This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 12.40 16:11:49.37 -10:51:55.7
1.79994 28.34226 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 0 0 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:49.37 -10:51:55.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:49.37 -10:51:55.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6843,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1843 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 12.64 16:29:42.88 -05:15:27.0
9.90990 28.16356 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 0 0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:42.88 -05:15:27.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:42.88 -05:15:27.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6843,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1843 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 13.06 16:27:42.99 -14:53:39.3
1.01811 22.79876 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:42.99 -14:53:39.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:42.99 -14:53:39.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6843,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1843 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 13.89 15:56:04.92 -06:41:35.1
2.70402 33.99286 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho -0 0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:56:04.92 -06:41:35.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:56:04.92 -06:41:35.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6843,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1843 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 14.36 15:52:20.78 -10:37:42.0
358.41780 32.13820 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -0 2 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:20.78 -10:37:42.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:20.78 -10:37:42.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6843,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1843 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1843 2461257.6843 12.76 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1
0.54075 25.31844 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX15" Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 G 14.040 G M
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -0 1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1: 15.71 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632,2461257.6843,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632 20260805.1843 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461257.68464674 05.08.2026 04:25:43.478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7884
Objects passed selection criteria: 7883
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7511.75
Average stars matched: 7371.5 (98.1329 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 23:49:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461257.68464674 05.08.2026 04:25:43.478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62569
Objects passed selection criteria: 62444
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59246.2
Average stars matched: 57465.8 (96.9947 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 284276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 23:50:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.68401800
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01427 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZzQlEr5Ql7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNCpmYJXmU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ee2wxCrPUE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HTDgNwl6ru
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Loaded 5209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4209 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Loaded 5209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4209 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8990 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6005 to -4.3251 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8990 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6005 to -4.3251 deg
Loaded 5223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4035 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZzQlEr5Ql7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FNCpmYJXmU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ee2wxCrPUE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, bad_region=0, passed=6825
Got 6825 stars (including 6499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=9.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.965 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.310 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.821 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.310
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1265 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1318 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HTDgNwl6ru (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=6878
Got 6878 stars (including 6551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=9.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.868 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.796 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.329 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.329 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.156
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.112
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.134
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (4904 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:54.96 -09:51:38.6: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.46 -08:12:14.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:20.67 -08:21:40.3: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.7: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:51.32 -06:39:36.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:10.72 -14:10:55.7: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:42.21 -04:51:41.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:59.24 -10:10:54.6: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:54.96 -09:51:38.6: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.46 -08:12:14.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:20.67 -08:21:40.3: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.7: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8697 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.46 -08:12:14.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2214 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:20.67 -08:21:40.3: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2336 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:54.96 -09:51:38.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0592 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:51.32 -06:39:36.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:51.32 -06:39:36.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1849 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:42.21 -04:51:41.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:42.21 -04:51:41.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1318 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:10.72 -14:10:55.7: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:10.72 -14:10:55.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1488 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:59.24 -10:10:54.6: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:59.24 -10:10:54.6: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2373 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.84 -14:41:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.25 -09:46:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20519_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.46 -07:42:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 02024_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.14 -07:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 01595_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:28.08 -06:58:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0263 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:10.749 -10:00:48.62
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:13.405 -10:00:15.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01427 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.urYmGr1X3e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6NUoAdnjs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QWMde45vko
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YEohC4Y8oU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Loaded 5306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3762 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Loaded 5306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3762 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8740 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6083 to -4.1791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8740 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6083 to -4.1791 deg
Loaded 5298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3780 out of 4279 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4279 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.urYmGr1X3e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1360 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6NUoAdnjs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1190 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1357 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QWMde45vko (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2025, bad_region=18, passed=52861
Got 52861 stars (including 50721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1339 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YEohC4Y8oU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1920, bad_region=20, passed=52722
Got 52722 stars (including 50685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1192 n_q3=1118 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_232658_TTUQ1b1x1_2051592_wTLJZgjf/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:02.81 -10:05:33.7: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:46.31 -12:26:02.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:02:46.27 -04:43:47.1: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:41.86 -12:37:19.6: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:17:10.68 -09:18:28.7: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:07.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.48 -07:32:29.7: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:29.81 -06:05:37.7: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:54.89 -07:42:02.7: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:17:10.68 -09:18:28.7: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:46.31 -12:26:02.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:07.6: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:10.68 -09:18:28.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3578 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:41.86 -12:37:19.6: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:46.31 -12:26:02.7: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6537 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:49.37 -10:51:55.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:54.89 -07:42:02.7: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:29.81 -06:05:37.7: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:07.6: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3428 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:41.86 -12:37:19.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5068 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:02.81 -10:05:33.7: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.48 -07:32:29.7: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:29.81 -06:05:37.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7653 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.89 -07:42:02.7: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1081 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:02:46.27 -04:43:47.1: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:02.81 -10:05:33.7: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2378 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.48 -07:32:29.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2406 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.27 -04:43:47.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7107 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:49.37 -10:51:55.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:42.88 -05:15:27.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:34.17 -12:26:11.3: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:42.99 -14:53:39.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:31.52 -10:54:57.7: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.93 -07:08:17.2: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.21 -14:38:20.1: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:42.88 -05:15:27.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.53 -12:08:24.3: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:42.99 -14:53:39.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:34.17 -12:26:11.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.93 -07:08:17.2: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:31.52 -10:54:57.7: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.17 -12:26:11.3: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8562 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.93 -07:08:17.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6135 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.52 -10:54:57.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6095 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.21 -14:38:20.1: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.21 -14:38:20.1: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4114 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.39 -12:27:35.2: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:56:04.92 -06:41:35.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.53 -12:08:24.3: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.53 -12:08:24.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8375 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.39 -12:27:35.2: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:56:04.92 -06:41:35.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.39 -12:27:35.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9531 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.14 -08:42:28.7: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:16.28 -11:32:05.3: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:52.70 -07:02:51.7: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:35.5: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:16.28 -11:32:05.3: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:16.28 -11:32:05.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1321 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.14 -08:42:28.7: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.14 -08:42:28.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0263 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:52.70 -07:02:51.7: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:52.70 -07:02:51.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8854 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:02.08 -12:48:39.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:45.98 -13:55:51.8: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:35.5: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:35.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0601 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:02.08 -12:48:39.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:45.98 -13:55:51.8: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:02.08 -12:48:39.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0877 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:45.98 -13:55:51.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0198 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:00.61 -10:40:13.6: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.56 -09:50:40.7: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:20.78 -10:37:42.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:25.46 -11:01:28.2: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:00.61 -10:40:13.6: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:00.61 -10:40:13.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3301 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.56 -09:50:40.7: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.56 -09:50:40.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2603 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:49.96 -14:11:42.0: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:38.39 -15:03:20.8: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:20.78 -10:37:42.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:25.46 -11:01:28.2: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:25.46 -11:01:28.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2586 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:49.96 -14:11:42.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:49.96 -14:11:42.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3548 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:38.39 -15:03:20.8: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:38.39 -15:03:20.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3563 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:56:27.07 -04:59:49.7: 15.40 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:33.13 -11:08:48.2: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:11.24 -11:19:07.9: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:33.13 -11:08:48.2: 15.51 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:56:27.07 -04:59:49.7: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:33.13 -11:08:48.2: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6943 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:27.07 -04:59:49.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4928 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:35:26.11 -12:48:53.6: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:57.63 -14:43:01.2: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:11.24 -11:19:07.9: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:11.24 -11:19:07.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7321 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:35:26.11 -12:48:53.6: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:26.11 -12:48:53.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5218 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:57.63 -14:43:01.2: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:57.63 -14:43:01.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7364 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:26.86 -10:10:03.9: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:46.27 -15:01:05.5: 15.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:23:02.45 -06:42:59.1: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:26.86 -10:10:03.9: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:46.27 -15:01:05.5: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:26.86 -10:10:03.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5129 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:46.27 -15:01:05.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5726 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:00.31 -12:19:31.0: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:21.02 -07:44:38.9: 15.73 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:23:02.45 -06:42:59.1: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:02.45 -06:42:59.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7827 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:00.31 -12:19:31.0: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:00.31 -12:19:31.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7163 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:21.02 -07:44:38.9: 15.44 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:21.02 -07:44:38.9: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9233 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:23:44.05 -12:35:49.2: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:23:44.05 -12:35:49.2: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:44.05 -12:35:49.2: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8242 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:17.46 -10:33:23.3: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1: 15.71 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.71 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:18:29.94 -13:38:55.1: ref_mag=15.71 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.7568 delta=2.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:17.46 -10:33:23.3: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:17.46 -10:33:23.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1495 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82671.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82735.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82500_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82500_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82505_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82505_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:19.14 -10:47:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:12.52 -15:05:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82545_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82545_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82546_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82546_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:53.78 -15:13:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82549_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82549_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.60 -12:31:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82577_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 82577_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.20 -05:49:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82586_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82586_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82592_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 82592_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82626_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82626_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82634_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82634_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:51.04 -11:08:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.13 -10:03:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:46.56 -08:27:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82671_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 82671_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82681_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82681_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.72 -06:41:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82703_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82703_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.92 -06:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82705_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82705_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82708_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82708_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82712_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82712_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82725_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82725_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.55 -07:06:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82733_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82733_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82735_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 82735_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82756_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82756_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82816_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82816_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82821_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82821_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82829_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82829_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82836_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82836_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82848_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82848_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82857_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82857_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82908_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82908_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82917_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 82917_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.73 -06:46:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.18 -05:51:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.85 -14:41:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.14 -07:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 53324_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38303_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 38303_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
