This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2168 2461255.7168 12.48 20:45:47.95 -25:30:28.4
19.70119 -35.50308 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 1 1 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:47.95 -25:30:28.4: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:47.95 -25:30:28.4: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2168* 20 45 47.95 -25 30 28.4 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.7168,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.2168 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2168 2461255.7168 12.48 20:44:07.93 -30:35:00.8
13.51630 -36.42353 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana 0 -1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:07.93 -30:35:00.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:07.93 -30:35:00.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2168* 20 44 07.93 -30 35 00.8 12.5 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.7168,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.2168 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2168 2461255.7168 13.47 20:45:52.76 -25:34:53.3
19.62060 -35.54102 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -0 2 2 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:52.76 -25:34:53.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:52.76 -25:34:53.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2168* 20 45 52.76 -25 34 53.3 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.7168,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.2168 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461255.71710545 03.08.2026 05:12:27.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4146
Objects passed selection criteria: 4139
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3894.75
Average stars matched: 3768.5 (96.7585 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 230704 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 00:21:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461255.71710545 03.08.2026 05:12:27.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29349
Objects passed selection criteria: 29281
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25643.8
Average stars matched: 24621 (96.0117 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 00:23:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.71644859
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99
Second-epoch second image center 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01476 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lw67zfWBCG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bxM7Hoao0M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fB9HHd7KpA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tR4VRWtzCy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.357300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.357300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2500 out of 2554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2554 out of 4114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.4 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
14.0 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lw67zfWBCG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, bad_region=0, passed=4103
Got 4103 stars (including 3776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3684 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3677 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3677 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3687 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 3678 stars left (next iteration limit 4044)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=3678 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1018 n_q2=805 n_q3=1055 n_q4=800 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bxM7Hoao0M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=4114
Got 4114 stars (including 3785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3692 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3694 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3684 stars left (next iteration limit 4051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=3684 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=1044 n_q2=793 n_q3=1056 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fB9HHd7KpA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, bad_region=0, passed=3775
Got 3775 stars (including 3474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3388 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3382 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3382 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3383 stars left (next iteration limit 3720)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=9.506 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.868 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3383 robust_rms_before=0.922 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.450 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.509
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=3383 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=884 n_q2=665 n_q3=1080 n_q4=754 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tR4VRWtzCy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, bad_region=0, passed=3712
Got 3712 stars (including 3474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3391 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 3383 stars left (next iteration limit 3721)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=9.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.866 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.500 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3383 robust_rms_before=0.884 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.433 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.500
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=3383 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=877 n_q2=666 n_q3=1084 n_q4=756 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.102
ref2=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.192
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.224
reference average sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (3678 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (3684 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160_astrometric_residuals.png (3383 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (3383 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.31 -24:06:37.2: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:48:09.72 -20:55:08.7: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:43.02 -22:51:40.3: 11.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.4: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:07:17.04 -22:18:41.6: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:58:25.40 -21:11:37.9: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:07:17.04 -22:18:41.6: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:43.02 -22:51:40.3: 11.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:58:25.40 -21:11:37.9: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.4: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:48:09.72 -20:55:08.7: 11.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.31 -24:06:37.2: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:17.04 -22:18:41.6: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1940 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:45:43.02 -22:51:40.3: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7069 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:25.40 -21:11:37.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1190 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.4: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0346 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:09.72 -20:55:08.7: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9972 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.31 -24:06:37.2: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8345 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20347.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20333_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20333_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:07:36.62 -23:55:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20347_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:43.02 -22:51:40.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.242 6807046324008632064 311.42928849479 -22.86113733523 10.7473 10.4840 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.242#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20356_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20366_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20375_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20381_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20384_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:34.46 -22:23:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20387_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20387_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.94 -29:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.45 -27:44:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:02.439 -25:57:31.99
Second-epoch second image center 21:06:59.727 -25:58:10.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01476 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BmXiboFy5J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6jfsAIUCsR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAPkJwgVyk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kOFBp1epsQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 30781 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4271 out of 4495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4495 out of 30781 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.1 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BmXiboFy5J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1095, bad_region=0, passed=30372
Got 30372 stars (including 29237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1373 n_q2=1080 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6jfsAIUCsR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1095, bad_region=1, passed=30767
Got 30767 stars (including 29632 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1382 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1276 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dAPkJwgVyk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=715, bad_region=2, passed=21152
Got 21152 stars (including 20410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21152 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1238 n_q2=935 n_q3=1582 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kOFBp1epsQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=652, bad_region=1, passed=21056
Got 21056 stars (including 20388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21056 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1241 n_q2=939 n_q3=1563 n_q4=1124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-11-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001423_TTUQ1b1x1_304337_s0z9flmc/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:04.26 -24:10:23.3: 10.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:41.14 -20:56:54.8: 11.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:12:59.37 -22:49:16.7: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:06:56.95 -24:59:33.7: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:42.43 -25:57:14.0: 12.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:40.65 -24:35:47.3: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:02:49.64 -23:01:52.1: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:01.13 -25:18:56.0: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:54:56.23 -22:18:30.4: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:47.95 -25:30:28.4: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:41.14 -20:56:54.8: 11.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:04.26 -24:10:23.3: 10.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:01.13 -25:18:56.0: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:40.65 -24:35:47.3: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.14 -20:56:54.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2070 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:12:59.37 -22:49:16.7: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:04.26 -24:10:23.3: ref_mag=10.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2623 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:54:56.23 -22:18:30.4: 12.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:02:49.64 -23:01:52.1: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:01.13 -25:18:56.0: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8266 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:06:56.95 -24:59:33.7: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:40.65 -24:35:47.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6126 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:42.43 -25:57:14.0: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:59.37 -22:49:16.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3246 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:56.23 -22:18:30.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3994 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:49.64 -23:01:52.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6878 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:56.95 -24:59:33.7: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8278 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.43 -25:57:14.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7975 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:47.95 -25:30:28.4: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:12.77 -20:41:13.8: 13.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:07.93 -30:35:00.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:58:08.12 -22:57:58.7: 13.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:33:36.97 -24:17:10.7: 13.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:15.44 -22:15:33.5: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:00:48.65 -21:22:23.4: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:12.79 -22:41:43.2: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:29.46 -21:44:39.5: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:42:44.07 -21:50:35.8: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:12.77 -20:41:13.8: 13.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:12.77 -20:41:13.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4255 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:15.44 -22:15:33.5: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:58:08.12 -22:57:58.7: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:07.93 -30:35:00.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:12.79 -22:41:43.2: 12.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:00:48.65 -21:22:23.4: 12.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:29.46 -21:44:39.5: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:33:36.97 -24:17:10.7: 13.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:15.44 -22:15:33.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3605 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:08.12 -22:57:58.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1788 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:12.79 -22:41:43.2: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1124 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:48.65 -21:22:23.4: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2528 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:29.46 -21:44:39.5: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:36.97 -24:17:10.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8806 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:42:44.07 -21:50:35.8: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:44.07 -21:50:35.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4445 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:09.05 -20:40:23.1: 13.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:23.60 -21:14:36.4: 13.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:20.03 -20:58:08.6: 13.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:36.85 -21:00:43.9: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:36:28.28 -21:47:35.7: 13.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:18.62 -22:14:53.7: 13.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:50:05.35 -20:58:34.6: 13.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:34:58.62 -22:50:55.1: 13.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:09.05 -20:40:23.1: 13.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:09.05 -20:40:23.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5237 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:50:05.35 -20:58:34.6: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:23.60 -21:14:36.4: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:20.03 -20:58:08.6: 13.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:18.62 -22:14:53.7: 13.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:36:28.28 -21:47:35.7: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:36.85 -21:00:43.9: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:05.35 -20:58:34.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4663 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:20.03 -20:58:08.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4245 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:23.60 -21:14:36.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4805 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:18.62 -22:14:53.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4829 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:28.28 -21:47:35.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5659 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:36.85 -21:00:43.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5686 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:34:58.62 -22:50:55.1: 13.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:58.62 -22:50:55.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4931 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:30.44 -21:52:02.9: 13.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:04.78 -21:32:46.1: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:03.79 -21:15:31.7: 14.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:23.59 -20:54:52.1: 13.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:55.81 -20:42:43.6: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:49:28.91 -21:49:50.3: 13.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:25.70 -22:16:12.5: 13.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:11.43 -21:13:54.3: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:30.44 -21:52:02.9: 13.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.44 -21:52:02.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5090 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:04.78 -21:32:46.1: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:04.78 -21:32:46.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6092 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:23.59 -20:54:52.1: 13.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:55.81 -20:42:43.6: 13.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:25.70 -22:16:12.5: 13.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:03.79 -21:15:31.7: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:49:28.91 -21:49:50.3: 13.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:23.59 -20:54:52.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6556 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:55.81 -20:42:43.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6098 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:25.70 -22:16:12.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5360 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:03.79 -21:15:31.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6189 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:28.91 -21:49:50.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3357 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:11.43 -21:13:54.3: 13.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:11.43 -21:13:54.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5946 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:40.78 -20:59:01.0: 14.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:20.31 -22:41:18.8: 13.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:47:19.23 -20:55:37.4: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:35.76 -21:13:31.6: 13.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:34:39.52 -22:32:45.6: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:36:48.19 -21:18:53.6: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:20.60 -21:46:59.3: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:52.76 -25:34:53.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:40.78 -20:59:01.0: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:40.78 -20:59:01.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5202 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:20.31 -22:41:18.8: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:34:39.52 -22:32:45.6: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:20.31 -22:41:18.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4421 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:47:19.23 -20:55:37.4: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.52 -22:32:45.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6374 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:35.76 -21:13:31.6: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:36:48.19 -21:18:53.6: 13.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:20.60 -21:46:59.3: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:19.23 -20:55:37.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6661 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:35.76 -21:13:31.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6618 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:48.19 -21:18:53.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5493 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:20.60 -21:46:59.