This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.38 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1
200.97199 -4.63611 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" EK Ori
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.300 pg < 16.900 pg 2425235.00000 148.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 12 45.91 +08 27 05.1 11.4 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EK Ori,2461254.9600,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EK Ori 20260802.4600 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.85 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7
201.54554 -11.99777 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J054752+0425.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.390 V Y 1.090 V 2452815.80000 326.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 05 47 51.47 +04 25 14.7 11.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J054752+0425.2,2461254.9600,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J054752+0425.2 20260802.4600 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.24 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4
200.93980 -2.88967 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1795 Ori
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 V < 15.000 V 2453652.00000 264.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 18 56.05 +09 18 19.4 11.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1795 Ori,2461254.9600,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1795 Ori 20260802.4600 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 10.53 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7
198.94602 -11.53521 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" FQ Ori
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.200 V < 15.700 V 2433310.00000 276.700000000000 M1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 05 44 28.88 +06 52 01.7 10.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FQ Ori,2461254.9600,10.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FQ Ori 20260802.4600 10.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.05 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2
201.27727 -4.48921 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" EM Ori
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 pg 14.800 pg 2425254.00000 137.000000000000 M6:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 13 52.28 +08 15 11.2 11.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EM Ori,2461254.9600,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EM Ori 20260802.4600 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.54 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2
205.99142 -8.19727 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J060935+0222.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.970 V Y 0.250 V 2452343.40000 133.337995000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 09 35.31 +02 22 28.2 11.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J060935+0222.5,2461254.9600,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J060935+0222.5 20260802.4600 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.42 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9
203.59784 -7.91770 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J060607+0435.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.620 V Y 0.600 V 2452620.90000 102.360280000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 06 06.79 +04 35 51.9 11.4 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J060607+0435.9,2461254.9600,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J060607+0435.9 20260802.4600 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 11.15 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5
204.18949 -10.67857 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J055728+0246.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V Y 0.460 V 2452596.60000 82.984136000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 05 57 28.42 +02 46 34.5 11.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J055728+0246.5,2461254.9600,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J055728+0246.5 20260802.4600 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 10.71 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4
199.55811 -6.69631 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" DS Ori
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.700 V Y 0.860 V 2453247.20000 334.000000000000 M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 02 43.44 +08 42 04.4 10.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DS Ori,2461254.9600,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DS Ori 20260802.4600 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 10.06 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9
204.89545 -7.29411 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J061045+0345.4
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.069 Ic Y 0.557 Ic 2453528.50000 520.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 10 44.95 +03 45 24.9 10.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061045+0345.4,2461254.9600,10.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061045+0345.4 20260802.4600 10.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 10.03 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3
201.27060 -7.88823 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J060148+0638.4
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V 12.500 V 2453758.00000 220.500000000000 SC
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 06 01 48.27 +06 38 19.3 10.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J060148+0638.4,2461254.9600,10.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J060148+0638.4 20260802.4600 10.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 9.57 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1
203.27047 -13.32106 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J054627+0218.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.690 V Y 0.640 V 2452140.20000 102.810957000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 05 46 27.35 +02 18 31.1 9.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J054627+0218.5,2461254.9600,9.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J054627+0218.5 20260802.4600 9.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4600 2461254.9600 9.55 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1
205.01743 -12.45247 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J055245+0113.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.580 V Y 0.340 V 2452211.10000 61.934845000000 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4600* 05 52 45.14 +01 13 22.1 9.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J055245+0113.3,2461254.9600,9.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J055245+0113.3 20260802.4600 9.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461254.96031538 02.08.2026 11:02:41.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22309
Objects passed selection criteria: 22142
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12816
Average stars matched: 12391.5 (96.6877 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 06:07:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461082.61632350 11.02.2026 02:47:20.350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461254.96031538 02.08.2026 11:02:41.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 118
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150410
Objects passed selection criteria: 149868
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 91267.5
Average stars matched: 87506 (95.8786 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 615768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 06:08:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.95968271
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0835 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z3h9JzvHrk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qk8I2NeEC8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6YbEWnygkb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9ThtBQVOWj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.917600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.917600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec +0.5852 to +11.3169 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9251 deg, Dec 0.5852 to 11.3169 deg
Loaded 13838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10471 out of 11616 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11616 out of 23947 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec +0.6076 to +11.3239 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9156 to 97.9135 deg, Dec 0.6076 to 11.3239 deg
Loaded 13821 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10495 out of 11630 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11630 out of 23981 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 9.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z3h9JzvHrk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2599, bad_region=0, passed=23947
Got 23947 stars (including 21319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=820 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1001 n_q4=1753 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qk8I2NeEC8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2508, bad_region=0, passed=23981
Got 23981 stars (including 21438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=829 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1010 n_q4=1740 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6YbEWnygkb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, bad_region=0, passed=1881
Got 1881 stars (including 1608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1881 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1518 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1483 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1483 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1482 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1482 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 1482 stars left (next iteration limit 1631)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1482 robust_rms=9.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1482 robust_rms=0.608 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.287 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1482 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1482 robust_rms_before=1.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.555 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.701 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.603
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.247 +06:03:41.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 1881 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1685411.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.370 -> 0.468 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=1482 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=381 n_q2=231 n_q3=455 n_q4=415 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9ThtBQVOWj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=0, passed=1799
Got 1799 stars (including 1494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1412 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1379 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1408 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1376 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1376 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 1376 stars left (next iteration limit 1516)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=9.053 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.203 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1376 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1376 robust_rms_before=1.397 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.558 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.797 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.724
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.797 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=1376 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.708 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.719 n_q1=339 n_q2=217 n_q3=428 n_q4=392 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.098
ref2=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new1=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.308
new2=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.550 worst_q_ratio=1.306
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.103
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (1482 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (1376 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31607_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 31607_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.63 +02:29:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13836_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 13836_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:55.93 +07:36:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:59:57.457 +05:59:33.15
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0835 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:03.162 +06:03:43.15
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.784 +06:04:22.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3OoJLgtBK6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VXebctQsfV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.71w2VtyEXh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yRedR72n2c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.768800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.768800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 165923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec +0.5713 to +11.3193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9025 to 97.9258 deg, Dec 0.5713 to 11.3193 deg
Loaded 13864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8480 out of 12115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12115 out of 165923 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 164824 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec +0.5830 to +11.3271 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.8906 to 97.9164 deg, Dec 0.5830 to 11.3271 deg
Loaded 13866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8525 out of 12126 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12126 out of 164824 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.3 mag. Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3OoJLgtBK6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=50, blended=21856, bad_region=0, passed=165873
Got 165873 stars (including 143783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 165873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 165873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=899 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1055 n_q4=1609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VXebctQsfV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=21523, bad_region=1, passed=164771
Got 164771 stars (including 143000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=916 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1057 n_q4=1610 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.71w2VtyEXh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=1, passed=18619
Got 18619 stars (including 18115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4803 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4728 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4728 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=1087 n_q2=741 n_q3=1489 n_q4=1411 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yRedR72n2c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=1, passed=17972
Got 17972 stars (including 17405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17972 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4739 stars left (next iteration limit 5209)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4739 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1076 n_q2=756 n_q3=1476 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_060518_TTUQ1b1x1_1656290_oATVSSf3/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:30:37.55 +01:48:52.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:24:05.03 +02:33:35.0: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:28.83 +02:39:29.0: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:15:21.04 +06:07:30.7: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:22:35.44 +03:14:10.9: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:21.89 +10:15:08.2: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:30:04.00 +02:24:38.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:22:35.44 +03:14:10.9: 11.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:28.83 +02:39:29.0: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:24:05.03 +02:33:35.0: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:21.89 +10:15:08.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:15:21.04 +06:07:30.7: 10.86 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:30:37.55 +01:48:52.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:35.44 +03:14:10.9: ref_mag=11.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2137 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.86 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:05.03 +02:33:35.0: ref_mag=10.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8638 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:21.89 +10:15:08.2: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5567 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:28.83 +02:39:29.0: ref_mag=10.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4634 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:37.55 +01:48:52.9: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2352 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:21.04 +06:07:30.7: ref_mag=10.86 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8583 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:30:04.00 +02:24:38.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:04.00 +02:24:38.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:55.60 +01:27:28.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:57.83 +03:06:06.3: 9.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:58.50 +02:08:48.1: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:24.71 +02:44:21.9: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:58.18 +02:46:41.3: 9.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:55.60 +01:27:28.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:55.60 +01:27:28.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:51.21 +01:37:29.2: 9.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:22:50.43 +01:00:00.5: 9.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:57.83 +03:06:06.3: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:57.83 +03:06:06.3: ref_mag=9.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8018 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:58.50 +02:08:48.1: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:24.71 +02:44:21.9: 9.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:58.18 +02:46:41.3: 9.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:58.50 +02:08:48.1: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9829 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:24.71 +02:44:21.9: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0123 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:58.18 +02:46:41.3: ref_mag=9.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0231 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:54.09 +01:23:12.9: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:23:32.77 +01:19:14.8: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:51.21 +01:37:29.2: 9.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:51.21 +01:37:29.2: ref_mag=9.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9868 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:22:50.43 +01:00:00.5: 9.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:50.43 +01:00:00.5: ref_mag=9.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1441 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:59.92 +01:41:31.8: 9.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:23:32.77 +01:19:14.8: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:54.09 +01:23:12.9: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:32.77 +01:19:14.8: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2150 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:54.09 +01:23:12.9: ref_mag=9.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1321 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:19.72 +01:22:43.6: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:24:47.59 +01:23:53.1: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:27.92 +02:25:10.0: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:25:52.18 +01:53:21.9: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:59.92 +01:41:31.8: 9.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:59.92 +01:41:31.8: ref_mag=9.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1799 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:58.87 +02:08:26.9: 9.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:19.72 +01:22:43.6: 9.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:21.57 +02:16:34.2: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:19.72 +01:22:43.6: ref_mag=9.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3067 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:24:47.59 +01:23:53.1: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:47.59 +01:23:53.1: ref_mag=9.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3112 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:27.92 +02:25:10.0: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:25:52.18 +01:53:21.9: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:27.92 +02:25:10.0: ref_mag=9.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3260 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:52.18 +01:53:21.9: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4246 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:30.05 +01:59:08.1: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:44.58 +02:57:05.3: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:21.75 +01:04:43.8: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:58.87 +02:08:26.9: 9.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:58.87 +02:08:26.9: ref_mag=9.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3963 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:21.57 +02:16:34.2: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:21.57 +02:16:34.2: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4350 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:50.67 +02:20:23.9: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:30.05 +01:59:08.1: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:44.58 +02:57:05.3: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:30.05 +01:59:08.1: ref_mag=10.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5918 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:44.58 +02:57:05.3: ref_mag=10.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5859 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:21.75 +01:04:43.8: 10.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:21.75 +01:04:43.8: ref_mag=10.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4744 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:57.19 +02:02:57.4: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:41.04 +01:23:07.9: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:38.32 +02:02:11.6: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:50.67 +02:20:23.9: 10.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:50.67 +02:20:23.9: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5695 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:17.97 +02:03:38.7: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:47.01 +02:03:03.7: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:57.19 +02:02:57.4: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:57.19 +02:02:57.4: ref_mag=10.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6931 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:35.12 +02:04:02.4: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:41.04 +01:23:07.9: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:38.32 +02:02:11.6: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:41.04 +01:23:07.9: ref_mag=10.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6013 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:38.32 +02:02:11.6: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5751 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:41.90 +02:11:00.2: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:29.53 +01:35:00.1: 10.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:30:08.42 +03:02:33.6: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:17.97 +02:03:38.7: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:17.97 +02:03:38.7: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5165 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:47.01 +02:03:03.7: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:47.01 +02:03:03.7: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7644 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:35.12 +02:04:02.4: 10.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:35.12 +02:04:02.4: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7155 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:52.31 +01:51:53.1: 10.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:41.90 +02:11:00.2: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:29.53 +01:35:00.1: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:41.90 +02:11:00.2: ref_mag=10.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8658 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:29.53 +01:35:00.1: ref_mag=10.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7213 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:36.91 +02:20:26.1: 10.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:30:08.42 +03:02:33.6: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:08.42 +03:02:33.6: ref_mag=10.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8124 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:44.50 +02:30:34.7: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:25:56.17 +01:29:02.5: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:52.31 +01:51:53.1: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:52.31 +01:51:53.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6457 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:42.85 +01:27:49.9: 9.95 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:53.71 +01:15:53.0: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:36.91 +02:20:26.1: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:36.91 +02:20:26.1: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8840 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:25:21.44 +01:41:07.2: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:44.50 +02:30:34.7: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:44.50 +02:30:34.7: ref_mag=10.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8051 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:25:56.17 +01:29:02.5: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:56.17 +01:29:02.5: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8462 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:29:15.42 +02:09:04.9: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:24:40.48 +01:34:56.9: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:42.85 +01:27:49.9: 9.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:53.71 +01:15:53.0: 10.54 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:42.85 +01:27:49.9: ref_mag=9.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8029 delta=-0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:53.71 +01:15:53.0: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7883 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:25:21.44 +01:41:07.2: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:21.44 +01:41:07.2: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8616 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:27:12.49 +01:15:05.5: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:53.04 +02:02:39.6: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:29:15.42 +02:09:04.9: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:15.42 +02:09:04.9: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8826 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:26:38.12 +02:12:46.8: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:24:40.48 +01:34:56.9: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:40.48 +01:34:56.9: ref_mag=10.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9529 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:45.63 +02:23:07.0: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:27:12.49 +01:15:05.5: 10.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:12.49 +01:15:05.5: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8950 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:53.04 +02:02:39.6: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:53.04 +02:02:39.6: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0134 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:24:10.62 +01:09:43.3: 10.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:26:38.12 +02:12:46.8: 10.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:25:22.59 +01:17:37.4: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:30:00.72 +02:38:55.2: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:38.12 +02:12:46.8: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8583 delta=-0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:28:49.92 +02:52:02.2: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:45.63 +02:23:07.0: 10.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:45.63 +02:23:07.0: ref_mag=10.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0888 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:24:10.62 +01:09:43.3: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:10.62 +01:09:43.3: ref_mag=10.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0947 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:30:00.72 +02:38:55.2: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:28:49.92 +02:52:02.2: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:00.72 +02:38:55.2: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9388 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:25:22.59 +01:17:37.4: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:49.92 +02:52:02.2: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0965 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:22.59 +01:17:37.4: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0055 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:45.91 +08:27:05.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.3780 delta=3.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:47:51.47 +04:25:14.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8348 delta=1.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:56.05 +09:18:19.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.2410 delta=2.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:44:28.88 +06:52:01.7: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=10.5267 delta=3.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:13:52.28 +08:15:11.2: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0442 delta=1.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:09:35.31 +02:22:28.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5254 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:06:06.79 +04:35:51.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4063 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:57:28.42 +02:46:34.5: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1351 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:02:43.44 +08:42:04.4: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7158 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:10:44.95 +03:45:24.9: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0673 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:48.27 +06:38:19.3: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0247 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-47-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:46:27.35 +02:18:31.1: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5739 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-48-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits at 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:52:45.14 +01:13:22.1: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5520 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05061.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out135524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143663.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190090_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190090_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190092_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190092_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:00.66 +10:43:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190093_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190093_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190095_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190095_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190098_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190098_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190102_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190102_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190103_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190103_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190106_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190106_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.38 +08:11:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190107_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.69 +02:29:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190118_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:16.76 +01:54:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190120_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190120_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.49 +01:30:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190129_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:58.76 +00:50:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190137_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190137_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:31.00 +09:13:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190164_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190164_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190166_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190166_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.04 +01:41:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190174_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190174_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:14.03 +01:33:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190185_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190185_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:34.33 +01:55:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190200_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190200_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:23.05 +02:55:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190204_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190204_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:09.40 +01:21:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190213_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190213_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:10.94 +01:26:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190220_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190220_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:17.65 +02:50:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190229_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190229_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.72 +00:52:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190235_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190235_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:43.12 +00:54:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190246_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190246_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190256_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190256_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:05.59 +01:14:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190265_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190265_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:28.19 +02:44:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190267_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190267_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:12.39 +01:13:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190281_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190281_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:57.83 +00:56:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190283_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190283_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:35.74 +01:08:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190284_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190284_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190302_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190302_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:08.71 +01:10:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190303_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190303_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.68 +02:08:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190304_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190304_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:40.67 +01:10:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190308_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190308_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:50.32 +01:49:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190330_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190330_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:41.46 +01:09:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190333_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190333_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190335_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190335_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190339_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190339_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190346_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190346_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:13.20 +00:55:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190352_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190352_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190353_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190353_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:33.38 +02:08:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190355_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190355_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:08.89 +02:08:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190356_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190356_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190367_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190367_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190372_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190372_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:02.42 +01:43:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190379_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190379_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190397_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190397_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190399_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190399_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:55.58 +07:26:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190400_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190400_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190418_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190418_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190425_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190425_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:01.29 +06:28:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190427_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190427_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190459_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190459_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190473_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190473_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190485_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190485_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:58.22 +07:22:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190491_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190491_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190494_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190494_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190503_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190503_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190504_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190504_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190515_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190515_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190522_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190522_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190537_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190537_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190551_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.57 +06:22:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190553_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190553_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190555_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190555_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190561_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190561_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190571_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190571_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190572_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190574_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190574_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190577_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190578_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190581_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190591_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190591_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190594_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190594_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190599_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190612_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190633_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190633_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:48.64 +10:25:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190635_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190635_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190643_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190643_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190647_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190651_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190651_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190653_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190653_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190681_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190681_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190729_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190729_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:56.02 +09:31:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190742_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190742_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190757_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190757_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190758_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190758_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190810_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 190810_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 111548_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45229_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 45229_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135524_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 135524_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 84127_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108481_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 108481_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 18993_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 46740_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 127054_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.39 +09:50:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23768_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 23768_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143663_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 143663_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 102420_fd_Ori-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_06-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
