This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 11.21 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6
351.64950 22.90199 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6: 15.13 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 12.76 15:32:18.92 -15:57:57.5
349.90025 31.86604 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 1 0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:32:18.92 -15:57:57.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:32:18.92 -15:57:57.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 12.96 16:04:26.32 -21:24:07.6
351.76129 22.66641 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 0 0 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:26.32 -21:24:07.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:26.32 -21:24:07.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 13.15 16:27:42.88 -14:53:37.9
1.01814 22.79935 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 0 1 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:42.88 -14:53:37.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:42.88 -14:53:37.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 13.41 16:24:34.09 -23:16:13.7
353.66328 17.97873 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:24:34.09 -23:16:13.7: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:24:34.09 -23:16:13.7: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 14.21 15:41:23.81 -13:20:22.7
353.91649 32.23298 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 0 0 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:23.81 -13:20:22.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:23.81 -13:20:22.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 14.32 15:55:04.64 -17:23:03.3
353.25053 27.04695 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 0 1 1 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:55:04.64 -17:23:03.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:55:04.64 -17:23:03.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 14.49 16:01:02.79 -16:57:34.4
354.69490 26.30701 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 0 -0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:01:02.79 -16:57:34.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:01:02.79 -16:57:34.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6745,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1745 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1745 2461257.6745 12.56 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9
0.54081 25.31890 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX14" Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 G 14.040 G M
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9: 15.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632,2461257.6745,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4329761620636677632 20260805.1745 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461257.67477869 05.08.2026 04:11:30.879 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8219
Objects passed selection criteria: 8204
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7413
Average stars matched: 7294.75 (98.4048 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 23:24:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461257.67477869 05.08.2026 04:11:30.879 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65167
Objects passed selection criteria: 65044
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61579.2
Average stars matched: 59422.8 (96.498 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 287932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 23:26:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.67420185
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dmmvt2wIJ8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jvBMCtp3uq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IhMd0O8q05
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YLfVuHo10L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Loaded 6479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4774 out of 4948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4948 out of 8615 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Dmmvt2wIJ8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, bad_region=0, passed=8924
Got 8924 stars (including 8411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1354 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jvBMCtp3uq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=8615
Got 8615 stars (including 8079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1209 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IhMd0O8q05 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, bad_region=0, passed=6161
Got 6161 stars (including 5760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=9.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.006 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.397 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1201 n_q2=1231 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YLfVuHo10L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=0, passed=6097
Got 6097 stars (including 5697 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=9.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.811 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4903 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4903 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.391 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.374
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1226 n_q3=1150 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.156
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.164
reference average sigma_overall=0.2805 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103_astrometric_residuals.png (4903 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6: 15.13 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=11.2023 delta=3.79 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20424_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:09.59 -16:32:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20425_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:53.75 -20:53:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20434_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.95 -21:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 20441_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20445_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.06 -19:20:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.91 -18:30:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.73 -18:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0191 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:58.085 -18:00:01.44
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:55.994 -18:00:42.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOowifKXYN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r50g0Ug0Hl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fj0nozLZh2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HcqzgMy9FX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.610200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.610200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 69473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Loaded 6543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4678 out of 5218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5218 out of 69473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.0 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AOowifKXYN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3233, bad_region=14, passed=67276
Got 67276 stars (including 63934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1159 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r50g0Ug0Hl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3361, bad_region=20, passed=69459
Got 69459 stars (including 65977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1159 n_q2=1234 n_q3=1164 n_q4=1358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Fj0nozLZh2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2274, bad_region=6, passed=55405
Got 55405 stars (including 53042 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HcqzgMy9FX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2211, bad_region=7, passed=55546
Got 55546 stars (including 53220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1216 n_q2=1261 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-10-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_231653_TTUQ1b1x1_890855_ft6vJayU/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:08:33.03 -13:19:09.6: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:27.88 -19:39:18.0: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:20.68 -14:01:56.8: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:40.9: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:40.62 -13:34:25.4: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:41.99 -21:12:50.1: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:08:06.28 -20:49:37.7: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:44.41 -16:15:51.6: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:10:28.65 -16:26:13.5: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:03.36 -16:05:40.8: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:44.41 -16:15:51.6: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:20.68 -14:01:56.8: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:41.99 -21:12:50.1: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:08:06.28 -20:49:37.7: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:03.36 -16:05:40.8: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:27.88 -19:39:18.0: 14.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:40.62 -13:34:25.4: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:10:28.65 -16:26:13.5: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:44.41 -16:15:51.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5103 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:08:33.03 -13:19:09.6: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:20.68 -14:01:56.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5054 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:41.99 -21:12:50.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0831 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:06.28 -20:49:37.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0253 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:27.88 -19:39:18.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3880 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:03.36 -16:05:40.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9592 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:40.62 -13:34:25.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1544 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:28.65 -16:26:13.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5875 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:33.03 -13:19:09.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3865 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:40.9: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:40.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2677 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:55.92 -15:09:42.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.5: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:36:36.22 -18:02:23.8: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:37.27 -22:00:58.6: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:26.49 -19:01:40.5: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:23.44 -13:17:03.1: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:11.29 -16:51:22.9: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.5: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:55.92 -15:09:42.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9225 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:37.27 -22:00:58.6: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:55.92 -15:09:42.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8142 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:37.27 -22:00:58.