NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 01 09.18247    2461049.68247    13.08    04:24:00.08 +12:20:02.4   5176 4198   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 02 12.18017    2461083.68017    12.98    04:24:00.07 +12:20:01.8   5177 4198   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37435    2461256.87435    11.89    04:24:00.17 +12:20:02.1   4441 2162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    12.22    04:24:00.02 +12:20:01.3   4442 2162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 04.3746  2461256.8746  12.05  04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7
182.60138 -25.09598 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 1.5 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  ASASSN-V J042400.10+122002.6  
Type: L
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    13.460   V            13.920   V                                                                              
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7:  13.11 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7:  13.00 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.05 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 186573 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 186573 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5939.3146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1258.3541 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5924.1070 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1254.4824 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 10.6096 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T03:58:53.5837878' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T08:58:53.5837878' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.3742312849 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T08:59:03.4872104' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.3743459145 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6629878031197 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996341180688 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9388888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 82.8686111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82531307140993 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits :) Spent 0.482946 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T03:59:34.3470820' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T08:59:34.3470820' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.3747030902 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T08:59:44.2494093' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.3748176969 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6629877543147 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996341108836 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0758333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 82.9563888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.79236737901554 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits :) Spent 0.484159 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.87434703 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00309 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6mkxVNZznr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PmwcedatfF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HKnWBA3WEm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rw1fTcPNvz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.3 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 12.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 12.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.3 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.6mkxVNZznr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PmwcedatfF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HKnWBA3WEm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=134, bad_region=0, passed=1240 Got 1240 stars (including 1106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1240 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1048 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1055 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1232 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1231 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1231 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 1057 stars left (next iteration limit 1160) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1057 robust_rms=9.578 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.667 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1057 robust_rms=0.642 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.551 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1057 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.601 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1057 robust_rms_before=1.717 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.651 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.601 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.651 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits N_match=1057 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=291 n_q2=173 n_q3=322 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rw1fTcPNvz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=132, bad_region=0, passed=1256 Got 1256 stars (including 1123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1256 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1074 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1070 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1070 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1245 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1073 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1070 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1070 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 1070 stars left (next iteration limit 1177) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1070 robust_rms=9.846 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.112 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1070 robust_rms=0.602 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.644 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1070 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.640 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1070 robust_rms_before=1.768 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.663 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.640 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.663 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits N_match=1070 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=297 n_q2=174 n_q3=319 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263 ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.339 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.374 reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392_astrometric_residuals.png (1057 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393_astrometric_residuals.png (1070 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    9.98    04:25:27.24 +16:33:22.9   4518 4711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.23 +16:33:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:45.574 +14:00:55.98 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:44.810 +14:00:56.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00309 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pqS6SOwdMl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0wKDo5TtBr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KkTxoFiQVO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B0T2gaY50B Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 12.7 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.pqS6SOwdMl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0wKDo5TtBr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299 Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KkTxoFiQVO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=183, bad_region=1, passed=8296 Got 8296 stars (including 8098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5339) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.718 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=1274 n_q2=921 n_q3=1487 n_q4=1173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.B0T2gaY50B (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, bad_region=1, passed=8535 Got 8535 stars (including 8324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8535 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5343) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1276 n_q2=926 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:30.8: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:30.8: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.76 +11:19:30.8: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6060 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0297 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 75627_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.37435    2461256.87435    11.51    04:02:38.79 +11:19:31.7   1309 1407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-58-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0392.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.81    04:02:38.73 +11:19:30.0   1311 1406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75832_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 75832_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    10.20    04:31:27.47 +17:38:55.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75947_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 75947_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    10.83    04:15:28.72 +16:27:11.5   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76111_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76111_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    10.90    04:27:15.33 +11:11:38.4   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76112_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76112_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.44    04:01:06.21 +12:21:29.4   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76125_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76125_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    10.57    04:56:12.77 +13:43:23.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    10.92    04:49:01.60 +10:47:06.0   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76561_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76561_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.86    04:26:24.86 +15:35:07.8   4688 4135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.84 +15:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76901_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 76901_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.67    04:56:53.79 +15:28:45.4   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77018_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 77018_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    12.73    04:18:29.24 +18:45:15.6   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 32892_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.48    04:56:22.00 +13:30:49.3   9142 3216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:56:21.97 +13:30:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47519_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 47519_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.81    04:35:39.19 +10:09:40.3   6233 0958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:35:39.20 +10:09:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 42273_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 42273_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.98    04:23:51.77 +09:27:41.9   4512 0429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:23:51.80 +09:27:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 20458_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    7.08    04:39:09.12 +15:47:56.0   6520 4384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:39:09.14 +15:47:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62047_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 62047_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.95    04:38:09.44 +12:30:38.9   6508 2398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:38:09.46 +12:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25881_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 25881_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    7.18    04:33:50.96 +14:50:36.5   5790 3756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:33:50.94 +14:50:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 36657_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    7.26    04:28:50.29 +13:02:50.2   5126 2632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:28:50.30 +13:02:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.10    04:43:24.13 +11:35:05.4   7319 1896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.05 +11:35:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.21    04:54:18.61 +11:10:44.5   8955 1778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.67 +11:10:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 60620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 Preparing report for the candidate 60620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    11.06    04:52:02.14 +17:32:14.4   8308 5590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:52:02.14 +17:32:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    9.74    04:28:18.03 +10:09:47.4   5146 0891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:28:18.00 +10:09:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13765_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 13765_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    7.12    04:35:55.19 +16:30:21.8   6026 4776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:35:55.16 +16:30:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 19630_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    7.06    04:39:16.49 +15:55:00.9   6533 4457   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:39:16.50 +15:55:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 53650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.95    04:44:25.94 +11:08:45.7   7490 1643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:44:25.95 +11:08:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56951_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 56951_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.94    04:46:01.74 +11:42:20.3   7701 1998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:46:01.76 +11:42:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55715_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 55715_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.81    04:54:46.85 +11:25:32.2   9013 1933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:54:46.85 +11:25:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 39342_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.65    04:50:36.74 +08:53:58.7   8515 0351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:50:36.72 +08:53:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 47885_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.66    04:54:53.77 +10:08:59.3   9095 1161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:54:53.78 +10:08:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11429_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 11429_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.85    04:57:22.25 +17:09:12.9   9103 5433   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:57:22.24 +17:09:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 The candidate 28585_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.37482    2461256.87482    6.58    04:52:31.70 +14:14:59.3   8539 3609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_040517_TTUQ1b1x1_3546070_D9HAz5h3/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_03-59-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0393.fits **** FOUND 04:52:31.72 +14:14:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 ################################################################################### 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:24:00.09 +12:20:01.7 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.87434703 -observatory V36 07:35:54.57 +20:18:31.0 Mercury (-0.1mag) 11:49:04.47 +00:50:11.2 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:38:03.15 +23:28:41.1 Mars (1.3mag) 08:39:28.09 +18:54:04.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:38.78 +03:17:55.9 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:15.98 +20:55:44.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:18.65 +00:14:42.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:30.67 -23:28:40.6 Pluto (14.4mag) 01:08:18.85 +11:04:03.2 Moon (-10.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 4 04:07 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.87434703: 08:39:35.58 +18:53:33.1 Io (6.0mag) 08:39:32.76 +18:53:45.7 Europa (6.3mag) 08:39:14.70 +18:55:01.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:39:03.05 +18:55:51.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:37:06.28 +18:51:08.0 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:39:28.90 +18:54:01.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:36:35.69 +18:50:25.2 Elara (17.7mag) 08:43:32.85 +18:35:22.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:42:54.15 +19:03:31.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:45.09 +03:18:13.2 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:43.46 +03:17:50.3 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:37.05 +03:15:59.9 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:31.46 +03:18:22.4 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:56:06.20 +03:11:37.4 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 4 04:07 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.87434703: 18:48:04.55 -24:53:05.9 JWST 18:27:17.85 +21:06:44.9 Chandra 10:46:25.86 -58:53:23.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 4 04:07 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.87434703 -observatory V36 03:09:13.21 +17:02:43.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:03.09 -34:38:49.1 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:50:10.62 -68:45:47.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:08:46.43 +32:54:48.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:31:58.30 +35:47:40.0 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:41:46.35 +31:39:51.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:39:36.36 +26:36:22.1 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:18:00.80 +28:38:35.9 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:26:16.77 +05:17:16.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:53.92 -12:08:19.4 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:15:54.97 +66:24:53.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:51:56.07 -12:34:27.7 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:03:43.32 +31:10:22.8 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:39.31 +15:37:09.7 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:08:03.87 +42:49:46.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:16:20.50 +48:56:36.8 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:12:00.17 -13:01:19.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:53:40.09 +24:49:49.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:29:06.33 -15:37:17.9 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:27:36.06 +21:08:38.6 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:55:52.83 +02:36:02.9 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:41.00 +78:10:42.3 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:53.41 +46:06:10.6 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:43:39.24 +08:07:32.3 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:53:56.70 -25:39:15.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:26:40.93 -03:09:57.2 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:34:24.97 +32:05:20.4 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:59:49.81 +05:54:07.9 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:17.83 -05:19:10.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:26:45.44 +20:44:53.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:41:27.60 -23:04:22.1 17.9mag 84P/Giclas 02:56:44.98 +13:23:24.2 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:45:56.47 +28:10:02.6 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 03:55:37.27 +15:22:58.4 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:43:43.73 +30:40:46.6 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:09:20.27 +27:17:19.3 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:36:04.54 -08:46:55.3 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:30:49.79 +21:11:13.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:21:52.40 +19:04:42.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:54.41 +03:25:45.9 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:21:56.43 -19:49:19.4 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:02:46.37 +37:33:49.0 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 16:19:43.71 +37:43:59.0 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:35:46.29 +09:25:36.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:39:44.72 -09:48:46.9 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:25:03.32 -52:49:29.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:10:53.52 +23:31:18.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:53:43.25 +37:46:34.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:09:19.44 +03:33:36.9 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:57:22.23 +18:33:48.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:30:00.41 +37:04:23.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 4 04:07 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 4 04:07 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 4 04:07 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:58:47.565 +38:09:19.12 AT 2026uvo 2026-07-03.18 19.9993 14:54:31.980 +13:02:07.54 SN 2026uvn 2026-07-11.19 20.1757 11:46:05.083 +12:26:21.83 AT 2026uvm 2026-07-10.18 20.2568 11:40:04.094 +15:27:54.40 AT 2026uvl 2026-07-10.18 19.9181 12:34:02.109 +17:02:37.91 AT 2026uvk 2026-07-11.18 20.1243 12:30:28.971 +05:18:23.99 AT 2026uvj 2026-07-12.19 19.2944 23:48:49.816 -04:51:08.68 AT 2026uvi 2026-06-26.43 20.7591 23:50:00.336 +09:59:54.99 AT 2026uvh 2026-07-08.38 20.1317 00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83 AT 2026uvg 2026-07-03.45 20.3378 02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86 AT 2026uvf 2026-07-08.47 20.1237 05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66 SN 2026uve 2026-07-14.17 17.677 14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05 AT 2026uvd 2026-07-15.38 19.23 15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56 AT 2026uvc 2026-07-15.38 20.26 14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01 AT 2026uvb 2026-07-15.39 19.73 13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22 AT 2026uva 2026-07-15.37 19.18 15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51 AT 2026uuz 2026-07-15.39 19.82 16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41 AT 2026uuy 2026-07-15.44 20.09 19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22 AT 2026uux 2026-07-14.41 20.62 00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80 AT 2026uuw 2026-06-26.42 21.69 01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17 AT 2026uuv 2026-07-11.21 20.08 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 4 04:07 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 85 C