This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 11.82 06:20:30.62 +33:22:37.7
179.76252 8.67734 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 1 0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:30.62 +33:22:37.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:30.62 +33:22:37.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9479,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4479 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 12.05 05:36:39.65 +31:44:16.8
176.59987 -0.15682 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 -0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:39.65 +31:44:16.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:39.65 +31:44:16.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9479,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4479 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 12.64 06:10:45.76 +31:47:12.6
180.22647 6.12135 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:10:45.76 +31:47:12.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:45.76 +31:47:12.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9479,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4479 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 13.29 06:17:01.44 +31:24:58.5
181.18379 7.12658 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:01.44 +31:24:58.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:01.44 +31:24:58.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9479,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4479 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 13.35 05:54:11.38 +33:16:00.5
177.21926 3.79407 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:11.38 +33:16:00.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:11.38 +33:16:00.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9479,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4479 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 12.80 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1
182.38137 2.30848 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" [WM2007] 320
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.150 V Y 0.710 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.4479* 06 00 10.59 +28 03 32.1 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[WM2007] 320,2461257.9479,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[WM2007] 320 20260805.4479 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4479 2461257.9479 12.75 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1
186.41743 3.32423 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0612546+250144
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.470 R1 Y 0.494 R1 191.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0612546+250144,2461257.9479,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0612546+250144 20260805.4479 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461257.94819551 05.08.2026 10:45:14.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25253
Objects passed selection criteria: 25135
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18609
Average stars matched: 18091.8 (97.2204 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 05:47:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461257.94819551 05.08.2026 10:45:14.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 170
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193435
Objects passed selection criteria: 192909
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 139364
Average stars matched: 134203 (96.2966 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 05:48:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.94753828
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0271 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01195 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UZwv1fMaMC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tXpqVso91r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOSinJUXYO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DqShHmCpYW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
3.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UZwv1fMaMC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tXpqVso91r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AOSinJUXYO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, bad_region=0, passed=10309
Got 10309 stars (including 9794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=9.049 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.566 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:07.883 +30:00:07.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10309 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429504.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.862 -> 0.408 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=1152 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1528 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DqShHmCpYW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=10214
Got 10214 stars (including 9714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=9.088 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.258 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4795 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.453
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.511 +29:59:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10214 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky429603.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.862 -> 0.354 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1151 n_q2=1100 n_q3=1532 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.200
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.355
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475_astrometric_residuals.png (4795 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 32027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.70 +29:51:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.21 +27:29:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.80 +29:09:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.04 +28:29:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.97 +28:18:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.88 +25:25:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.64 +31:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.04 +28:36:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.01 +31:35:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0271 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:07.884 +30:00:08.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:05.507 +29:59:38.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01195 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uJMulSV2Jc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e9WOlmNAaP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tl6BfhQIWe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ylT1JYtoBc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 164 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uJMulSV2Jc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e9WOlmNAaP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tl6BfhQIWe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4026, bad_region=7, passed=67772
Got 67772 stars (including 63678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1545 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ylT1JYtoBc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3910, bad_region=10, passed=67487
Got 67487 stars (including 63493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1548 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-44-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0474.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_054551_TTUQ1b1x1_420220_SqaickLx/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:04.32 +29:31:14.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:00.28 +33:25:05.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:37.53 +35:09:57.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:29.87 +33:02:04.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:49:05.25 +34:39:49.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:38.26 +25:45:04.6: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:51.17 +28:01:52.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.90 +26:16:28.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:38.26 +25:45:04.6: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:04.32 +29:31:14.3: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:29.87 +33:02:04.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:37.53 +35:09:57.8: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:49:05.25 +34:39:49.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:00.28 +33:25:05.8: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:51.17 +28:01:52.9: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:38.26 +25:45:04.6: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5902 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:04.32 +29:31:14.3: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6254 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:29.87 +33:02:04.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2446 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:37.53 +35:09:57.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5848 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:05.25 +34:39:49.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2492 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:00.28 +33:25:05.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4274 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:51.17 +28:01:52.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9855 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:14.26 +24:34:22.0: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.90 +26:16:28.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.90 +26:16:28.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6934 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:28.95 +34:51:24.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:14.26 +24:34:22.0: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:14.26 +24:34:22.0: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0184 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:19.76 +32:13:35.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.87 +29:01:22.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.55 +31:54:37.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:28.95 +34:51:24.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:28.95 +34:51:24.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5401 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:19.76 +32:13:35.1: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.55 +31:54:37.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.87 +29:01:22.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:19.76 +32:13:35.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5586 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.55 +31:54:37.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5958 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.87 +29:01:22.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2982 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:30.62 +33:22:37.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:39.65 +31:44:16.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.5: 12.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:30.62 +33:22:37.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:39.65 +31:44:16.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.5: 12.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:23.93 +32:33:21.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.1831 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:48.02 +35:04:25.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:45.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:01.49 +33:16:04.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:10:45.76 +31:47:12.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:48.02 +35:04:25.3: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:48.02 +35:04:25.3: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9196 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:45.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:45.9: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6545 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:01.49 +33:16:04.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:01.49 +33:16:04.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7017 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:45.76 +31:47:12.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:03:07.61 +31:03:51.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:49.49 +30:37:23.0: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:41.20 +29:39:16.2: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:07.61 +31:03:51.0: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:49.49 +30:37:23.0: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:07.61 +31:03:51.0: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8616 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:49.49 +30:37:23.0: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9125 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:41.20 +29:39:16.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:41.20 +29:39:16.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1496 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:01.56 +27:35:20.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:17:01.44 +31:24:58.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:01.56 +27:35:20.3: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:01.56 +27:35:20.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8605 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:11.38 +33:16:00.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:27.34 +31:08:56.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.9: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:01.44 +31:24:58.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:27.34 +31:08:56.5: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.9: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:11.38 +33:16:00.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:27.34 +31:08:56.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4325 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7591 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.38 +32:23:07.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.38 +32:23:07.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.38 +32:23:07.8: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9535 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:14.17 +27:23:06.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:14.17 +27:23:06.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:14.17 +27:23:06.9: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7287 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:00:10.59 +28:03:32.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7963 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:54.50 +25:01:46.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7430 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243143.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242169_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242179_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242181_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.73 +34:59:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:02.05 +33:06:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.20 +34:11:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.20 +33:16:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:21.36 +34:19:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.60 +34:57:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.71 +34:19:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.03 +33:47:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242210_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242211_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242213_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.58 +32:34:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.83 +32:31:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.78 +32:34:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242342_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242342_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.28 +32:03:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242361_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.49 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242386_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242386_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.68 +28:29:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242395_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.43 +32:35:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242451_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 242451_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242461_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 242461_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.60 +27:35:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242485_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.84 +34:55:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.60 +35:01:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242515_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242515_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242516_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.28 +28:37:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242522_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242522_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.75 +34:23:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242543_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.61 +32:30:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242633_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242633_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.69 +30:30:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242636_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242636_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.35 +31:39:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242639_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.04 +33:00:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242646_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.55 +32:41:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.87 +24:55:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.97 +31:08:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242673_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.73 +32:31:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242683_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242683_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.68 +26:04:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.00 +25:05:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242691_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242691_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.76 +34:15:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242700_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242700_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.16 +34:48:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242707_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242707_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:55.10 +32:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242709_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242709_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.70 +32:45:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242723_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242723_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.46 +26:00:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242725_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.63 +31:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242754_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242754_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.94 +32:33:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.16 +32:48:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242771_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242771_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:11.68 +34:09:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.41 +34:30:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242794_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242796_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.13 +33:56:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242807_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 242807_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242814_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242814_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.00 +26:41:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242826_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242826_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.90 +31:57:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242843_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.03 +29:43:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.42 +31:10:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242858_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242858_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.44 +25:01:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242888_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242888_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:56.67 +29:14:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242891_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242891_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.76 +30:30:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242894_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242894_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.15 +33:06:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.04 +29:28:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242908_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242908_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.93 +29:00:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242911_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242911_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242919_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242919_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.32 +25:47:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242921_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242921_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:00.07 +34:55:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242923_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:35.20 +32:16:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242927_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242927_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242929_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242929_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:51.05 +27:58:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:33.01 +34:49:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242952_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242952_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.36 +31:01:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242955_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242955_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.21 +32:06:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242965_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242965_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.16 +29:10:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242977_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242977_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:31.64 +33:12:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242979_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242979_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.14 +32:38:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242981_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 242981_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:29.13 +34:17:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:29.23 +28:08:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.41 +27:47:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243017_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243017_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.63 +30:45:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243019_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243019_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.04 +34:52:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.86 +33:01:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243057_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:40.82 +32:02:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243071_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243071_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:47.13 +32:30:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243084_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243084_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.94 +31:04:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243099_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.60 +30:42:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243106_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243106_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.62 +32:59:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243121_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243121_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:19.96 +31:18:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243128_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243128_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:29.78 +31:54:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243143_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 243143_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243149_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 243149_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243163_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243163_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.59 +32:04:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243233_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:05.26 +32:24:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243248_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 243248_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39563_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 39563_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.26 +33:12:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:44.97 +25:51:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.59 +31:56:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.88 +29:09:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.61 +25:17:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.05 +28:36:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.73 +25:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.72 +30:53:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.56 +28:56:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.34 +32:13:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.67 +29:51:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.99 +32:01:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.77 +34:35:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.13 +29:24:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.74 +32:22:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.55 +25:40:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 158410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.42 +34:45:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.19 +27:36:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 146748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.96 +28:00:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:50.43 +29:13:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.19 +27:47:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.21 +33:26:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.41 +29:32:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.20 +29:27:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.57 +30:45:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.82 +34:38:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.16 +25:59:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.40 +31:03:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.37 +33:40:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:35.26 +33:28:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.55 +33:45:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.37 +30:50:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:16.98 +28:29:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.84 +31:25:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.31 +25:12:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 45963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.37 +27:23:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.65 +30:56:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:13.72 +29:53:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:01.98 +32:58:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.24 +27:45:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.36 +34:41:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.15 +29:02:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.06 +32:03:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:37.13 +31:42:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.99 +31:35:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.63 +29:22:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 108247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:04.38 +29:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.21 +27:29:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 186660_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:49.98 +26:38:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
Preparing report for the candidate 207689_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.86 +28:18:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.08 +31:40:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.66 +31:24:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-45-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0475 did not pass the final checks
