Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference image | 2026 02 12.25171 | 2461083.75171 | 13.70 | 06:11:31.03 +80:37:56.0 | 2848 5017 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits |
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 02 12.25237 | 2461083.75237 | 13.65 | 06:11:30.95 +80:37:55.8 | 2849 5024 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 06.29044 | 2461258.79044 | 12.71 | 06:11:30.47 +80:37:56.0 | 5185 0570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 06.29102 | 2461258.79102 | 12.48 | 06:11:30.12 +80:37:55.9 | 5186 0568 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2907 2461258.7907 12.60 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9
133.13150 25.13730 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX
3" NSVS J0611316+803756
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.284 R1 Y 0.869 R1 145.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference image | 2026 02 12.25171 | 2461083.75171 | 13.66 | 08:12:30.45 +81:22:52.5 | 1725 2389 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits |
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 02 12.25237 | 2461083.75237 | 13.58 | 08:12:30.48 +81:22:52.5 | 1725 2396 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 06.29044 | 2461258.79044 | 12.77 | 08:12:30.04 +81:22:53.2 | 7700 1931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 06.29102 | 2461258.79102 | 12.45 | 08:12:30.28 +81:22:53.4 | 7701 1930 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2907 2461258.7907 12.61 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3
132.25528 29.80380 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX
1" NSVS 751858
Type: SR|L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.479 R1 12.985 R1 2451596.24000 > 359.000000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference image | 2026 02 12.25171 | 2461083.75171 | 13.60 | 07:06:27.37 +79:31:59.0 | 1420 4353 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits |
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 02 12.25237 | 2461083.75237 | 13.64 | 07:06:27.06 +79:31:59.4 | 1421 4361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 06.29044 | 2461258.79044 | 12.64 | 07:06:26.82 +79:31:58.9 | 6717 0201 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 06.29102 | 2461258.79102 | 12.76 | 07:06:28.15 +79:32:00.3 | 6718 0200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2907 2461258.7907 12.70 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6
134.70504 27.32163 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.883+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 111061 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 111061 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1744.1794 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 515.0813 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1761.2550 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 507.6141 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.63601 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.015 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-06T01:58:03.9046636' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-06T06:58:03.9046636' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61258.2903229631 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-06T06:58:13.8119814' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61258.2904376271 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7720341369318 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.009583627179 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1911111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.13361111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98290525550042 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits :) Spent 0.632753 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-06T01:58:53.6967420' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-06T06:58:53.6967420' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61258.290899259 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-06T06:59:03.5984156' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61258.2910138657 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.7720335470649 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0095836695239 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.2038888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.14861111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98215137629937 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits :) Spent 0.619365 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.79043870 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nV9vl1C1JO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AKzbYFpJ8m Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l3biZjjYz9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.enFOHigXx6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.nV9vl1C1JO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096 Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AKzbYFpJ8m (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185 Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.l3biZjjYz9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, bad_region=0, passed=5427 Got 5427 stars (including 5175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5427 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0300 through 0 to 179.9695, gap 179.9695 to 180.0300 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0263 through 0 to 179.9664, gap 179.9664 to 180.0263 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=8.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.211 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.869 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.340 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1452 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1538 n_q4=861 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.enFOHigXx6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=231, bad_region=0, passed=5181 Got 5181 stars (including 4946 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5181 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0324 through 0 to 179.9692, gap 179.9692 to 180.0324 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5181 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0274 through 0 to 179.9665, gap 179.9665 to 180.0274 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5181 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5181 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5330) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=8.177 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.944 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.358 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=0.857 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.376 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.358 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.376 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1432 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1522 n_q4=847 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.146 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.159 reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (4845 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 20722_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 04:13:05.40 +86:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21432_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 21432_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.83 04:13:05.87 +86:52:28.5 3937 4489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.63 +80:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.69 06:23:25.65 +80:04:17.6 5522 0262 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.04 +81:08:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.05 02:43:16.01 +81:08:13.3 0785 2566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.46 +80:57:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:27.192 +85:00:47.87 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:24.263 +85:00:57.34 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00284 