This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.2503 2461249.7503 9.21 20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4
37.11080 -19.26753 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 1 -0 1 9.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.7503,9.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.2503 9.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.2503 2461249.7503 13.08 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6
46.65174 -18.62529 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos 1 -1 2 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.7503,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.2503 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.2503 2461249.7503 12.78 20:59:21.07 -06:35:46.8
42.20986 -31.37226 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:59:21.07 -06:35:46.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:59:21.07 -06:35:46.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.7503,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.2503 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.2503 2461249.7503 13.16 20:12:24.61 -02:06:04.8
40.52771 -18.93234 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.365 Corduba -0 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:24.61 -02:06:04.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:24.61 -02:06:04.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461249.7503,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260728.2503 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 28.2503 2461249.7503 12.81 20:54:00.13 +01:53:37.7
49.85758 -25.99374 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.6 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 1730618211059734912
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.770 G 17.880 G
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -0 -1 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:54:00.13 +01:53:37.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:54:00.13 +01:53:37.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1730618211059734912,2461249.7503,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1730618211059734912 20260728.2503 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461249.75058571 28.07.2026 06:00:40.605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14802
Objects passed selection criteria: 14739
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10772.2
Average stars matched: 10451.2 (97.0201 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 04:25:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461249.75058571 28.07.2026 06:00:40.605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 106898
Objects passed selection criteria: 106651
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83975.8
Average stars matched: 80765.8 (96.1775 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1998808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jul 28 02:13:30 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-182-g8380f0ac
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 28 04:30:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461249.74991607
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52
Second-epoch image center 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52
Second-epoch image center 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UCf9FjwV3Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R0QZhjDyKO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ow48y5UfY1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z5E6cwp2YH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7162 to 316.4583 deg, Dec -7.2811 to +3.2571 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7162 to 316.4583 deg, Dec -7.2811 to 3.2571 deg
Loaded 10825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8861 out of 9345 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9345 out of 15674 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7162 to 316.4583 deg, Dec -7.2811 to +3.2571 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7162 to 316.4583 deg, Dec -7.2811 to 3.2571 deg
Loaded 10825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8861 out of 9345 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9345 out of 15674 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7034 to 316.4356 deg, Dec -7.2626 to +3.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7034 to 316.4356 deg, Dec -7.2626 to 3.2709 deg
Loaded 10815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8887 out of 9346 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9346 out of 15695 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UCf9FjwV3Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1089, bad_region=0, passed=15674
Got 15674 stars (including 14574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=1231 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1299 n_q4=1139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R0QZhjDyKO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=0, passed=15695
Got 15695 stars (including 14640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=1228 n_q2=1177 n_q3=1297 n_q4=1146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ow48y5UfY1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, bad_region=0, passed=5982
Got 5982 stars (including 5491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4842 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=9.761 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.912 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4842 robust_rms_before=0.887 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.355 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.355 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4842 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1427 n_q4=1062 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z5E6cwp2YH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, bad_region=0, passed=6034
Got 6034 stars (including 5537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=9.702 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.465 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.356 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.351
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1436 n_q4=1047 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.151
ref2=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.094
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.121
reference average sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.1595
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4850 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4848 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (4842 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4841 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21040.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21040_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 21040_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21144_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 21144_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.56 -06:36:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.66 +00:56:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.74 +01:19:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:07:37.60 -05:07:12.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52
Second-epoch image center 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.766 -02:00:45.52
Second-epoch image center 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:03.170 -01:59:05.98
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:06.199 -01:58:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PINWMbhaW7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EGfu7FhNX8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.15QJIkRoBp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hTVKkMjR0h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7116 to 316.4605 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7116 to 316.4605 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2590 deg
Loaded 10829 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7940 out of 9760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9760 out of 116458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.557750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.557750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7116 to 316.4605 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7116 to 316.4605 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2590 deg
Loaded 10829 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7940 out of 9760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9760 out of 116458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7023 to 316.4466 deg, Dec -7.2678 to +3.2725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7023 to 316.4466 deg, Dec -7.2678 to 3.2725 deg
Loaded 10829 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7933 out of 9769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9769 out of 116829 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PINWMbhaW7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=9969, bad_region=0, passed=116420
Got 116420 stars (including 106301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1207 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EGfu7FhNX8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=10115, bad_region=1, passed=116788
Got 116788 stars (including 106521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116788 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1214 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1202 n_q4=1195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.15QJIkRoBp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1959, bad_region=1, passed=52515
Got 52515 stars (including 50474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1116 n_q3=1450 n_q4=1070 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hTVKkMjR0h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1951, bad_region=1, passed=52545
Got 52545 stars (including 50519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1215 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1456 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_00-59-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-28_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_010921_TTUQ1b1x1_1794208_8uGM8Faw/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:49:03.45 -03:33:32.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:55:52.09 -05:08:30.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:31.12 -01:29:43.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:50.5: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:42.12 -04:32:49.0: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:07:55.19 -00:48:10.1: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:02:15.76 -04:35:06.6: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:06:15.97 +03:10:04.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:30.62 -02:03:42.4: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:31.12 -01:29:43.1: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:31.12 -01:29:43.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4424 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:09.20 -01:51:02.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:49:03.45 -03:33:32.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:03.45 -03:33:32.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2982 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:55:52.09 -05:08:30.0: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:42.12 -04:32:49.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:52.09 -05:08:30.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3074 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:50.5: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:42.12 -04:32:49.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5481 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:50.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9877 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:09.20 -01:51:02.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:09.20 -01:51:02.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2806 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:07:55.19 -00:48:10.1: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:55.19 -00:48:10.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5757 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:06:15.97 +03:10:04.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:15.97 +03:10:04.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:02:15.76 -04:35:06.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:16.76 -00:59:04.7: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:15.76 -04:35:06.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8722 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:06:49.93 +00:20:48.2: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:01.92 -02:15:07.5: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:30.62 -02:03:42.4: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:07:45.92 -05:16:31.3: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:30.62 -02:03:42.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:04:00.25 -04:25:56.3: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:16.76 -00:59:04.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.76 -00:59:04.