This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 11.35 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8
125.46467 5.19451 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0118190+675607
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.859 g Y 0.444 g 2458379.33020 98.891103600000
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.35 is 4.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.41 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 01 18 20.85 +67 56 01.8 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0118190+675607,2461258.6542,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0118190+675607 20260806.1542 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.12 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7
128.84799 5.57031 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Mis V1298
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.968 g Y 2.950 g 2451420.00000 288.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 01 54 13.61 +67 43 04.7 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Mis V1298,2461258.6542,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Mis V1298 20260806.1542 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.86 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6
130.47090 7.32218 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J021622.26+685630.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.420 V 14.810 V 2457707.69900 39.860000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 16 22.15 +68 56 29.6 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J021622.26+685630.0,2461258.6542,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J021622.26+685630.0 20260806.1542 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.69 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2
126.85157 5.26001 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0906 Cas
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.737 g Y 1.320 g 2458270.88050 221.596865400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 01 32 58.80 +67 48 54.2 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0906 Cas,2461258.6542,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0906 Cas 20260806.1542 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.62 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7
131.03695 10.15893 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ZTF J023432.08+712322.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.850 r Y 0.298 r 2458560.46550 54.935084900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 34 32.64 +71 23 22.7 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J023432.08+712322.6,2461258.6542,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J023432.08+712322.6 20260806.1542 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.14 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5
130.78561 9.55273 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0228498+705528
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.647 R1 Y 0.488 R1 101.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 28 50.25 +70 55 27.5 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0228498+705528,2461258.6542,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0228498+705528 20260806.1542 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 13.04 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6
132.24000 11.62449 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J025618.16+721202.2
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.510 V 14.690 V 2457402.80000 21.087000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 56 18.26 +72 12 03.6 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J025618.16+721202.2,2461258.6542,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J025618.16+721202.2 20260806.1542 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 13.12 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1
132.96890 9.59711 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J025232.81+700420.0
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.670 V 14.870 V 2457992.06100 24.408000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 52 32.85 +70 04 20.1 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J025232.81+700420.0,2461258.6542,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J025232.81+700420.0 20260806.1542 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 13.13 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9
131.50702 9.41064 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J023607.80+703109.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.040 V 14.350 V 2457795.00000 701.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 36 07.86 +70 31 08.9 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J023607.80+703109.7,2461258.6542,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J023607.80+703109.7 20260806.1542 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 13.01 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6
132.43783 9.54785 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.587+/-0.029 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 46 45.63 +70 15 40.6 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461258.6542,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260806.1542 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.99 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4
131.47966 8.96897 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J023346.23+700725.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.220 g Y 0.240 g 2459094.03800 129.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 33 46.29 +70 07 25.4 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J023346.23+700725.6,2461258.6542,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J023346.23+700725.6 20260806.1542 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1542 2461258.6542 12.69 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3
131.74957 11.73348 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS J0251199+723114
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.128 R1 Y 0.486 R1 134.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.1542* 02 51 20.94 +72 31 11.3 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0251199+723114,2461258.6542,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0251199+723114 20260806.1542 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461258.65451810 06.08.2026 03:42:20.364 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15735
Objects passed selection criteria: 15660
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11305
Average stars matched: 10944 (96.8067 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 23:50:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461258.65451810 06.08.2026 03:42:20.364 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111209
Objects passed selection criteria: 110881
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80201.8
Average stars matched: 76904.8 (95.8891 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 571768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 23:52:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.65381604
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0622 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01232 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UfUHzHK9cz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wrmulTwvwW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eivQ1Iuiro
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GwA1VHzqjA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec +62.8421 to +75.4742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec 62.8421 to 75.4742 deg
Loaded 15567 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7687 out of 8291 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8291 out of 16441 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec +62.8421 to +75.4742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec 62.8421 to 75.4742 deg
Loaded 15567 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7687 out of 8291 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8291 out of 16441 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.8933 to 64.5343 deg, Dec +62.8422 to +75.4992 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.8933 to 64.5343 deg, Dec 62.8422 to 75.4992 deg
Loaded 15555 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7689 out of 8287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8287 out of 16457 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UfUHzHK9cz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1328, bad_region=0, passed=16441
Got 16441 stars (including 15090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1151 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.504
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wrmulTwvwW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1310, bad_region=0, passed=16457
Got 16457 stars (including 15122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1384 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.446
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eivQ1Iuiro (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, bad_region=0, passed=6386
Got 6386 stars (including 6119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 770 to 828 (Dec 64.1 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 770 to 828 (Dec 64.1 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=5.760 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=36.045 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.827 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.451 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.402
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 942.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:35.532 +70:00:17.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6386 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1185123.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.827 -> 0.332 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1662 n_q2=614 n_q3=1504 n_q4=1090 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GwA1VHzqjA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=249, bad_region=0, passed=6213
Got 6213 stars (including 5963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 828 (Dec 64.0 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 828 (Dec 64.0 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=5.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=32.915 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.410
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1707 n_q2=574 n_q3=1502 n_q4=1083 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.504
ref2=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.446
new1=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.241
new2=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.284
reference average sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3468 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21111_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 21111_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.51 +69:16:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08053_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 08053_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:00.01 +70:31:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11067_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 11067_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:20.19 +68:28:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10263_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 10263_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:01:20.16 +68:43:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11599_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 11599_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:18:20.85 +67:56:01.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0622 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:35.404 +70:00:18.15
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:38.912 +69:59:37.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01232 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.unNtc15I3u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cY9nzEmHJY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dBd4fyUUcY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Cjm2FW4cm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec +62.7957 to +75.4937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec 62.7957 to 75.4937 deg
Loaded 15748 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6660 out of 8419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8419 out of 120979 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec +62.7957 to +75.4937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec 62.7957 to 75.4937 deg
Loaded 15748 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6660 out of 8419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8419 out of 120979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 120718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6807 to 64.5470 deg, Dec +62.8422 to +75.5017 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6807 to 64.5470 deg, Dec 62.8422 to 75.5017 deg
Loaded 15616 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6686 out of 8410 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8410 out of 120718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.unNtc15I3u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=10189, bad_region=5, passed=120941
Got 120941 stars (including 110503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1390 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cY9nzEmHJY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=10151, bad_region=2, passed=120679
