This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.3079 2461251.8079 12.34 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6
134.63032 7.97365 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0300166+675207
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.170 g Y 0.625 g 2458383.76930 124.630365800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.3079* 03 00 16.73 +67 52 10.6 12.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0300166+675207,2461251.8079,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0300166+675207 20260730.3079 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.3079 2461251.8079 12.90 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2
130.85965 6.83637 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 372241
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.605 g Y 0.486 g 2458292.23550 118.039703100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.3079* 02 18 36.99 +68 21 21.2 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 372241,2461251.8079,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 372241 20260730.3079 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.3079 2461251.8079 13.26 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8
127.22616 5.51627 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0137216+680017
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.150 g Y 1.223 g 2458462.34020 318.739215900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.3079* 01 37 21.08 +68 00 15.8 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0137216+680017,2461251.8079,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0137216+680017 20260730.3079 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.3079 2461251.8079 13.22 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0
136.52132 10.19118 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0330092+684552
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.465 R1 Y 0.711 R1 157.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.3079* 03 30 09.21 +68 45 54.0 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0330092+684552,2461251.8079,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0330092+684552 20260730.3079 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461251.80829201 30.07.2026 07:23:46.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15728
Objects passed selection criteria: 15663
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11437.2
Average stars matched: 11077.2 (96.8524 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 02:36:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461083.62488818 12.02.2026 02:59:40.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461251.80829201 30.07.2026 07:23:46.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111811
Objects passed selection criteria: 111511
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84578.8
Average stars matched: 81156.8 (95.9541 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 571772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 02:37:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461251.80748848
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87
Second-epoch image center 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0848 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87
Second-epoch image center 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0809 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DZhy9HcNEb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LmtVUz4bfc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QAMQYblLWZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oo2ByiorHw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7968 to 64.5312 deg, Dec +62.8433 to +75.4744 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7968 to 64.5312 deg, Dec 62.8433 to 75.4744 deg
Loaded 15559 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7686 out of 8290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8290 out of 16441 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.7968 to 64.5312 deg, Dec +62.8433 to +75.4744 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.7968 to 64.5312 deg, Dec 62.8433 to 75.4744 deg
Loaded 15559 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7686 out of 8290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8290 out of 16441 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.8987 to 64.5307 deg, Dec +62.8432 to +75.4995 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.8987 to 64.5307 deg, Dec 62.8432 to 75.4995 deg
Loaded 15548 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7690 out of 8286 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8286 out of 16457 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.1 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DZhy9HcNEb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1328, bad_region=0, passed=16441
Got 16441 stars (including 15090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1151 n_q2=1398 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LmtVUz4bfc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1310, bad_region=0, passed=16457
Got 16457 stars (including 15122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1384 n_q3=1062 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.432
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QAMQYblLWZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=477, bad_region=1, passed=6569
Got 6569 stars (including 6081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=10.985 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.473 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.439 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.960 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.350
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:18.087 +69:59:04.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6569 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3516628.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.960 -> 0.315 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1300 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1450 n_q4=1113 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Oo2ByiorHw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, bad_region=0, passed=6573
Got 6573 stars (including 6082 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6573 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=11.121 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.078 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.439 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.969 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:20.950 +69:59:43.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6573 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3516619.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.969 -> 0.306 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1295 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1452 n_q4=1109 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.507
ref2=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.432
new1=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new2=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.4695
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21014_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 21014_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:12.27 +69:26:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21185_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 21185_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.53 +69:16:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87
Second-epoch image center 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0848 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:24:17.367 +69:59:18.87
Second-epoch image center 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0809 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:23:17.988 +69:59:05.16
Second-epoch second image center 02:23:20.836 +69:59:44.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m6rnWdib3N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6SJ7tvcxb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hl0TTSMmfr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5y3UvW1LbN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6873 to 64.5438 deg, Dec +62.7969 to +75.4939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6873 to 64.5438 deg, Dec 62.7969 to 75.4939 deg
Loaded 15745 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6663 out of 8421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8421 out of 120979 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6873 to 64.5438 deg, Dec +62.7969 to +75.4939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6873 to 64.5438 deg, Dec 62.7969 to 75.4939 deg
Loaded 15745 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6663 out of 8421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8421 out of 120979 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 120718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 8.6867 to 64.5433 deg, Dec +62.8432 to +75.5020 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 8.6867 to 64.5433 deg, Dec 62.8432 to 75.5020 deg
Loaded 15609 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6690 out of 8413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8413 out of 120718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.m6rnWdib3N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=10189, bad_region=5, passed=120941
Got 120941 stars (including 110503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1390 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.400
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E6SJ7tvcxb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=10151, bad_region=2, passed=120679
Got 120679 stars (including 110286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1161 n_q2=1392 n_q3=1060 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hl0TTSMmfr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1906, bad_region=1, passed=49470
Got 49470 stars (including 47458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1292 n_q2=1020 n_q3=1444 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5y3UvW1LbN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2003, bad_region=0, passed=49625
Got 49625 stars (including 47526 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1296 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1440 n_q4=1135 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-22-37_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_023427_TTUQ1b1x1_3498890_0ufgr7hd/wcs_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:50:30.95 +72:36:36.2: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:35:26.27 +70:54:38.4: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:27:47.07 +72:09:58.2: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:56:34.07 +67:47:26.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:02:19.12 +70:19:00.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:26:54.12 +65:21:53.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:27:50.35 +72:09:29.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:56:34.07 +67:47:26.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:50:30.95 +72:36:36.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:27:47.07 +72:09:58.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:35:26.27 +70:54:38.4: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:02:19.12 +70:19:00.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:34.07 +67:47:26.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3752 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:30.95 +72:36:36.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5814 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:26.27 +70:54:38.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5770 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:47.07 +72:09:58.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4393 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:19.12 +70:19:00.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1215 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:37:16.88 +69:32:24.9: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:14:43.56 +70:09:16.8: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:26:54.12 +65:21:53.6: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:27:50.35 +72:09:29.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:54.12 +65:21:53.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8253 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:50.35 +72:09:29.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2428 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:56:55.39 +73:29:29.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:37:16.88 +69:32:24.9: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:16.88 +69:32:24.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9566 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:14:43.56 +70:09:16.8: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:43.56 +70:09:16.8: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8815 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:56:55.39 +73:29:29.7: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:55.39 +73:29:29.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8725 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:19:38.29 +72:37:40.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:00:21.85 +64:55:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:16:52.24 +67:15:48.8: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:10:56.68 +69:17:59.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:34:48.48 +65:46:28.8: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:00:21.85 +64:55:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:21.85 +64:55:07.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:16:52.24 +67:15:48.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:38.29 +72:37:40.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:16:52.24 +67:15:48.8: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7499 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:10:56.68 +69:17:59.6: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.29 +72:37:40.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4485 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:56.68 +69:17:59.6: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8065 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:07:00.68 +72:50:15.9: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:16:15.34 +71:42:10.2: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:34:48.48 +65:46:28.8: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:34:48.48 +65:46:28.8: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9126 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:02:22.69 +71:18:23.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:07:00.68 +72:50:15.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:00.68 +72:50:15.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9989 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:15.34 +71:42:10.2: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:15.34 +71:42:10.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0779 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:55:09.80 +73:21:01.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:34:41.41 +67:43:29.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:05:32.21 +68:36:52.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:02:22.69 +71:18:23.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:22.69 +71:18:23.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0407 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:32:14.49 +72:55:12.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:55:09.80 +73:21:01.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:09.80 +73:21:01.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0640 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:34:41.41 +67:43:29.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:05:32.21 +68:36:52.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:41.41 +67:43:29.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0837 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:32.21 +68:36:52.3: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1884 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:57:05.21 +73:13:41.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:32:14.49 +72:55:12.8: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:14.49 +72:55:12.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1757 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:34:30.81 +71:31:47.3: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:24:27.08 +72:50:32.6: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:57:05.21 +73:13:41.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:57:05.21 +73:13:41.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3378 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:02:58.76 +71:16:40.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:34:30.81 +71:31:47.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:30.81 +71:31:47.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3325 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:24:27.08 +72:50:32.6: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:37:09.39 +68:42:28.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:27.08 +72:50:32.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4118 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:39:13.39 +65:29:51.0: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:02:58.76 +71:16:40.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:58.76 +71:16:40.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4605 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:37:09.39 +68:42:28.5: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:09.39 +68:42:28.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6121 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:39:13.39 +65:29:51.0: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:13.39 +65:29:51.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7493 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-59-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:00:16.73 +67:52:10.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3380 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:18:36.99 +68:21:21.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8952 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:37:21.08 +68:00:15.8: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2537 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-00-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:30:09.21 +68:45:54.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2089 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141640_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141640_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141641_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141641_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141642_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141642_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:37.88 +70:10:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141643_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141643_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141645_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141645_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:54.71 +70:51:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141649_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141649_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141652_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141652_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:56.73 +69:15:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141653_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141653_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141656_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141656_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:32.58 +70:23:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141659_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141659_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:05:39.55 +69:33:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141660_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141660_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141665_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141665_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:58:17.46 +71:03:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141667_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141667_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:59.54 +65:23:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141670_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141670_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141673_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141673_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:57:16.00 +66:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141675_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141675_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141676_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141676_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141677_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141677_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:42.69 +65:40:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141678_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141678_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141679_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141679_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:27.16 +70:09:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141682_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141682_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:00.08 +70:03:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141874_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141874_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:52.48 +69:16:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142099_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142099_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:07.68 +66:08:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142258_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142258_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:52.94 +70:53:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142332_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142332_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:17.93 +74:20:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142496_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142496_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:30.05 +71:43:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142567_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142567_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142686_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142686_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:13.82 +65:31:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142767_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142767_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142789_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142789_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142839_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142839_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142850_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142850_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:39.66 +71:34:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142921_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142921_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:17.64 +68:25:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142940_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142940_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:49.36 +70:52:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142952_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142952_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142963_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142963_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:04.26 +66:05:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142998_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 142998_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:02.03 +70:17:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143015_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143015_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:34.55 +70:39:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143059_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143059_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143072_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143072_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:48.70 +68:28:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143154_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143154_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143210_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143210_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143248_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143248_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:50.84 +73:22:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143265_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143265_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:02.71 +72:24:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143266_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143266_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143273_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143273_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:13.37 +67:03:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143283_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143283_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:51.71 +70:32:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143301_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143301_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143314_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143314_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:03.34 +65:19:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143322_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143322_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143398_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143398_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143465_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143465_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:20.49 +70:01:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143519_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143519_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:50.22 +69:07:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143543_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143543_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:34.76 +70:55:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143590_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143590_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:21:06.12 +68:26:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143598_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143598_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143610_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143610_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:59.22 +71:11:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143622_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143622_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:09.70 +73:03:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143624_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143624_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:15.29 +70:37:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143638_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143638_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:10.99 +70:38:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143665_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143665_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143674_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143674_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:36.33 +64:57:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143681_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143681_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143737_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143737_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:22.92 +69:19:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143775_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143775_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:47.65 +70:56:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143778_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143778_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:11.81 +67:38:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143792_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143792_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143828_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143828_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:29.13 +68:31:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143862_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143862_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:13.99 +71:45:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143905_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143905_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:35:01.46 +67:43:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143939_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143939_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143955_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 143955_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:46.90 +68:49:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144026_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 144026_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:50.29 +70:45:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144183_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 144183_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:45.70 +68:09:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144205_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 144205_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72030_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 72030_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:40.46 +67:24:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 108033_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 61521_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:37.65 +70:18:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 141451_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:31.67 +68:17:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 118282_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 112724_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57462_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 57462_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 18421_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:56.53 +73:40:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 32290_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:20.50 +70:57:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 53505_fd_Cas-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_02-23-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks