This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 11.54 18:55:07.15 -31:08:12.5
4.99045 -14.36020 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 0 0 0 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:07.15 -31:08:12.5: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:07.15 -31:08:12.5: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.6259,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.1259 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 11.73 19:23:15.03 -37:58:06.1
0.41095 -22.18584 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 0 2 2 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:23:15.03 -37:58:06.1: 14.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:23:15.03 -37:58:06.1: 14.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.6259,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.1259 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 12.01 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4
2.45908 -15.45799 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J185523.45-334904.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V 13.270 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J185523.45-334904.0,2461258.6259,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J185523.45-334904.0 20260806.1259 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 12.26 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4
3.54398 -8.77054 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J182846.36-300434.1
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 14.330 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4: 13.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4: 13.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J182846.36-300434.1,2461258.6259,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J182846.36-300434.1 20260806.1259 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 12.18 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5
357.61585 -10.72658 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1873 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 pg < 19.000 pg 2435639.00000 247.700000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5: 14.10 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1873 Sgr,2461258.6259,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1873 Sgr 20260806.1259 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 11.75 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2
357.67570 -7.90570 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V2640 Sgr
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 pg 15.400 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2640 Sgr,2461258.6259,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2640 Sgr 20260806.1259 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1259 2461258.6259 9.28 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5
358.95273 -12.23725 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V3574 Sgr
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.960 V Y 0.550 V 2452680.30000 257.881378000000 S5,4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5: 10.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5: 10.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.27 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3574 Sgr,2461258.6259,9.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3574 Sgr 20260806.1259 9.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461258.62615700 06.08.2026 03:01:29.965 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9147
Objects passed selection criteria: 9127
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7291.25
Average stars matched: 7091.25 (97.257 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 22:04:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
First image: 2461229.75814948 08.07.2026 06:11:34.115 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Last image: 2461258.62615700 06.08.2026 03:01:29.965 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 109055
Objects passed selection criteria: 108888
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85493
Average stars matched: 81142.5 (94.9113 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 571684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 22:06:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.62555197
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0248 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00872 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AXb7GFI3du
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pLphLpPeSy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RAZmgi3Yco
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b7Ai6ZktNT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7751 out of 8000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8000 out of 9747 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.316500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.316500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7337 to 291.6151 deg, Dec -39.2711 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18854 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7751 out of 8000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8000 out of 9747 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 9637 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7334 to 291.6528 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7334 to 291.6528 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4569 deg
Loaded 18877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7647 out of 7892 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7892 out of 9637 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AXb7GFI3du (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=676, bad_region=0, passed=9747
Got 9747 stars (including 9058 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9747 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.737 n_q1=1440 n_q2=831 n_q3=1539 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pLphLpPeSy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=703, bad_region=1, passed=9637
Got 9637 stars (including 8923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5304)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.718 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.755 n_q1=1438 n_q2=829 n_q3=1522 n_q4=1032 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RAZmgi3Yco (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=5026
Got 5026 stars (including 4747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4694 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4557 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4693 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4558 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4558 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4558 stars left (next iteration limit 5012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4558 robust_rms=7.043 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=34.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4558 robust_rms=0.572 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4558 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4558 robust_rms_before=1.035 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.670 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.572 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.911 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.731
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:01.904 -33:59:12.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5026 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1516986.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.035 -> 0.572 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=4558 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=1296 n_q2=630 n_q3=1682 n_q4=950 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b7Ai6ZktNT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=262, bad_region=0, passed=4985
Got 4985 stars (including 4717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4665 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4530 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4529 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4666 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4535 stars left (next iteration limit 4981)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=7.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=26.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.547 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.699 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4535 robust_rms_before=1.034 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.670 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.547 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.857 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.699
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:59.670 -33:58:57.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4985 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1516935.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.034 -> 0.547 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=4535 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.709 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1306 n_q2=638 n_q3=1614 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits sigma_overall=0.699 worst_q_ratio=1.078
ref2=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.718 worst_q_ratio=1.051
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.633 worst_q_ratio=1.203
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.603 worst_q_ratio=1.176
reference average sigma_overall=0.7085 worst_q_ratio=1.0645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.66 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (4821 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.68 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (4558 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (4535 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:59:39.03 -39:06:59.6: 10.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:13:20.03 -29:21:10.5: 9.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:13:20.03 -29:21:10.5: 9.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:59:39.03 -39:06:59.6: 10.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:20.03 -29:21:10.5: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9279 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:39.03 -39:06:59.6: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4702 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 20594_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.39 -31:08:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20740_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 20740_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20743_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 20743_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:29.75 -36:07:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02043_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 02043_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:53.39 -36:27:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01938_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 01938_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.07 -36:48:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06810_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 06810_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:07.25 -31:23:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07866_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 07866_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:18.08 -30:25:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0248 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:55.925 -34:00:01.60
Second-epoch image center 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:47:01.894 -33:59:11.88
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:59.662 -33:58:57.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00872 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QTSMBmzgfC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lTIvIsubGP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FFiECjMJh9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W1mXfDZdUI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 119127 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14049 out of 15978 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15978 out of 119127 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.086600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.086600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 119127 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6982 to 291.7315 deg, Dec -39.2735 to -28.4566 deg
Loaded 18960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14049 out of 15978 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15978 out of 119127 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 123059 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6989 to 291.7304 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6989 to 291.7304 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4568 deg
Loaded 18963 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14010 out of 15963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15963 out of 123059 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QTSMBmzgfC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=8489, bad_region=1, passed=119120
Got 119120 stars (including 110456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 119120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 119120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.724 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.798 n_q1=1470 n_q2=838 n_q3=1467 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lTIvIsubGP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=8929, bad_region=1, passed=123053