Got 120679 stars (including 110286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1161 n_q2=1392 n_q3=1060 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dBd4fyUUcY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1646, bad_region=4, passed=41000
Got 41000 stars (including 39297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41000 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1621 n_q2=599 n_q3=1529 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Cjm2FW4cm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1668, bad_region=7, passed=40472
Got 40472 stars (including 38763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1660 n_q2=560 n_q3=1532 n_q4=1120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-41-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_224431_TTUQ1b1x1_201440_GIIta7rG/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:56:55.31 +73:29:28.6: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:59:54.00 +70:24:00.7: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:00:16.95 +65:03:56.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:12:04.74 +66:44:24.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:36:31.94 +68:24:11.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:25:29.98 +65:28:14.3: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:45:56.95 +71:41:25.2: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:12:04.74 +66:44:24.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:25:29.98 +65:28:14.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:59:54.00 +70:24:00.7: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:56:55.31 +73:29:28.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:45:56.95 +71:41:25.2: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:36:31.94 +68:24:11.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:00:16.95 +65:03:56.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:04.74 +66:44:24.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8780 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:29.98 +65:28:14.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3232 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:54.00 +70:24:00.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2054 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:56.95 +71:41:25.2: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2566 delta=-1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:16.95 +65:03:56.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6602 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:55.31 +73:29:28.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8229 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:31.94 +68:24:11.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9990 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:38.43 +72:37:39.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:38.43 +72:37:39.6: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.43 +72:37:39.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3065 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:34:48.38 +65:46:32.5: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:05:32.04 +68:36:51.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:15.41 +71:42:09.4: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:02:22.42 +71:18:23.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:34:48.38 +65:46:32.5: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:05:32.04 +68:36:51.3: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:34:48.38 +65:46:32.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7100 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:32.04 +68:36:51.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7364 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:15.41 +71:42:09.4: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:15.41 +71:42:09.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8518 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:02:58.70 +71:16:39.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:02:22.42 +71:18:23.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:22.42 +71:18:23.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9273 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:53:05.42 +71:29:24.4: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:18:14.02 +71:45:14.4: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:02:58.70 +71:16:39.0: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:58.70 +71:16:39.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1261 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:53:05.42 +71:29:24.4: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:05.42 +71:29:24.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1287 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:14.02 +71:45:14.4: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:14.02 +71:45:14.4: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2529 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:48:11.50 +71:22:34.7: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:48:11.50 +71:22:34.7: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:11.50 +71:22:34.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2279 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:54:13.61 +67:43:04.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1156 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:05:51.93 +72:29:59.0: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:05:51.93 +72:29:59.0: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:51.93 +72:29:59.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6032 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:16:22.15 +68:56:29.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8554 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:07:43.64 +73:08:47.7: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:54:03.56 +71:39:05.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:32:58.80 +67:48:54.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6813 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:07:43.64 +73:08:47.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:43.64 +73:08:47.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5840 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:34:32.64 +71:23:22.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6152 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:54:03.56 +71:39:05.6: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:03.56 +71:39:05.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4018 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:28:50.25 +70:55:27.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1344 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:32:05.79 +71:17:31.7: 13.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:32:05.79 +71:17:31.7: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:05.79 +71:17:31.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2218 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:30:06.55 +70:43:59.4: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:03:27.29 +72:51:06.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:30:06.55 +70:43:59.4: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:06.55 +70:43:59.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2386 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:56:18.26 +72:12:03.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0347 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:03:27.29 +72:51:06.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:27.29 +72:51:06.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1306 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:52:32.85 +70:04:20.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1187 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:32:58.49 +71:13:21.9: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:36:07.86 +70:31:08.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1239 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:46:45.63 +70:15:40.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0100 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:32:58.49 +71:13:21.9: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:32:58.49 +71:13:21.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8317 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:33:46.29 +70:07:25.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9966 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:51:20.94 +72:31:11.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6877 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26101.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55142.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55863.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141635_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141635_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141637_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141637_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:37.57 +70:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141640_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141640_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141645_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141645_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141647_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141647_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141649_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141649_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141650_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141650_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:27.25 +70:09:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141651_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141651_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141652_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141652_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141758_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141758_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.50 +69:16:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142254_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142254_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:14.08 +65:31:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142331_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142331_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:17.87 +74:20:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142423_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142423_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:29.76 +71:43:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142502_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142502_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142531_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142531_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:59.40 +72:52:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142599_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142599_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:04.01 +66:05:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142613_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142613_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:02.05 +70:17:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142688_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142688_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:17.60 +68:25:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142705_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142705_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142860_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142860_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:49.39 +70:52:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142911_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142911_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:40.01 +71:34:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142960_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 142960_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:51.00 +73:22:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143011_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143011_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:34.57 +70:39:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143018_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143018_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:15.00 +70:37:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143043_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143043_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143050_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143050_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:51.82 +70:32:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143060_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143060_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:09.79 +73:21:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143062_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143062_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143080_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143080_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:52.95 +70:53:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143115_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143115_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:02.80 +72:24:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143131_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143131_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:11.77 +67:38:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143147_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143147_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:47.06 +68:49:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143156_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143156_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:59.48 +71:11:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143180_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143180_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:20.89 +70:01:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143203_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143203_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:27.22 +72:50:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143295_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143295_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143320_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143320_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:34.82 +70:55:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143357_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143357_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143406_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143406_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:35:01.90 +73:29:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143435_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143435_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:49.78 +72:09:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143484_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143484_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143658_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143658_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:10.57 +69:27:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143712_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 143712_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:33.92 +71:18:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 32409_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:26.35 +72:25:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24141_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 24141_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:01.58 +72:49:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60791_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 60791_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:55.02 +69:38:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105219_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 105219_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:36.01 +67:16:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116386_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 116386_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:08.27 +68:15:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:38.62 +70:57:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86927_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 86927_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:37.28 +69:01:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:20.48 +70:56:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85806_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 85806_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:31.01 +65:37:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111017_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 111017_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:47:12.29 +67:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105494_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 105494_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:53.29 +67:19:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40672_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 40672_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 73865_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:56.14 +69:13:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111371_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 111371_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:34:40.46 +67:27:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86809_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 86809_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:01:20.17 +68:43:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66764_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 66764_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:19.77 +69:46:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58432_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 58432_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:49.57 +70:27:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98179_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 98179_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:51.22 +66:39:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109800_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 109800_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:53:04.65 +67:46:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67383_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 67383_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:30.17 +69:28:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109419_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 109419_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16209_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 16209_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:05:57.46 +73:08:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110520_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 110520_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:15.59 +68:44:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70993_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 70993_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:02.46 +69:27:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39669_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 39669_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:02.34 +72:02:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 114615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:00.70 +67:34:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:16.77 +67:52:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108578_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 108578_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:24.44 +67:32:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23041_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 23041_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43587_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 43587_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:48.96 +71:41:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:37.66 +70:18:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94487_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 94487_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:04.21 +66:22:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58448_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 58448_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:32.11 +70:19:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106385_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 106385_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:11.32 +67:10:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86849_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 86849_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:37.10 +68:21:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83726_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 83726_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:46:17.71 +65:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:31.54 +68:17:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98814_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 98814_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:49.12 +66:47:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91751_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 91751_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:13.51 +65:50:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119309_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 119309_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:04.34 +68:41:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20155_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 20155_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:43.55 +72:42:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79825_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 79825_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:22.52 +65:06:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110782_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 110782_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34636_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 34636_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:39:28.57 +72:00:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15920_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 15920_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43438_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 43438_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110874_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 110874_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:57.97 +67:50:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35635_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 35635_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67053_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 67053_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:37.84 +69:36:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74077_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 74077_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:30.20 +69:07:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67678_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 67678_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:03.15 +69:42:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107230_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 107230_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:07.73 +67:25:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:37:21.36 +68:00:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50575_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 50575_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93795_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 93795_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:57:10.75 +66:18:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61428_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 61428_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:18.17 +70:18:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84556_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 84556_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:35.22 +65:31:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45391_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 45391_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28104_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 28104_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:53:12.32 +72:18:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:56.48 +73:40:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89302_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 89302_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:27.55 +65:55:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58386_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 58386_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:00.04 +70:31:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 52940_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28486_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 28486_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20187_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 20187_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55863_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 55863_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113977_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 113977_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:20.22 +68:28:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90842_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 90842_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:49.52 +66:02:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50796_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 50796_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:22.81 +71:02:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72456_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 72456_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:46.02 +68:39:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88648_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 88648_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:20.71 +65:51:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54396_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 54396_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55142_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 55142_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46057_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 46057_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59550_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 59550_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26101_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 26101_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102178_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049
The candidate 102178_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-42-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0049 did not pass the final checks