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0874 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:01.92 -02:15:07.5: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:01.92 -02:15:07.5: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2697 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:06:49.93 +00:20:48.2: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:07:45.92 -05:16:31.3: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:20:00.21 -06:41:13.4: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:45.92 -05:16:31.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9146 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:49.93 +00:20:48.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2475 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:32.90 -06:43:24.6: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:04:00.25 -04:25:56.3: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.25 -04:25:56.3: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8478 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:54:59.92 -05:25:22.6: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:20:00.21 -06:41:13.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:00.21 -06:41:13.4: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8741 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:32.90 -06:43:24.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:32.90 -06:43:24.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0093 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:15:36.96 -01:13:07.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:54:59.92 -05:25:22.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:59.92 -05:25:22.6: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8379 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:12.33 -05:04:58.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:14:56.43 -04:36:45.1: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:29.02 -00:33:01.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:08:14.16 -01:14:28.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:42:08.55 +02:24:15.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:15:36.96 -01:13:07.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:36.96 -01:13:07.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7660 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:08:54.87 -05:41:37.0: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:52:18.71 -05:29:31.5: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:12.33 -05:04:58.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:12.33 -05:04:58.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7172 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:55:53.31 -05:03:50.6: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:29.02 -00:33:01.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:29.02 -00:33:01.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8244 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:42:08.55 +02:24:15.3: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:08:14.16 -01:14:28.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:08.55 +02:24:15.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6989 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:14.16 -01:14:28.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8606 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:14:56.43 -04:36:45.1: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:56.43 -04:36:45.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4975 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:08:54.87 -05:41:37.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:54.87 -05:41:37.0: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4504 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:21.53 -00:43:40.9: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:52:18.71 -05:29:31.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:18.71 -05:29:31.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0625 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:55:53.31 -05:03:50.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:53.31 -05:03:50.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9575 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:07.28 +00:31:52.6: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:21.53 -00:43:40.9: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:21.53 -00:43:40.9: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3774 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:58.87 +00:00:33.1: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:01:39.64 -04:09:07.6: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:05:27.15 +02:22:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:07.28 +00:31:52.6: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.28 +00:31:52.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3330 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:39.27 -04:59:23.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:36.1: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:58.87 +00:00:33.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:58.87 +00:00:33.1: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7885 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:19.74 -04:37:38.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:01:39.64 -04:09:07.6: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:39.64 -04:09:07.6: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2300 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.71 -03:39:29.9: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0198 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:05:27.15 +02:22:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.15 +02:22:58.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:39.27 -04:59:23.4: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:39.27 -04:59:23.4: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8595 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:14:12.51 -00:01:39.5: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:53.61 -05:39:34.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:36.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.66 -03:21:36.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3714 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:19.74 -04:37:38.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:19.74 -04:37:38.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3876 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:14:12.51 -00:01:39.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:53.61 -05:39:34.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:12.51 -00:01:39.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6086 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.61 -05:39:34.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6048 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:12.12 -03:29:35.7: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:02:39.93 -03:03:05.4: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:23.60 -00:27:18.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:29.29 +01:50:40.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6005 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:40.50 -01:34:07.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:41.48 -02:35:11.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:12.12 -03:29:35.7: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:12.24 -00:08:40.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.12 -03:29:35.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7545 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:23.60 -00:27:18.6: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:23.60 -00:27:18.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6869 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:02:39.93 -03:03:05.4: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:39.93 -03:03:05.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5387 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:32:14.30 +02:07:57.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:40.50 -01:34:07.6: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:40.50 -01:34:07.6: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7563 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:29:40.87 +03:00:34.3: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:58.93 -04:28:58.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:41.48 -02:35:11.2: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:41.48 -02:35:11.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7122 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:12.24 -00:08:40.8: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.24 -00:08:40.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9137 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:26.66 +01:44:38.5: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:32:14.30 +02:07:57.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:14.30 +02:07:57.2: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7655 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:29:40.87 +03:00:34.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:40.87 +03:00:34.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9425 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:09:27.71 -01:38:17.3: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:58.93 -04:28:58.9: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:58.93 -04:28:58.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8774 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:57:35.92 -02:13:51.1: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:59:21.07 -06:35:46.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:26.66 +01:44:38.5: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:26.66 +01:44:38.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8846 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:24.61 -02:06:04.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:09:27.71 -01:38:17.3: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:27.71 -01:38:17.3: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1050 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:19:47.88 -00:53:25.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:57:35.92 -02:13:51.1: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:35.05 +03:07:05.6: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.0806 delta=2.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:35.92 -02:13:51.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7880 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:59:21.07 -06:35:46.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:20.89 +02:56:38.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:31.89 +01:40:25.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:42:26.55 -02:18:39.6: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:24.61 -02:06:04.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:19:47.88 -00:53:25.9: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:05:07.55 +02:33:15.7: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:20.89 +02:56:38.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:20:24.16 -03:21:31.5: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:47.88 -00:53:25.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0915 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.89 +02:56:38.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1168 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:31.89 +01:40:25.2: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:05:07.55 +02:33:15.7: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:20:24.16 -03:21:31.5: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:31.89 +01:40:25.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1776 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:42:26.55 -02:18:39.6: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:24.16 -03:21:31.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0592 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:07.55 +02:33:15.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9489 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:26.55 -02:18:39.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9708 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:30:19.09 +01:53:24.3: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:19:34.21 -02:07:29.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:30:19.09 +01:53:24.3: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:19.09 +01:53:24.3: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1385 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:14:59.54 -04:36:10.2: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:22:53.31 -02:40:20.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:29:59.95 +02:43:19.3: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:25:46.65 +00:58:22.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:19:34.21 -02:07:29.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:34.21 -02:07:29.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1340 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9868 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:22:53.31 -02:40:20.4: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:29:59.95 +02:43:19.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:25:46.65 +00:58:22.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:14:59.54 -04:36:10.2: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:53.31 -02:40:20.4: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2629 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:59.95 +02:43:19.3: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1905 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:46.65 +00:58:22.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2143 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.54 -04:36:10.2: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1534 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:00:19.74 -05:48:15.5: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:34.26 -02:33:11.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:40.85 +01:15:51.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.4: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 21:00:19.74 -05:48:15.5: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:19.74 -05:48:15.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8535 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:25.93 -02:02:37.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:34.26 -02:33:11.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:03.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.26 -02:33:11.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1749 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:40.85 +01:15:51.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:40.85 +01:15:51.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3179 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:42:25.61 -02:18:18.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.4: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:25.93 -02:02:37.7: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.69 +01:48:54.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4457 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:25.93 -02:02:37.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3349 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:03.5: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.90 +02:19:03.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5204 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:42:25.61 -02:18:18.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:11:34.69 -01:18:05.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:25.61 -02:18:18.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6994 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:39.62 -01:06:17.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:13.66 -03:28:49.0: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:39.62 -01:06:17.0: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:11:34.69 -01:18:05.0: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:39.62 -01:06:17.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9198 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:34.69 -01:18:05.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7668 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:13.66 -03:28:49.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:27:21.48 -02:06:13.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:13.66 -03:28:49.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7294 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:27:21.48 -02:06:13.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:21.48 -02:06:13.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2950 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:54:00.13 +01:53:37.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:54:00.13 +01:53:37.7: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138296.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138343.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78810.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137264_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137264_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137266_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137266_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137270_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:25.22 +00:34:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137273_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137273_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137274_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137275_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137276_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137276_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137279_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137279_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137283_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137283_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137284_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137284_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137288_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137288_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137289_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137290_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137290_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137293_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137293_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137294_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137297_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137297_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137298_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137298_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137299_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137299_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137301_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137301_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137302_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137302_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137304_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137304_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137305_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137305_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137306_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137306_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137308_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137308_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137312_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137312_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137313_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137313_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137314_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137314_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137315_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137315_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137316_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137316_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137317_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137317_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137320_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137320_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137344_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137344_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:37.59 -05:07:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137509_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137509_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137546_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137546_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137649_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137649_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137710_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137710_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137789_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137789_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:10.66 +01:45:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137911_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137911_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137977_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 137977_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138030_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138030_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138037_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138037_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138056_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138056_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138063_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138063_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138073_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138073_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:11.14 -04:05:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138086_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138086_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138090_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138090_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138092_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138092_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138133_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138133_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138156_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138156_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138169_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138169_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138213_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138213_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138219_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138219_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138271_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138271_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138296_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 138296_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138299_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138299_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138300_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 138300_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138343_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 138343_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138347_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138347_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138353_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138353_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138356_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138356_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138357_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138357_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138366_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138366_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138408_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138408_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138420_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138420_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138449_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138449_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138470_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138470_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138492_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138492_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138500_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138500_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138501_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138501_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138503_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138503_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138510_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138510_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:16.94 +01:53:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138520_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138520_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138621_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138621_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138645_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138645_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138680_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138680_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138723_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138723_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:20.39 -01:29:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138743_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138743_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138969_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 138969_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139000_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 139000_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139003_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 139003_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.77 +01:19:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.67 +00:56:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05043_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211
The candidate 05043_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-28_01-00-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0211 did not pass the final checks
