This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2869 2461254.7869 10.39 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7
136.67724 -9.76939 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0420 And
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 V < 15.000 V 2452178.00000 355.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2869* 02 18 21.53 +50 46 04.7 10.4 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0420 And,2461254.7869,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0420 And 20260802.2869 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2869 2461254.7869 10.21 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2
133.20278 -8.27562 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" KW Per
Type: EB/SD
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.500 pg 11.500 pg 2442404.33200 0.931258840000 A2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2869* 01 59 59.99 +53 13 24.2 10.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KW Per,2461254.7869,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KW Per 20260802.2869 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2869 2461254.7869 12.04 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1
141.58081 -6.29719 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0255487+520046
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.108 r Y 0.458 r 2458292.68870 63.452460000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2869* 02 55 48.34 +52 00 49.1 12.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0255487+520046,2461254.7869,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0255487+520046 20260802.2869 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2869 2461254.7869 11.79 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1
138.12640 -4.06787 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" EM Per
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 13.800 V 2451415.00000 115.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2869* 02 41 27.90 +55 31 27.1 11.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EM Per,2461254.7869,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EM Per 20260802.2869 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 02.2869 2461254.7869 12.83 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2
139.14321 -4.86048 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J024533.45+542246.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.054 g Y 0.904 g 2458256.85780 327.207724600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 02.2869* 02 45 33.60 +54 22 46.2 12.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J024533.45+542246.9,2461254.7869,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J024533.45+542246.9 20260802.2869 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.60776087 11.02.2026 02:35:00.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
First image: 2461082.60776087 11.02.2026 02:35:00.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Last image: 2461254.78737672 02.08.2026 06:53:39.349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25434
Objects passed selection criteria: 25307
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17259.8
Average stars matched: 16811.8 (97.4044 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 01:56:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.60776087 11.02.2026 02:35:00.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
First image: 2461082.60776087 11.02.2026 02:35:00.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Last image: 2461254.78737672 02.08.2026 06:53:39.349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 256 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 170194
Objects passed selection criteria: 169721
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 119842
Average stars matched: 115566 (96.4311 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 633536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 2 02:01:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461254.78648722
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65
Second-epoch image center 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65
Second-epoch image center 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01108 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X0SLQLFteN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a4XWKJx8yz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WVdOF3gqfE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cofFB4j4Tm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.8114 to 57.7181 deg, Dec +47.6643 to +59.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.8114 to 57.7181 deg, Dec 47.6643 to 59.3474 deg
Loaded 17782 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11139 out of 12656 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12656 out of 27390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.8114 to 57.7181 deg, Dec +47.6643 to +59.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.8114 to 57.7181 deg, Dec 47.6643 to 59.3474 deg
Loaded 17782 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11139 out of 12656 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12656 out of 27390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 27254 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.8111 to 57.7181 deg, Dec +47.6645 to +59.3563 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.8111 to 57.7181 deg, Dec 47.6645 to 59.3563 deg
Loaded 17798 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11127 out of 12638 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12638 out of 27254 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.3 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
2.8 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.8 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
15.3 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X0SLQLFteN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3329, bad_region=0, passed=27390
Got 27390 stars (including 24043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=734 n_q2=1759 n_q3=937 n_q4=1479 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a4XWKJx8yz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3281, bad_region=0, passed=27254
Got 27254 stars (including 23936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=728 n_q2=1759 n_q3=935 n_q4=1488 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WVdOF3gqfE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=505, bad_region=0, passed=7405
Got 7405 stars (including 6893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=6.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=55.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.757 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.479 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.480
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1481 n_q2=794 n_q3=1909 n_q4=698 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cofFB4j4Tm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, bad_region=0, passed=7423
Got 7423 stars (including 6926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=6.939 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=48.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.759 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.464 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.502
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.464 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1485 n_q2=811 n_q3=1880 n_q4=702 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.246
ref2=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.277
new1=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.301
new2=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.235
reference average sigma_overall=0.39 worst_q_ratio=1.2615
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2088 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3966 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31720_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31720_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:01.39 +57:08:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31735_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31735_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:06.82 +57:08:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31746_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31746_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:47.97 +51:48:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31748_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31748_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:52.43 +48:54:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31752_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31752_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:55.00 +53:15:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10019_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 10019_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:55.06 +54:57:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20704_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20704_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:29.47 +51:16:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20715_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20715_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:14.17 +51:15:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13161_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 13161_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:28.01 +54:18:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15058_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 15058_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:07.87 +53:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24367_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 24367_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:42:36.51 +49:50:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22010_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 22010_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 15279_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:59:59.99 +53:13:24.2
02:18:21.53 +50:46:04.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65
Second-epoch image center 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:17.265 +53:58:23.65
Second-epoch image center 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:43.350 +53:59:36.88
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:40.614 +54:00:08.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01108 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CgVGsKrFM7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EAC0WnrweU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rg5knwMWgN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I1S4eoHFm4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 187222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7726 to 57.7717 deg, Dec +47.6427 to +59.3506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7726 to 57.7717 deg, Dec 47.6427 to 59.3506 deg
Loaded 17878 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8547 out of 12924 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12924 out of 187222 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 187222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7726 to 57.7717 deg, Dec +47.6427 to +59.3506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7726 to 57.7717 deg, Dec 47.6427 to 59.3506 deg
Loaded 17878 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8547 out of 12924 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12924 out of 187222 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 187335 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7678 to 57.7709 deg, Dec +47.6441 to +59.3602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7678 to 57.7709 deg, Dec 47.6441 to 59.3602 deg
Loaded 17904 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8510 out of 12918 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12918 out of 187335 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.1 pix Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
2.7 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.7 pix fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
15.4 mag. Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CgVGsKrFM7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=26988, bad_region=2, passed=187169
Got 187169 stars (including 159895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 187169 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=808 n_q2=1645 n_q3=989 n_q4=1480 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EAC0WnrweU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 569.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=26917, bad_region=2, passed=187273
Got 187273 stars (including 160013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 187273 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=810 n_q2=1657 n_q3=983 n_q4=1474 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rg5knwMWgN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2680, bad_region=2, passed=53802
Got 53802 stars (including 51049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1492 n_q2=789 n_q3=1903 n_q4=713 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I1S4eoHFm4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2595, bad_region=4, passed=53821
Got 53821 stars (including 51137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53821 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1489 n_q2=815 n_q3=1872 n_q4=718 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-52-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-02_CI_Per-01-Q1b1x1_015419_TTUQ1b1x1_176132_SnlC4qDN/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:41:45.41 +56:11:54.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 03:17:06.75 +51:47:44.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:21:44.21 +52:58:32.1: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:07:14.51 +50:33:42.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:14:37.84 +55:04:48.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:22:08.07 +57:10:02.5: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 03:17:06.75 +51:47:44.9: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:41:45.41 +56:11:54.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:21:44.21 +52:58:32.1: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:06.75 +51:47:44.9: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4680 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:41:45.41 +56:11:54.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5154 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:44.21 +52:58:32.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0298 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:22:14.30 +50:02:56.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:07:14.51 +50:33:42.9: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:14:37.84 +55:04:48.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:14.51 +50:33:42.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5865 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:37.84 +55:04:48.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7388 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:22:08.07 +57:10:02.5: 12.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:08.07 +57:10:02.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6487 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:22:14.30 +50:02:56.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:14.30 +50:02:56.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3772 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:13:07.20 +58:05:05.7: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:13:07.20 +58:05:05.7: 10.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:13:07.20 +58:05:05.7: ref_mag=10.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0903 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:26:35.44 +54:08:36.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:06.36 +57:09:59.8: 12.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 03:26:13.80 +56:06:52.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:21.10 +55:00:23.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:26:35.44 +54:08:36.1: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:35.44 +54:08:36.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3512 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:19:06.36 +57:09:59.8: 12.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 03:26:13.80 +56:06:52.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:47:58.60 +55:37:49.1: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:06.36 +57:09:59.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.3860 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:13.80 +56:06:52.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2141 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:30:05.44 +55:19:51.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:19:21.10 +55:00:23.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:21.10 +55:00:23.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4709 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:47:58.60 +55:37:49.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:30:05.44 +55:19:51.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:58.60 +55:37:49.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5294 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:05.44 +55:19:51.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6787 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:15:11.53 +57:35:12.5: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:33:00.02 +57:31:51.2: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:11:58.70 +53:38:54.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:14:32.80 +52:19:14.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:15:11.53 +57:35:12.5: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:11.53 +57:35:12.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0149 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:46:45.79 +54:04:01.4: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:33:00.02 +57:31:51.2: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:11:58.70 +53:38:54.9: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:33:00.02 +57:31:51.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9444 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:58.70 +53:38:54.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0237 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:14:32.80 +52:19:14.3: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:20:53.61 +55:23:47.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:32.80 +52:19:14.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0012 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:46:45.79 +54:04:01.4: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:38:35.79 +57:50:52.3: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:45.79 +54:04:01.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8899 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:20:53.61 +55:23:47.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:20:53.61 +55:23:47.6: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0862 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:38:35.79 +57:50:52.3: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:38:35.79 +57:50:52.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4601 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:55:48.34 +52:00:49.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0086 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:12:58.90 +54:13:05.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:12:58.90 +54:13:05.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:58.90 +54:13:05.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2742 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:41:27.90 +55:31:27.1: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7940 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits at 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:45:33.60 +54:22:46.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8304 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out214188.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213757_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213757_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:27.44 +55:41:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213765_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213765_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:51.75 +55:15:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213766_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213766_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:33.51 +54:34:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213776_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213776_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213779_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213779_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:19.50 +52:06:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213781_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213781_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:15:32.94 +52:09:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213783_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213783_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213786_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213786_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:45.00 +53:21:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213789_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213789_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213790_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213790_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:00.09 +55:31:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213791_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213791_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213793_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213793_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:02.43 +48:57:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213794_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213794_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:33.18 +52:17:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213795_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213795_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213797_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213797_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:20.89 +51:30:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213799_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213799_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:08.39 +57:07:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213802_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213802_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213803_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213803_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:28.36 +51:30:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213806_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213806_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213807_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213807_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:32.13 +57:09:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213808_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213808_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:43.64 +59:07:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213809_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213809_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:40.88 +51:43:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213810_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213810_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:32.51 +52:56:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213811_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213811_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:25.58 +58:42:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213814_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213814_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:17.06 +50:58:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213816_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213816_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:20.38 +51:42:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213817_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213817_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:20.69 +54:10:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213819_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213819_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213820_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213820_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:51.12 +49:45:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213835_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213835_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:06.87 +57:08:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213847_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213847_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:16.53 +57:10:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213890_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213890_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:22.98 +54:30:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213913_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213913_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:49.31 +58:30:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213915_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213915_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:01.19 +53:38:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213920_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213920_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:47.32 +57:00:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213922_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213922_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:52.35 +50:15:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213932_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213932_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:32.39 +58:00:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213935_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213935_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:59.05 +49:01:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213945_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213945_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:35.05 +57:02:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213946_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213946_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:07.19 +56:34:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213952_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213952_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:20.07 +57:15:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213955_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213955_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:45.67 +54:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213958_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213958_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:54.04 +54:50:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213972_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213972_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213976_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213976_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:15.12 +58:01:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213981_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213981_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:43.99 +53:04:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213982_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213982_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213989_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213989_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213991_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213991_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:47.54 +57:14:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213995_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213995_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:18.69 +56:10:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213996_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 213996_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:25.12 +49:14:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214000_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214000_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:55.70 +57:05:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214007_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214007_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214008_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214008_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:02.51 +50:04:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214020_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214020_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:02.42 +49:13:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214022_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214022_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:13.71 +50:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214023_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214023_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214030_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214030_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214038_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214038_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:28.63 +57:34:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214043_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214043_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:38.70 +57:02:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214052_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214052_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:56.81 +58:00:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214053_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214053_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:47.45 +50:35:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214054_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214054_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:47.26 +58:08:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214060_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214060_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:38.35 +48:55:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214064_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214064_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:59.41 +56:40:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214068_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214068_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:16.35 +56:34:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214069_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214069_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:04.21 +54:13:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214076_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214076_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:10.40 +49:48:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214080_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214080_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:13.22 +52:21:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214083_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214083_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:26.56 +56:27:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214090_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214090_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:59.17 +55:55:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214091_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214091_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214094_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214094_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:01.16 +54:01:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214105_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214105_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:30.09 +57:55:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214106_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214106_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214112_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214112_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214113_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214113_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214115_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214115_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:32.72 +56:18:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214119_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214119_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:59.99 +57:02:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214121_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214121_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:51.89 +58:31:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214123_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214123_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:18.57 +54:31:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214130_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214130_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:08.98 +57:48:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214134_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214134_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:03.87 +56:05:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214145_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214145_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214159_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214159_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:42.37 +53:56:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214162_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214162_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214167_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214167_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:48.20 +50:12:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214169_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214169_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:40.26 +52:42:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214176_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214176_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:13.91 +54:24:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214188_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214188_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:35.79 +57:50:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.900 457949380410745600 039.64899181129 +57.84733807495 12.6532 10.7879 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.900#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214189_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 214189_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:18.88 +56:40:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186868_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 186868_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:04.51 +50:53:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126976_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 126976_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:50.06 +52:05:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126607_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 126607_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105788_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 105788_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:37.26 +53:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131685_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 131685_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:11.40 +51:55:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143411_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 143411_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.34 +50:51:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45825_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 45825_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:18.40 +55:36:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101049_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 101049_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:55.47 +53:28:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200397_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 200397_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:55.00 +53:15:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200128_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 200128_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:27.96 +54:18:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64199_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 64199_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:45.07 +55:10:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149757_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 149757_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:32.80 +50:25:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86580_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86580_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183698_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 183698_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:36.71 +50:37:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125358_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 125358_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.38 +51:13:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76747_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 76747_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:47.89 +54:31:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125704_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 125704_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:30.24 +51:10:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93515_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93515_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:36.64 +53:39:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73195_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 73195_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:00.22 +54:46:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26140_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 26140_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:02.89 +56:19:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97110_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 97110_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:07.45 +53:19:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22735_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 22735_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:32.99 +57:50:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56514_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 56514_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:23.70 +55:57:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93254_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93254_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:12:52.77 +53:49:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145649_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 145649_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:25.42 +50:57:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93783_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 93783_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:19.88 +53:22:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63236_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 63236_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165801_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 165801_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:57:01.16 +49:28:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170496_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 170496_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:11.40 +49:54:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133051_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133051_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96276_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 96276_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:50.56 +53:46:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105986_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 105986_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:24.51 +53:17:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48744_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 48744_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:48.39 +56:14:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115087_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 115087_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:29.40 +51:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147949_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 147949_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:17.63 +50:35:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167935_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 167935_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:42:36.51 +49:50:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172658_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 172658_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.23 +48:59:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182386_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182386_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:21.54 +50:46:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132784_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 132784_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:47.99 +51:48:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63775_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 63775_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:55.00 +54:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47286_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 47286_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:46.29 +56:29:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102080_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 102080_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:59.98 +53:13:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143250_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 143250_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:29.51 +51:16:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125093_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 125093_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:18.64 +52:14:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143363_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 143363_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:14.11 +51:15:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145947_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 145947_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:27.94 +50:27:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98204_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 98204_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:09.26 +53:03:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102999_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 102999_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:07.84 +53:28:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55798_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 55798_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:47.39 +55:44:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11927_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 11927_fd_Per-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-02_01-53-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
