######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 978744 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 978744 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits

renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2282.0439
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 562.6765
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3573.3506
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 775.5234
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3567.5208
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 774.5337
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.56586
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T03:59:05.0227726' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T08:59:05.0227726' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.3743636804 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T08:59:14.9261618' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.3744783103 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.999313360865 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996601015209 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.5138888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 155.063888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.76133456245315 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 46.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits :)
Spent 0.814138 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T03:59:57.1029049' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T08:59:57.1029049' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.3749664584 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T09:00:07.0035893' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.3750810535 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.999313279535 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996601237486 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.5897222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 155.2975 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.7579724658827 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 46.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits :)
Spent 0.966209 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 33794.829350
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21727.0, right_median=27156.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits

fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.87447942
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ToiS9tvDnV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pkhoDQJUb9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pTKS9T9cGV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RiBLxOFiFv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5850 to 8.4070 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5850 to 8.4070 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Loaded 4116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.281300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.281300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5850 to 8.4070 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5850 to 8.4070 deg, Dec -23.2538 to -12.6277 deg
Loaded 4116 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1878 out of 1902 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1902 out of 2302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.2)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5851 to 8.3971 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5851 to 8.3971 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6278 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1325 out of 1343 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1343 out of 1693 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.3 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
13.7 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ToiS9tvDnV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=176, bad_region=441, passed=2298
Got 2298 stars (including 1705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2298 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5850 through 0 to 8.4070, gap 8.4070 to 351.5850
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1645 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1643 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1643 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4071, gap 8.4071 to 351.5848
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1645 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1642 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1642 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 1642 stars left (next iteration limit 1807)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=1642 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=546 n_q2=297 n_q3=507 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pkhoDQJUb9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=152, bad_region=292, passed=1693
Got 1693 stars (including 1266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.3971, gap 8.3971 to 351.5851
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1215 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1213 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1213 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.3973, gap 8.3973 to 351.5848
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1215 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1213 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1213 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 1213 stars left (next iteration limit 1334)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=1213 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=390 n_q2=186 n_q3=436 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pTKS9T9cGV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=510, passed=2531
Got 2531 stars (including 1815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5953
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1761 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5951 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5951
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 1757 stars left (next iteration limit 1933)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1757 robust_rms=6.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1757 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1757 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1757 robust_rms_before=1.101 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.328 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.348 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.375
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.348 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=1757 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=596 n_q2=322 n_q3=549 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RiBLxOFiFv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=513, passed=2508
Got 2508 stars (including 1789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5953
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5950 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5950
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 1730 stars left (next iteration limit 1903)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1730 robust_rms=6.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.308 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1730 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.558 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1730 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1730 robust_rms_before=1.096 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.368 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.379
