This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3656 2461254.8656 13.40 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1
129.70238 36.08257 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461254.8656,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260802.3656 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3656 2461254.8656 13.67 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0
137.62829 23.53812 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461254.8656,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260802.3656 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3656 2461254.8656 13.51 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0
133.60233 35.43105 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461254.8656,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260802.3656 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.3656 2461254.8656 13.05 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6
142.31828 28.67065 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J112.5251+72.8168 | 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.819+/-0.029 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J112.5251+72.8168,2461254.8656,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J112.5251+72.8168 20260802.3656 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461254.86586459 02.08.2026 08:46:40.701 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11899
Objects passed selection criteria: 11850
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8168
Average stars matched: 7976.75 (97.6585 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 03:52:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461254.86586459 02.08.2026 08:46:40.701 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61591
Objects passed selection criteria: 61464
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45529.2
Average stars matched: 44212.5 (97.1079 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 281988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 03:52:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.86535443
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45
Second-epoch image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0669 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45
Second-epoch image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04
Second-epoch second image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00160 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00160 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ubX1pA3Ohu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GkMK5kEk27
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gzVdnpPsUD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l6FyZRLDUm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg
Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg
Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7615 deg
Loaded 13373 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7038 out of 7341 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7341 out of 12488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.5 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ubX1pA3Ohu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=0, passed=12435
Got 12435 stars (including 11671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1407 n_q3=1006 n_q4=1299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.377
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GkMK5kEk27 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=749, bad_region=0, passed=12488
Got 12488 stars (including 11734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1009 n_q4=1299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gzVdnpPsUD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3982
Got 3982 stars (including 3747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3674 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3664 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3664 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3674 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3663 stars left (next iteration limit 4030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=8.882 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3663 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.350 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.369
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=3663 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1010 n_q2=710 n_q3=1128 n_q4=815 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l6FyZRLDUm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3964
Got 3964 stars (including 3728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3656 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3650 stars left (next iteration limit 4016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=8.808 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3650 robust_rms_before=0.958 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.349 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.395
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=3650 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1004 n_q2=727 n_q3=1118 n_q4=801 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.377
ref2=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.396
new1=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.109
reference average sigma_overall=0.3655 worst_q_ratio=1.3865
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (3663 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (3650 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1841 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20657_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20657_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20660_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20660_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.46 +75:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20696_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.76 +73:24:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45
Second-epoch image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0669 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45
Second-epoch image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04
Second-epoch second image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00160 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00160 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lFacoVo8Q5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.stnZHHHyV7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aocYO2Uz17
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zF8MmQm7xd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 65755 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7618 deg
Loaded 13422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6499 out of 7407 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7407 out of 65755 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lFacoVo8Q5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4412, bad_region=1, passed=66694
Got 66694 stars (including 62210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1405 n_q3=990 n_q4=1313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.stnZHHHyV7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4260, bad_region=0, passed=65740
Got 65740 stars (including 61407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=1207 n_q2=1402 n_q3=983 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.434
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aocYO2Uz17 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=687, bad_region=9, passed=25500
Got 25500 stars (including 24771 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1328 n_q2=887 n_q3=1544 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zF8MmQm7xd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=703, bad_region=9, passed=25506
Got 25506 stars (including 24767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1328 n_q2=891 n_q3=1554 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1837 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3686 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9757 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5083 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3318 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9641 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.92 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: ref_mag=9.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1992 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0949 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4142 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4421 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7563 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5385 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3661 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5796 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7173 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8630 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6934 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8959 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1037 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9641 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0550 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45025.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81131_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81131_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.88 +79:19:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81133_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81133_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81134_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81134_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81135_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81135_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:27.52 +73:42:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81143_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81143_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81144_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81144_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:13.92 +77:57:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81145_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81145_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:51.17 +76:27:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81148_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81148_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:33.60 +73:41:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81149_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81149_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:00.75 +74:17:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81150_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81150_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81151_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81151_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:52.96 +79:57:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81152_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81152_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81153_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81153_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81177_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81177_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81247_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81247_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81250_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81250_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81271_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81271_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81283_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81283_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81292_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81292_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81293_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81293_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81306_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81306_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81370_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81370_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:31.97 +79:13:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81408_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81408_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81432_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81432_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:53.19 +71:44:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81440_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81440_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81453_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81453_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:02.60 +74:00:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81475_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81475_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81480_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81480_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81494_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81494_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81508_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81508_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81529_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81529_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.48 +75:13:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81537_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81537_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81543_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81543_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81545_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81545_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81552_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81552_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81568_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81568_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:41.68 +81:42:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81570_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81570_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:11.08 +80:29:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:22.75 +76:48:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81590_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81590_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81601_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81601_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81605_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81605_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:48.50 +82:24:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81621_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81621_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81627_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81627_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81637_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81637_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81639_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81639_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81653_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81653_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:13.03 +74:09:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81659_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81659_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81663_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81663_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81697_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81697_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81714_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81714_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81719_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81719_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81750_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81750_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:55.22 +79:31:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81782_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81782_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81794_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81794_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81825_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81825_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81836_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81836_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81839_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81839_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:15.63 +79:52:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81840_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81840_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81852_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81852_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:46.16 +80:19:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81864_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81864_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 81872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81879_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 81879_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81885_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81885_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81896_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81896_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81898_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81898_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81903_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 81903_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10578_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 10578_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:26.80 +80:04:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50589_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 50589_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.79 +73:24:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.50 +75:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76949_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 76949_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45025_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 45025_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55592_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 55592_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks