This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.03 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9
151.36690 4.54435 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J043228.06+544253.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.130 V 12.500 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J043228.06+544253.8,2461254.7882,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J043228.06+544253.8 20260802.2882 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.42 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0
150.15344 5.21223 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0358 Cam
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.600 w 11.000 w
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0358 Cam,2461254.7882,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0358 Cam 20260802.2882 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.18 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3
147.19764 1.90716 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0358355+554156
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.339 g Y 1.391 g 2458449.40680 174.387519400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0358355+554156,2461254.7882,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0358355+554156 20260802.2882 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.35 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3
151.19946 -1.41146 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J040412.67+503405.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.746 r Y 0.372 r 2458265.62480 348.798975000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 04 04 12.71 +50 34 06.3 12.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J040412.67+503405.3,2461254.7882,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J040412.67+503405.3 20260802.2882 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.39 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1
152.07329 5.34021 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0439494+544333
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.261 R1 Y 0.702 R1 83.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0439494+544333,2461254.7882,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0439494+544333 20260802.2882 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.10 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6
153.51724 7.33055 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSVS J0456497+545335
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.774 R1 Y 0.816 R1 92.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0456497+545335,2461254.7882,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0456497+545335 20260802.2882 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.07 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7
147.73124 -4.37319 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0335332+502528
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.947 r Y 0.454 r 2458450.90750 145.538552300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 03 35 33.56 +50 25 30.7 12.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0335332+502528,2461254.7882,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0335332+502528 20260802.2882 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.39 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9
147.26614 1.37498 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0533 Cam
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 R1 11.700 R1 2451537.00000 90.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0533 Cam,2461254.7882,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0533 Cam 20260802.2882 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.03 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4
149.77962 -2.42304 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J035315.43+504313.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.469 g Y 0.613 g 2458388.51260 291.314029200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 03 53 15.64 +50 43 14.4 12.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J035315.43+504313.7,2461254.7882,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J035315.43+504313.7 20260802.2882 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.27 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5
148.59274 -0.11449 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" IRAS 03530+5306
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 R1 11.800 R1 70.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IRAS 03530+5306,2461254.7882,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IRAS 03530+5306 20260802.2882 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.22 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1
153.46360 0.34276 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1031 Per
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.050 R1 11.350 R1 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 04 22 06.86 +50 17 29.1 12.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1031 Per,2461254.7882,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1031 Per 20260802.2882 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.55 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5
153.57271 7.05182 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 2134204
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.540 g Y 0.794 g 2458522.60670 148.125319500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2134204,2461254.7882,11.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2134204 20260802.2882 11.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 12.05 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7
149.75722 5.29381 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J042834.76+562350.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.280 V 14.030 V 2458268.77170 382.386166700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042834.76+562350.5,2461254.7882,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042834.76+562350.5 20260802.2882 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.83 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9
152.50261 4.55458 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J043744.56+535304.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.860 V 13.520 V 2457690.00000 509.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J043744.56+535304.7,2461254.7882,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J043744.56+535304.7 20260802.2882 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.87 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4
154.58037 3.00301 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J043912.64+511817.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.740 g Y 0.204 g 2458406.24790 225.969407900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 04 39 12.75 +51 18 16.4 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J043912.64+511817.0,2461254.7882,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J043912.64+511817.0 20260802.2882 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.50 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8
153.32906 5.03754 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J044351.73+533459.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 13.050 V 2457288.00000 78.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044351.73+533459.7,2461254.7882,11.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044351.73+533459.7 20260802.2882 11.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.47 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7
146.50926 5.46452 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0412238+584818
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.099 R1 Y 0.759 R1 129.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0412238+584818,2461254.7882,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0412238+584818 20260802.2882 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.20 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1
155.05987 0.03364 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J042739.06+485604.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.420 g Y 0.290 g 2459502.80700 38.840000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 04 27 38.99 +48 56 06.1 11.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042739.06+485604.7,2461254.7882,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042739.06+485604.7 20260802.2882 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 11.14 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1
154.54100 2.42359 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J043618.01+505646.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.740 V 12.950 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2882* 04 36 17.92 +50 56 47.1 11.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J043618.01+505646.0,2461254.7882,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J043618.01+505646.0 20260802.2882 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2882 2461254.7882 10.90 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4
152.21332 4.24434 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0434520+535327
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.995 R1 Y 0.517 R1 110.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0434520+535327,2461254.7882,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0434520+535327 20260802.2882 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461254.78850182 02.08.2026 06:55:16.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16141
Objects passed selection criteria: 16029
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10096.5
Average stars matched: 9812.25 (97.1847 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 01:58:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461254.78850182 02.08.2026 06:55:16.557 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 102
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126492
Objects passed selection criteria: 126054
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80824.2
Average stars matched: 77566 (95.9687 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 595492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 01:59:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.78789913
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0688 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0770 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3xpWfjEaqB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fgum9M2qWf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dKK9V43r9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kwNI24s8ZV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.947200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.947200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8036 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3xpWfjEaqB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1702, bad_region=1, passed=17373
Got 17373 stars (including 15651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1403 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fgum9M2qWf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=0, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1225 n_q4=1409 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9dKK9V43r9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=161, bad_region=0, passed=2946
Got 2946 stars (including 2785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2721 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2693 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2693 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2721 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 2691 stars left (next iteration limit 2962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2691 robust_rms=7.704 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2691 robust_rms=0.691 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2691 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.721 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2691 robust_rms_before=1.505 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.545 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.696 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.721
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.696 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=2691 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.722 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=863 n_q2=420 n_q3=833 n_q4=575 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kwNI24s8ZV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, bad_region=0, passed=2992
Got 2992 stars (including 2819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 2723 stars left (next iteration limit 2996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2723 robust_rms=8.103 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.821 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2723 robust_rms=0.703 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.877 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2723 robust_rms=0.557 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.680 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2723 robust_rms_before=1.561 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.557 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.665 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.680
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.665 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=2723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.701 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=880 n_q2=435 n_q3=818 n_q4=590 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.541 worst_q_ratio=1.335
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.551 worst_q_ratio=1.273
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.29
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (2691 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (2723 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0688 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0770 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:36.757 +53:59:29.90
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:39.598 +53:58:59.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52BMd8lxMT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oLTLSKA0Y4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qk0dZWqTMI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.28b0FRNPQI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 100 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.52BMd8lxMT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=14794, bad_region=2, passed=140659
Got 140659 stars (including 125608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oLTLSKA0Y4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, bad_region=1, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qk0dZWqTMI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=587, bad_region=4, passed=22123
Got 22123 stars (including 21504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22123 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.534 n_q1=1522 n_q2=775 n_q3=1533 n_q4=1037 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.28b0FRNPQI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=593, bad_region=4, passed=22669
Got 22669 stars (including 22044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=1518 n_q2=777 n_q3=1541 n_q4=1028 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-54-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_015549_TTUQ1b1x1_236583_qFkdyUmZ/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:11:23.51 +55:54:38.7: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:11:23.51 +55:54:38.7: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:23.51 +55:54:38.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0962 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:32:28.00 +54:42:52.9: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0208 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:30:05.98 +56:03:16.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4210 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:58:35.85 +55:41:54.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1738 delta=1.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:12.71 +50:34:06.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3246 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:39:49.45 +54:43:33.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3763 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:56:49.09 +54:53:36.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0520 delta=1.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:35:33.56 +50:25:30.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0536 delta=1.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:56:32.36 +55:14:52.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3877 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:53:15.64 +50:43:14.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0230 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:56:55.47 +53:15:15.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2638 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:06.86 +50:17:29.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1679 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:55:32.07 +54:40:40.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5427 delta=1.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:28:34.71 +56:23:50.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0552 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:39:12.75 +51:18:16.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8647 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:37:44.59 +53:53:03.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8193 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:43:52.22 +53:35:00.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4919 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:12:23.97 +58:48:17.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4712 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:27:38.99 +48:56:06.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1867 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:36:17.92 +50:56:47.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1407 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:34:52.11 +53:53:25.4: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8991 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114547.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34702.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39232.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49622.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54144.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54190.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55572.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:02.39 +51:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163532_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163532_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:31.83 +57:49:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.47 +58:31:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:19.36 +53:43:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163625_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163625_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:43.81 +59:09:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163636_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163636_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:27.63 +57:10:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163641_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163641_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.33 +56:19:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163659_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 163659_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:04.11 +52:35:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:14.64 +50:17:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 70759_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:43.00 +53:36:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:32.81 +51:45:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 55572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39232_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 39232_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 56527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:49.08 +54:24:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 18230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:07.41 +57:52:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:21.71 +51:28:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:52.43 +55:33:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.06 +52:49:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.58 +52:48:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:35.24 +49:37:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.48 +51:18:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:27.20 +52:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36118_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 36118_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:54.06 +56:35:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 53753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:10.00 +55:00:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:47.89 +52:38:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:17.03 +52:52:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 84562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:19.46 +52:43:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54190_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 54190_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:18.02 +54:02:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:25.98 +49:58:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.63 +55:55:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 116627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:18.33 +50:35:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 105274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:01.84 +49:36:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78386_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 78386_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.76 +50:14:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13289_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 13289_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.44 +58:14:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 34702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.33 +50:00:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112768_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112768_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:25.45 +50:24:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112506_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112506_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:18.37 +50:11:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 105544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:22.95 +49:11:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124009_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 124009_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:26.23 +50:36:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10309_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 10309_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:01.93 +57:44:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:31.51 +51:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 97587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:37.69 +56:40:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.59 +56:10:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09457_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 09457_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:09.62 +58:31:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16286_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 16286_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:58.14 +57:33:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100851_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 100851_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:14.80 +49:12:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.18 +54:28:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 66182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05917_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 05917_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 102763_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.61 +49:29:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.57 +57:24:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19395_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 19395_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.39 +57:38:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:07.71 +52:24:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102892_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 102892_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:28.53 +50:27:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125281_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 125281_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.21 +51:43:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.27 +58:13:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120181_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 120181_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:43.47 +50:49:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129249_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 129249_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.85 +48:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64513_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 64513_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108386_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 108386_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:30.37 +49:14:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.76 +51:13:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80326_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 80326_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:12.51 +52:55:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:27.57 +52:39:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:14.93 +49:54:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.19 +50:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:56.10 +49:53:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:39.06 +50:50:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 18182_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:41.62 +57:24:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63949_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 63949_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:01.37 +53:54:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119797_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 119797_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:12.28 +50:51:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121261_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 121261_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:11.23 +50:55:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:57.83 +53:28:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:54.34 +53:04:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 111548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:35.16 +50:21:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 109712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.35 +50:02:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 115805_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:36.99 +50:41:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63535_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 63535_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:46.29 +53:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:16.97 +53:45:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 92234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:09.35 +48:44:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 69434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:07.03 +52:52:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92455_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 92455_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:22.10 +49:30:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115412_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 115412_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:03.08 +49:03:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22661_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 22661_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:00.25 +56:45:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39467_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 39467_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-55-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
