This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2730 2461258.7730 12.89 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9
147.35074 -1.92251 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 3.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 1974468
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.539 r Y 0.300 R1 2458340.87910 80.809523800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2730* 03 42 59.29 +52 37 10.9 12.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1974468,2461258.7730,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1974468 20260806.2730 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2730 2461258.7730 12.73 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0
147.81886 -1.35310 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J034743.67+524658.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.900 g Y 0.380 g 2459126.74800 57.470000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2730* 03 47 43.93 +52 46 59.0 12.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034743.67+524658.6,2461258.7730,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034743.67+524658.6 20260806.2730 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2730 2461258.7730 12.36 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6
148.58877 -3.56432 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J034254.53+503350.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.830 V 14.160 V 2457342.80000 68.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2730* 03 42 54.63 +50 33 51.6 12.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034254.53+503350.7,2461258.7730,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034254.53+503350.7 20260806.2730 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2730 2461258.7730 11.85 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9
150.37533 -1.96456 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J035800.15+504127.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.540 g Y 0.350 g 2458765.85500 503.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2730* 03 58 00.16 +50 41 26.9 11.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J035800.15+504127.1,2461258.7730,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J035800.15+504127.1 20260806.2730 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461258.77322935 06.08.2026 06:33:17.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16142
Objects passed selection criteria: 16034
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10138
Average stars matched: 9854.25 (97.2011 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 01:39:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461258.77322935 06.08.2026 06:33:17.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126553
Objects passed selection criteria: 126127
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82401
Average stars matched: 79128.2 (96.0283 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 595484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 01:40:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.77272694
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00678 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gRwDVtTj0N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACgecHQ5rW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WSn016Ekqa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qFv7HxQvwI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.947200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.947200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8036 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gRwDVtTj0N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1702, bad_region=1, passed=17373
Got 17373 stars (including 15651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1403 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ACgecHQ5rW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=0, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1225 n_q4=1409 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WSn016Ekqa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=148, bad_region=0, passed=2999
Got 2999 stars (including 2849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 2756 stars left (next iteration limit 3037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2756 robust_rms=8.278 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2756 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.989 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2756 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2756 robust_rms_before=1.376 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.551 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.523
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.551 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits N_match=2756 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=912 n_q2=424 n_q3=852 n_q4=568 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qFv7HxQvwI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=142, bad_region=0, passed=3093
Got 3093 stars (including 2947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 2850 stars left (next iteration limit 3138)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2850 robust_rms=7.801 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2850 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2850 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.527 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2850 robust_rms_before=1.303 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.559 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.527
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.559 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=2850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=949 n_q2=438 n_q3=902 n_q4=561 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.184
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.232
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.29
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222_astrometric_residuals.png (2756 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223_astrometric_residuals.png (2850 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:13:59.936 +53:59:18.02
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:01.383 +53:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00678 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hwvGP1uFrK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PeLhxrAsXI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.72rvsCpBlv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits &> /tmp/tmp.me2ireZB17
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hwvGP1uFrK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=14794, bad_region=2, passed=140659
Got 140659 stars (including 125608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PeLhxrAsXI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, bad_region=1, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.72rvsCpBlv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=638, bad_region=1, passed=25326
Got 25326 stars (including 24642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1532 n_q2=753 n_q3=1576 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.me2ireZB17 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=675, bad_region=1, passed=25767
Got 25767 stars (including 25059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1537 n_q2=750 n_q3=1608 n_q4=975 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0222.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_013641_TTUQ1b1x1_3833419_9TY9lV1s/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:56:47.85 +52:20:12.2: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:35:13.38 +57:25:23.5: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:52:53.79 +53:55:52.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:14.79 +56:23:00.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:57:16.55 +49:45:37.4: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:47.85 +52:20:12.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:35:13.38 +57:25:23.5: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:14.79 +56:23:00.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:53.79 +53:55:52.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:57:16.55 +49:45:37.4: 11.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:47.85 +52:20:12.2: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9783 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:14.79 +56:23:00.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4951 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:13.38 +57:25:23.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2743 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:53.79 +53:55:52.3: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4357 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:16.55 +49:45:37.4: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9295 delta=-0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:18.33 +52:39:28.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:26:53.31 +51:58:58.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:10:31.14 +57:49:31.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:18.33 +52:39:28.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:18.33 +52:39:28.8: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6235 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:26:53.31 +51:58:58.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.31 +51:58:58.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3809 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:10:31.14 +57:49:31.1: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:31.14 +57:49:31.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1399 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:59.29 +52:37:10.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8659 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:47:43.93 +52:46:59.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6914 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:54.63 +50:33:51.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3428 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:58:00.16 +50:41:26.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8398 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84565.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86459.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163534_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163534_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:31.78 +57:49:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163537_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163537_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163538_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163538_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163541_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163541_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163555_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163555_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163560_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163560_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163590_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163590_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.46 +58:31:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:19.50 +53:43:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:20.02 +53:27:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163640_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163640_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163647_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163647_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:43.86 +59:09:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163654_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163654_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.22 +56:19:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163655_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163655_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163658_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163658_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:25.25 +56:31:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163663_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163663_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163667_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163667_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163668_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163668_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.28 +51:10:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163679_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163679_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163681_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163681_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:51.92 +57:27:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163688_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163688_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163690_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163690_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:33.59 +51:41:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163696_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163696_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163699_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163699_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.53 +57:55:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163700_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163700_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163709_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163709_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163716_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163716_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163721_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163721_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:22.60 +57:40:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163723_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163723_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:12.87 +51:33:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163724_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 163724_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 86459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:51.60 +51:05:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:35.81 +55:41:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 84565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:21.63 +51:28:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.22 +52:49:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:21.97 +53:06:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:52.57 +55:33:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.73 +52:48:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:35.32 +49:37:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.60 +51:18:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:26.97 +52:56:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126693_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 126693_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:33.54 +51:09:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:57.67 +57:16:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:47.71 +52:38:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:17.02 +52:52:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:49.17 +54:53:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:18.20 +54:02:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:26.07 +49:58:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.60 +55:55:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:33.49 +50:25:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114464_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 114464_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:32.35 +55:14:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64901_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 64901_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:15.49 +50:43:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:06.79 +50:17:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:32.49 +54:40:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 48433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:26.63 +54:36:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.81 +50:14:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13289_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 13289_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.42 +58:14:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.17 +50:00:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:44.57 +53:53:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116102_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
Preparing report for the candidate 116102_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:37.55 +56:40:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.48 +56:10:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09457_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 09457_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:09.72 +58:31:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100851_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 100851_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:14.83 +49:12:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.09 +54:28:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05917_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 05917_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:24.08 +58:48:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.64 +57:24:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 102763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.47 +49:29:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19395_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 19395_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.30 +57:38:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32224_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 32224_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:52.21 +56:50:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:34.71 +50:15:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:07.79 +52:24:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.38 +58:13:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.19 +51:43:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.07 +57:20:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129249_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 129249_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.91 +48:59:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.97 +51:13:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:32.80 +51:45:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:15.03 +49:54:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:27.55 +52:39:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:56.17 +49:53:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:39.04 +50:50:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 18182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:41.62 +57:24:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:42.90 +53:36:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:57.88 +53:28:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:14.68 +50:17:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:54.33 +53:04:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:35.16 +50:21:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.27 +50:02:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 115805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:36.96 +50:41:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63535_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 63535_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:46.18 +53:09:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223
The candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-33-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0223 did not pass the final checks