NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-04-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.42    10:47:12.76 +79:21:22.4   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.39    10:47:12.93 +79:21:27.7   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 02.3656  2461254.8656  13.40  10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1
129.70238  36.08257 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1:  15.65 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1:  15.66 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.67    06:03:54.93 +76:14:59.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.67    06:03:53.80 +76:15:02.7   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 02.3656  2461254.8656  13.67  06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0
137.62829  23.53812 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0:  15.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0:  15.86 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.60    09:51:24.27 +77:40:55.9   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.41    09:51:24.53 +77:40:56.1   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 02.3656  2461254.8656  13.51  09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0
133.60233  35.43105 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 03 20.21968    2461119.71968    14.20    07:30:06.09 +72:49:00.4   6159 5933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 03 20.22019    2461119.72019    14.46    07:30:05.84 +72:49:01.3   6160 5932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.06    07:30:06.06 +72:48:58.1   3531 0390   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.05    07:30:05.80 +72:49:01.0   3532 0389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 02.3656  2461254.8656  13.05  07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6
142.31828  28.67065 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 0.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | ATO J112.5251+72.8168        | 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 (user input)  | dubious (ATLAS)  |   (ATLAS)            |  (position from user input)                            J-Ks=0.819+/-0.029 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6:  14.27 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6:  14.40 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.33 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 777758 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 777758 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits

renamed 'Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.9569 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 576.8255 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3113.6617 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 715.5737 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3112.7421 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 715.2809 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.56054 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-02T03:45:56.6233050' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-02T08:45:56.6233050' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61254.3652386921 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-02T08:46:06.5248709' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61254.3653532872 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.998967659879 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998143617089 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.7591666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 8.73472222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.46962519655174 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 188.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :) Spent 0.519557 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-02T03:46:40.7013702' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-02T08:46:40.7013702' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61254.3657488544 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-02T08:46:50.6053004' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61254.3658634839 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.998967596207 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998144007741 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.7825 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 8.77027777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.46737097106286 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29503 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 80.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 188.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :) Spent 0.473772 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits


fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.86535443 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0669 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 Second-epoch second image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00160 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00160 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ubX1pA3Ohu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GkMK5kEk27 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gzVdnpPsUD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l6FyZRLDUm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6344 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1389 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6344 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7041 out of 7354 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7354 out of 12435 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1397 to 167.1161 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7615 deg Loaded 13373 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7038 out of 7341 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7341 out of 12488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.5 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ubX1pA3Ohu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, bad_region=0, passed=12435 Got 12435 stars (including 11671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1407 n_q3=1006 n_q4=1299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.377 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GkMK5kEk27 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=749, bad_region=0, passed=12488 Got 12488 stars (including 11734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1009 n_q4=1299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gzVdnpPsUD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3982 Got 3982 stars (including 3747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3982 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3674 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3664 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3664 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3664 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3674 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3663 stars left (next iteration limit 4030) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=8.882 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.160 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3663 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3663 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.350 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.369 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=3663 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1010 n_q2=710 n_q3=1128 n_q4=815 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.l6FyZRLDUm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=232, bad_region=0, passed=3964 Got 3964 stars (including 3728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3964 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3656 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3650 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3650 stars left (next iteration limit 4016) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=8.808 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.659 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3650 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3650 robust_rms_before=0.958 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.349 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.395 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=3650 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1004 n_q2=727 n_q3=1118 n_q4=801 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.377 