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5070 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:52.76 -25:34:53.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:53.79 -21:52:01.8: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:49.24 -22:11:47.5: 13.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:36.94 -21:07:33.2: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:53:17.31 -22:39:11.3: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:42:33.56 -21:30:36.7: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:41:11.97 -20:48:43.3: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:49:36.14 -20:52:08.6: 14.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:53.79 -21:52:01.8: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:53.79 -21:52:01.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5266 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:36.94 -21:07:33.2: 14.23 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:41:11.97 -20:48:43.3: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:49.24 -22:11:47.5: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:42:33.56 -21:30:36.7: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:36.94 -21:07:33.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7023 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:53:17.31 -22:39:11.3: 14.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:11.97 -20:48:43.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7943 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:49:36.14 -20:52:08.6: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:49.24 -22:11:47.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7379 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:33.56 -21:30:36.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5917 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:17.31 -22:39:11.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4456 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:36.14 -20:52:08.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7500 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:02.13 -22:22:53.1: 14.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:47:05.43 -22:35:58.0: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:48:11.53 -22:01:19.7: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:59.92 -22:19:00.5: 14.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:52:57.76 -22:00:59.0: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:00:38.96 -21:30:48.1: 14.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:38.64 -25:11:31.7: 14.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:02.13 -22:22:53.1: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:48:11.53 -22:01:19.7: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:59.92 -22:19:00.5: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:02.13 -22:22:53.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7276 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:11.53 -22:01:19.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6549 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:52:57.76 -22:00:59.0: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:47:05.43 -22:35:58.0: 14.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.92 -22:19:00.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7115 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:00:38.96 -21:30:48.1: 14.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:57.76 -22:00:59.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7675 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:05.43 -22:35:58.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7360 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:38.96 -21:30:48.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8600 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:38.64 -25:11:31.7: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:38.64 -25:11:31.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3119 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:57:59.52 -22:14:32.1: 14.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:52:16.32 -22:46:04.0: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:52:53.39 -23:49:27.3: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:01:13.75 -23:07:12.7: 14.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:57:59.52 -22:14:32.1: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:52:16.32 -22:46:04.0: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:01:13.75 -23:07:12.7: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:52:53.39 -23:49:27.3: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:59.52 -22:14:32.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6835 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:16.32 -22:46:04.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7340 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:13.75 -23:07:12.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8330 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:53.39 -23:49:27.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6055 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:59:00.49 -22:46:13.1: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:59:00.49 -22:46:13.1: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:00.49 -22:46:13.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9903 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53179.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53317.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53508.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52752_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52755_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52757_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52763_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52766_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52767_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52888_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53023_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53100_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53169_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53179_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53293_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:40.49 -26:55:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53306_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53317_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53358_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53358_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53378_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53389_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53389_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53393_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53393_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53401_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53401_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53409_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53418_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53418_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53435_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53438_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53439_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53439_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53444_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53444_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53449_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53449_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53461_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53461_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53463_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53464_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53465_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53471_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53472_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53474_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53474_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53476_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53479_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53479_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53485_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53485_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53490_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53490_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53491_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53496_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53496_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53499_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53499_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53501_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53507_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53507_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53508_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53508_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53514_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53542_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53544_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53560_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53560_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53561_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53565_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53578_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53580_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53587_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53603_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53603_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53609_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53620_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53620_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53621_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53622_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53622_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53647_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53647_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53653_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53653_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53681_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 01138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:57:15.98 -30:45:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:07:36.60 -23:55:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02165_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 02165_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:23.25 -30:10:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.46 -27:44:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.94 -29:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26084_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 26084_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15204_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 15204_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-12-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks