This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 10.91 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0
126.77676 5.91825 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CK Cas
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.700 pg 14.800 pg M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 01 33 20.13 +68 28 36.0 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CK Cas,2461257.6429,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CK Cas 20260805.1429 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 11.95 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9
128.72985 5.59168 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0153043+674602
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.536 R1 Y 0.470 R1 110.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 01 53 04.53 +67 46 00.9 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0153043+674602,2461257.6429,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0153043+674602 20260805.1429 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 13.16 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7
129.80510 4.09056 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0159493+660242
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.691 r Y 0.463 r 2458277.55050 81.815064600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 01 59 49.69 +66 02 43.7 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0159493+660242,2461257.6429,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0159493+660242 20260805.1429 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 13.20 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2
125.21958 8.30114 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V1089 Cas
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 R1 13.300 R1 2451450.15000 118.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 01 19 22.84 +71 02 55.2 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1089 Cas,2461257.6429,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1089 Cas 20260805.1429 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 12.70 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8
135.10817 11.88671 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0328205+705703
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.205 r Y 0.353 r 2458355.32580 197.173791400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 03 28 20.05 +70 56 59.8 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0328205+705703,2461257.6429,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0328205+705703 20260805.1429 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 13.26 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5
129.95323 7.23254 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0210369+690106
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.666 R1 Y 0.757 R1 135.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 02 10 37.13 +69 01 04.5 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0210369+690106,2461257.6429,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0210369+690106 20260805.1429 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1429 2461257.6429 12.78 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4
132.39840 5.68431 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J022922.30+664419.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.413 r Y 0.556 r 2458373.43630 169.817464300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 05.1429* 02 29 22.11 +66 44 20.4 12.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J022922.30+664419.9,2461257.6429,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J022922.30+664419.9 20260805.1429 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461257.64323236 05.08.2026 03:26:05.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15878
Objects passed selection criteria: 15829
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12902.8
Average stars matched: 12501 (96.8863 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 22:31:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461257.64323236 05.08.2026 03:26:05.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 112447
Objects passed selection criteria: 112172
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90623.2
Average stars matched: 86967 (95.9654 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 571776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 22:34:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.64249317
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0328 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0356 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00955 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9T0M81GlYR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1tmgdl01yO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Jgh5XFNcd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tYy5P0kIvJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec +62.8421 to +75.4742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec 62.8421 to 75.4742 deg
Loaded 15567 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7687 out of 8291 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8291 out of 16441 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec +62.8421 to +75.4742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7911 to 64.5348 deg, Dec 62.8421 to 75.4742 deg
Loaded 15567 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7687 out of 8291 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8291 out of 16441 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.8933 to 64.5343 deg, Dec +62.8422 to +75.4992 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.8933 to 64.5343 deg, Dec 62.8422 to 75.4992 deg
Loaded 15555 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7689 out of 8287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8287 out of 16457 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9T0M81GlYR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1328, bad_region=0, passed=16441
Got 16441 stars (including 15090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1151 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.504
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1tmgdl01yO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1310, bad_region=0, passed=16457
Got 16457 stars (including 15122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1384 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.446
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Jgh5XFNcd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=0, passed=9501
Got 9501 stars (including 9035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=9.606 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.590 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.423
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.403 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1302 n_q2=877 n_q3=1599 n_q4=1103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tYy5P0kIvJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=0, passed=9540
Got 9540 stars (including 9049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=9.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.905 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.395 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1290 n_q2=885 n_q3=1600 n_q4=1104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.504
ref2=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.446
new1=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.287
new2=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.237
reference average sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9116 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21014_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 21014_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:12.18 +69:26:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21162_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 21162_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.52 +69:16:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11067_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 11067_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02726_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 02726_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:56.56 +73:40:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13325_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 13325_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:39.94 +64:35:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:33:20.13 +68:28:36.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0328 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.491 +69:59:18.59
Second-epoch image center 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0356 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:54.617 +69:59:07.00
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:52.852 +69:59:40.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00955 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oGidrS2cxb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PO7B5j4NMe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U9BTZWDu7r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3d2jqjCXNo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec +62.7957 to +75.4937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec 62.7957 to 75.4937 deg
Loaded 15748 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6660 out of 8419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8419 out of 120979 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec +62.7957 to +75.4937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6810 to 64.5474 deg, Dec 62.7957 to 75.4937 deg
Loaded 15748 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6660 out of 8419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8419 out of 120979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 120718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6807 to 64.5470 deg, Dec +62.8422 to +75.5017 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6807 to 64.5470 deg, Dec 62.8422 to 75.5017 deg
Loaded 15616 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6686 out of 8410 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8410 out of 120718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 114 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oGidrS2cxb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=10189, bad_region=5, passed=120941
Got 120941 stars (including 110503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1390 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PO7B5j4NMe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=10151, bad_region=2, passed=120679
Got 120679 stars (including 110286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1161 n_q2=1392 n_q3=1060 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U9BTZWDu7r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3159, bad_region=7, passed=61361
Got 61361 stars (including 58098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1284 n_q2=875 n_q3=1590 n_q4=1140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3d2jqjCXNo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3112, bad_region=10, passed=62172
Got 62172 stars (including 58936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1290 n_q2=883 n_q3=1587 n_q4=1126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-25-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_222657_TTUQ1b1x1_2170635_itGEVhF9/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:30:30.29 +70:24:52.9: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:32:17.07 +70:05:15.1: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:28:49.14 +70:58:21.3: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:42:24.16 +70:24:40.5: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:32:17.07 +70:05:15.1: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:28:49.14 +70:58:21.3: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:30:30.29 +70:24:52.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:17.07 +70:05:15.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1406 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:30.29 +70:24:52.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6566 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:49.14 +70:58:21.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7066 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:12:04.94 +66:44:22.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:14:43.82 +70:09:17.7: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:42:24.16 +70:24:40.5: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:24.16 +70:24:40.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6893 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:12:04.94 +66:44:22.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:14:43.82 +70:09:17.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:43.82 +70:09:17.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7869 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:04.94 +66:44:22.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9126 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:38.31 +72:37:41.0: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:56.56 +69:17:58.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:38.31 +72:37:41.0: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:15.54 +71:42:11.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.31 +72:37:41.0: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3750 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:56.56 +69:17:58.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:56.56 +69:17:58.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5911 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:15.54 +71:42:11.2: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:15.54 +71:42:11.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8789 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:02:58.84 +71:16:40.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 04:07:57.97 +72:13:15.7: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:54:14.94 +73:55:39.0: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:02:58.84 +71:16:40.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:58.84 +71:16:40.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1425 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 04:07:57.97 +72:13:15.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:57.97 +72:13:15.7: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0921 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:25.6: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:54:14.94 +73:55:39.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:14.94 +73:55:39.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4367 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:25.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:10.76 +72:02:25.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1798 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:26.11 +72:37:03.2: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:16:21.56 +66:23:50.6: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:26.11 +72:37:03.2: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:26.11 +72:37:03.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6368 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:16:21.56 +66:23:50.6: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:21.56 +66:23:50.6: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2488 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:46:06.77 +71:00:12.6: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:46:06.77 +71:00:12.6: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:06.77 +71:00:12.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9566 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:53:04.53 +67:46:00.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9495 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:59:49.69 +66:02:43.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1499 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:19:22.84 +71:02:55.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1952 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:28:20.05 +70:56:59.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6924 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5: 14.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:10:37.13 +69:01:04.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2471 delta=1.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:29:22.11 +66:44:20.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7758 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109800.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90842.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141639_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141639_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141659_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141659_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:51.13 +68:30:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141662_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141662_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141668_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141668_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141673_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141673_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:09.14 +74:42:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141676_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141676_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141680_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141680_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:37.62 +70:10:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141686_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141686_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:58.57 +71:57:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141688_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141688_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:30.77 +65:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141689_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141689_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:52.64 +70:39:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141694_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141694_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:23.14 +71:42:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141698_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141698_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141699_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141699_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:51.05 +72:09:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141701_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141701_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:42.79 +65:40:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141706_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141706_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141707_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141707_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:27.14 +70:09:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141872_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141872_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.51 +69:16:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142283_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142283_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:52.99 +70:53:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142329_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142329_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:17.92 +74:20:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142416_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142416_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142508_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142508_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:14.08 +65:31:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142605_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142605_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142819_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142819_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:49.54 +70:52:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142931_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142931_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:02.08 +70:17:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142941_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 142941_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143032_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143032_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:10.01 +73:21:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143056_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143056_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:04.29 +66:05:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143070_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143070_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:09.86 +73:03:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143160_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143160_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:50.48 +73:22:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143259_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143259_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:02.89 +72:24:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143280_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143280_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:26.80 +72:50:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143303_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143303_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:47.24 +72:59:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143317_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143317_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:13.50 +67:03:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143320_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143320_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:47.53 +68:49:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143337_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143337_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143380_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143380_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:03.40 +65:19:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143453_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143453_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:21:05.58 +68:26:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143475_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143475_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143495_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143495_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:13.94 +71:45:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143506_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143506_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:49.56 +72:09:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:59.40 +71:11:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143552_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143552_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143585_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143585_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:34.53 +70:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143626_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143626_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:10.84 +74:44:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143657_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143657_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:20.77 +70:01:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143720_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143720_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:27.29 +73:52:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143729_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143729_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143828_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143828_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:49.70 +70:45:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143857_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143857_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:11.15 +70:38:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143891_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143891_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:46.05 +68:09:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143897_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143897_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143970_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 143970_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:35:01.39 +67:43:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144029_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144029_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:20.06 +67:56:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144032_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144032_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:02:47.32 +69:14:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144082_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144082_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:26.75 +69:28:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144146_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144146_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:35:39.13 +70:44:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144177_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144177_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:08.16 +73:49:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144188_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144188_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144189_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144189_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:37:14.07 +68:44:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144207_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144207_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:05.69 +69:45:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144260_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144260_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:18.10 +70:25:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144307_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144307_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:41.24 +70:26:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144327_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144327_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:44.46 +72:27:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:10.63 +69:27:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144587_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144587_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144803_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144803_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:06.41 +71:54:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144862_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144862_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:37:22.55 +69:29:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144867_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144867_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:10.80 +68:36:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144918_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144918_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:13.34 +68:50:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144997_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 144997_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:54.99 +69:46:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 105534_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:59.01 +65:39:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96588_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 96588_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:39.96 +64:35:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93002_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 93002_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:36.03 +65:44:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60791_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 60791_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:55.07 +69:38:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85806_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 85806_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:30.91 +65:37:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 73865_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:55.99 +69:13:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62895_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 62895_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:18.89 +68:04:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85375_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 85375_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:45:04.46 +65:01:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64047_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 64047_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:32.31 +68:47:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110520_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110520_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:15.53 +68:44:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 114615_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:00.80 +67:34:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98814_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 98814_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:49.03 +66:47:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:37.01 +68:21:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:31.53 +68:17:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91751_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 91751_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:13.49 +65:50:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119309_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 119309_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:04.46 +68:41:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16668_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 16668_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:32.55 +74:00:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79825_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 79825_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:22.34 +65:06:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106385_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 106385_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:10.94 +67:10:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94487_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 94487_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:04.24 +66:22:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:37.68 +70:18:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74077_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 74077_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:30.29 +69:07:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108578_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 108578_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:24.41 +67:32:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:37:21.13 +68:00:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108495_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 108495_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:26.71 +65:45:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:16.75 +67:52:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72030_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 72030_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:40.34 +67:24:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109800_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 109800_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84556_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 84556_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:35.28 +65:31:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57514_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 57514_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:42.62 +68:46:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57462_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 57462_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:08.82 +68:45:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:56.55 +73:40:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35165_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 35165_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:32.75 +70:12:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111371_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111371_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:34:40.65 +67:27:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113977_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 113977_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:20.17 +68:28:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90842_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 90842_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50796_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 50796_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99114_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 99114_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:31.10 +66:11:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27491_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 27491_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86927_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 86927_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:38.57 +70:57:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95047_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 95047_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_22-26-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
