This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4097 2461254.9097 9.22 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7
169.25520 -14.93996 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" RY Tau
Type: CTTS/ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.300 V 11.700 V 5.600000000000 F8Ve-K1IV/Ve(T)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4097* 04 21 57.42 +28 26 34.7 9.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RY Tau,2461254.9097,9.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RY Tau 20260802.4097 9.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.4097 2461254.9097 12.57 04:28:59.00 +26:41:25.2
171.68162 -14.96446 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:28:59.00 +26:41:25.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:28:59.00 +26:41:25.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.4097* 04 28 59.00 +26 41 25.2 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461254.9097,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260802.4097 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461254.91008127 02.08.2026 09:50:21.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12638
Objects passed selection criteria: 12581
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8894.75
Average stars matched: 8656 (97.3158 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 04:55:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461254.91008127 02.08.2026 09:50:21.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90353
Objects passed selection criteria: 90125
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65291.5
Average stars matched: 63040.2 (96.552 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 04:56:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.90941013
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0495 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01562 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N6Bx979oeE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0LnBb95eMI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i6kSNp5cK6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n1vEEHgfuS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.N6Bx979oeE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0LnBb95eMI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i6kSNp5cK6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, bad_region=0, passed=4420
Got 4420 stars (including 4126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4043 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4030 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4030 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4044 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4031 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4031 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4031 stars left (next iteration limit 4433)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4031 robust_rms=9.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4031 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4031 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4031 robust_rms_before=0.955 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.323
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:13.362 +30:00:10.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4420 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3627609.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.955 -> 0.313 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=4031 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1177 n_q2=709 n_q3=966 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n1vEEHgfuS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=4427
Got 4427 stars (including 4125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4040 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4022 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4022 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4042 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4024 stars left (next iteration limit 4424)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4024 robust_rms=9.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4024 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4024 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4024 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.331
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.360 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits N_match=4024 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1158 n_q2=705 n_q3=967 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182_astrometric_residuals.png (4031 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4024 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.49 +32:37:27.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.49 +32:37:27.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.49 +32:37:27.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.2256 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:43.81 +25:42:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20902_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 20902_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 08587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:21:57.42 +28:26:34.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0495 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:13.344 +30:00:11.46
Second-epoch second image center 04:00:16.285 +29:59:30.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01562 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9cBxeKxvXh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sxic7iBCSN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NsBfAMQpxc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rY6qYXJLis
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9cBxeKxvXh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sxic7iBCSN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NsBfAMQpxc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1054, bad_region=7, passed=32015
Got 32015 stars (including 30905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1400 n_q2=833 n_q3=1207 n_q4=1453 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rY6qYXJLis (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1060, bad_region=9, passed=32757
Got 32757 stars (including 31638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1398 n_q2=823 n_q3=1208 n_q4=1458 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_045315_TTUQ1b1x1_3587519_PAvKKP7t/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.4: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:17.83 +33:35:12.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:34:42.35 +34:03:43.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:50.60 +29:05:02.1: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.1: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:36.8: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:50.60 +29:05:02.1: 12.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.1: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.87 +34:00:30.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:17.83 +33:35:12.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:34:42.35 +34:03:43.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:38.48 +32:37:26.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:50.60 +29:05:02.1: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8366 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6614 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4323 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:17.83 +33:35:12.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1633 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.35 +34:03:43.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9358 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:32.40 +32:08:41.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:46.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:36.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.90 +28:26:36.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5437 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:32.40 +32:08:41.6: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:46.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:32.40 +32:08:41.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7060 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.68 +25:11:46.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7023 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:28:59.00 +26:41:25.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.7: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:25:04.68 +28:42:44.7: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:35.71 +33:42:36.5: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.13 +32:10:14.2: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:28:59.00 +26:41:25.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:35.71 +33:42:36.5: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:25:04.68 +28:42:44.7: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:35.71 +33:42:36.5: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7944 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:04.68 +28:42:44.7: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1873 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.36 +30:51:26.7: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6764 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:35.58 +27:52:29.8: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:01:55.85 +31:58:48.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:08.60 +30:57:45.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.13 +32:10:14.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.13 +32:10:14.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1045 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:35.58 +27:52:29.8: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:01:55.85 +31:58:48.5: 12.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:08.60 +30:57:45.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.58 +27:52:29.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1967 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:55.85 +31:58:48.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9809 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:08.60 +30:57:45.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0860 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.11 +33:41:32.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:26.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.94 +32:10:59.7: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:24.88 +35:07:03.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3590 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:38.84 +29:48:35.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:11.55 +30:56:21.0: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:26.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.11 +33:41:32.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:45.21 +31:32:26.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3698 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.11 +33:41:32.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3781 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.94 +32:10:59.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.94 +32:10:59.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3774 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:30.92 +31:30:24.2: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:38.84 +29:48:35.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:11.55 +30:56:21.0: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.84 +29:48:35.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4886 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:11.55 +30:56:21.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6072 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:30.92 +31:30:24.2: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:30.92 +31:30:24.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7936 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117533_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117533_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117536_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117536_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117540_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117540_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:34.45 +34:52:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117542_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117635_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117635_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.34 +25:32:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117646_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117646_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.11 +33:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117683_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117683_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.93 +27:22:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117702_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117702_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:18.32 +31:52:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117757_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117763_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:26.85 +35:06:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 117766_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117803_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.20 +27:33:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117815_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117815_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117820_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117820_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.17 +34:09:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117825_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117825_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.02 +34:06:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117838_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117838_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:33.05 +33:50:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.93 +32:27:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117867_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117867_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117873_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:23.32 +33:51:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117893_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117893_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.71 +33:27:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.45 +34:21:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117904_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117911_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117911_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117916_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117916_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:02.40 +29:01:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117995_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 117995_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118023_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 118023_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.08 +32:33:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118027_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 118027_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 06813_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:03.88 +34:10:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.30 +33:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.19 +28:53:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.24 +33:48:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:17.20 +28:04:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.23 +29:42:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94019_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183
The candidate 94019_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_04-50-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0183 did not pass the final checks