ref2=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.396 new1=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.128 new2=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.109 reference average sigma_overall=0.3655 worst_q_ratio=1.3865 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (3663 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (3650 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.11 +71:55:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:17.48 +81:23:21.7: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1841 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 20634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    10.14    09:21:17.55 +81:23:21.4   6439 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    10.24    09:21:17.41 +81:23:22.0   6440 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20657_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 20657_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    9.18    08:48:10.12 +71:55:26.3   7124 0143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    9.21    08:48:10.10 +71:55:26.6   7125 0142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20660_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 20660_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    9.50    06:25:56.49 +75:27:04.1   1296 2505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:25:56.46 +75:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 20696_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    10.30    08:03:59.77 +73:24:31.3   5023 0731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 08:03:59.76 +73:24:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0669 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.169 +77:29:56.45 Second-epoch image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0662 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:01:14.985 +77:30:42.04 Second-epoch second image center 08:01:13.926 +77:30:46.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00160 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00160 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lFacoVo8Q5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.stnZHHHyV7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aocYO2Uz17 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zF8MmQm7xd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec +70.6173 to +82.7646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9322 to 167.2035 deg, Dec 70.6173 to 82.7646 deg Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7411 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7411 out of 66718 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 65755 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec +70.6169 to +82.7618 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9299 to 167.2067 deg, Dec 70.6169 to 82.7618 deg Loaded 13422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6499 out of 7407 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7407 out of 65755 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lFacoVo8Q5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4412, bad_region=1, passed=66694 Got 66694 stars (including 62210 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66694 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66694 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5407) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1405 n_q3=990 n_q4=1313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.stnZHHHyV7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4260, bad_region=0, passed=65740 Got 65740 stars (including 61407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=1207 n_q2=1402 n_q3=983 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.434 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.aocYO2Uz17 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=687, bad_region=9, passed=25500 Got 25500 stars (including 24771 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25500 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1328 n_q2=887 n_q3=1544 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zF8MmQm7xd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=703, bad_region=9, passed=25506 Got 25506 stars (including 24767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25506 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25506 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1328 n_q2=891 n_q3=1554 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: 9.93 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:52.61 +78:53:39.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1837 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:01.78 +79:00:08.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3686 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.16 +79:22:42.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9757 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:54.96 +81:21:40.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5083 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.13 +71:55:26.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:24.04 +82:06:34.7: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3318 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9641 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.92 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:17.50 +81:23:21.6: ref_mag=9.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1992 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:21.98 +75:07:47.9: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0949 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:25.29 +72:42:50.3: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4142 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:11.69 +74:03:26.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4421 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:48.32 +79:22:53.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7563 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:15.91 +75:44:31.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5385 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:10.51 +80:28:22.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:06:54.05 +73:13:46.2: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3661 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:31.27 +78:10:42.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5796 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:51:26.57 +78:11:10.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7173 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:59.92 +77:52:08.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8630 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:10.78 +75:24:26.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6934 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:44:24.40 +81:36:30.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8959 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:46.42 +79:08:43.7: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1037 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:59.02 +79:55:13.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:07.88 +79:03:45.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9641 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0550 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45025.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81131_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81131_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.51    07:15:07.14 +79:19:59.9   3457 4355   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 07:15:06.88 +79:19:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81133_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81133_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.51    06:06:55.25 +81:21:40.4   2157 6026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.51    06:06:54.66 +81:21:40.8   2158 6026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81134_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81134_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.54    05:30:01.87 +79:00:07.4   0610 5269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.27    05:30:01.70 +79:00:08.6   0610 5268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81135_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81135_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.32    07:13:52.68 +78:53:40.5   3381 4100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.10    07:13:52.53 +78:53:39.1   3381 4099   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.15    06:51:27.57 +73:42:41.9   1962 1196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:51:27.52 +73:42:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81143_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81143_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.16    05:04:36.32 +79:22:42.4   0164 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.87    05:04:36.01 +79:22:42.5   0164 5897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81144_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81144_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.70    05:58:13.83 +77:57:03.6   1025 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 05:58:13.92 +77:57:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81145_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81145_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.35    05:43:51.02 +76:27:41.0   0154 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 05:43:51.17 +76:27:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81148_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81148_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.17    06:25:33.58 +73:41:31.2   0901 1509   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:25:33.60 +73:41:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81149_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81149_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.92    06:26:00.85 +74:17:22.5   1049 1843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:26:00.75 +74:17:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81150_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81150_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    11.96    05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.3   0822 5391   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.97    05:33:44.25 +79:21:48.2   0823 5390   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81151_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81151_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.05    05:38:53.21 +79:57:46.7   1140 5619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 05:38:52.96 +79:57:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81152_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81152_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    11.34    08:02:24.18 +82:06:34.5   4684 5967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.33    08:02:23.91 +82:06:34.8   4684 5966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81153_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81153_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    10.15    09:21:17.59 +81:23:21.4   6439 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    10.26    09:21:17.41 +81:23:21.9   6440 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81177_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81177_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    9.22    08:48:10.14 +71:55:26.1   7124 0143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    9.22    08:48:10.12 +71:55:26.6   7125 0142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81247_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81247_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    10.97    08:29:24.05 +81:05:41.0   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81250_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81250_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.05    07:00:21.62 +79:35:03.8   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.34    06:17:51.06 +73:37:04.2   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81271_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81271_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.12    07:45:49.20 +75:16:17.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81283_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81283_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    11.13    08:51:21.88 +75:07:47.7   6768 2059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.06    08:51:22.09 +75:07:48.1   6769 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81292_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81292_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    11.41    06:28:25.36 +72:42:50.5   0810 0907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.42    06:28:25.23 +72:42:50.1   0810 0906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81293_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81293_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.16    10:00:40.00 +75:33:32.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81306_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81306_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.58    07:42:40.70 +81:59:01.7   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.26    09:19:43.07 +73:29:01.0   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.65    06:31:50.38 +73:53:38.9   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81370_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81370_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.96    06:27:33.90 +71:19:54.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.10    05:48:32.23 +79:13:24.3   1138 5096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 05:48:31.97 +79:13:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81408_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81408_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.13    07:24:58.73 +80:26:21.2   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81432_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81432_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.07    06:40:53.40 +71:44:47.9   1174 0165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:40:53.19 +71:44:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81440_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81440_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.03    06:53:59.34 +73:25:46.4   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81453_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81453_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.37    06:11:02.56 +74:00:47.9   0404 1920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:11:02.60 +74:00:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81475_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81475_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.46    06:08:11.66 +74:03:27.2   0305 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.42    06:08:11.72 +74:03:26.3   0306 1994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81480_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81480_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.78    09:33:26.96 +72:01:28.8   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81494_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81494_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.26    07:47:13.28 +74:19:29.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.74    05:16:48.39 +79:22:54.8   0436 5680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.77    05:16:48.25 +79:22:53.1   0436 5679   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81508_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81508_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.59    06:03:15.78 +75:44:32.2   0574 3005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.50    06:03:16.05 +75:44:31.7   0574 3003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81529_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81529_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.55    07:04:29.48 +75:13:34.7   2683 1977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 07:04:29.48 +75:13:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81537_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81537_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.29    09:06:54.25 +73:13:45.6   7716 1141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.49    09:06:53.84 +73:13:46.8   7717 1141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81543_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81543_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.66    06:17:22.20 +75:14:31.4   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81545_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81545_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.85    05:20:10.53 +80:28:22.9   0912 6154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.82    05:20:10.48 +80:28:22.8   0913 6153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81552_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81552_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.55    08:51:31.24 +78:10:41.4   6299 3834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.62    08:51:31.30 +78:10:43.0   6300 3834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81568_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81568_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.73    08:09:41.64 +81:42:14.3   4855 5731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 08:09:41.68 +81:42:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81570_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81570_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.57    06:02:11.43 +80:29:35.0   1826 5601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:02:11.08 +80:29:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.95    06:19:22.83 +76:48:44.2   1376 3359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:19:22.75 +76:48:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81590_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81590_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.67    08:51:26.53 +78:11:11.3   6296 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.79    08:51:26.61 +78:11:10.5   6296 3838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81601_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81601_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.99    05:31:00.02 +77:52:07.4   0245 4682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.78    05:30:59.83 +77:52:08.9   0245 4681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81605_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81605_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.86    07:29:48.83 +82:24:02.4   4024 6155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 07:29:48.50 +82:24:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81621_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81621_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.06    05:36:06.05 +77:13:46.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81627_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81627_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.14    05:36:53.17 +77:40:32.1   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.08    05:31:18.38 +79:23:22.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81637_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81637_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.69    09:40:44.61 +75:24:46.2   8486 2892   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81639_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81639_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.69    09:29:11.01 +75:24:28.0   8085 2700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.69    09:29:10.55 +75:24:24.5   8086 2699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81653_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81653_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.02    06:53:12.90 +74:09:30.3   2101 1442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:53:13.03 +74:09:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81659_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81659_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.93    09:44:24.38 +81:36:30.0   6853 6269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.87    09:44:24.41 +81:36:30.9   6853 6269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81663_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81663_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.21    06:05:23.44 +81:29:30.7   2160 6112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81697_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81697_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.79    08:03:28.60 +74:41:32.4   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81714_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81714_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.11    06:53:53.27 +81:18:49.3   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.97    09:36:26.80 +81:21:23.6   6763 6050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81719_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81719_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.11    07:09:46.56 +79:08:43.2   3289 4268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.10    07:09:46.28 +79:08:44.2   3290 4268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.87    08:26:28.22 +81:21:32.9   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81750_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81750_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.24    08:06:54.69 +79:31:10.7   4888 4410   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 08:06:55.22 +79:31:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81782_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81782_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.06    06:06:01.20 +74:17:22.8   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81794_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81794_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.34    10:17:25.26 +77:00:56.1   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81825_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81825_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.58    06:23:38.24 +74:57:31.2   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81836_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81836_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    13.66    05:05:59.40 +79:55:12.4   0409 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.60    05:05:58.65 +79:55:15.1   0409 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81839_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81839_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.17    08:00:15.63 +79:51:59.6   4697 4609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 08:00:15.63 +79:52:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81840_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81840_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.18    10:03:23.03 +75:45:16.0   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81852_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81852_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.80    05:25:45.84 +80:19:15.9   0974 5993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 05:25:46.16 +80:19:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.40    08:46:00.84 +79:59:13.9   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81864_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81864_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.26    06:47:06.82 +73:20:34.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 81872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81879_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 81879_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81885_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81885_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.61    07:21:36.48 +73:19:55.3   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.54    06:40:41.00 +76:30:47.4   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81896_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81896_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.47    07:33:15.58 +74:06:04.0   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81898_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 81898_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    13.86    06:25:35.92 +75:59:15.2   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81903_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 81903_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10578_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 10578_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    11.61    06:23:26.84 +80:04:14.4   2222 5145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:23:26.80 +80:04:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50589_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 50589_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    10.33    08:03:59.79 +73:24:31.3   5023 0731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 08:03:59.79 +73:24:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    9.59    06:25:56.49 +75:27:04.2   1296 2505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits **** FOUND 06:25:56.50 +75:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76949_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 76949_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 02.36535    2461254.86535    12.96    05:16:07.53 +79:03:45.9   0301 5539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-45-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.97    05:16:08.23 +79:03:45.9   0302 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 45025_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 Preparing report for the candidate 45025_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55592_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 The candidate 55592_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 02.36586    2461254.86586    12.63    06:29:15.30 +72:53:38.8   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_034758_TTUQ1b1x1_962934_0FIcdJ4N/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_03-46-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 ########### Completed Cam-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 ################################################################################### 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 -- not a known variable star 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 -- not a known variable star 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 -- not a known variable star 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 -- not a known variable star Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 06:03:54.36 +76:15:01.0 07:30:05.93 +72:48:59.6 09:51:24.40 +77:40:56.0 10:47:12.84 +79:21:25.1 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461254.86535443 -observatory V36 07:26:50.31 +20:06:57.9 Mercury (0.2mag) 11:41:47.01 +01:49:13.4 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:32:10.21 +23:23:32.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:37:38.84 +19:00:39.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:43.66 +03:19:02.0 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:00.31 +20:55:04.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:24.63 +00:15:26.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:42.37 -23:27:52.2 Pluto (14.4mag) 23:32:35.32 -01:15:44.2 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 2 03:52 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461254.86535443: 08:37:45.36 +19:00:13.9 Io (6.0mag) 08:37:40.58 +19:00:32.8 Europa (6.3mag) 08:37:48.51 +18:59:57.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:37:15.36 +19:02:16.4 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:35:19.84 +18:56:32.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:37:40.14 +19:00:34.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:34:47.93 +18:56:13.4 Elara (17.7mag) 08:41:42.16 +18:42:56.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:41:12.72 +19:09:42.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:55.46 +03:18:57.7 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:38.65 +03:18:54.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:36.19 +03:16:49.4 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:56:45.76 +03:19:28.5 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:56:13.71 +03:12:59.7 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 2 03:52 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461254.86535443: 18:40:56.04 -25:47:00.2 JWST 08:12:04.31 -07:45:37.6 Chandra 10:37:27.64 -58:25:38.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 2 03:52 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461254.86535443 -observatory V36 03:06:48.80 +16:51:50.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:49.98 -34:39:05.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:48:16.23 -68:41:45.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:08:12.24 +32:52:21.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:25:31.09 +34:40:26.2 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:43:22.65 +31:45:45.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:37:32.57 +26:38:18.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:16:09.87 +28:44:04.7 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:24:55.94 +05:16:41.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:39.42 -12:03:55.4 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:18:39.78 +66:35:56.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:54:15.98 -12:23:00.0 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:01:23.63 +31:04:59.5 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:05.30 +15:37:11.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:10:42.13 +42:40:03.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:19:12.48 +48:46:56.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:10:19.54 -13:03:25.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:52:16.95 +25:10:43.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:28:08.73 -15:21:42.2 17.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:24:53.11 +21:15:51.2 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:54:45.70 +02:43:37.5 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:06:10.78 +78:20:33.0 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:04:53.38 +46:03:09.9 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:42:03.01 +07:53:37.7 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:51:32.09 -24:46:01.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:25:30.96 -03:02:52.5 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:31:50.30 +31:53:55.8 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:55:43.00 +06:33:35.5 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:13.57 -05:15:43.2 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:22:07.00 +20:45:32.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:43:15.67 -22:49:55.3 17.9mag 84P/Giclas 02:54:30.49 +13:13:07.8 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:40:38.36 +28:25:06.4 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 03:50:07.51 +14:36:39.2 17.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:37:02.79 +30:50:14.2 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:04:31.91 +27:36:36.3 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:32:07.17 -08:00:02.0 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:27:47.97 +21:11:00.5 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:18:21.39 +19:09:44.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:04:04.55 +03:25:47.0 17.7mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:22:11.81 -19:54:26.9 14.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:55:42.21 +37:24:21.7 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 16:47:37.91 +35:33:35.7 12.6mag 169P/NEAT 02:31:50.41 +09:21:35.5 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:38:54.67 -09:40:22.6 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:26:33.92 -52:45:49.6 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:05:02.60 +22:38:38.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:47:36.04 +37:47:07.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:08:48.08 +03:46:37.8 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:55:31.96 +18:39:34.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:27:02.01 +37:14:56.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 2 03:52 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 2 03:52 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 2 03:52 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:49:39.777 -37:18:54.58 AT 2026uju 2026-07-13.07 22.934 14:54:26.835 -38:14:29.04 AT 2026ujt 2026-07-13.07 23.0941 14:55:38.655 -37:32:07.47 AT 2026ujs 2026-07-13.05 23.3435 15:03:41.887 -37:23:29.20 AT 2026ujr 2026-07-13.08 22.969 14:52:12.207 -37:26:01.08 AT 2026ujq 2026-07-13.05 23.2506 15:09:01.651 -38:50:30.89 AT 2026ujp 2026-07-13.05 23.1149 14:58:09.953 -41:22:45.09 AT 2026ujo 2026-07-13.05 21.9758 14:56:47.595 -41:35:10.45 AT 2026ujn 2026-07-13.05 20.3612 15:10:46.542 -37:24:26.89 AT 2026ujm 2026-07-13.05 22.857 15:01:15.315 -37:02:21.14 AT 2026ujl 2026-07-13.05 21.6824 14:52:23.223 -40:42:27.52 AT 2026ujk 2026-07-13.07 23.0058 14:59:45.613 -39:34:57.61 AT 2026ujj 2026-07-13.05 22.0092 15:00:19.929 -40:41:34.53 AT 2026uji 2026-07-13.07 22.5204 15:00:19.861 -36:24:20.89 AT 2026ujh 2026-07-13.05 22.1716 14:57:23.091 -39:39:46.60 AT 2026ujg 2026-07-13.05 23.6266 14:47:58.907 -40:16:21.10 AT 2026ujf 2026-07-13.05 23.0312 15:10:54.794 -37:44:45.52 AT 2026uje 2026-07-13.11 23.2507 19:04:42.066 -22:55:46.17 AT 2026ujd 2026-07-11.26 21.1019 19:35:18.696 -19:09:11.22 AT 2026ujc 2026-07-09.23 21.7061 19:41:34.696 -20:27:13.28 AT 2026ujb 2026-07-09.23 22.0814 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 2 03:52 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 86 C