This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.53 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6
137.94334 -1.90280 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 460885660571212544 | 02:46:51.85 +57:34:12.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=-0.099+/- (B)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 02 46 52.47 +57 33 54.6 12.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 460885660571212544,2461255.7105,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 460885660571212544 20260803.2105 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.24 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8
145.93629 4.08691 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J040204.26+581016.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.680 V 13.830 V 2457011.88000 42.270000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J040204.26+581016.1,2461255.7105,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J040204.26+581016.1 20260803.2105 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.88 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4
135.43960 -1.67793 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J023009.77+584628.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.620 V 14.880 V 2458491.43870 48.959170800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 02 30 10.12 +58 46 31.4 12.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J023009.77+584628.1,2461255.7105,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J023009.77+584628.1 20260803.2105 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.39 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7
143.93820 3.40753 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J034659.15+585521.9
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.130 V 14.480 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034659.15+585521.9,2461255.7105,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034659.15+585521.9 20260803.2105 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.41 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3
136.38475 -0.56420 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J024019.44+592558.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.350 V 14.670 V 2458333.84100 50.239998700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 02 40 19.73 +59 25 59.3 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J024019.44+592558.9,2461255.7105,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J024019.44+592558.9 20260803.2105 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.22 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4
139.74782 -0.37370 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J030411.29+580547.2
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.910 g Y 0.220 g 2458362.86500 28.122000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 03 04 11.46 +58 05 47.4 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J030411.29+580547.2,2461255.7105,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J030411.29+580547.2 20260803.2105 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 12.04 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8
138.93482 -0.68121 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was found in ASASSN-V 2" ASASSN-V J025739.42+581248.6
Type: SR
MeanMag 13.76 m Amp. 0.15 m Period 38.820472 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 02 57 39.69 +58 12 48.8 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.7105,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.2105 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.2105 2461255.7105 13.07 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8
136.85781 1.31996 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 464886779083679872 | 02:50:12.21 +60:56:20.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.846+/-0.029 (Very red!)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 03.2105* 02 50 12.30 +60 56 20.8 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 464886779083679872,2461255.7105,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 464886779083679872 20260803.2105 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461255.71080542 03.08.2026 05:03:23.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19915
Objects passed selection criteria: 19778
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13665.8
Average stars matched: 13238.8 (96.8754 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 00:14:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461255.71080542 03.08.2026 05:03:23.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 186
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 65 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 142594
Objects passed selection criteria: 142182
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97052
Average stars matched: 92728.5 (95.5452 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 607324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 3 00:16:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.71016389
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0423 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.muelMRhlkk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dyIjwbset2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IpP3M0qzkP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SvJI8hy29L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.961600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.961600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec +55.2344 to +67.5141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec 55.2344 to 67.5141 deg
Loaded 17774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9548 out of 10598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10598 out of 20729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.muelMRhlkk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2177, bad_region=0, passed=20929
Got 20929 stars (including 18725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1299 n_q2=1255 n_q3=1372 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dyIjwbset2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2180, bad_region=0, passed=20729
Got 20729 stars (including 18522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1379 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IpP3M0qzkP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, bad_region=0, passed=6633
Got 6633 stars (including 6284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=6.830 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.760 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.255 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.947 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.476 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.750 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.947
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.750 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.780 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=1636 n_q2=837 n_q3=1467 n_q4=934 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.469
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SvJI8hy29L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, bad_region=0, passed=6667
Got 6667 stars (including 6322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=6.760 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=26.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.715 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.212 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.514 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.559 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.589 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.761 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.907
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.761 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1649 n_q2=832 n_q3=1466 n_q4=925 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.432
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.215
ref2=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new1=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.469
new2=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.432
reference average sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.2355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31336_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31336_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.74 +64:20:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:40.96 +58:23:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16177_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 16177_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.11 +62:32:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:18.96 +61:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.75 +63:58:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.84 +60:44:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04612_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 04612_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:31.95 +58:16:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15369_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 15369_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.14 +62:31:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.76 +59:02:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01608_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 01608_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.98 +57:38:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07549_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 07549_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:19.19 +59:29:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05863_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 05863_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:50.81 +58:56:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08351_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 08351_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:25.17 +60:46:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:03.90 +59:56:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.53 +58:52:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08307_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 08307_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.66 +61:06:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0423 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0315 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:20.253 +62:01:48.75
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:23.199 +62:01:10.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OqGd384EY4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r0V9CnHY90
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oXaqTDEDj1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSgcxLl2tB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 154983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec +55.1748 to +67.5161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec 55.1748 to 67.5161 deg
Loaded 17915 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7797 out of 10804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10804 out of 154983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 178 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OqGd384EY4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17688, bad_region=2, passed=154936
Got 154936 stars (including 136983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1285 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r0V9CnHY90 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=17825, bad_region=1, passed=154953
Got 154953 stars (including 136846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1226 n_q3=1354 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oXaqTDEDj1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1670, bad_region=2, passed=40278
Got 40278 stars (including 38560 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40278 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1603 n_q2=815 n_q3=1503 n_q4=955 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gSgcxLl2tB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1715, bad_region=2, passed=40321
Got 40321 stars (including 38568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.770 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1610 n_q2=806 n_q3=1499 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.437
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-02-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-03_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_000822_TTUQ1b1x1_4045069_QsMSGThW/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:25.94 +63:41:29.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:27:27.40 +58:19:54.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:52:30.84 +56:57:50.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:54.45 +63:00:16.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:27:27.40 +58:19:54.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:27.40 +58:19:54.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:25.94 +63:41:29.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:46:52.47 +57:33:54.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5106 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:25.94 +63:41:29.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2412 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:52:30.84 +56:57:50.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:30.84 +56:57:50.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:54.45 +63:00:16.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:54.45 +63:00:16.0: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7572 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:16:03.02 +60:02:25.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:47:13.77 +62:29:12.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:16:03.02 +60:02:25.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:03.02 +60:02:25.5: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9285 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:47:13.77 +62:29:12.0: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:13.77 +62:29:12.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8107 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:04.10 +58:10:15.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2417 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:13:44.85 +60:57:56.1: 13.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:13:44.85 +60:57:56.1: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:44.85 +60:57:56.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6774 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:30:10.12 +58:46:31.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8784 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:46:58.93 +58:55:22.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3859 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:40:19.73 +59:25:59.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4059 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:04:11.46 +58:05:47.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2163 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:57:39.69 +58:12:48.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0401 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:20:46.16 +57:07:56.9: 11.04 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:50:12.30 +60:56:20.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0421 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:20:46.16 +57:07:56.9: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:46.16 +57:07:56.9: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1437 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out179109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27045.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28959.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62268.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 179101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:56.42 +61:08:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179109_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 179109_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179474_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 179474_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179665_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 179665_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:02.44 +58:35:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179866_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 179866_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:32.66 +58:00:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180222_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180222_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.25 +58:13:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180343_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180343_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:15.12 +58:01:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180349_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180349_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:21.27 +60:22:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180364_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180364_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180372_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180372_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:27.17 +63:58:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180387_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180387_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:18.07 +62:37:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180490_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180490_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:05.96 +58:50:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180526_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180526_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:23.78 +63:36:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180562_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180562_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:21.12 +65:39:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180606_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180606_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180610_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180610_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.66 +62:41:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:22.33 +64:05:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180668_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180668_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:15.80 +65:40:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180756_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180756_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:21.01 +66:31:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180760_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180760_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:13.82 +60:26:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:34.22 +63:01:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180821_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180821_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:49.89 +62:54:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180826_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180826_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:24.47 +58:24:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180835_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180835_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:29.32 +64:41:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180876_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180876_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:59:15.26 +60:33:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180931_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 180931_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:13.48 +67:03:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:36.15 +64:57:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:43.05 +62:22:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181069_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181069_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:45.73 +62:35:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181100_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181100_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:31.97 +63:22:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181313_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181313_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.75 +62:41:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181385_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181385_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181415_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181415_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:51.12 +59:19:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181483_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181483_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:54.61 +64:21:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181495_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181495_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:07.78 +63:56:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181586_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181586_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181699_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181699_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:32.99 +63:12:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181814_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181814_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:36.22 +62:22:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181894_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 181894_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:45.37 +63:54:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:47.39 +60:44:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:30.78 +65:31:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.61 +61:06:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:24.80 +63:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.32 +59:58:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.84 +63:20:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61907_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 61907_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:16.59 +60:35:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 41984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.77 +59:02:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:46.53 +64:45:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.73 +63:58:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:18.95 +61:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:07.01 +59:46:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27630_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 27630_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:40.97 +58:23:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:00.98 +63:49:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 33192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:25.81 +58:50:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:41:05.23 +62:17:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:48.69 +62:24:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.27 +62:31:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24825_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 24825_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:38.74 +58:22:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37368_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 37368_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:11.18 +59:27:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:25.02 +58:41:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:49.49 +60:54:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.91 +60:15:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 17463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:40.75 +60:24:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:10.39 +59:20:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:56.90 +65:19:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 09017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:08.55 +57:19:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:19.72 +59:05:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28816_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 28816_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:33.20 +57:50:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28749_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 28749_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:27.06 +58:33:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62885_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 62885_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:43.88 +60:25:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27234_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 27234_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:10.33 +58:26:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 167098_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:39.48 +59:55:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 125600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:51.94 +64:59:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61672_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 61672_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:09:23.07 +60:17:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71107_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 71107_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49869_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 49869_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:36.44 +59:07:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56335_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 56335_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:56.13 +59:02:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31891_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31891_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:54.16 +57:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25447_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25447_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:53.13 +58:12:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55350_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 55350_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:45.40 +59:43:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58200_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 58200_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:00.83 +62:02:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 53524_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:44.64 +58:26:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 81062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:01:55.38 +61:20:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:27.19 +65:45:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25015_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25015_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:59:06.27 +57:48:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.74 +64:20:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73136_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 73136_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:14.23 +61:06:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 68790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:10:21.76 +60:44:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:15.31 +61:33:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25990_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25990_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:05.67 +57:13:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87758_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 87758_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:44.49 +62:24:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.26 +58:31:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25477_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25477_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:02:34.92 +57:57:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33995_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 33995_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:43.67 +59:05:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:26.18 +63:44:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 28959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.17 +62:48:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 73530_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:29.93 +61:32:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 32655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:59.77 +58:28:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62268_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 62268_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136222_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 136222_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:22.48 +62:38:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 63804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:55.11 +59:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:02.12 +62:17:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41883_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 41883_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:35.36 +59:33:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75986_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 75986_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:49.33 +61:36:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:45.26 +60:25:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27045_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 27045_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:10.27 +61:55:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31820_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 31820_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.23 +58:14:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 78119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:05:09.27 +61:14:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:25.88 +60:39:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:09.83 +59:40:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:29.96 +59:19:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:28.98 +57:43:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:15.67 +62:09:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:40.04 +58:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31556_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 31556_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:25.55 +58:42:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:38.87 +58:42:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29114_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 29114_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:00.26 +58:25:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 53119_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:08.34 +60:05:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:05.47 +59:34:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55379_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 55379_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:52:03.83 +59:25:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76912_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 76912_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:32.86 +61:33:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:56.47 +62:56:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143016_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 143016_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:11.37 +63:52:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:24.38 +64:25:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.10 +62:32:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:11.80 +60:22:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27108_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 27108_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:04.27 +57:50:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:43.19 +60:06:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22371_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 22371_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:55.12 +57:22:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.94 +57:38:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 55463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:19.20 +59:29:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42949_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 42949_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:50.85 +58:56:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24374_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 24374_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:03:35.37 +57:52:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:35.92 +62:50:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:25.16 +60:46:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:45.98 +60:22:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 17101_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:15.02 +57:51:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90598_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 90598_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:27.28 +62:13:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.95 +58:40:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21190_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 21190_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:41.64 +58:23:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 18570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:08.63 +57:13:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 80092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 08723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:41.53 +60:54:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.89 +60:44:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33951_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 33951_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:44.43 +59:15:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34614_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 34614_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:31.97 +58:16:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:40.49 +61:05:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 97541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:57.29 +62:51:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:07.46 +57:52:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24961_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 24961_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:38.50 +58:13:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:56.19 +59:35:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:33.50 +63:58:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:39.63 +60:07:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25830_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25830_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:25.64 +57:02:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:23.54 +60:15:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:00.66 +60:02:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:03.87 +59:56:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23834_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 23834_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:25.35 +57:54:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:08.93 +63:12:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:10.91 +59:21:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 32731_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:32.79 +58:43:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:31.73 +58:45:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.52 +58:52:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.19 +57:52:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11173_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 11173_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:47.97 +57:08:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20473_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 20473_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:49:30.81 +57:05:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:43.41 +57:58:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.70 +57:27:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:26.79 +59:09:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-03_00-03-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
