NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 01 09.18555    2461049.68555    14.67    04:06:23.31 +33:39:27.9   4036 0966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 01 09.18615    2461049.68615    14.49    04:06:23.34 +33:39:27.8   4031 0970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.47    04:06:22.43 +33:39:32.8   5460 5445   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.39    04:06:22.45 +33:39:33.7   5465 5452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 30.3418  2461251.8418  12.43  04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3
163.00787 -13.64206 galactic  Per  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
980 Anacostia                1     -1       2  12.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3:  15.08 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3:  15.04 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.06 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 410628 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 410628 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits

renamed 'Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits_preview.png'
Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 500.8057 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 607.2146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6531.8902 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1543.7624 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6493.2619 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1534.9073 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 13.0428 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-30T03:11:35.6880429' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-30T08:11:35.6880429' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61251.3413852779 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-30T08:11:45.5885255' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61251.3414998613 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9980963457913 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.000084693476 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1133333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.6508333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.78344669850957 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits :) Spent 0.491270 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-30T03:12:28.0414955' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-30T08:12:28.0414955' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61251.3419912155 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-30T08:12:37.9425928' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61251.3421058101 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 59.9980962611807 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 30.0000846728467 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2816666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.7536111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.74392615648547 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits :) Spent 0.468467 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/d_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits


fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461251.84150102 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Image size: 944.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 Second-epoch second image center 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jY3OUgZPuf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E13kGfgL8F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fMHrsxp2Qk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s1NISvOjry Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3066 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5843 to 69.6283 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3066 deg Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5547 out of 6059 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6059 out of 13390 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5745 to 69.6282 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3110 deg Loaded 7268 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5559 out of 6072 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6072 out of 13513 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 13.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 13.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.jY3OUgZPuf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390 Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.E13kGfgL8F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513 Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fMHrsxp2Qk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=192, bad_region=0, passed=2266 Got 2266 stars (including 2074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2266 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2026 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2017 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2017 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2255 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2025 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2018 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2256 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2018 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2256 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2018 stars left (next iteration limit 2218) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2018 robust_rms=7.877 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.081 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2018 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.851 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2018 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.508 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2018 robust_rms_before=1.432 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.678 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.508 verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:01.925 +30:00:22.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2266 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2005407.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.432 -> 0.401 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits N_match=2018 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=627 n_q2=278 n_q3=558 n_q4=555 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.392 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.s1NISvOjry (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=197, bad_region=0, passed=2281 Got 2281 stars (including 2082 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2281 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2031 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2014 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2031 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2024 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 2024 stars left (next iteration limit 2226) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2024 robust_rms=8.086 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.940 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2024 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.798 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2024 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.494 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2024 robust_rms_before=1.369 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.547 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.494 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=2024 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=623 n_q2=285 n_q3=550 n_q4=566 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.237 ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.286 new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.392 new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.300 reference average sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.2615 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358_astrometric_residuals.png (2018 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359_astrometric_residuals.png (2024 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Image size: 944.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:59:59.648 +29:59:56.09 Second-epoch image center 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:00:01.810 +30:00:23.97 Second-epoch second image center 03:59:59.271 +29:59:44.