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits N_match=1730 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=568 n_q2=329 n_q3=543 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.174
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.117
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.101
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.098
reference average sigma_overall=0.3915 worst_q_ratio=1.1455
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (1642 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401_astrometric_residuals.png (1213 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (1757 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415_astrometric_residuals.png (1730 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:56.820 -18:00:11.64
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.416 -17:59:54.04
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.910 -18:00:26.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01347 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vCGU6bXTLh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5io5P1hxpu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OCfa8eQ6TS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fet8GMaYDb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5849 to 8.4418 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5849 to 8.4418 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Loaded 4163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.127450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.127450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 13800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5849 to 8.4418 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5849 to 8.4418 deg, Dec -23.2779 to -12.6004 deg
Loaded 4163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3376 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 13800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 11523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5851 to 8.4395 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5851 to 8.4395 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5847 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3404 out of 3475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3475 out of 11523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
13.8 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vCGU6bXTLh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=454, bad_region=1822, passed=13796
Got 13796 stars (including 11610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5849 through 0 to 8.4418, gap 8.4418 to 351.5849
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4419, gap 8.4419 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1542 n_q2=786 n_q3=1629 n_q4=883 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5io5P1hxpu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=313, bad_region=1652, passed=11521
Got 11521 stars (including 9599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11521 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5851 through 0 to 8.4395, gap 8.4395 to 351.5851
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4396, gap 8.4396 to 351.5848
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1571 n_q2=754 n_q3=1645 n_q4=864 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OCfa8eQ6TS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=491, bad_region=2508, passed=15271
Got 15271 stars (including 12371 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5843
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1575 n_q2=845 n_q3=1558 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fet8GMaYDb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=515, bad_region=2515, passed=15371
Got 15371 stars (including 12466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5173 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5173
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5169 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5169
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1575 n_q2=850 n_q3=1547 n_q4=872 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:20.04 -21:37:30.2: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:57.29 -19:41:32.4: 13.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:23.44 -14:22:38.5: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:46.56 -21:06:44.7: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:17:18.34 -22:03:46.6: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:09:35.71 -21:22:09.1: 13.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:14:39.32 -22:11:23.6: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:01:18.45 -14:24:39.7: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:39.43 -21:01:51.5: 13.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:05:27.25 -21:48:48.3: 13.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:57.29 -19:41:32.4: 13.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:57.29 -19:41:32.4: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2721 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:20.04 -21:37:30.2: 14.11 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:20.04 -21:37:30.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5610 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:17:18.34 -22:03:46.6: 13.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:23.44 -14:22:38.5: 14.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:46.56 -21:06:44.7: 13.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:09:35.71 -21:22:09.1: 13.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:14:39.32 -22:11:23.6: 14.13 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:18.34 -22:03:46.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3107 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:46.56 -21:06:44.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4942 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:35.71 -21:22:09.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0384 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:39.32 -22:11:23.6: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3866 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:01:18.45 -14:24:39.7: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:39.43 -21:01:51.5: 13.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:05:27.25 -21:48:48.3: 13.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:39.43 -21:01:51.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5747 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:27.25 -21:48:48.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4901 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:11:44.15 -17:14:28.0: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.4: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:42.9: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:47.61 -21:50:42.0: 14.05 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:02.4: 13.97 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:00.12 -21:45:23.6: 13.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:14.30 -20:41:35.7: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:11:44.15 -17:14:28.0: 13.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8: 14.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:44.15 -17:14:28.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5652 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4632 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.4: 13.74 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:42.9: 13.82 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:12.60 -21:43:14.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5862 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:00.08 -21:58:42.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5199 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:02.4: 13.82 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:47.61 -21:50:42.0: 13.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:02.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6314 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:14.30 -20:41:35.7: 13.84 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:00.12 -21:45:23.6: 13.79 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:14.30 -20:41:35.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6467 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:00.12 -21:45:23.6: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6305 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:47.61 -21:50:42.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7525 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:32:55.52 -22:06:03.6: 13.80 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:02:30.47 -22:13:19.5: 14.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:12:36.56 -21:57:55.3: 13.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:01.67 -21:47:49.1: 13.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:19:07.01 -21:53:17.1: 13.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:15:00.57 -21:29:01.5: 14.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:09:46.61 -18:58:58.9: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:32:55.52 -22:06:03.6: 13.75 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:02:30.47 -22:13:19.5: 13.97 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:55.52 -22:06:03.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6148 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:13:33.33 -21:18:31.3: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:30.47 -22:13:19.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.6866 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:12:36.56 -21:57:55.3: 13.90 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:36.56 -21:57:55.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6851 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:19:07.01 -21:53:17.1: 13.86 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:07.01 -21:53:17.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6132 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:15:00.57 -21:29:01.5: 13.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:00.57 -21:29:01.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6418 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:01.67 -21:47:49.1: 13.84 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:01.67 -21:47:49.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6061 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:13:33.33 -21:18:31.3: 13.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:33.33 -21:18:31.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6256 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:09:46.61 -18:58:58.9: 14.05 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:46.61 -18:58:58.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6828 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:06:26.34 -20:37:50.4: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:58:10.79 -20:00:38.4: 14.44 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:37:06.49 -21:03:03.7: 14.01 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:34.93 -19:21:02.5: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:32:19.38 -20:21:00.1: 13.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:18:04.86 -19:39:17.0: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:06:26.34 -20:37:50.4: 13.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:26.34 -20:37:50.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6237 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:58:10.79 -20:00:38.4: 14.06 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 00:16:15.95 -17:36:12.8: 14.43 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:38:47.31 -21:15:19.0: 13.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:10.79 -20:00:38.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.5404 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:37:06.49 -21:03:03.7: 13.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:34.93 -19:21:02.5: 13.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:06.49 -21:03:03.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6954 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:34.93 -19:21:02.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6426 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:32:19.38 -20:21:00.1: 13.63 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:19.38 -20:21:00.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6913 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:18:04.86 -19:39:17.0: 13.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:04.86 -19:39:17.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6129 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 00:16:15.95 -17:36:12.8: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:15.95 -17:36:12.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=13.7489 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:38:47.31 -21:15:19.0: 13.89 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:47.31 -21:15:19.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7558 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:36:52.54 -16:51:49.3: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_04-41-41_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 23:41:31.56 -22:06:40.3: 13.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:36:52.54 -16:51:49.3: 13.81 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:52.54 -16:51:49.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5596 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-26-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0401.fits at 23:41:31.56 -22:06:40.3: 13.63 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:31.56 -22:06:40.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7211 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20280.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20262_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20262_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.27 | 00:17:57.30 -19:41:32.4 | 7346 2131 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.27 | 00:17:57.28 -19:41:32.4 | 7352 2137 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20280_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
Preparing report for the candidate 20291_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20294_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.07 | 00:09:35.77 -21:22:08.7 | 6136 1142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.01 | 00:09:35.66 -21:22:09.5 | 6142 1147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20300_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.30 | 00:17:18.41 -22:03:46.1 | 7218 0693 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.32 | 00:17:18.27 -22:03:47.1 | 7223 0698 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20307_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.38 | 00:14:39.31 -22:11:24.2 | 6841 0626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.39 | 00:14:39.33 -22:11:22.9 | 6847 0632 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20318_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.49 | 00:05:27.28 -21:48:47.1 | 5549 0881 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.49 | 00:05:27.21 -21:48:49.4 | 5555 0886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20319_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20319_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.49 | 00:13:20.03 -21:37:30.6 | 6662 0975 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.67 | 00:13:20.04 -21:37:29.8 | 6668 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20327_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.52 | 00:18:39.53 -21:01:50.5 | 7425 1315 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.65 | 00:18:39.33 -21:01:52.5 | 7431 1320 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20329_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.51 | 00:16:46.59 -21:06:44.0 | 7156 1274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.48 | 00:16:46.54 -21:06:45.3 | 7162 1279 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20332_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.56 | 00:18:28.75 -22:12:02.4 | 7381 0603 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.73 | 00:18:28.67 -22:12:02.3 | 7387 0608 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20336_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.49 | 00:11:44.19 -17:14:28.5 | 6484 3636 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.68 | 00:11:44.12 -17:14:27.4 | 6490 3641 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20339_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20339_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.53 | 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.8 | 6487 1749 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.41 | 00:11:59.94 -20:21:30.7 | 6493 1754 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20343_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.58 | 00:16:00.06 -21:58:42.9 | 7034 0750 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.47 | 00:16:00.09 -21:58:42.8 | 7040 0755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20345_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.59 | 00:15:12.62 -21:43:14.5 | 6926 0910 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.58 | 00:15:12.59 -21:43:14.2 | 6932 0915 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20348_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.59 | 00:12:00.08 -21:45:23.1 | 6472 0900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.68 | 00:12:00.17 -21:45:24.1 | 6478 0905 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20350_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.69 | 00:18:47.64 -21:50:42.6 | 7431 0818 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.94 | 00:18:47.58 -21:50:41.3 | 7437 0824 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20351_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.62 | 00:18:14.30 -20:41:35.4 | 7371 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.68 | 00:18:14.29 -20:41:36.0 | 7377 1528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20352_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.64 | 00:12:36.56 -21:57:55.5 | 6555 0770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.75 | 00:12:36.57 -21:57:55.2 | 6561 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20354_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.62 | 00:13:01.67 -21:47:49.6 | 6616 0871 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.59 | 00:13:01.68 -21:47:48.6 | 6622 0877 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20356_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.61 | 23:32:55.53 -22:06:04.0 | 0957 0631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.62 | 23:32:55.51 -22:06:03.1 | 0963 0637 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20358_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20358_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.64 | 00:02:30.51 -22:13:19.3 | 5133 0636 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.77 | 00:02:30.43 -22:13:19.7 | 5139 0641 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20360_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.62 | 00:13:33.32 -21:18:31.4 | 6697 1167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.63 | 00:13:33.33 -21:18:31.1 | 6703 1172 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20363_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.63 | 00:15:00.60 -21:29:02.3 | 6901 1055 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.65 | 00:15:00.55 -21:29:00.7 | 6907 1061 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20364_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.62 | 00:19:07.04 -21:53:17.3 | 7477 0791 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.61 | 00:19:06.99 -21:53:16.9 | 7482 0796 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20368_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.65 | 00:09:46.65 -18:58:59.5 | 6184 2587 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.74 | 00:09:46.57 -18:58:58.4 | 6190 2593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20369_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.53 | 23:58:10.79 -20:00:38.4 | 4526 1980 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.55 | 23:58:10.79 -20:00:38.4 | 4532 1985 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20375_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.62 | 00:06:26.30 -20:37:50.1 | 5695 1597 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.62 | 00:06:26.38 -20:37:50.7 | 5701 1602 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20376_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.63 | 23:37:06.50 -21:03:02.9 | 1537 1297 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.82 | 23:37:06.49 -21:03:04.5 | 1543 1302 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20380_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.63 | 00:18:04.90 -19:39:17.0 | 7365 2153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.60 | 00:18:04.82 -19:39:17.0 | 7371 2159 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20386_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.59 | 23:32:19.38 -20:21:00.4 | 0836 1698 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.86 | 23:32:19.39 -20:20:59.7 | 0843 1704 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20390_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20390_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.64 | 00:16:34.91 -19:21:03.3 | 7154 2344 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.65 | 00:16:34.95 -19:21:01.7 | 7161 2349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20392_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.66 | 23:38:47.29 -21:15:19.6 | 1780 1180 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.99 | 23:38:47.33 -21:15:18.5 | 1786 1186 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20397_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20397_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.65 | 00:16:15.92 -17:36:12.3 | 7135 3403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.98 | 00:16:15.98 -17:36:13.3 | 7141 3408 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20401_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.67 | 23:41:31.57 -22:06:40.8 | 2180 0670 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.79 | 23:41:31.54 -22:06:39.7 | 2186 0675 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20402_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415
The candidate 20402_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 07 28.37448 | 2461249.87448 | 13.55 | 23:36:52.45 -16:51:50.0 | 1432 3841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 07 28.37508 | 2461249.87508 | 13.57 | 23:36:52.62 -16:51:48.5 | 1439 3847 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_045606_TTUQ2b1x1_3785067_N1JqyDfW/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-28_03-59-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0415.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:01:18.45 -14:24:39.7
00:05:23.44 -14:22:38.5
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:01:18.45 -14:24:39.7
00:05:23.44 -14:22:38.5
###################################################################################
00:01:18.45 -14:24:39.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:05:23.44 -14:22:38.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.87447942 -observatory V36
07:11:39.51 +19:18:58.3 Mercury (1.0mag)
11:23:17.16 +04:15:31.4 Venus (-4.2mag)
05:17:30.27 +23:07:12.8 Mars (1.3mag)
08:33:06.62 +19:16:47.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:49.20 +03:21:06.1 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:10:18.34 +20:53:14.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:37.65 +00:17:06.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:29:11.55 -23:25:49.0 Pluto (14.4mag)
19:31:27.39 -25:39:22.5 Moon (-12.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 28 04:58 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.87447942:
08:33:13.42 +19:16:19.5 Io (5.9mag)
08:33:13.15 +19:16:21.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:32:52.43 +19:17:45.8 Ganymede (5.5mag)
08:33:27.31 +19:15:21.3 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:30:55.83 +19:09:48.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:33:06.02 +19:16:50.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:30:20.85 +19:10:28.7 Elara (17.7mag)
08:37:05.39 +19:01:32.5 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:36:59.58 +19:24:51.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:46.73 +03:20:35.4 Titan (8.5mag)
00:56:43.43 +03:21:07.8 Rhea (9.8mag)
00:56:28.77 +03:18:28.7 Iapetus (11.2mag)
00:57:04.91 +03:20:52.4 Hyperion (14.5mag)
00:56:25.84 +03:15:45.0 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 28 04:58 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.87447942:
18:24:25.00 -27:47:17.6 JWST
13:24:34.61 +53:33:54.6 Chandra
05:35:51.26 +39:15:44.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 28 04:58 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.87447942 -observatory V36
03:00:37.86 +16:23:29.7 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:06:07.36 -34:38:43.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:43:28.64 -68:32:28.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:06:43.69 +32:46:25.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:08:29.51 +31:21:42.2 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:47:15.25 +31:58:08.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:32:19.02 +26:42:53.1 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:11:35.83 +28:57:44.6 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:21:35.57 +05:14:40.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:13.11 -11:53:32.9 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:25:32.79 +66:59:14.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
16:00:38.39 -11:54:08.1 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:33:19.30 +66:46:03.8 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:55:29.61 +30:51:35.3 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:09:21.60 +15:36:21.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:17:22.14 +42:10:50.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:26:06.39 +48:19:09.6 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:06:03.47 -13:09:50.0 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:48:43.09 +26:02:11.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:25:35.17 -14:44:48.3 17.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:16.47 +21:33:03.5 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:52:08.19 +03:01:40.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:11:48.20 +78:41:49.1 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:01:57.19 +45:54:44.9 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:38:09.76 +07:16:58.6 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:45:13.23 -22:31:38.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:22:41.46 -02:45:57.1 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:25:17.27 +31:25:02.2 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:45:28.18 +08:11:28.2 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:53:43.99 -05:08:51.3 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:10:28.48 +20:44:37.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
02:48:31.12 +12:45:18.4 16.5mag 88P/Howell
07:27:11.58 +29:00:07.1 16.0mag 93P/Lovas
03:36:43.05 +12:42:40.1 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:20:25.60 +31:08:03.7 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
08:52:32.13 +28:22:28.5 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:22:22.75 -06:02:37.5 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos
05:20:10.66 +21:09:18.6 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:09:29.97 +19:20:51.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
08:14:11.83 +12:52:52.6 17.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:21:32.19 -19:44:10.1 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
06:37:58.87 +36:55:12.4 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring
17:39:46.61 +29:56:29.0 13.1mag 169P/NEAT
02:21:40.84 +09:07:56.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:37:13.07 -09:20:19.2 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR
20:30:27.75 -52:27:05.6 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
02:50:34.39 +20:25:23.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:32:20.38 +37:44:44.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:07:43.61 +04:18:22.9 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:50:58.01 +18:53:38.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:19:34.09 +37:41:02.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 28 04:58 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 28 04:58 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 28 04:58 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:29:08.363 +04:26:31.33 AT 2026udp 2026-07-11.48 21.13
15:03:58.202 -05:04:22.07 AT 2026udo 2026-07-11.27 20.37
15:25:01.653 +14:49:40.41 AT 2026udn 2026-07-11.35 20.9
22:22:01.421 -20:45:13.04 AT 2026udm 2026-07-11.56 20.85
15:26:26.200 +14:24:00.82 AT 2026udl 2026-07-11.35 21.78
21:52:33.423 -12:26:26.70 AT 2026udk 2026-06-26.41 21.23
23:28:20.264 -02:45:01.54 AT 2026udj 2026-06-27.39 21.46
15:05:14.436 -36:20:56.85 AT 2026udi 2026-07-08.03 19.35
00:31:18.282 -43:46:06.08 AT 2026udh 2026-07-12.40 23.4739
00:40:36.730 -43:07:11.88 AT 2026udg 2026-07-12.40 22.7345
00:27:10.575 -44:08:47.04 AT 2026udf 2026-07-12.40 22.824
03:56:35.271 -49:17:39.98 AT 2026ude 2026-07-12.41 22.9789
00:31:32.044 -43:21:56.99 AT 2026udd 2026-07-12.40 23.6713
22:50:13.778 -07:23:19.66 AT 2026udc 2026-07-12.36 23.1965
00:40:48.112 -44:10:38.19 AT 2026udb 2026-07-12.40 23.683
00:36:44.855 -44:15:14.57 AT 2026uda 2026-07-12.40 23.7801
23:51:48.800 +02:16:08.44 AT 2026ucz 2026-07-12.35 23.3767
22:47:30.921 -12:02:41.49 AT 2026ucy 2026-07-12.36 21.821
00:41:15.829 -45:07:23.74 AT 2026ucx 2026-07-12.40 24.4645
00:34:52.967 -44:42:02.22 AT 2026ucw 2026-07-12.40 23.3852
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 28 04:58 tns_transients_list.txt