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8192 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:36:36.22 -18:02:23.8: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:50.45 -22:18:13.1: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:36.22 -18:02:23.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9004 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:23.44 -13:17:03.1: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:23.44 -13:17:03.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1623 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:11.29 -16:51:22.9: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:11.29 -16:51:22.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7118 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:20:26.49 -19:01:40.5: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:26.49 -19:01:40.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8207 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:50.45 -22:18:13.1: 13.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:14.45 -19:47:32.4: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:50.45 -22:18:13.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7021 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:42.80 -22:48:30.9: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:06.72 -20:31:23.8: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:10.99 -21:51:11.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:14.45 -19:47:32.4: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:14.45 -19:47:32.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5307 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:36.7: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:42.80 -22:48:30.9: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:01:44.51 -22:15:31.3: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:42.80 -22:48:30.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6140 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:39.36 -19:28:01.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:10.99 -21:51:11.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:44:25.52 -21:18:59.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:10.99 -21:51:11.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5898 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:36.7: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:33.91 -16:23:34.8: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:36.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5894 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:06.72 -20:31:23.8: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:01:44.51 -22:15:31.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:06.72 -20:31:23.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7196 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:44.51 -22:15:31.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4027 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:39.36 -19:28:01.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:39.36 -19:28:01.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3890 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:44:25.52 -21:18:59.5: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:33.91 -16:23:34.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:25.52 -21:18:59.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3470 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:33.91 -16:23:34.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1688 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:46.23 -16:05:29.2: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:46.23 -16:05:29.2: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:46.23 -16:05:29.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1555 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:47:18.77 -16:10:47.2: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:58.09 -14:59:06.6: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:47:18.77 -16:10:47.2: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:18.77 -16:10:47.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2699 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:58.09 -14:59:06.6: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:58.09 -14:59:06.6: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6430 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:26.32 -21:24:07.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:32:18.92 -15:57:57.5: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:42.88 -14:53:37.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:24:34.09 -23:16:13.7: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:26.32 -21:24:07.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:14.8: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:34.17 -17:42:50.7: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:32:18.92 -15:57:57.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:42.88 -14:53:37.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:40.58 -15:24:42.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:42.15 -22:47:39.9: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:24:34.09 -23:16:13.7: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:35.8: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:14.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:02.73 -22:35:31.5: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:35.82 -19:12:14.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4650 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:34.17 -17:42:50.7: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.17 -17:42:50.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4654 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:51:40.58 -15:24:42.5: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:40.58 -15:24:42.5: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5522 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:42.15 -22:47:39.9: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:42.15 -22:47:39.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5747 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:35.8: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:35.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6267 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:02.73 -22:35:31.5: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:02.73 -22:35:31.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7788 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:23.13 -20:37:54.8: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:44.46 -15:36:28.8: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:26:09.22 -13:15:44.2: 14.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:30.18 -21:21:56.2: 14.82 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:23.13 -20:37:54.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:23.13 -20:37:54.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8858 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:44.46 -15:36:28.8: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:44.46 -15:36:28.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9035 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:26:09.22 -13:15:44.2: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:23.81 -13:20:22.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:09.22 -13:15:44.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1151 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:19.78 -16:50:26.6: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:30.18 -21:21:56.2: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:30.18 -21:21:56.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2556 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:23.81 -13:20:22.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:19.78 -16:50:26.6: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:19.78 -16:50:26.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2781 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:52.87 -21:14:12.4: 14.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:11.79 -17:56:14.0: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:22.04 -13:14:08.5: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:04.25 -22:13:52.2: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:29:52.87 -21:14:12.4: 14.52 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:32:11.79 -17:56:14.0: 14.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:52.87 -21:14:12.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3526 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:11.79 -17:56:14.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3209 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:22.04 -13:14:08.5: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:22.04 -13:14:08.5: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3537 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:04.25 -22:13:52.2: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:04.25 -22:13:52.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3054 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:55:04.64 -17:23:03.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:46.78 -14:10:15.0: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:45.61 -22:50:04.5: 14.76 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:29.69 -13:32:26.9: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:55:04.64 -17:23:03.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:45.61 -22:50:04.5: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:46.78 -14:10:15.0: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:29.69 -13:32:26.9: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:46.78 -14:10:15.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3010 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:45.61 -22:50:04.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2934 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:29.69 -13:32:26.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5071 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:45.34 -19:05:44.6: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:11:45.34 -19:05:44.6: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:45.34 -19:05:44.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3115 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:32.1: 15.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:35.7: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:23.76 -13:46:37.8: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:32.1: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:23.76 -13:46:37.8: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:35.7: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:32.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5642 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:23.76 -13:46:37.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4657 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:35.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5443 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:23.63 -22:47:23.5: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:23.63 -22:47:23.5: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:23.63 -22:47:23.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2613 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:19.16 -17:35:35.6: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:31.99 -18:39:45.9: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:36:37.38 -18:55:45.3: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:31.99 -18:39:45.9: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:31.99 -18:39:45.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6346 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:19.16 -17:35:35.6: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:19.16 -17:35:35.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5325 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:47:46.76 -20:25:52.0: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:36:37.38 -18:55:45.3: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:37.38 -18:55:45.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3487 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:47:46.76 -20:25:52.0: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:46.76 -20:25:52.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5893 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:37:40.41 -17:48:04.3: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:05:13.86 -18:09:36.9: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:37:40.41 -17:48:04.3: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:40.41 -17:48:04.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5146 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:01:02.79 -16:57:34.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:05:13.86 -18:09:36.9: 15.32 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:13.86 -18:09:36.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6660 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:01:02.79 -16:57:34.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9: 15.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:18:29.86 -13:38:53.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=12.5647 delta=2.59 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84652.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84417_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84417_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84419_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84419_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84430_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84430_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84432_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84432_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84442_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84442_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84444_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84444_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84467_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84467_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:00.57 -17:09:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84469_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84469_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:24.36 -21:53:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84472_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84472_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84473_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84473_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:25.17 -22:18:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84478_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84478_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84480_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84480_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:40.05 -18:50:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84482_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84482_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84487_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84487_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:46.46 -19:53:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84490_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84490_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:49.99 -19:50:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84494_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84494_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:03.85 -18:33:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84498_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84498_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84501_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84501_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84502_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84502_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84505_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84505_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:26.42 -22:58:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84507_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84507_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84508_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84508_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84509_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84509_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:57.05 -22:05:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84511_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84511_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:05.54 -21:08:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:01.64 -21:14:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:23.02 -20:25:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84516_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84516_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84519_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84519_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:11.14 -23:10:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84520_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84520_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:50.27 -18:53:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84522_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84522_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:09.64 -16:32:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84524_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84524_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:53.75 -20:53:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84540_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84540_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:24.22 -21:18:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84553_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84553_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.94 -18:30:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84559_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84559_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:47.91 -21:55:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84567_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84567_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.60 -22:21:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84569_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84569_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.09 -18:41:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84570_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84570_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.78 -20:08:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84583_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84583_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.17 -18:59:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84589_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84589_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:46.50 -20:01:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84590_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84590_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84604_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84604_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84617_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84617_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84638_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84638_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:58.85 -23:00:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84646_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84646_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:10.31 -16:41:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84652_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84652_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84657_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84657_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84662_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84662_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84668_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84668_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84673_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84673_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84679_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84679_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84699_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84699_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84733_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84733_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84738_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84738_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:51.63 -13:10:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84752_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84752_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84753_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84753_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:48.09 -15:48:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84761_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84761_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84771_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84771_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84783_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84783_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84789_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84789_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84793_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84793_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84795_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84795_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:24.73 -22:01:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84797_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84797_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84800_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84800_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84807_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84807_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84810_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84810_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84811_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84811_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:57.91 -20:40:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84814_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84814_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84838_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84838_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84841_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84841_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84846_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84846_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84855_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84855_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84865_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84865_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84899_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84899_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84905_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84905_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84907_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84907_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84910_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 84910_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84912_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 84912_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.69 -22:44:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 04121_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.95 -21:31:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.98 -16:36:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.00 -19:20:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27053_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 27053_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:59.95 -17:03:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.71 -18:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