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eLEuabBLh5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B3AB40e44S Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w8McXYrcid Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j8vGaR0meI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3538 to +35.3065 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5591 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3538 to 35.3065 deg Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4827 out of 6106 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6106 out of 99190 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec +24.3539 to +35.3115 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5597 to 69.6801 deg, Dec 24.3539 to 35.3115 deg Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4807 out of 6112 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6112 out of 98825 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 2.4 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.eLEuabBLh5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158 Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.B3AB40e44S (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800 Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.w8McXYrcid (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=459, bad_region=1, passed=18222 Got 18222 stars (including 17728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18222 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=1480 n_q2=661 n_q3=1379 n_q4=1367 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.j8vGaR0meI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=467, bad_region=1, passed=18511 Got 18511 stars (including 18021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18511 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18511 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1476 n_q2=663 n_q3=1388 n_q4=1355 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:33.2: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:38:21.95 +34:00:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:06.98 +28:52:26.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:52:25.98 +34:28:41.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:50.63 +29:05:01.4: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.8: 11.27 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:32.53 +32:08:41.0: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:52:25.98 +34:28:41.1: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.8: 11.26 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:38:21.95 +34:00:29.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:21.95 +34:00:29.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:06.98 +28:52:26.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:50.63 +29:05:01.4: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:25.98 +34:28:41.1: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7329 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.8: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3032 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:33.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:06.98 +28:52:26.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3484 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:50.63 +29:05:01.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6903 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:07.64 +26:36:33.2: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9718 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:35.84 +33:42:36.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:32.53 +32:08:41.0: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.8: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4041 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:32.53 +32:08:41.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6607 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.06 +32:10:15.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:35.84 +33:42:36.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:35.84 +33:42:36.8: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5588 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:29.93 +29:40:19.6: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.94 +32:11:00.3: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.5: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.06 +32:10:15.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.06 +32:10:15.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9520 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:29.93 +29:40:19.6: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:29.93 +29:40:19.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0303 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.94 +32:11:00.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.94 +32:11:00.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1092 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.5: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.5: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0938 delta=3.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.4229 delta=2.63 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110522.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18985.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117531_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117531_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.77    03:39:50.66 +29:05:01.1   2165 2544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.64    03:39:50.59 +29:05:01.6   2170 2551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117532_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117532_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.66    03:52:26.05 +34:28:41.6   3696 5843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.85    03:52:25.92 +34:28:40.6   3701 5850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117536_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117536_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    11.95    03:40:07.63 +26:36:33.3   2219 1048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.00    03:40:07.65 +26:36:33.1   2225 1054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117537_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    11.29    03:43:52.37 +25:16:25.8   2741 0249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.32    03:43:52.36 +25:16:25.8   2747 0255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117624_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117624_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.59    03:53:04.43 +25:32:41.3   3998 0467   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 03:53:04.42 +25:32:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    11.36    04:38:21.92 +34:00:30.1   9456 6118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.37    04:38:21.99 +34:00:29.5   9461 6125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117641_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117641_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.62    04:26:11.21 +31:27:24.4   8097 4371   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:26:11.21 +31:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117653_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117653_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.83    04:10:49.10 +33:34:36.1   6025 5446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:10:49.12 +33:34:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117693_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117693_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.35    03:46:06.92 +28:52:26.9   2996 2436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.35    03:46:07.04 +28:52:25.2   3002 2442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117696_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117696_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.31    03:54:18.14 +31:52:04.7   4002 4283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 03:54:18.18 +31:52:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117707_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117707_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.50    03:37:35.86 +28:26:36.7   1870 2154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.35    03:37:35.85 +28:26:36.8   1875 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117718_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117718_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.65    03:44:32.50 +32:08:41.3   2745 4402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.67    03:44:32.55 +32:08:40.7   2750 4409   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117721_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117721_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.60    03:56:26.80 +35:06:48.7   4181 6257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 03:56:26.80 +35:06:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117731_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.12    04:20:25.01 +27:22:48.0   7598 1838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:20:24.97 +27:22:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117732_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117732_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.53    04:08:35.88 +33:42:35.7   5736 5497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.60    04:08:35.80 +33:42:37.9   5741 5504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117768_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.66    03:56:48.23 +27:33:43.9   4446 1710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 03:56:48.31 +27:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117780_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117780_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.96    03:55:53.03 +32:10:15.3   4190 4468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.94    03:55:53.09 +32:10:15.3   4195 4475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117781_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    12.96    03:46:29.90 +29:40:18.4   3034 2918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    13.17    03:46:29.96 +29:40:20.7   3040 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 30.34150    2461251.84150    13.10    03:44:23.90 +32:11:01.1   2726 4426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-11-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    13.12    03:44:23.98 +32:10:59.6   2731 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.10    03:51:16.21 +33:02:07.1   3589 4971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.787 217167225960380928 057.81769703437 +33.03523028693 11.9161 10.0088 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18985_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 18985_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    12.16    04:04:04.99 +25:42:49.1   5485 0652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:04:04.94 +25:42:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.85    04:37:15.33 +33:48:48.6   9336 5986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:37:15.27 +33:48:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 96865_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    11.74    04:25:17.14 +28:04:41.1   8203 2327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:25:17.22 +28:04:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    10.98    04:10:38.00 +34:15:55.1   5970 5860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:10:38.01 +34:15:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 39689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 07 30.34211    2461251.84211    10.58    04:22:10.30 +31:21:53.5   7586 4256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_040625_TTUQ1b1x1_1991573_CpApEx2w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_03-12-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 04:22:10.31 +31:21:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3 ########### Completed Tau-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3 ################################################################################### 04:06:22.44 +33:39:33.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 03:51:16.28 +33:02:07.5 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461251.84150102 -observatory V36 07:16:21.52 +19:40:15.4 Mercury (0.6mag) 11:30:38.46 +03:17:58.5 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:23:17.54 +23:14:15.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:34:53.98 +19:10:29.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:48.15 +03:20:24.0 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:10:35.39 +20:53:58.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:32.84 +00:16:29.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:00.04 -23:26:38.0 Pluto (14.4mag) 21:11:27.48 -18:14:55.0 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 30 04:08 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461251.84150102: 08:34:57.58 +19:10:13.5 Io (5.9mag) 08:34:47.51 +19:10:56.1 Europa (6.2mag) 08:34:54.70 +19:10:30.0 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:34:56.10 +19:10:16.9 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:32:39.79 +19:04:36.1 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:34:55.02 +19:10:25.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:32:05.97 +19:04:53.3 Elara (17.7mag) 08:38:54.74 +18:54:14.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:38:39.51 +19:18:55.1 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:55.01 +03:19:52.0 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:52.46 +03:20:10.6 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:32.51 +03:17:53.4 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:01.54 +03:20:29.2 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:22.19 +03:14:46.6 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 30 04:08 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461251.84150102: 18:30:46.92 -27:02:45.7 JWST 19:04:48.88 +07:47:07.3 Chandra 05:02:20.02 +47:25:21.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 30 04:08 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461251.84150102 -observatory V36 03:03:06.08 +16:34:53.4 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:05:09.74 -34:39:03.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:45:22.48 -68:36:00.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:07:19.17 +32:48:43.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:15:23.07 +32:45:59.5 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:45:44.78 +31:53:39.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:34:23.59 +26:41:07.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:13:23.55 +28:52:21.0 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:22:54.44 +05:15:33.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:21.83 -11:57:32.5 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:22:49.76 +66:50:45.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:58:01.66 -12:05:34.8 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 07:57:50.28 +30:56:52.6 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:08:49.52 +15:36:50.8 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:14:43.60 +42:23:13.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:23:25.72 +48:30:44.0 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:07:45.41 -13:07:05.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:50:08.58 +25:41:59.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:26:37.44 -14:59:01.9 17.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:20:51.36 +21:26:24.0 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:53:08.65 +02:54:41.6 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:09:15.80 +78:34:01.1 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:03:11.18 +45:58:13.0 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:39:40.64 +07:31:47.9 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:47:45.98 -23:24:46.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:23:47.52 -02:52:30.7 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:27:53.60 +31:36:31.0 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:49:30.76 +07:32:55.7 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:58.89 -05:11:15.6 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:15:04.87 +20:45:24.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:50:56.98 +12:56:39.8 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:32:32.30 +28:46:44.8 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:41:57.67 +13:27:23.9 17.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:26:58.65 +31:01:59.7 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:57:16.37 +28:04:45.0 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:26:12.18 -06:49:03.1 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:23:11.82 +21:10:10.7 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:13:00.59 +19:16:43.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:04:12.58 +03:24:59.3 17.7mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 08:20:06.22 +12:24:35.2 17.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:22:19.18 -20:02:50.9 14.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:44:59.40 +37:07:40.9 15.7mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:21:46.63 +32:07:42.4 12.9mag 169P/NEAT 02:25:45.00 +09:13:56.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:37:49.20 -09:28:04.4 17.5mag 235P/LINEAR 20:28:55.02 -52:36:07.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:56:15.92 +21:18:17.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:38:21.70 +37:46:19.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:08:06.71 +04:05:58.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:52:45.94 +18:48:08.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:22:31.38 +37:30:46.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 30 04:08 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Jul 30 04:08 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 30 04:08 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:56:20.148 +22:48:23.34 AT 2026uez 2026-05-19.43 20.79 17:03:37.940 +40:54:46.91 AT 2026uey 2026-05-17.49 21.43 15:04:21.070 +07:14:23.81 AT 2026uex 2026-06-15.44 20.66 08:49:47.663 -07:24:01.25 AT 2026uew 2026-02-19.37 20.99 04:43:45.409 -21:56:34.12 AT 2026uev 2026-01-14.29 21.36 14:23:02.118 +17:49:57.26 AT 2026ueu 2026-04-20.54 21.18 11:50:55.515 -19:56:24.73 AT 2026uet 2026-01-27.53 21.55 10:59:04.434 -17:05:34.76 AT 2026ues 2026-05-06.27 20.91 15:39:15.006 +12:22:05.73 AT 2026uer 2026-02-13.60 21.8 19:17:04.295 +46:23:18.13 AT 2026ueq 2026-07-01.31 17.5086 08:10:18.850 +45:21:28.27 AT 2026uep 2026-02-21.37 20.88 15:04:40.281 +05:21:56.55 AT 2026ueo 2026-07-09.29 21.15 17:12:49.063 +27:32:51.65 AT 2026uen 2026-07-08.32 19.49 10:28:53.926 +20:07:41.86 AT 2026uem 2026-01-14.45 21.07 11:11:53.428 +13:29:27.96 AT 2026uel 2026-01-29.63 22.38 14:49:01.370 +34:26:52.68 AT 2026uek 2026-06-13.34 20.33 13:48:44.907 -10:17:48.40 AT 2026uej 2026-05-19.33 20.99 14:32:34.192 +18:00:45.73 AT 2026uei 2026-02-13.54 21.3 08:49:51.222 +00:38:50.85 AT 2026ueh 2026-03-09.32 21.51 08:22:39.912 +47:57:53.40 AT 2026ueg 2026-03-06.30 20.74 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 30 04:08 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C