Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.1685  2461257.6685  11.46  11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9
154.63905  61.73612 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 1.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -crosshair 4273.00244 5885.99756 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -crosshair 4274.39453 5885.72949 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16847 11 21 20.92 +49 28 40.9          11.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16823 11 21 21.12 +49 28 40.6          11.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16871 11 21 20.72 +49 28 41.3          11.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.1685*  11 21 20.92 +49 28 40.9  11.5 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461257.6685,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260805.1685 11.46CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.1685  2461257.6685  14.55  11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6
145.13842  57.95316 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                            J-Ks=1.449+/-0.256 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6:  16.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -crosshair 3929.72754 2236.98047 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -crosshair 3930.26025 2236.95850 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16847 11 28 35.20 +55 27 28.6          14.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16823 11 28 35.16 +55 27 28.8          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16871 11 28 35.24 +55 27 28.3          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.1685*  11 28 35.20 +55 27 28.6  14.6 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461257.6685,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260805.1685 14.55CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.1685  2461257.6685  14.82  11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7
140.53728  55.74299 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -crosshair 3630.06836 233.84210 image    wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -crosshair 3630.03711 234.44141 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16847 11 34 55.95 +58 41 34.7          14.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16823 11 34 55.72 +58 41 37.0          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.16871 11 34 56.19 +58 41 32.4          14.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.1685*  11 34 55.95 +58 41 34.7  14.8 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461257.6685,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260805.1685 14.82CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
First image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Last  image: 2461257.66871046 05.08.2026 04:02:46.584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6831
Objects passed selection criteria:  6799
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5216.5
Average stars matched: 5069.5 (97.182 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   233060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug  4 23:16:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
First image: 2461093.77947690 22.02.2026 06:42:16.804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Last  image: 2461257.66871046 05.08.2026 04:02:46.584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 114
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  33779
Objects passed selection criteria:  33689
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28193.8
Average stars matched: 27013.8 (95.8147 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   256000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug  4 23:17:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 322333 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 322333 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits


renamed 'UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits_preview.png'

UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.9961
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.2603
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1211.3632
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 428.6468
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1212.5751
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 428.2205
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.71001
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T23:02:05.0015924' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T04:02:05.0015924' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.1681134375 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T04:02:14.9054500' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61257.168228067 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.411662685129 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9994930477748 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     19.9833333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     322.229166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.90445165009773 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits :)

Spent 0.729217 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T23:02:46.5842586' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T04:02:46.5842586' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.1685947222 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T04:02:56.4856376' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61257.1687093172 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     169.411662720571 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9994930754811 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     19.8938888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              322.285 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.91675926184901 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits :)

Spent 0.656165 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/d_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits



fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.66822918
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AekcUuuGFb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EiWQS5WhOj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XBslOYBMwb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.urUx1nm7yr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.925500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.925500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.6704 to +59.4175 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.6704 to 59.4175 deg
Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3487 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 6962 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 2.3 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AekcUuuGFb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=0, passed=6940
Got 6940 stars (including 6459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1182 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EiWQS5WhOj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=0, passed=6962
Got 6962 stars (including 6476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1204 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XBslOYBMwb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=223, bad_region=0, passed=3560
Got 3560 stars (including 3332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3252 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3248 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3248 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3252 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3248 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3248 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 3248 stars left (next iteration limit 3572)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3248 robust_rms=11.208 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3248 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.642 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3248 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3248 robust_rms_before=1.083 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.368 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.400
