NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    12.00    00:01:18.52 -14:24:36.4   5088 0542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    11.95    00:01:18.49 -14:24:36.8   5081 0536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 28.3633  2461249.8633  11.97  00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6
 77.85911 -72.73203 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6:  14.35 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6:  14.79 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    12.82    23:54:14.82 -05:07:42.6   3703 6072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    12.69    23:54:14.84 -05:07:43.1   3696 6066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 28.3633  2461249.8633  12.76  23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8
 88.62852 -64.12253 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
113 Amalthea                -1     -0       1  12.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8:  14.40 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8:  14.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    12.97    00:05:23.46 -14:22:36.4   5684 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    12.95    00:05:23.39 -14:22:35.4   5677 0590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 28.3633  2461249.8633  12.96  00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9
 80.54886 -73.33408 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -1     -0       1  12.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9:  14.30 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9:  14.72 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 923098 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 923098 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4370.0440 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 789.4767 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3252.3232 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 776.5857 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3243.0087 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 775.5815 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.744231 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T03:42:26.6526659' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T08:42:26.6526659' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.362808472 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T08:42:36.5544559' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.3629230787 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999674065992 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99963942045177 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.0872222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 146.226388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.55079993937004 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29524 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29524 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 45.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits :) Spent 0.897956 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-28T03:43:24.0071098' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-28T08:43:24.0071098' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61249.3634723034 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-28T08:43:33.9074330' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61249.3635868868 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999673978221 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99963945091784 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.1986111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 146.502222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.54724503088533 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29524 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29524 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 54.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 45.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits :) Spent 0.808195 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-26.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.86292421 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0766 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01519 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jXQ2fG2OmQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DUy6HAok3D Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gmeSm7cdFc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B00CduU050 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Loaded 4222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.417100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.417100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Loaded 4222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=6.7) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg Loaded 4519 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2424 out of 2445 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2445 out of 2964 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (aperture=6.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.5 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 2.9 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 2.9 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 14.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.jXQ2fG2OmQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=1896 Got 1896 stars (including 1700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0195 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 352.0195 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1638 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1637 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0194 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 352.0194 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1638 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 1636 stars left (next iteration limit 1800) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=1636 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=427 n_q2=409 n_q3=419 n_q4=381 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DUy6HAok3D (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=164, bad_region=0, passed=2964 Got 2964 stars (including 2800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2719 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2717 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6375 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2720 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 2718 stars left (next iteration limit 2988) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=2718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=718 n_q2=627 n_q3=764 n_q4=609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gmeSm7cdFc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=218, bad_region=0, passed=3243 Got 3243 stars (including 3024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3243 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7421 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.7421 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7417 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.7417 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 2942 stars left (next iteration limit 3236) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2942 robust_rms=11.806 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.616 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2942 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2942 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.307 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2942 robust_rms_before=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.313 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.307 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.313 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits N_match=2942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=809 n_q2=694 n_q3=795 n_q4=644 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.B00CduU050 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=3217 Got 3217 stars (including 3000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3217 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7420 through 0 to 8.2315, gap 8.2315 to 351.7420 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7415 through 0 to 8.2320, gap 8.2320 to 351.7415 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 2913 stars left (next iteration limit 3203) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2913 robust_rms=11.955 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.629 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2913 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.383 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2913 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2913 robust_rms_before=1.028 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.316 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.316 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=2913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=796 n_q2=703 n_q3=777 n_q4=637 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.089 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.252 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.144 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.168 reference average sigma_overall=0.3435 worst_q_ratio=1.1705 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (1636 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (2718 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (2942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (2913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21127_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 21127_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    10.30    00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.2   7583 4023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0766 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:19.592 -09:59:29.50 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:22.620 -09:58:58.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01519 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bkrmqpy2iR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WqsRnIGkLT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V93yokPZ6T Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OV96ArE6Ps Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Loaded 4235 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 12067 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.224100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.224100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Loaded 4235 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 12067 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits (aperture=5.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg Loaded 4569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3571 out of 3656 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3656 out of 15752 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (aperture=5.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 2.7 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 2.7 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 14.2 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.bkrmqpy2iR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=343, bad_region=0, passed=12062 Got 12062 stars (including 11705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12062 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 351.9970 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9968 through 0 to 8.1584, gap 8.1584 to 351.9968 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5352) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WqsRnIGkLT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=467, bad_region=2, passed=15750 Got 15750 stars (including 15264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15750 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6375 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15750 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1210 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1371 n_q4=1181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V93yokPZ6T (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=455, bad_region=1, passed=16655 Got 16655 stars (including 16179 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16655 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7352 through 0 to 8.2160, gap 8.2160 to 351.7352 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16655 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7348 through 0 to 8.2165, gap 8.2165 to 351.7348 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16655 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16655 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5351) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1360 n_q4=1167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.OV96ArE6Ps (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=482, bad_region=1, passed=16828 Got 16828 stars (including 16317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16828 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7025 through 0 to 8.2315, gap 8.2315 to 351.7025 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7021 through 0 to 8.2321, gap 8.2321 to 351.7021 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16828 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1357 n_q4=1169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6: 14.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:19:37.46 -14:53:35.3: 13.34 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:28:12.17 -13:54:37.3: 13.95 +/- 0.34 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9: 14.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:26:43.37 -13:56:02.2: 13.57 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:11:23.36 -10:02:28.3: 13.30 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:35:11.88 -09:41:24.1: 13.32 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:22.62 -12:35:35.8: 13.05 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8: 14.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:24:07.03 -14:59:55.6: 13.31 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:11:23.36 -10:02:28.3: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:22.62 -12:35:35.8: 13.66 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:23.36 -10:02:28.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4919 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:19:37.46 -14:53:35.3: 13.60 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:26:43.37 -13:56:02.2: 13.88 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:22.62 -12:35:35.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1378 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 23:35:11.88 -09:41:24.1: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:37.46 -14:53:35.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2145 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:28:12.17 -13:54:37.3: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:43.37 -13:56:02.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2637 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:11.88 -09:41:24.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1862 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:12.17 -13:54:37.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2939 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:24:07.03 -14:59:55.6: 13.79 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:07.03 -14:59:55.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2742 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:42.20 -14:08:12.1: 13.43 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:35.62 -14:35:55.0: 13.51 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:25:02.59 -14:59:17.0: 13.43 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:27:33.43 -13:50:30.1: 13.83 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:30:40.60 -13:24:13.3: 13.59 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425.fits at 00:29:19.43 -14:46:28.8: 13.61 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:25:42.20 -14:08:12.1: 13.42 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:42.20 -14:08:12.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1444 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:40.60 -13:24:13.3: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:27:33.43 -13:50:30.1: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:30:35.62 -14:35:55.0: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:25:02.59 -14:59:17.0: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:40.60 -13:24:13.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2745 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:33.43 -13:50:30.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3439 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:35.62 -14:35:55.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0701 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:02.59 -14:59:17.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3165 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits at 00:29:19.43 -14:46:28.8: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:19.43 -14:46:28.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3128 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24272.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24243_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24243_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    12.63    00:11:23.33 -10:02:28.2   6428 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    12.39    00:11:23.39 -10:02:28.3   6421 3249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24245_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24245_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    10.24    00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.2   7583 4023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24260_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 Preparing report for the candidate 24260_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24272_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 Preparing report for the candidate 24272_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24285_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24285_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.16    23:35:11.86 -09:41:23.6   1040 3122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.21    23:35:11.89 -09:41:24.6   1032 3116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24290_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 Preparing report for the candidate 24290_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.10    00:30:22.59 -12:35:38.6   9329 1825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.21    00:30:22.64 -12:35:33.0   9322 1821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.19    00:26:43.40 -13:56:01.0   8814 0993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.38    00:26:43.33 -13:56:03.4   8807 0987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24336_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24336_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.22    00:19:37.46 -14:53:34.8   7787 0374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.21    00:19:37.46 -14:53:35.8   7780 0368   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24338_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24338_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.17    00:28:12.11 -13:54:37.5   9034 1013   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.53    00:28:12.23 -13:54:37.0   9027 1008   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.17    00:24:07.00 -14:59:55.9   8454 0331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.42    00:24:07.06 -14:59:55.4   8447 0325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.13    00:25:42.25 -14:08:11.0   8667 0865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.15    00:25:42.15 -14:08:13.3   8660 0859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.20    00:30:35.57 -14:35:56.0   9408 0601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    12.98    00:30:35.68 -14:35:54.0   9402 0596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.62    00:29:29.66 -14:35:24.2   9237 0597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits **** FOUND 00:29:29.64 -14:35:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24381_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24381_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.30    00:30:40.59 -13:24:13.3   9393 1333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.25    00:30:40.61 -13:24:13.3   9386 1327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.35    00:27:33.48 -13:50:28.3   8936 1053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.34    00:27:33.38 -13:50:31.9   8929 1047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.31    00:25:02.52 -14:59:16.9   8591 0341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.32    00:25:02.66 -14:59:17.1   8584 0336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 The candidate 24393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 28.36292    2461249.86292    13.31    00:29:19.38 -14:46:29.9   9223 0489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-42-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0378.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 28.36359    2461249.86359    13.31    00:29:19.47 -14:46:27.7   9216 0484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_042623_TTUQ1b1x1_2399783_HhQThwF1/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_03-43-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9 ################################################################################### 00:01:18.50 -14:24:36.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:54:14.83 -05:07:42.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:05:23.43 -14:22:35.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.86292421 -observatory V36 07:11:38.12 +19:18:50.3 Mercury (1.0mag) 11:23:14.51 +04:15:51.6 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:17:28.22 +23:07:10.0 Mars (1.3mag) 08:33:05.98 +19:16:49.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:49.21 +03:21:06.3 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:10:18.24 +20:53:13.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:37.68 +00:17:06.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:11.62 -23:25:48.7 Pluto (14.4mag) 19:31:02.27 -25:42:13.1 Moon (-12.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 28 06:29 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.86292421: 08:33:12.91 +19:16:21.2 Io (5.9mag) 08:33:12.34 +19:16:24.6 Europa (6.3mag) 08:32:51.82 +19:17:47.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:33:26.76 +19:15:23.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:30:55.21 +19:09:49.8 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:33:05.67 +19:16:51.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:30:20.23 +19:10:30.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:37:04.74 +19:01:35.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:36:58.98 +19:24:53.1 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:46.67 +03:20:35.7 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:43.44 +03:21:08.2 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:28.75 +03:18:28.9 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:04.92 +03:20:52.5 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:25.86 +03:15:45.3 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 28 06:29 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461249.86292421: 18:24:24.82 -27:47:52.6 JWST 13:15:49.57 +53:34:36.0 Chandra 05:23:33.20 +42:36:57.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 28 06:29 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461249.86292421 -observatory V36 03:00:36.99 +16:23:25.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:06:07.72 -34:38:43.3 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:43:27.97 -68:32:27.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:06:43.48 +32:46:24.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:08:27.07 +31:21:10.1 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:47:15.78 +31:58:09.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:32:18.28 +26:42:53.7 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:11:35.19 +28:57:46.5 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:21:35.10 +05:14:40.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:13.07 -11:53:31.5 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:25:33.76 +66:59:17.4 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:00:39.33 -11:54:04.0 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:33:17.97 +66:46:01.1 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:55:28.77 +30:51:33.4 15.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:21.80 +15:36:21.2 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:17:23.09 +42:10:45.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:26:07.34 +48:19:05.4 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:06:02.87 -13:09:50.9 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:48:42.58 +26:02:18.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:25:34.78 -14:44:43.3 17.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:18:15.56 +21:33:05.8 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:52:07.83 +03:01:42.4 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:11:49.17 +78:41:51.9 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:01:56.74 +45:54:43.5 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:38:09.22 +07:16:53.3 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:45:12.41 -22:31:19.9 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:22:41.07 -02:45:54.8 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:25:16.35 +31:24:58.1 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:45:26.74 +08:11:41.8 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:43.90 -05:08:50.5 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:10:26.84 +20:44:37.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:48:30.26 +12:45:14.3 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:27:09.67 +29:00:11.7 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:36:41.22 +12:42:24.3 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:20:23.29 +31:08:05.5 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:52:30.45 +28:22:34.7 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:22:21.39 -06:02:21.1 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:20:09.59 +21:09:18.2 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:09:28.72 +19:20:52.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 08:14:09.71 +12:53:02.5 17.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:32.15 -19:44:12.4 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:37:56.39 +36:55:07.7 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:39:52.52 +29:55:44.8 13.1mag 169P/NEAT 02:21:39.41 +09:07:54.5 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:37:12.87 -09:20:16.5 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR 20:30:28.35 -52:27:02.3 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:50:32.40 +20:25:04.5 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:32:18.25 +37:44:44.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:43.48 +04:18:27.3 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:50:57.37 +18:53:40.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:19:33.03 +37:41:06.3 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 28 06:29 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 28 06:29 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 28 06:29 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 21:29:08.363 +04:26:31.33 AT 2026udp 2026-07-11.48 21.13 15:03:58.202 -05:04:22.07 AT 2026udo 2026-07-11.27 20.37 15:25:01.653 +14:49:40.41 AT 2026udn 2026-07-11.35 20.9 22:22:01.421 -20:45:13.04 AT 2026udm 2026-07-11.56 20.85 15:26:26.200 +14:24:00.82 AT 2026udl 2026-07-11.35 21.78 21:52:33.423 -12:26:26.70 AT 2026udk 2026-06-26.41 21.23 23:28:20.264 -02:45:01.54 AT 2026udj 2026-06-27.39 21.46 15:05:14.436 -36:20:56.85 AT 2026udi 2026-07-08.03 19.35 00:31:18.282 -43:46:06.08 AT 2026udh 2026-07-12.40 23.4739 00:40:36.730 -43:07:11.88 AT 2026udg 2026-07-12.40 22.7345 00:27:10.575 -44:08:47.04 AT 2026udf 2026-07-12.40 22.824 03:56:35.271 -49:17:39.98 AT 2026ude 2026-07-12.41 22.9789 00:31:32.044 -43:21:56.99 AT 2026udd 2026-07-12.40 23.6713 22:50:13.778 -07:23:19.66 AT 2026udc 2026-07-12.36 23.1965 00:40:48.112 -44:10:38.19 AT 2026udb 2026-07-12.40 23.683 00:36:44.855 -44:15:14.57 AT 2026uda 2026-07-12.40 23.7801 23:51:48.800 +02:16:08.44 AT 2026ucz 2026-07-12.35 23.3767 22:47:30.921 -12:02:41.49 AT 2026ucy 2026-07-12.36 21.821 00:41:15.829 -45:07:23.74 AT 2026ucx 2026-07-12.40 24.4645 00:34:52.967 -44:42:02.22 AT 2026ucw 2026-07-12.40 23.3852 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 28 06:29 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C