Got 123053 stars (including 113958 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 123053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 123053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 123053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4829 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=4829 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.720 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.710 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.775 n_q1=1469 n_q2=832 n_q3=1467 n_q4=1061 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FFiECjMJh9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2444, bad_region=1, passed=51627
Got 51627 stars (including 49106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 4823 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=4823 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.876 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1290 n_q2=680 n_q3=1773 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W1mXfDZdUI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2357, bad_region=1, passed=50964
Got 50964 stars (including 48539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.842 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.515 n_q1=1300 n_q2=687 n_q3=1729 n_q4=1099 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-00-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_220213_TTUQ1b1x1_1384432_ZQLmmBXi/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:19:22.86 -29:21:05.0: 12.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:41:18.42 -30:42:37.1: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:35:37.53 -29:56:50.1: 12.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:48:47.43 -32:37:09.6: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:08:12.41 -35:58:50.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:33:25.88 -30:06:00.7: 12.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:02:49.72 -31:21:10.2: 12.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:11.79 -32:51:23.2: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:07:28.89 -36:22:26.3: 10.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:31.11 -28:42:50.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:08:12.41 -35:58:50.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:12.41 -35:58:50.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:35:37.53 -29:56:50.1: 12.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:48:47.43 -32:37:09.6: 11.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:02:49.72 -31:21:10.2: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:19:22.86 -29:21:05.0: 12.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:11.79 -32:51:23.2: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:41:18.42 -30:42:37.1: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:33:25.88 -30:06:00.7: 12.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:37.53 -29:56:50.1: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2990 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:47.43 -32:37:09.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9483 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:49.72 -31:21:10.2: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1326 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:22.86 -29:21:05.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8901 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:11.79 -32:51:23.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7283 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:18.42 -30:42:37.1: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9384 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:25.88 -30:06:00.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4257 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:07:28.89 -36:22:26.3: 10.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:31.11 -28:42:50.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:31.11 -28:42:50.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.89 -36:22:26.3: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3037 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.5: 10.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:07.15 -31:08:12.5: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:18:23.74 -33:08:41.8: 11.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:23:49.69 -28:40:08.1: 11.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:30:48.62 -31:28:26.5: 12.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:07.15 -31:08:12.5: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.5: 10.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:40.57 -29:50:45.5: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6231 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:18:23.74 -33:08:41.8: 11.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:23.74 -33:08:41.8: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0110 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:23:49.69 -28:40:08.1: 11.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:49.69 -28:40:08.1: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7380 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:45:14.09 -35:52:12.2: 12.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:30:48.62 -31:28:26.5: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:48.62 -31:28:26.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9865 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:23:15.03 -37:58:06.1: 14.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 19:21:51.75 -32:08:59.0: 12.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:45:14.09 -35:52:12.2: 12.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:14.09 -35:52:12.2: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0275 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:23:15.03 -37:58:06.1: 14.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 19:21:51.75 -32:08:59.0: 12.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:51.75 -32:08:59.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2020 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:13:19.08 -33:47:26.5: 13.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:27.39 -29:52:52.9: 12.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:52:01.23 -31:54:54.8: 12.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:17:07.61 -32:14:46.7: 13.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:13:19.08 -33:47:26.5: 13.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:13:19.08 -33:47:26.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.3367 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:27.39 -29:52:52.9: 12.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:27.39 -29:52:52.9: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5386 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:52:01.23 -31:54:54.8: 12.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:01.23 -31:54:54.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4428 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:17:07.61 -32:14:46.7: 13.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:17:07.61 -32:14:46.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.4356 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:40:33.68 -33:50:10.9: 12.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:21:47.01 -31:37:12.7: 13.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:25:05.66 -31:31:11.1: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:40:33.68 -33:50:10.9: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:33.68 -33:50:10.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5085 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:21:47.01 -31:37:12.7: 13.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:21:47.01 -31:37:12.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.8133 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:25:05.66 -31:31:11.1: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:38:31.44 -32:54:44.0: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:55:23.50 -33:49:02.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0029 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:38:31.44 -32:54:44.0: 13.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:31.44 -32:54:44.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2600 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:40:27.13 -33:13:32.9: 13.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:40:27.13 -33:13:32.9: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:40:27.13 -33:13:32.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.5443 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:38:45.13 -28:53:50.1: 12.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:38:45.13 -28:53:50.1: 12.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:45.13 -28:53:50.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3308 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4: 13.22 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4: 13.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:28:46.36 -30:04:35.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.2575 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5: 14.10 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:24:52.40 -36:10:59.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=12.1723 delta=1.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:12:37.58 -34:51:34.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.7372 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-11-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits at 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5: 10.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-12-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0051.fits at 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5: 10.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:34:23.07 -35:38:40.5: ref_mag=10.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.2683 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out142321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out145572.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out145643.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out145939.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27589.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144247_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144247_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144253_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144253_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144255_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144255_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144268_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144268_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144273_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144273_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144283_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144283_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144300_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144300_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144301_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144301_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144306_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144306_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144342_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144342_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144457_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144457_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144624_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144624_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144790_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144790_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:41.35 -30:11:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144816_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 144816_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144840_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144840_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144926_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144926_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.49 -36:20:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144958_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144958_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:48.22 -31:48:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144980_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 144980_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:18.22 -34:54:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:39.16 -37:18:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145180_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145180_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:49.68 -36:01:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145191_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145191_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145194_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145194_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.44 -29:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145198_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145198_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:29.48 -36:27:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145202_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145202_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:49.50 -36:41:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145218_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145218_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:49.46 -33:37:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:07.78 -33:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:51.70 -30:36:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:30.26 -29:31:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145297_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 145297_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145316_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145316_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:45.45 -36:22:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145334_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145334_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:47.61 -29:59:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:25.61 -30:51:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145403_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145403_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:08.99 -33:50:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145527_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145527_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:45.68 -34:33:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145538_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145538_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:00.28 -31:11:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145544_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145544_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.19 -30:01:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145572_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145572_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:19.08 -33:47:26.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.763 4039436876699548928 273.32891117269 -33.79070965609 11.7832 10.2791 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.763#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145581_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145581_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:22.20 -35:33:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145592_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145592_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145616_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145616_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:48.30 -36:15:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145640_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145640_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145643_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145643_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:07.61 -32:14:46.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.155 4045810711241328640 274.28107168537 -32.24656690184 12.1947 10.9538 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.155#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.55 -29:11:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:16.52 -34:12:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145653_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145653_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:24.62 -28:41:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145685_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145685_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:12.09 -32:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145715_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145715_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:14.34 -35:28:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145742_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145742_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:41.75 -30:09:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145757_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145757_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:36.19 -31:04:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:42.40 -33:40:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145779_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145779_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145808_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145808_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:01.43 -30:07:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145855_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145855_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:07.45 -31:00:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145905_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145905_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:48.45 -36:02:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145939_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145939_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:05.66 -31:31:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.542 4046094660119798144 276.27286963822 -31.52010813867 12.3325 10.6394 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.542#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145964_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145964_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:41.94 -34:04:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145993_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 145993_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:20.83 -29:19:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146023_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 146023_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:30.83 -29:33:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146054_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 146054_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:43.44 -29:34:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146064_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 146064_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:46.27 -34:40:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146170_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 146170_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:47.97 -36:38:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50403_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 50403_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30249_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 30249_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:22.40 -35:12:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129441_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 129441_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129734_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 129734_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:33.50 -30:41:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65303_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 65303_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:47.44 -32:33:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91998_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 91998_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:09.92 -32:16:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23570_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 23570_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:29.83 -36:07:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 142321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:27.13 -33:13:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.434 6736375690872869248 280.11350919098 -33.22635703519 11.9470 10.6799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.434#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 59381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:18.04 -33:09:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13525_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 13525_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:28.32 -36:53:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 87022_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:48.20 -31:04:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77432_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 77432_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106946_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 106946_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:04.10 -30:39:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109517_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 109517_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:58.51 -30:51:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 66880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:21.09 -32:35:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134455_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 134455_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:53.09 -30:18:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133787_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 133787_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.36 -30:48:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102541_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 102541_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 49641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:20.21 -33:40:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16005_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 16005_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:07.38 -36:45:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15776_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 15776_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:32.54 -36:49:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86460_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 86460_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:31.31 -31:10:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24382_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 24382_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:28.71 -35:45:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90718_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 90718_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:17.27 -32:00:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39635_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 39635_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96736_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 96736_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:52.50 -29:03:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103754_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 103754_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:03.85 -30:10:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35550_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 35550_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:32.17 -34:58:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89654_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 89654_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:06.35 -31:46:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107067_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 107067_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:34.35 -30:31:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73069_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 73069_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.23 -29:28:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21371_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 21371_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:56.65 -36:10:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09141_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 09141_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:31.74 -37:47:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110583_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 110583_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.39 -31:08:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61577_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 61577_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:45.85 -32:59:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 21822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33947_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 33947_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48776_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 48776_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:26.59 -33:48:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101093_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 101093_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:58.62 -29:51:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17869_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 17869_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:53.39 -36:27:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16719_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 16719_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.05 -36:48:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78557_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 78557_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:17.58 -29:06:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 89025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:07.26 -31:23:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106066_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 106066_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:18.08 -30:25:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79193_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 79193_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.62 -29:30:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27589_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 27589_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74571_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 74571_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:12.62 -31:19:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56011_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 56011_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:13.97 -33:05:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 20644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-01-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