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=3248 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=857 n_q2=804 n_q3=849 n_q4=738 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.urUx1nm7yr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=205, bad_region=0, passed=3530
Got 3530 stars (including 3319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3237 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3237 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3234 stars left (next iteration limit 3557)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3234 robust_rms=11.118 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3234 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3234 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3234 robust_rms_before=1.096 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.362 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=3234 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=852 n_q2=797 n_q3=841 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.218
ref2=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.115
new2=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.094
reference average sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.1875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (3248 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093_astrometric_residuals.png (3234 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20323_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    11.53    11:47:21.19 +54:57:39.3   2289 2318   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:47:21.18 +54:57:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79
Second-epoch image center 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:17:49.260 +53:59:09.29
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:49.743 +53:59:08.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ggsA6sCWND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TfrlT2FAf7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ThKBUvqRV7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cGM5FLxpMe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg
Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.59

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.59

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg
Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 34891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.5448 to +59.4321 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.5448 to 59.4321 deg
Loaded 5335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 34891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ggsA6sCWND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1580, bad_region=11, passed=34803
Got 34803 stars (including 33155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TfrlT2FAf7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1579, bad_region=13, passed=34870
Got 34870 stars (including 33223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ThKBUvqRV7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=921, bad_region=18, passed=22190
Got 22190 stars (including 21214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1355 n_q2=1251 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cGM5FLxpMe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=771, bad_region=21, passed=21834
Got 21834 stars (including 21004 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1352 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1205 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:35:38.98 +51:22:29.9:  13.22 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:17:01.56 +49:28:02.6:  13.25 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:16:41.87 +53:12:22.7:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:47:06.55 +58:42:31.2:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:38:45.92 +53:30:10.9:  11.56 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:35:38.98 +51:22:29.9:  13.32 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:17:01.56 +49:28:02.6:  13.21 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:16:41.87 +53:12:22.7:  12.53 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:38.98 +51:22:29.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4821 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:01.56 +49:28:02.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3004 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:16:41.87 +53:12:22.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9163 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:47:06.55 +58:42:31.2:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:06.55 +58:42:31.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:38:45.92 +53:30:10.9:  11.59 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:45.92 +53:30:10.9: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6706 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:31:48.35 +58:25:40.0:  12.71 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:04.3:  12.38 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:33:45.45 +55:34:31.7:  12.92 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:31:48.35 +58:25:40.0:  12.74 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:04.3:  12.37 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:48.35 +58:25:40.0: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7828 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:53:28.34 +49:13:04.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4458 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:33:45.45 +55:34:31.7:  12.91 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:45.45 +55:34:31.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8489 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:17:17.70 +51:08:53.4:  13.11 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:54:38.78 +54:18:19.9:  13.22 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:17:17.70 +51:08:53.4:  13.13 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:17.70 +51:08:53.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1708 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:54:38.78 +54:18:19.9:  13.18 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:38.78 +54:18:19.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2197 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6:  16.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7:  16.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52339_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.87    11:12:38.93 +56:47:27.8   5321 1531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:12:38.96 +56:47:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.85    11:51:44.18 +50:21:37.8   1405 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:51:44.15 +50:21:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52349_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52349_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.62    11:16:29.72 +58:23:32.1   5060 0548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:16:29.71 +58:23:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52354_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52354_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    13.50    11:35:38.99 +51:22:29.1   3022 4611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.47    11:35:38.97 +51:22:30.6   3022 4611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    13.34    11:17:01.53 +49:28:02.7   4696 5920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.27    11:17:01.58 +49:28:02.5   4696 5920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52356_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52356_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.30    11:56:57.62 +49:29:54.8   0799 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:57.57 +49:29:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52357_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.60    11:54:43.36 +50:24:39.6   1125 4910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:54:43.42 +50:24:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52359_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    12.94    11:16:41.85 +53:12:22.7   4860 3669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.90    11:16:41.89 +53:12:22.7   4861 3669   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52360_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.87    11:26:34.88 +58:03:19.5   4246 0692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:26:34.90 +58:03:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52362_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.63    11:00:15.63 +51:30:43.3   6340 4732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:00:15.66 +51:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52363_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    11.67    10:38:45.92 +53:30:10.9   8274 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    11.67    10:38:45.93 +53:30:11.0   8275 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52392_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    9.58    10:47:06.54 +58:42:31.0   7380 0357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    9.58    10:47:06.56 +58:42:31.4   7381 0357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52442_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    10.67    11:10:37.92 +50:20:20.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 52525_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52528_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    11.49    11:10:49.94 +58:55:15.1   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52531_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    11.66    12:01:29.87 +55:52:52.8   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    11.75    12:01:46.81 +55:02:49.8   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52605_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.05    11:25:07.36 +56:10:02.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52628_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.18    11:17:04.63 +56:48:20.1   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52697_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.38    11:17:45.96 +54:41:44.4   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52715_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.33    11:16:46.07 +49:26:51.0   4721 5933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:16:46.08 +49:26:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52763_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.48    11:14:18.01 +51:08:25.9   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52765_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.68    11:32:21.13 +57:12:17.8   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52772_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.41    10:41:47.93 +52:57:23.5   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52774_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52774_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.24    11:18:51.80 +48:54:34.3   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52788_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    12.45    10:53:28.47 +49:13:04.4   7011 6117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.44    10:53:28.21 +49:13:04.2   7012 6117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52801_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    12.80    11:31:48.41 +58:25:40.1   3856 0424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.77    11:31:48.30 +58:25:39.9   3857 0424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52807_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.92    11:57:13.21 +58:01:41.6   1814 0335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:57:13.16 +58:01:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52818_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.74    12:13:45.74 +57:50:55.3   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52830_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.84    11:50:22.74 +49:35:41.6   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52845_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.78    11:53:07.02 +57:01:10.9   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52847_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    12.86    11:33:45.47 +55:34:31.7   3499 2118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.84    11:33:45.44 +55:34:31.8   3500 2118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52893_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.63    10:30:36.70 +51:48:53.1   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52896_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.97    11:27:38.55 +55:47:37.9   4030 2043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:27:38.57 +55:47:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52909_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.10    11:55:07.20 +55:09:28.1   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52929_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.62    11:27:01.96 +50:53:58.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52962_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    12.75    10:38:01.59 +56:46:37.8   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52982_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.10    11:21:36.94 +57:04:11.4   4596 1320   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:36.99 +57:04:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 52998_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.22    11:39:59.75 +54:04:04.9   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53033_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.22    11:00:24.34 +51:28:25.7   6326 4755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:00:24.40 +51:28:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53044_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.26    10:40:54.24 +58:25:03.3   7882 0501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  10:40:54.33 +58:25:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53062_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.03    10:52:22.70 +52:31:32.3   7064 4111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  10:52:22.67 +52:31:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53070_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53070_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    13.17    11:17:17.77 +51:08:53.8   4731 4903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.17    11:17:17.63 +51:08:53.1   4732 4903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53116_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53116_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.16823    2461257.66823    13.21    10:54:38.67 +54:18:20.1   6835 3044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.23    10:54:38.89 +54:18:19.7   6835 3043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53175_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.47    11:57:08.88 +49:26:50.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53185_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.44    12:06:28.69 +56:37:40.3   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53198_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.72    12:03:39.70 +54:00:49.9   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53215_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.52    11:36:31.41 +49:24:29.9   2787 5783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:36:31.46 +49:24:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53233_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.36    11:23:14.71 +58:34:10.3   4537 0404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:14.78 +58:34:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53259_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.59    12:06:59.91 +57:56:57.4   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53280_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53280_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.56    11:41:51.19 +56:45:49.2   2920 1316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:41:51.28 +56:45:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53281_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.58    12:05:45.81 +51:07:56.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53332_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53332_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.60    11:40:21.90 +52:15:37.8   2658 4024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:40:21.97 +52:15:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53340_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53340_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.66    11:56:38.69 +56:53:08.8   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53362_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.35    12:03:32.95 +50:51:02.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53390_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53390_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.63    12:02:21.27 +52:55:28.1   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53398_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53398_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.69    11:56:59.79 +49:29:56.4   0795 5414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:59.89 +49:29:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53412_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.82    11:28:33.38 +52:01:09.1   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53430_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.81    10:57:06.73 +52:22:01.0   6630 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:06.73 +52:22:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53460_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53460_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.80    12:05:10.69 +52:00:27.5   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53496_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53496_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.84    11:50:45.89 +51:49:33.4   1658 4132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:50:45.48 +51:49:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53523_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53523_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.86    12:00:44.95 +54:41:18.3   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53565_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.81    11:56:44.95 +52:16:36.3   1159 3761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:44.87 +52:16:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53573_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53573_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.61    10:56:44.60 +53:07:03.2   6659 3762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  10:56:44.55 +53:07:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53590_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.84    11:35:04.76 +55:30:22.6   3383 2146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:35:04.70 +55:30:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53607_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.87    11:47:56.49 +50:07:18.4   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53633_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.69    11:32:56.57 +49:43:22.5   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53636_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.72    12:09:59.29 +54:32:06.2   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53641_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.93    12:07:56.14 +52:40:55.7   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53680_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.71    11:39:33.53 +57:46:31.1   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53707_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.76    10:46:53.83 +56:44:41.1   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53800_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53800_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.16    11:18:36.72 +55:16:05.3   4770 2421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:18:36.69 +55:16:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53850_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.77    11:34:43.96 +51:44:15.8   3135 4404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:34:44.06 +51:44:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53865_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.24    12:02:53.43 +56:35:57.4   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53884_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.19    12:05:42.93 +56:07:41.7   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53938_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.19    10:39:49.45 +56:24:08.4   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53967_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.91    10:40:35.94 +52:09:45.9   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53998_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 53998_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.75    11:09:16.96 +56:37:37.0   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54014_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.45    11:28:37.36 +54:47:22.2   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54051_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54051_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.16    11:45:57.28 +49:28:29.7   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54053_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.27    12:07:26.87 +55:58:33.3   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54054_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.69    10:29:25.42 +53:18:41.8   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54075_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.83    10:47:23.45 +56:21:45.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54108_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54108_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.20    12:01:09.82 +54:49:31.4   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54115_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.05    11:23:03.95 +58:49:30.0   4564 0251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:04.02 +58:49:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54152_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.70    10:30:40.66 +52:19:42.4   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54283_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54283_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.05    10:29:30.07 +53:34:11.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54289_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54289_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.99    10:36:23.34 +57:13:34.6   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54295_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 54295_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54303_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54303_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.44    11:35:35.18 +55:31:56.2   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54310_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54310_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.85    11:49:00.43 +56:13:21.5   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54312_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54312_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.41    11:16:30.35 +52:58:03.3   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54318_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 54318_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54334_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54334_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.72    11:28:14.58 +54:00:00.6   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54346_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.74    11:11:07.94 +54:10:08.0   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 54348_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    14.63    11:17:11.98 +55:03:01.6   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17148_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 17148_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.16871    2461257.66871    13.06    12:01:56.73 +54:13:40.1   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_230654_TTUQ1b1x1_3996274_fSp4Jkw6/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_23-02-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 25s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7
########### Completed UMa-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7
###################################################################################
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9  -- not a known variable star
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6  -- not a known variable star
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7  -- not a known variable star
Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:21:20.92 +49:28:40.9
11:28:35.20 +55:27:28.6
11:34:55.95 +58:41:34.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.66822918 -observatory V36
07:39:55.54 +20:21:18.5 Mercury (-0.2mag)
11:51:55.39 +00:26:51.9 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:40:22.13 +23:30:28.1 Mars (1.3mag)
08:40:11.09 +18:51:27.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:36.43 +03:17:27.2 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:21.94 +20:56:00.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:16.17 +00:14:23.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:26.09 -23:28:59.4 Pluto (14.4mag)
01:49:40.60 +15:20:00.3 Moon (-10.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  4 23:16 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.66822918:
08:40:06.31 +18:51:48.3 Io (6.0mag)
08:40:22.15 +18:50:40.5 Europa (6.3mag)
08:39:57.60 +18:52:26.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:39:49.62 +18:53:00.3 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:37:48.26 +18:48:59.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:40:15.14 +18:51:10.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:37:18.20 +18:48:07.0 Elara (17.7mag)
08:44:16.37 +18:32:22.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:43:34.04 +19:01:04.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:39.27 +03:17:50.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:37.05 +03:17:34.2 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.03 +03:15:38.7 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:26.02 +03:17:49.7 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:02.84 +03:11:02.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  4 23:16 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.66822918:
18:51:56.62 -24:33:27.5 JWST
11:07:15.45 +50:42:14.4 Chandra
20:25:53.07 +32:16:22.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  4 23:16 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.66822918 -observatory V36
03:10:09.40 +17:06:55.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:46.12 -34:38:40.2 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:50:55.51 -68:47:26.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:59.65 +32:55:46.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:34:27.26 +36:12:16.9 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:08.02 +31:37:21.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:40:24.79 +26:35:34.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:44.64 +28:36:26.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:48.66 +05:17:29.0 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:00.27 -12:10:05.9 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:14:50.55 +66:20:16.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:51:03.00 -12:38:58.8 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:04:37.89 +31:12:30.9 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:29.80 +15:37:06.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:07:02.14 +42:53:18.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:15:11.95 +49:00:11.1 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:12:39.44 -13:00:34.5 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:54:12.32 +24:41:31.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:28.16 -15:43:34.4 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:28:40.84 +21:05:45.4 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:56:19.91 +02:33:00.4 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:13.31 +78:06:41.1 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:15.33 +46:07:16.2 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:44:17.52 +08:12:55.2 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:54:54.10 -25:59:59.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:27:08.71 -03:12:47.0 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:35:25.43 +32:09:47.9 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:01:27.06 +05:38:32.3 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:18.37 -05:20:39.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:28:34.80 +20:44:27.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:40:45.04 -23:10:02.0 17.8mag 84P/Giclas
02:57:36.43 +13:27:17.8 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:48:00.91 +28:03:56.4 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:57:48.41 +15:41:19.0 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:46:21.75 +30:36:39.1 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:11:13.80 +27:09:34.6 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:37:38.52 -09:05:24.0 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:32:01.12 +21:11:13.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:23:15.17 +19:02:36.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:49.49 +03:25:38.1 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:47.77 -19:47:22.3 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:05:32.96 +37:37:11.3 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:07:27.44 +38:31:57.7 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
02:37:17.90 +09:26:56.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:40:06.06 -09:52:09.5 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:24:29.54 -52:50:20.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:13:12.25 +23:51:53.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:56:07.81 +37:46:05.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:32.68 +03:28:26.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:58:05.72 +18:31:30.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  4 23:16 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  4 23:16 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  4 23:16 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:10:37.347 +08:41:02.43  AT 2026vdv  2026-07-20.39 17.63
00:48:47.035 -17:46:37.99  AT 2026vdu  2026-07-19.83 19.69
15:08:14.743 -20:24:40.47  AT 2026vdt  2026-07-15.37 19.81
12:37:49.799 -40:14:52.54  AT 2026vds  2026-07-15.40 18.95
17:22:30.654 +19:42:09.07  SN 2026vdr  2026-07-17.91 19.5
20:41:44.088 -01:12:34.78  AT 2026vdq  2026-07-20.01 18.35
14:49:19.169 -14:49:17.78  AT 2026vdp  2026-07-15.38 20.17
00:42:55.360 +41:17:27.00  AT 2026vdo  2026-07-20.08 17.7
18:01:57.813 +32:54:02.20  AT 2026vdn  2026-07-15.24 20.8647
17:45:13.282 +43:23:54.28  AT 2026vdm  2026-07-12.34 20.6398
21:52:40.898 +29:03:58.38  AT 2026vdl  2026-07-12.05 19.09
16:53:07.017 +53:15:53.01  AT 2026vdk  2026-07-19.80 19.75
17:29:48.362 +40:12:07.56  AT 2026vdj  2026-07-19.85 19.22
17:09:35.647 +52:57:47.42  AT 2026vdi  2026-07-10.75 19.25
18:09:45.403 +52:52:08.44  AT 2026vdh  2026-07-19.86 18.64
19:57:17.864 -00:48:07.49  AT 2026vdg  2026-07-19.83 19.36
10:58:53.375 +42:00:26.07  AT 2026vdf  2026-07-19.17 19.6018
13:17:26.777 +11:43:36.24  AT 2026vde  2026-03-17.44 20.0006
13:41:39.541 +44:54:17.04  AT 2026vdd  2026-07-15.21 20.5478
13:55:22.647 -27:41:06.85  AT 2026vdc  2026-07-15.37 17.42
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug  4 23:16 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug  4 23:15:38 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 30s (0.50 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 52s (0.87 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 15 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 27s (0.45 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 15s (0.25 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 25s (0.42 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 72s (1.20 min)
FIELD_UMa-07-Q1b1x1: 141s (2.35 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 143s (2.38 min)
Finished: Tue Aug  4 23:18:01 CDT 2026