This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 12.55 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2
139.11435 2.31043 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J047.5906+60.7401 | 03:10:21.73 +60:44:24.3 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.718+/-0.032 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.2208* 03 10 21.95 +60 44 25.2 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J047.5906+60.7401,2461251.7208,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J047.5906+60.7401 20260730.2208 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 12.43 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6
142.13251 2.92854 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J053.3645+59.6145 | 03:33:25.56 +59:37:07.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.462+/-0.033 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J053.3645+59.6145,2461251.7208,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J053.3645+59.6145 20260730.2208 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 12.21 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7
139.18753 -0.16334 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J045.3038+58.5531 | 03:01:13.53 +58:33:03.6 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: C 1988ISKZ...29...16A BC 189 J-Ks=1.684+/-0.028 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.2208* 03 01 13.52 +58 33 03.7 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J045.3038+58.5531,2461251.7208,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J045.3038+58.5531 20260730.2208 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 11.59 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4
144.84649 3.86479 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 473050622861076480
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 G 11.050 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 473050622861076480,2461251.7208,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 473050622861076480 20260730.2208 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 11.05 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0
139.19498 6.00941 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0328012+634915
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.835 g Y 0.523 g 2458433.71820 148.698957700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0328012+634915,2461251.7208,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0328012+634915 20260730.2208 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 10.88 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6
139.78964 -0.61261 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 1942420
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.150 R1 10.350 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.2208* 03 03 35.42 +57 52 02.6 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1942420,2461251.7208,10.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1942420 20260730.2208 10.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 30.2208 2461251.7208 10.46 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3
138.12925 -0.53295 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 968
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 pg 15.000 pg 142.000000000000 M5
ATTENTION: measured mag 10.46 is 4.0 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 14.50 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 30.2208* 02 52 42.15 +58 42 50.3 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 968,2461251.7208,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 968 20260730.2208 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461251.72113714 30.07.2026 05:18:16.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19677
Objects passed selection criteria: 19515
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12253
Average stars matched: 11893.5 (97.066 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 00:22:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461251.72113714 30.07.2026 05:18:16.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 141235
Objects passed selection criteria: 140759
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89005
Average stars matched: 84746 (95.2149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 607320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jul 30 00:23:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461251.72043240
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93
Second-epoch image center 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 943.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93
Second-epoch image center 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0736 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01156 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4wnZF0827B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1ikOFkgWuX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k45zOPvQCm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5IJBDc5j8K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3261 to 69.7036 deg, Dec +55.1713 to +67.5015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3261 to 69.7036 deg, Dec 55.1713 to 67.5015 deg
Loaded 17760 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9564 out of 10586 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10586 out of 20930 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.961600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.961600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3261 to 69.7036 deg, Dec +55.1713 to +67.5015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3261 to 69.7036 deg, Dec 55.1713 to 67.5015 deg
Loaded 17760 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9564 out of 10586 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10586 out of 20930 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3006 to 69.9320 deg, Dec +55.2353 to +67.5143 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3006 to 69.9320 deg, Dec 55.2353 to 67.5143 deg
Loaded 17771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9546 out of 10591 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10591 out of 20729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4wnZF0827B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2177, bad_region=0, passed=20929
Got 20929 stars (including 18725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1299 n_q2=1255 n_q3=1372 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1ikOFkgWuX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2180, bad_region=0, passed=20729
Got 20729 stars (including 18522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1379 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k45zOPvQCm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=0, passed=3806
Got 3806 stars (including 3562 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3500 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3477 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3477 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3499 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3480 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3480 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 3480 stars left (next iteration limit 3824)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3480 robust_rms=6.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=31.957 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3480 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.157 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3480 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3480 robust_rms_before=1.424 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.628 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.608
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.628 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=3480 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=1209 n_q2=512 n_q3=1094 n_q4=665 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5IJBDc5j8K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=3820
Got 3820 stars (including 3572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3508 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3508 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3488 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3488 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 3488 stars left (next iteration limit 3834)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=6.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=29.722 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3488 robust_rms_before=1.387 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.511 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.702 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.637
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.702 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=3488 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.676 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=1202 n_q2=515 n_q3=1092 n_q4=679 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.253
new1=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new2=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.406
reference average sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (3480 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175_astrometric_residuals.png (3488 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31327_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 31327_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.77 +64:20:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 04085_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.50 +58:52:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 06557_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:03.91 +59:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 03777_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:40.95 +58:23:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 10428_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:19.00 +61:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 14642_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.75 +63:58:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 10198_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.96 +60:44:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 05505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.72 +59:02:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93
Second-epoch image center 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 943.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.073 +62:00:13.93
Second-epoch image center 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0736 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:26:08.334 +61:58:54.49
Second-epoch second image center 03:26:10.795 +61:58:16.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01156 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1K985IVoUj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nXV22Mzf9v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C7mIYdZIVC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VUz5PlmnxN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2729 to 69.9709 deg, Dec +55.1713 to +67.5043 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2729 to 69.9709 deg, Dec 55.1713 to 67.5043 deg
Loaded 17906 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 10786 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10786 out of 154964 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2729 to 69.9709 deg, Dec +55.1713 to +67.5043 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2729 to 69.9709 deg, Dec 55.1713 to 67.5043 deg
Loaded 17906 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 10786 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10786 out of 154964 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 154983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2730 to 69.9686 deg, Dec +55.1757 to +67.5163 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2730 to 69.9686 deg, Dec 55.1757 to 67.5163 deg
Loaded 17905 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7796 out of 10800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10800 out of 154983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 119 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1K985IVoUj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17688, bad_region=2, passed=154936
Got 154936 stars (including 136983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1285 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nXV22Mzf9v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=17825, bad_region=1, passed=154953
Got 154953 stars (including 136846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1226 n_q3=1354 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C7mIYdZIVC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=799, bad_region=0, passed=23964
Got 23964 stars (including 23134 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23964 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=1627 n_q2=755 n_q3=1542 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VUz5PlmnxN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=912, bad_region=0, passed=24208
Got 24208 stars (including 23276 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013107 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010486 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=1608 n_q2=757 n_q3=1542 n_q4=963 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-17-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-30_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_002030_TTUQ1b1x1_2576931_uwq6GMNb/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:27:27.39 +58:19:55.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:34:02.52 +61:29:38.8: 12.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:26.06 +63:41:27.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:34:02.52 +61:29:38.8: 12.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:27:27.39 +58:19:55.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:27.39 +58:19:55.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:02.52 +61:29:38.8: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2895 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:26.06 +63:41:27.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:26.06 +63:41:27.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2277 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:10:21.95 +60:44:25.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5713 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:33:25.84 +59:37:07.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3771 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:01:13.52 +58:33:03.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2159 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:54:38.90 +58:42:30.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5831 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:28:01.03 +63:49:15.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0593 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:03:35.42 +57:52:02.6: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8761 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:52:42.15 +58:42:50.3: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4512 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42485.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 179104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179679_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 179679_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179761_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 179761_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180122_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180122_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:02.49 +58:35:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180209_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180209_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:32.52 +58:00:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180505_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.36 +58:13:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180558_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180558_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:49:23.38 +57:04:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180866_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180866_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:26.87 +63:58:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180954_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180954_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:05.82 +58:50:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180962_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180962_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:17.83 +62:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 180984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:15.36 +64:18:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181182_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181182_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:21.27 +65:39:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181218_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181218_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:45.83 +62:35:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:17:13.36 +67:03:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181299_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181299_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:16.00 +65:40:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181418_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 181418_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:36.00 +64:57:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:30.83 +65:31:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.68 +61:06:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115277_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 115277_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:59.35 +65:39:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 95191_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:24.85 +63:04:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.53 +58:52:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.30 +59:58:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 99975_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.85 +63:20:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:40.40 +64:35:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 97339_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:08.94 +63:12:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:03.94 +59:56:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 46481_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:07.11 +59:46:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 102393_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:56.49 +62:56:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31055_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 31055_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:20.99 +58:34:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 62688_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:40.62 +60:24:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28816_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 28816_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:51:33.09 +57:50:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 119763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25447_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 25447_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:53.22 +58:12:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:00.88 +62:02:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53524_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:44.61 +58:26:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 114261_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:26.98 +65:45:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25015_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 25015_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:59:06.20 +57:48:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.73 +64:20:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 68790_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112236_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 112236_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:34.71 +65:01:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.09 +58:31:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 143943_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:26.23 +63:44:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:19.88 +59:05:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42485_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 42485_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.14 +62:48:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 32655_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:59.78 +58:28:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 63804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:55.16 +59:36:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17671_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 17671_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 85928_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:02.21 +62:17:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72141_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 72141_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 123532_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:56.73 +65:19:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 35541_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 75793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:45.33 +60:25:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.87 +60:15:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 64140_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:49.64 +60:54:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.09 +58:14:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:25.84 +60:39:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:09.90 +59:40:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24825_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 24825_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:38.64 +58:22:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:29.86 +59:19:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.15 +62:31:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 83314_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:15.85 +62:09:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:40.06 +58:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 95569_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:04:48.81 +62:24:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31556_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 31556_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:25.62 +58:42:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:05.58 +59:34:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55379_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 55379_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:52:03.82 +59:25:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 148927_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:41:05.29 +62:17:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:24.29 +64:25:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 33192_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:25.83 +58:50:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.15 +62:32:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 80010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:11.75 +60:22:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:43.07 +60:06:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22371_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 22371_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:55.34 +57:22:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.97 +57:38:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 142512_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 55463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:54:19.24 +59:29:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42949_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 42949_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:00:50.90 +58:56:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24374_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 24374_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 62849_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:25.18 +60:46:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 143445_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:35.97 +62:50:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 56414_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:46.00 +60:22:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.94 +58:40:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27630_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 27630_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:40.94 +58:23:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 43112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 78982_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:18.97 +61:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 142711_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:21.75 +63:58:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 126441_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:46.51 +64:45:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 77504_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:56.94 +60:44:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34614_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 34614_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:31.99 +58:16:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 66817_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:40.29 +61:05:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 41984_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:10.73 +59:02:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 73134_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:39.45 +60:07:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25830_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 25830_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:25.64 +57:02:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 56857_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:23.59 +60:15:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52104_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:00.77 +60:02:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40003_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 40003_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:32.53 +59:26:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23834_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 23834_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:25.32 +57:54:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 40427_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:11.00 +59:21:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 32731_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:32.83 +58:43:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 98818_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:36.17 +63:17:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 29804_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:31.70 +58:45:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:10.49 +59:38:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84691_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 84691_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:57.96 +61:31:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.14 +57:52:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24400_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 24400_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:59:48.74 +57:39:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84802_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 84802_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:50.22 +62:19:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11173_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 11173_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:47.97 +57:08:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:27.45 +59:54:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20473_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 20473_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:49:30.73 +57:05:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:43.36 +57:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.76 +57:27:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:47.48 +60:44:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:26.83 +59:09:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:08.12 +57:51:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78594_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 78594_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-30_00-18-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
