This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.1852 2461255.6852 11.54 19:25:36.11 -37:43:54.7
0.80745 -22.55589 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia -0 1 1 11.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:25:36.11 -37:43:54.7: 14.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:25:36.11 -37:43:54.7: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.6852,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.1852 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.1852 2461255.6852 12.29 19:56:10.41 -35:14:10.4
5.35545 -27.75480 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.139 Juewa 1 1 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:56:10.41 -35:14:10.4: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:56:10.41 -35:14:10.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461255.6852,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260803.1852 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 03.1852 2461255.6852 12.24 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9
6.52125 -24.46942 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J194220-3318.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.960 V Y 0.900 V 2452237.30000 86.666664000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9: 13.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194220-3318.6,2461255.6852,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194220-3318.6 20260803.1852 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461255.68556442 03.08.2026 04:27:02.766 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5224
Objects passed selection criteria: 5219
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4867.25
Average stars matched: 4593.75 (94.3808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 23:37:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461255.68556442 03.08.2026 04:27:02.766 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42644
Objects passed selection criteria: 42571
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38267.2
Average stars matched: 36346 (94.9794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 264480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 23:39:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461255.68489821
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01429 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.va7NXZ1ohR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XFVjZoBF3q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bMXu4zZ9EE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IXLre5yZdu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.312600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.312600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Loaded 9578 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4228 out of 4314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4314 out of 5190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
3.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
3.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.va7NXZ1ohR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=4697
Got 4697 stars (including 4352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4245 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4242 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4224 stars left (next iteration limit 4648)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4224 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=983 n_q2=917 n_q3=1399 n_q4=925 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XFVjZoBF3q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, bad_region=0, passed=5190
Got 5190 stars (including 4828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4713 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4711 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4686 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4686 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4686 stars left (next iteration limit 5155)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4686 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1001 n_q3=1518 n_q4=1033 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bMXu4zZ9EE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=245, bad_region=0, passed=4871
Got 4871 stars (including 4623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4871 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4486 stars left (next iteration limit 4932)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4486 robust_rms=9.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4486 robust_rms=0.596 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4486 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4486 robust_rms_before=1.021 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.666 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.646
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.666 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits N_match=4486 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=987 n_q2=797 n_q3=1678 n_q4=1024 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IXLre5yZdu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=242, bad_region=0, passed=4842
Got 4842 stars (including 4595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4842 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4467 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4467 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4497 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4466 stars left (next iteration limit 4913)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4466 robust_rms=9.870 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4466 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.845 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4466 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.706 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4466 robust_rms_before=1.035 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.678 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.706
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.678 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=4466 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=972 n_q2=801 n_q3=1668 n_q4=1025 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.533 worst_q_ratio=1.135
ref2=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.340
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.276
reference average sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.1765
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (4224 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4686 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116_astrometric_residuals.png (4486 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117_astrometric_residuals.png (4466 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:40:17.94 -34:32:15.6: 11.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:32:32.78 -31:20:05.1: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:50:53.68 -32:12:42.2: 11.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:48:42.03 -36:08:52.0: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:27:29.05 -34:24:20.1: 11.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:48:42.03 -36:08:52.0: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:32:32.78 -31:20:05.1: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:42.03 -36:08:52.0: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6430 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:32.78 -31:20:05.1: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6988 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:40:17.94 -34:32:15.6: 10.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:17.94 -34:32:15.6: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0266 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:27:29.05 -34:24:20.1: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:29.05 -34:24:20.1: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9260 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:50:53.68 -32:12:42.2: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:53.68 -32:12:42.2: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9914 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20691_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:00.59 -30:57:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20711_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20723_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20723_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20755_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20755_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20762_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20772_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 20772_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03078_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 03078_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.52 -31:42:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0392 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:34.890 -33:59:54.25
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:37.467 -34:00:34.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01429 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AFVG721K3r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iPOtXxWfGe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5Zqh1rzgs2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uCxv9C7wan
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.110400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.110400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 46244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Loaded 9650 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7461 out of 7928 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7928 out of 46244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 47 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AFVG721K3r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1818, bad_region=1, passed=44261
Got 44261 stars (including 42383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1178 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1503 n_q4=1122 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iPOtXxWfGe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1811, bad_region=0, passed=46239
Got 46239 stars (including 44347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=1179 n_q2=970 n_q3=1614 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5Zqh1rzgs2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1243, bad_region=1, passed=31931
Got 31931 stars (including 30635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1038 n_q2=895 n_q3=1807 n_q4=1120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uCxv9C7wan (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1188, bad_region=2, passed=31890
Got 31890 stars (including 30650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=1043 n_q2=884 n_q3=1822 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-26-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0116.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_233425_TTUQ1b1x1_3807473_p0xuphaB/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:23:04.64 -38:58:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:34:45.97 -28:58:21.1: 13.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.5: 12.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:28:58.90 -30:51:56.4: 12.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:34:31.37 -34:02:31.0: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:12.72 -29:05:31.1: 13.36 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:23:04.64 -38:58:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:04.64 -38:58:06.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:23:49.99 -29:28:59.5: 13.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:23:38.52 -30:14:54.1: 11.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:33:14.74 -29:07:59.1: 12.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:25:36.11 -37:43:54.7: 14.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:12.72 -29:05:31.1: 13.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:23:49.99 -29:28:59.5: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:12.72 -29:05:31.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1747 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:34:31.37 -34:02:31.0: 12.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:23:38.52 -30:14:54.1: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.5: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:34:45.97 -28:58:21.1: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:28:58.90 -30:51:56.4: 12.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:49.99 -29:28:59.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4335 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:24.24 -29:29:25.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4005 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:38.52 -30:14:54.1: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4361 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:31.37 -34:02:31.0: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5511 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:45.97 -28:58:21.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5159 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:58.90 -30:51:56.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8995 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:33:14.74 -29:07:59.1: 12.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:14.74 -29:07:59.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9735 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:25:36.11 -37:43:54.7: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:36.62 -28:36:53.6: 12.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:36.62 -28:36:53.6: 12.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:36.62 -28:36:53.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6346 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:26:47.14 -36:14:59.7: 13.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:16:24.71 -28:44:07.9: 13.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:42:17.38 -37:35:24.1: 14.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:56:10.41 -35:14:10.4: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:15:58.31 -29:02:10.7: 13.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:31:40.47 -29:23:07.7: 12.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:22.44 -28:38:41.9: 13.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:26:47.14 -36:14:59.7: 13.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:47.14 -36:14:59.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.6419 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:16:24.71 -28:44:07.9: 13.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:56:10.41 -35:14:10.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:42:17.38 -37:35:24.1: 13.96 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:22:31.99 -29:07:36.2: 13.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:24.71 -28:44:07.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1381 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:17.38 -37:35:24.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=12.7003 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:15:58.31 -29:02:10.7: 13.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:58.31 -29:02:10.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.9310 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:31:40.47 -29:23:07.7: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:40.47 -29:23:07.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7778 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:22.44 -28:38:41.9: 13.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:22.44 -28:38:41.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2794 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:22:31.99 -29:07:36.2: 13.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:31.99 -29:07:36.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1470 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.4: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:18:05.07 -29:30:05.8: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:15:59.62 -28:35:31.1: 13.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:16:45.82 -28:52:09.6: 13.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:23:38.95 -29:55:46.8: 13.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:27:46.90 -29:09:52.4: 13.89 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:15:59.62 -28:35:31.1: 13.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.4: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:33.73 -29:59:01.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3570 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:59.62 -28:35:31.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3292 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:18:05.07 -29:30:05.8: 13.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:05.07 -29:30:05.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4406 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:18:06.41 -28:49:40.7: 13.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:16:45.82 -28:52:09.6: 13.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:45.82 -28:52:09.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3832 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:23:38.95 -29:55:46.8: 13.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:27:46.90 -29:09:52.4: 13.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:46.90 -29:09:52.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4078 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:38.95 -29:55:46.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2374 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:18:06.41 -28:49:40.7: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:14.61 -31:22:24.3: 13.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:06.41 -28:49:40.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4442 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:17:27.40 -28:50:02.5: 13.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:14.61 -31:22:24.3: 13.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:14.61 -31:22:24.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4204 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:29:11.08 -34:17:31.4: 13.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:57.40 -30:37:22.1: 14.06 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:29:11.08 -34:17:31.4: 14.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:43:43.25 -30:59:19.9: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:11.08 -34:17:31.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2405 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:36:56.08 -32:20:43.3: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:17:27.40 -28:50:02.5: 13.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:27:02.43 -29:49:32.8: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:27.40 -28:50:02.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4847 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:18:02.00 -29:31:47.1: 13.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:27:02.43 -29:49:32.8: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:57.40 -30:37:22.1: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:02.43 -29:49:32.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3771 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:43:43.25 -30:59:19.9: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:57.40 -30:37:22.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4131 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:43.25 -30:59:19.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4069 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:36:56.08 -32:20:43.3: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:56.08 -32:20:43.3: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2467 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:18:02.00 -29:31:47.1: 13.87 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:02.00 -29:31:47.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5988 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:22:16.99 -29:17:14.7: 13.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:02:34.73 -29:51:48.6: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:22:16.99 -29:17:14.7: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:51:33.34 -31:28:14.4: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:16.99 -29:17:14.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5130 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9: 13.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:51:33.34 -31:28:14.4: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:33.34 -31:28:14.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5172 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:02:34.73 -29:51:48.6: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:20:35.52 -29:18:09.8: 13.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:34.73 -29:51:48.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5956 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:24:54.19 -29:17:02.3: 13.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:19.48 -33:18:39.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2385 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:24:54.19 -29:17:02.3: 13.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:54.19 -29:17:02.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6152 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:20:35.52 -29:18:09.8: 13.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:35.52 -29:18:09.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5262 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56753.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22315.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55865_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55865_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55866_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55866_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55872_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55872_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55877_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55877_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55880_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55880_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55881_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55881_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55889_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 55889_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56094_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56094_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56153_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56153_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:44.23 -28:41:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56161_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56161_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56186_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
Preparing report for the candidate 56186_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56468_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56468_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56471_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56471_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:21.48 -29:41:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56512_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
Preparing report for the candidate 56512_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56554_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56554_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56618_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56618_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56670_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56670_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56712_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56712_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56753_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56753_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:17.38 -37:35:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.288 6739753704129152256 295.57210836461 -37.59028900848 12.3932 10.6985 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.288#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56758_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56758_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56791_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56791_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56824_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56824_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:29.03 -29:12:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56840_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56840_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56882_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56882_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56903_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56903_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56911_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56911_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56918_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56918_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56935_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56935_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56944_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56944_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56959_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56959_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56961_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56961_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56962_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56962_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56968_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56968_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56975_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56975_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56993_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 56993_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57019_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57019_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57036_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57036_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57084_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57084_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57096_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57096_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57102_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57102_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57110_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57110_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57123_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 57123_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22315_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
Preparing report for the candidate 22315_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52235_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 52235_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:50.16 -34:30:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:29.86 -38:05:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50395_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 50395_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.81 -29:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42596_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117
The candidate 42596_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_23-27-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0117 did not pass the final checks