This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2029 2461256.7029 12.67 16:29:30.94 -05:11:44.3
9.93567 28.23949 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 -0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:29:30.94 -05:11:44.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:29:30.94 -05:11:44.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7029,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2029 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2029 2461256.7029 13.41 15:48:34.55 -01:02:20.1
6.79785 38.95825 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia 0 -0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:48:34.55 -01:02:20.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:48:34.55 -01:02:20.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2029* 15 48 34.55 -01 02 20.1 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7029,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2029 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2029 2461256.7029 13.72 15:55:54.60 -06:37:02.1
2.74227 34.07392 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 -0 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:55:54.60 -06:37:02.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:55:54.60 -06:37:02.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7029,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2029 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2029 2461256.7029 14.39 16:07:27.59 -01:40:12.7
9.63103 34.76991 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 0 0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:07:27.59 -01:40:12.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:07:27.59 -01:40:12.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2029* 16 07 27.59 -01 40 12.7 14.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7029,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2029 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461256.70311723 04.08.2026 04:52:19.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7805
Objects passed selection criteria: 7801
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7502.75
Average stars matched: 7350.25 (97.9674 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 23:55:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461256.70311723 04.08.2026 04:52:19.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58140
Objects passed selection criteria: 57998
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53540
Average stars matched: 51956.5 (97.0424 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 279160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 23:57:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.70259819
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0460 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00937 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1EqAluUjh3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1uExX3gPBR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lkWnwZ0PEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aOeuM0KJVq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to +3.7094 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to 3.7094 deg
Loaded 5817 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4240 out of 4426 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 7891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1EqAluUjh3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=0, passed=7946
Got 7946 stars (including 7422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1570 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1uExX3gPBR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=7891
Got 7891 stars (including 7359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4925 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1572 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1004 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lkWnwZ0PEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, bad_region=0, passed=7167
Got 7167 stars (including 6807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=9.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.951 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.755 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1604 n_q2=1155 n_q3=1186 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aOeuM0KJVq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, bad_region=0, passed=7180
Got 7180 stars (including 6829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=9.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4924 robust_rms_before=0.775 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.316
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1594 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1197 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.164
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.043
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.068
reference average sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.159
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (4924 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4925 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.4: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:23.24 -02:44:35.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:05.0: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:18:56.50 -00:28:56.0: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:36.38 -00:35:51.1: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:59.71 -00:11:23.5: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:40.37 -01:50:41.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:20:22.23 -00:08:04.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:00.41 -00:08:24.3: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:28.32 -01:24:49.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:36.38 -00:35:51.1: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:20:22.23 -00:08:04.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:40.37 -01:50:41.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:36.38 -00:35:51.1: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0836 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:22.23 -00:08:04.2: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0654 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:40.37 -01:50:41.1: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0827 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:18:56.50 -00:28:56.0: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.4: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:05.0: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:23.24 -02:44:35.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:56.50 -00:28:56.0: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0572 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:59.71 -00:11:23.5: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.4: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0297 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:05.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0388 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:59.71 -00:11:23.5: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8914 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:23.24 -02:44:35.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0812 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:00.41 -00:08:24.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:00.41 -00:08:24.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1113 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:28.32 -01:24:49.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:28.32 -01:24:49.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1102 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:18.84 -00:20:41.1: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.9: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:18.84 -00:20:41.1: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:18.84 -00:20:41.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1642 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.9: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1325 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20426_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20430_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.74 -03:50:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20431_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20432_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20434_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.20 -05:51:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20435_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20436_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20437_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20438_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20439_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20440_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20440_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20442_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20444_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20446_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:23.44 -03:44:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 06907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.21 -06:40:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0460 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:13.738 -01:56:38.10
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.794 -01:56:51.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00937 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1pf7we1dZN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eQiYv3yzS5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UtY6pWNOkA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6yHvs2YsS4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 63091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.7231 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.7231 deg
Loaded 5852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4036 out of 4593 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4593 out of 63091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1pf7we1dZN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=3091, bad_region=9, passed=62812
Got 62812 stars (including 59585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1555 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eQiYv3yzS5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3188, bad_region=15, passed=63058
Got 63058 stars (including 59755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4936 stars left (next iteration limit 5429)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1556 n_q2=1196 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UtY6pWNOkA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1683, bad_region=3, passed=44909
Got 44909 stars (including 43151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44909 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1585 n_q2=1160 n_q3=1201 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6yHvs2YsS4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1745, bad_region=5, passed=44808
Got 44808 stars (including 42997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1578 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1208 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.052
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-51-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_235309_TTUQ1b1x1_3601446_23R7iX6E/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:26.21 -00:37:44.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:46.26 +00:11:45.7: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:46:34.33 -07:07:12.3: 13.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:38:31.96 -01:27:42.2: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:43.03 -01:28:02.4: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:06.72 +00:43:09.3: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:28.64 +00:38:08.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:48:25.97 -05:42:36.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:44:20.86 +00:53:27.2: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:39:19.11 -01:46:23.3: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:28.64 +00:38:08.6: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:44:20.86 +00:53:27.2: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:43.03 -01:28:02.4: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:06.72 +00:43:09.3: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:48:25.97 -05:42:36.9: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:46:34.33 -07:07:12.3: 14.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:46.26 +00:11:45.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:20.86 +00:53:27.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.03 -01:28:02.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1594 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:26.21 -00:37:44.5: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:34.33 -07:07:12.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0504 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:06.72 +00:43:09.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1963 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:28.64 +00:38:08.6: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1953 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:25.97 -05:42:36.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1097 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:38:31.96 -01:27:42.2: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:46.26 +00:11:45.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7314 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:26.21 -00:37:44.5: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0105 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:31.96 -01:27:42.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4091 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:39:19.11 -01:46:23.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:19.11 -01:46:23.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3290 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:22:31.57 -04:13:37.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:47:20.69 -01:57:20.6: 12.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:29:30.94 -05:11:44.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:30:05.25 -00:47:45.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:23:23.94 -04:54:43.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:29:30.94 -05:11:44.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:23:23.94 -04:54:43.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:20:29.76 +02:52:52.6: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:23.94 -04:54:43.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1681 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:48:34.55 -01:02:20.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:46:43.76 +02:13:30.2: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:30:05.25 -00:47:45.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:05.25 -00:47:45.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4216 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:38.70 -06:09:05.4: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:20:29.76 +02:52:52.6: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:29.76 +02:52:52.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5777 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:55:54.60 -06:37:02.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:22:31.57 -04:13:37.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:47:20.69 -01:57:20.6: 13.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:31.57 -04:13:37.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4159 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:20.69 -01:57:20.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7512 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:38.70 -06:09:05.4: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:48:34.55 -01:02:20.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:46:43.76 +02:13:30.2: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:38.70 -06:09:05.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6223 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:43.76 +02:13:30.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7497 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:55:54.60 -06:37:02.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:58.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:58.3: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:49.25 -02:00:58.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7610 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:40:57.45 -07:14:01.3: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:45.81 -00:46:24.2: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:13:01.78 +00:39:37.5: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:01:45.56 -05:32:24.6: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.3: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:41.60 +01:36:49.2: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:13:01.78 +00:39:37.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:40:57.45 -07:14:01.3: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:01.78 +00:39:37.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9173 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:57.45 -07:14:01.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3140 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:45.81 -00:46:24.2: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:01:45.56 -05:32:24.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:45.81 -00:46:24.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2311 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.3: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:45.56 -05:32:24.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3219 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:37.01 -01:29:26.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3176 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:41.60 +01:36:49.2: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:41.60 +01:36:49.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3378 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:15:53.00 -02:22:19.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:15:53.00 -02:22:19.7: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:53.00 -02:22:19.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2577 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:37:31.87 +00:09:21.3: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:36:58.51 -04:24:16.9: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:37:37.41 -06:50:52.3: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:07:27.59 -01:40:12.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:51.56 +01:15:22.3: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:43.20 -01:02:51.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:37:31.87 +00:09:21.3: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:31.87 +00:09:21.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5723 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:36:58.51 -04:24:16.9: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:58.51 -04:24:16.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5972 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:37:37.41 -06:50:52.3: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:07:27.59 -01:40:12.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:37.41 -06:50:52.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5525 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:43.20 -01:02:51.7: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:51.56 +01:15:22.3: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:43.20 -01:02:51.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4806 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:51.56 +01:15:22.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6673 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78690.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78554_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78554_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78559_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78559_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78561_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78563_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78563_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78568_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78568_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:39.75 -06:47:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78569_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78569_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78571_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78571_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78572_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78572_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78574_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78574_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78610_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78610_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78613_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78613_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78614_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78614_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78615_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78615_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78631_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78631_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.24 -05:49:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78642_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78642_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:40.10 +01:12:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78651_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78651_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.48 +02:13:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78670_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78670_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:27.64 +00:38:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78681_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78681_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:49.35 +00:36:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78682_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 78682_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78690_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 78690_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78695_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78700_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78700_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78705_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78705_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.61 -07:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78761_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78761_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78770_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78770_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78793_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78793_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78794_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78794_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78797_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78797_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78803_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78820_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78820_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78828_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78828_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78838_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78838_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78845_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78845_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78855_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78855_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78857_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 78857_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78892_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 78892_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 55722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.77 -03:50:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 45725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_23-52-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks