.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2120 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:16:44.64 +60:57:20.8: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:36:15.26 +59:11:40.6: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:15.26 +59:11:40.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3406 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:00:26.35 +57:31:38.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:45:27.09 +57:32:36.6: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:01:10.95 +56:47:58.3: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:10.95 +56:47:58.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4093 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:53:53.77 +61:45:35.9: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:16:44.64 +60:57:20.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:44.64 +60:57:20.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3321 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:00:26.35 +57:31:38.4: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:51:21.36 +63:34:31.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:26.35 +57:31:38.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2937 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:45:27.09 +57:32:36.6: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:27.09 +57:32:36.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4195 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:01:35.74 +63:40:00.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:53:53.77 +61:45:35.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:53.77 +61:45:35.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3220 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:51:21.36 +63:34:31.0: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:21.36 +63:34:31.0: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0555 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:02:30.83 +60:03:11.2: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:01:35.74 +63:40:00.8: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:35.74 +63:40:00.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4211 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:10:31.06 +57:10:06.3: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:54:07.38 +60:57:34.2: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:25:10.94 +61:17:56.5: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:20:44.15 +61:23:39.7: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:08:38.84 +60:17:35.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:02:30.83 +60:03:11.2: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:30.83 +60:03:11.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6170 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:10:31.06 +57:10:06.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:31.06 +57:10:06.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4905 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:54:07.38 +60:57:34.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:07.38 +60:57:34.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6467 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:26:59.99 +67:08:22.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:25:10.94 +61:17:56.5: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:10.94 +61:17:56.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6757 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:20:44.15 +61:23:39.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:44.15 +61:23:39.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7107 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:08:38.84 +60:17:35.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:38.84 +60:17:35.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6989 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:02:38.21 +56:28:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:09:29.52 +56:56:08.2: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:02:38.21 +56:28:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:38.21 +56:28:07.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:26:59.99 +67:08:22.3: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:59.99 +67:08:22.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3880 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:09:29.52 +56:56:08.2: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:29.52 +56:56:08.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3764 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 19:26:24.71 +64:11:50.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:15:57.65 +60:18:37.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5524 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:55:12.03 +63:22:48.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5063 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 19:26:24.71 +64:11:50.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:24.71 +64:11:50.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2907 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:09:31.29 +59:47:08.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3850 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:29.59 +60:26:12.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4458 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:43:28.86 +60:56:01.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3229 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:50:20.76 +63:08:39.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2087 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8: 14.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:46:51.40 +64:36:04.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2069 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:02:12.64 +59:41:24.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1390 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:08:53.29 +61:18:38.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0344 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:05:07.51 +60:28:10.5: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:05:07.51 +60:28:10.5: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:05:07.51 +60:28:10.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5741 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 21:22:32.20 +60:28:14.6: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 21:22:32.20 +60:28:14.6: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:32.20 +60:28:14.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9201 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_04-51-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_04-39-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:49.79 +61:37:40.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7822 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83718.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83198.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163913_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163913_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163915_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163915_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:37.60 +59:30:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163924_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163924_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:53.03 +56:41:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163926_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163926_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:03.17 +60:35:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163928_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163928_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:57.79 +58:53:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163934_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163934_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163935_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163935_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:08.83 +58:35:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163936_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163936_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163937_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163937_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163939_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163939_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163940_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163940_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:09.02 +56:50:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163941_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163941_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163942_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163942_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:15.92 +58:18:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163943_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163943_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:05.33 +60:25:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163944_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163944_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163945_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163945_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163947_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163947_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163950_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163950_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163951_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163951_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163952_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163952_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:06.91 +57:02:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163954_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163954_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163955_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163955_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:01.17 +59:28:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163956_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163956_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:40.21 +57:45:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163959_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163959_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163960_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163960_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:09.34 +61:43:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163961_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163961_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:31.83 +59:01:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163962_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 163962_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:06.12 +59:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164065_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164065_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164097_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164097_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:27:11.61 +59:45:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164149_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164149_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:13:16.37 +58:29:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164204_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164204_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:30.75 +59:51:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164231_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164231_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:48.76 +57:05:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164390_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164390_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164471_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164471_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:38.89 +58:27:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164477_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164477_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:50:06.52 +56:48:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164504_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164504_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164536_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164536_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164540_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164540_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:08.82 +59:37:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164543_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164543_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:11:47.06 +58:28:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164544_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164544_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164581_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164581_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:11:18.86 +57:38:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164625_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164625_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164647_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164647_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164668_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164668_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:13.62 +56:31:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164679_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164679_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:53.84 +59:35:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164681_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164681_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164707_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164707_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164731_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164731_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164756_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164756_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:59.82 +62:10:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164769_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164769_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:05.99 +59:26:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164778_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164778_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:54.28 +62:03:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164795_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164795_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164800_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164800_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164805_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164805_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:21.12 +62:00:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164813_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164813_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164818_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164818_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:16:21.85 +56:24:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164848_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164848_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164898_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164898_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164916_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164916_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:25.41 +57:32:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164922_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164922_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164939_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164939_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164945_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164945_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164962_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164962_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164983_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164983_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:33.66 +56:50:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164987_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164987_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164998_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 164998_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:20.38 +59:27:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165006_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165006_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165011_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165011_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:40.33 +58:47:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165013_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165013_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165023_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165023_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165053_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165053_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:49.04 +62:19:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165057_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165057_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165066_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165066_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:58:02.88 +57:00:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165068_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165068_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165087_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165087_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:21:30.87 +60:15:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165090_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165090_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:23.21 +62:04:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165130_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165130_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165135_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165135_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165137_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165137_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:23.46 +58:55:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165157_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165157_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165167_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165167_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:37.75 +57:45:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165174_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165174_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:07:30.96 +58:15:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165218_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165218_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:41.82 +57:49:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165246_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165246_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:11:40.96 +57:39:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165283_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165283_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165297_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165297_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165307_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165307_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165358_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165358_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:34.56 +60:00:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165381_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165381_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165386_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165386_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165436_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165436_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165439_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165439_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:20:30.90 +57:38:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165458_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165458_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165535_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165535_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:11.74 +59:27:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165592_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165592_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165595_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165595_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165645_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 165645_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70550_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 70550_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:09.16 +61:15:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83198_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 83198_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42991_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 42991_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153927_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 153927_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:01.61 +57:57:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111927_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 111927_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88847_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 88847_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23120_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 23120_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34203_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 34203_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:52.05 +63:54:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80564_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 80564_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86263_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 86263_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:43.64 +60:36:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26141_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 26141_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:04.94 +64:39:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46980_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 46980_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125495_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 125495_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:30.43 +57:59:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130308_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 130308_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:42:30.49 +59:15:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97791_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 97791_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:18:08.67 +58:10:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137119_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 137119_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13909_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 13909_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78711_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 78711_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:15.00 +61:05:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 33133_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:28.20 +64:15:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70184_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 70184_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135846_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 135846_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:53.67 +59:47:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83718_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 83718_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:07.51 +60:28:10.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.637 2192467520552064640 316.28284078965 +60.47024489863 12.5367 11.0278 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.637#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78347_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285
The candidate 78347_fd_Cep-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_02-39-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks