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h9KZ51HcdT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nYTeCTQqa1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.savSeZ0hhf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0OYhR5aDDD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.72 04:55:34.55 +80:57:33.8 3384 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.h9KZ51HcdT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560 Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nYTeCTQqa1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103 Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.savSeZ0hhf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1051, bad_region=6, passed=32171 Got 32171 stars (including 31071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32171 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0011 through 0 to 179.9983, gap 179.9983 to 180.0011 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0266 through 0 to 179.9903, gap 179.9903 to 180.0266 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32171 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1429 n_q2=1008 n_q3=1582 n_q4=886 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0OYhR5aDDD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=997, bad_region=7, passed=31103 Got 31103 stars (including 30048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0158 through 0 to 179.9911, gap 179.9911 to 180.0158 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0059 through 0 to 179.9906, gap 179.9906 to 180.0059 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1400 n_q2=993 n_q3=1641 n_q4=875 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 08:20:05.39 +82:44:19.3: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:55:58.77 +85:36:57.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.21 +84:02:25.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:11.46 +83:35:20.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:49:36.10 +83:21:42.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:49:36.10 +83:21:42.1: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 08:20:05.39 +82:44:19.3: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:55:58.77 +85:36:57.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.21 +84:02:25.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:11.46 +83:35:20.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:36.10 +83:21:42.1: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8252 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:51:52.74 +86:16:02.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:05.39 +82:44:19.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6677 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:58.77 +85:36:57.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1935 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.21 +84:02:25.6: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4055 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.46 +83:35:20.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6636 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:05:19.28 +83:28:02.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:22:28.02 +83:23:53.1: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:19.35 +85:35:58.4: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:51:52.74 +86:16:02.0: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:52.74 +86:16:02.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2396 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:05:19.28 +83:28:02.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:19.28 +83:28:02.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0209 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:55:55.11 +85:54:39.6: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:22:28.02 +83:23:53.1: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:19.35 +85:35:58.4: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.02 +83:23:53.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4544 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:19.35 +85:35:58.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9533 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:09:07.45 +85:10:46.0: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:55:55.11 +85:54:39.6: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:55.11 +85:54:39.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5669 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:09:07.45 +85:10:46.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:07.45 +85:10:46.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4411 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5858 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5923 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6881 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91167_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91167_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 02:29:03.34 +82:12:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91168_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91168_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.09 02:29:03.33 +82:12:43.1 1075 3229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 12.85 08:20:05.05 +82:44:17.4 7348 2690 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91169_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91169_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.54 08:20:05.73 +82:44:21.3 7349 2690 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 00:22:34.69 +84:51:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91171_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91171_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.27 00:22:35.15 +84:51:38.3 1641 5802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.37 23:55:58.99 +85:36:57.7 2073 6173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.08 23:55:58.55 +85:36:57.5 2073 6171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 03:09:48.23 +83:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.13 03:09:47.67 +83:29:04.1 2166 3218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:46:54.82 +84:36:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91511_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91511_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 11.55 02:46:54.63 +84:36:27.0 2372 3956 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.65 23:48:30.81 +84:30:48.5 1398 6272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91769_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 91769_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.16 08:36:04.66 +80:14:16.3 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 92693_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.90 02:50:49.31 +86:10:09.1 3083 4578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 00:27:20.38 +86:54:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 92852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.01 00:27:20.67 +86:54:59.9 2886 5924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93366_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 93366_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 11.58 08:44:44.34 +83:28:14.5 7411 3314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 12.40 03:13:28.37 +84:02:25.5 2429 3438 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93845_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 93845_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.42 03:13:28.05 +84:02:25.7 2430 3436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:46:17.08 +82:48:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93983_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 93983_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.50 02:46:17.34 +82:48:51.9 1577 3216 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94000_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94000_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.92 00:43:08.03 +84:27:26.9 1452 5473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94105_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94105_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.15 06:04:01.49 +82:11:59.7 4957 1504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:18:12.59 +89:17:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94110_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94110_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.62 02:18:22.83 +89:17:30.3 4386 5949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 12.73 03:11:11.25 +83:35:20.2 2225 3253 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94663_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94663_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.60 03:11:11.68 +83:35:20.1 2225 3251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 12.87 03:49:35.92 +83:21:41.4 2682 2760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94669_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94669_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.77 03:49:36.27 +83:21:42.8 2683 2758 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 07:29:48.72 +82:24:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94676_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94676_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.46 07:29:48.73 +82:24:03.1 6605 2020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94893_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94893_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.95 00:30:55.40 +87:51:14.3 3451 5989 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 04:10:45.37 +80:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94987_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 94987_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.94 04:10:45.06 +80:41:30.5 2313 1125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95023_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95023_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.06 03:25:20.83 +81:28:48.1 1646 2079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:36:38.87 +81:39:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.01 02:36:39.45 +81:39:19.4 0920 2888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.77 03:52:08.03 +83:46:11.0 2845 2949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 04:08:43.13 +86:38:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95167_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95167_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.96 04:08:41.11 +86:38:22.8 3842 4377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95226_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95226_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.75 03:23:09.57 +87:27:46.8 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 23:45:13.80 +88:51:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95255_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95255_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.97 23:45:13.65 +88:51:23.0 4040 6228 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:59:26.90 +85:11:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95272_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95272_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.05 02:59:26.22 +85:11:48.2 2743 4090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.25 01:51:53.50 +86:16:01.5 2774 5083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95340_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95340_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.23 01:51:51.99 +86:16:02.4 2774 5081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95385_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95385_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.70 06:23:15.75 +80:02:57.6 5520 0248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 05:19:00.87 +81:13:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95519_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95519_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.92 05:19:00.56 +81:13:18.9 3952 0964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.04 05:05:18.68 +83:28:03.7 3920 2348 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95568_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95568_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.00 05:05:19.89 +83:28:01.2 3921 2346 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.55 00:22:28.11 +83:23:52.7 0752 5692 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95589_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95589_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.36 00:22:27.93 +83:23:53.5 0753 5690 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 06:39:20.31 +87:18:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.06 06:39:20.19 +87:18:49.0 5056 4611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.04 07:09:18.88 +85:35:58.1 5596 3693 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95747_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95747_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.87 07:09:19.81 +85:35:58.7 5596 3692 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95970_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 95970_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.21 02:41:30.51 +81:08:50.7 0762 2600 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.72 01:24:57.02 +81:50:15.4 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96070_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96070_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.90 00:36:33.72 +83:21:48.2 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.76 08:17:58.96 +80:18:42.2 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96302_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96302_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.69 01:18:37.86 +82:13:42.0 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.69 23:55:53.47 +85:54:36.0 2252 6176 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.47 23:55:56.75 +85:54:43.3 2253 6173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96539_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96539_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.36 06:39:15.47 +82:59:07.6 5576 2058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 06.29044 2461258.79044 13.51 04:09:06.15 +85:10:46.0 3461 3585 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96566_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96566_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.37 04:09:08.75 +85:10:45.9 3462 3583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96842_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96842_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.66 01:07:18.56 +84:47:34.1 1744 5196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96915_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96915_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.04 09:28:59.42 +83:15:44.0 8022 3807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96938_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 96938_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.94 03:02:13.99 +81:08:36.2 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67056_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 Preparing report for the candidate 67056_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62519_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 62519_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 13.90 02:54:29.89 +82:08:29.9 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23221_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 Preparing report for the candidate 23221_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48982_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 Preparing report for the candidate 48982_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.41 05:07:55.18 +81:28:18.1 3730 1155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 04:21:49.21 +84:46:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 12.38 04:21:49.54 +84:46:16.5 3513 3291 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.59 +80:04:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.72 06:23:25.61 +80:04:17.7 5522 0262 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.07 +81:08:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.24 02:43:16.03 +81:08:13.4 0785 2566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.47 +80:57:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 10.73 04:55:34.58 +80:57:33.8 3384 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 07:31:03.13 +82:24:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 6.89 07:31:03.12 +82:24:42.4 6625 2036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 08:04:46.40 +79:28:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 The candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 6.69 08:04:46.34 +79:28:45.1 8185 0859 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits **** FOUND 09:37:04.09 +81:19:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 ################################################################################### 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 -- a known variable star 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 -- not a known variable star 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 -- a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 06:11:30.29 +80:37:55.9 07:06:27.48 +79:31:59.6 08:12:30.16 +81:22:53.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461258.79043870 -observatory V36 07:46:02.02 +20:23:18.3 Mercury (-0.3mag) 11:55:56.42 -00:06:05.1 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:43:38.91 +23:32:48.3 Mars (1.3mag) 08:41:12.01 +18:47:44.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:32.72 +03:16:44.3 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:30.24 +20:56:21.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:12.57 +00:13:57.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:19.59 -23:29:26.0 Pluto (14.4mag) 02:51:16.57 +21:02:06.6 Moon (-10.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 6 02:04 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461258.79043870: 08:41:18.02 +18:47:18.3 Io (6.0mag) 08:41:07.68 +18:48:03.1 Europa (6.3mag) 08:41:09.48 +18:47:58.8 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:40:58.88 +18:48:43.3 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:38:47.81 +18:45:56.5 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:41:10.33 +18:47:51.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:38:18.50 +18:44:50.9 Elara (17.7mag) 08:45:17.95 +18:28:06.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:44:30.54 +18:57:35.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:30.13 +03:17:11.3 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:26.83 +03:16:46.9 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:36.55 +03:15:07.2 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:19.16 +03:16:58.0 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:57.66 +03:10:10.4 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 6 02:05 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461258.79043870: 18:55:29.99 -24:00:50.4 JWST 17:17:45.72 +39:59:14.0 Chandra 09:59:57.97 -56:02:33.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 6 02:05 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461258.79043870 -observatory V36 03:11:28.19 +17:12:49.0 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:02:23.10 -34:38:22.4 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:51:58.96 -68:49:48.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:09:18.20 +32:57:10.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:37:56.15 +36:46:00.6 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:40:13.33 +31:33:42.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:41:33.11 +26:34:27.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:19:46.82 +28:33:23.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:27:33.87 +05:17:44.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:09.78 -12:12:37.9 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:13:19.40 +66:13:29.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:49:49.88 -12:45:19.5 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:05:54.93 +31:15:31.8 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:17.00 +15:36:58.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:05:35.04 +42:57:58.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:13:34.07 +49:04:59.9 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:13:34.74 -12:59:34.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:54:57.69 +24:29:46.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:29:58.82 -15:52:33.8 17.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:30:13.16 +21:01:37.0 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:56:58.80 +02:28:39.6 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:03:40.11 +78:00:43.9 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:06:44.75 +46:08:49.0 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:45:12.15 +08:20:23.8 17.3mag A/2026 E1 21:56:11.10 -26:29:08.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:27:48.42 -03:16:49.8 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:36:50.52 +32:16:06.3 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:03:44.76 +05:16:28.9 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:17.83 -05:22:50.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:31:09.32 +20:43:43.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:39:43.72 -23:18:00.2 17.8mag 84P/Giclas 02:58:47.69 +13:32:42.2 16.7mag 88P/Howell 07:50:56.22 +27:55:11.0 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:00:55.10 +16:07:21.0 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:50:05.46 +30:30:30.7 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:13:54.42 +26:58:29.9 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:39:52.02 -09:31:26.6 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:33:41.84 +21:11:10.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:25:12.02 +18:59:35.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:41.29 +03:25:20.4 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:21:33.17 -19:44:45.5 14.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:09:28.36 +37:41:38.7 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 15:48:46.57 +39:32:48.1 12.3mag 169P/NEAT 02:39:25.95 +09:28:37.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:40:37.15 -09:56:57.0 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:23:40.79 -52:50:57.1 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:16:28.78 +24:20:54.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:59:32.37 +37:45:13.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:09:52.15 +03:21:05.9 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:59:07.35 +18:28:14.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 6 02:04 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 6 02:04 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 6 02:04 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 09:39:31.292 -08:28:35.35 AT 2026vla 2026-02-21.40 20.65 17:07:24.157 +32:28:59.94 AT 2026vkz 2026-06-16.33 21.89 18:55:34.805 +34:42:05.78 AT 2026vky 2026-06-22.39 21.01 15:27:13.875 -10:50:21.14 AT 2026vkx 2026-06-14.35 20.55 13:36:43.476 +25:28:01.16 AT 2026vkw 2026-06-25.38 20.6 04:43:04.292 -16:08:54.64 AT 2026vkv 2026-01-12.30 21.72 04:48:25.928 -18:19:58.05 AT 2026vku 2026-01-26.25 21.35 12:55:24.686 +13:58:33.13 AT 2026vkt 2026-06-05.34 21.42 11:39:28.884 +47:23:59.43 AT 2026vks 2026-01-14.61 21.82 10:26:55.799 -14:09:20.42 AT 2026vkr 2026-01-13.55 21.98 12:26:22.284 +20:06:25.68 AT 2026vkq 2026-02-13.60 20.86 12:08:12.778 +41:30:56.83 AT 2026vkp 2026-06-15.27 20.88 05:11:50.298 -12:02:24.75 AT 2026vko 2026-02-15.23 20.49 00:35:37.087 -45:29:22.45 AT 2026vkn 2026-06-26.42 23.13 04:11:06.535 -49:23:35.67 AT 2026vkm 2026-07-09.42 22.31 23:40:19.411 -26:01:53.34 AT 2026vkl 2026-07-20.59 21.47 22:23:27.160 +00:54:32.97 AT 2026vkk 2026-07-14.55 21.17 21:14:05.875 -09:55:36.50 AT 2026vkj 2026-07-20.46 21.9 17:17:56.970 +19:09:32.22 AT 2026vki 2026-07-19.39 21.8 17:18:18.165 +24:21:20.44 AT 2026vkh 2026-07-19.40 21.78 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 6 02:04 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 06.29102 2461258.79102 6.58 09:37:04.16 +81:19:37.3 9084 3265 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_020234_TTUQ1b1x1_1618591_HorZY905/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-58-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
