NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    11.92    00:01:23.82 -14:20:28.6   4424 5794   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.91    00:01:23.86 -14:20:29.3   4423 5789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 27.4510  2461248.9510  11.91  00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9
 78.06462 -72.69370 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9:  14.36 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9:  14.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    12.68    23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.7   5839 0284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.71    23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.9   5839 0279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 27.4510  2461248.9510  12.70  23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8
 88.68937 -64.08175 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
113 Amalthea                -0     -0       0  12.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8:  14.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8:  14.84 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    12.87    00:05:24.51 -14:18:07.6   3839 5736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.83    00:05:24.53 -14:18:07.6   3839 5731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 27.4510  2461248.9510  12.85  00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6
 80.72129 -73.27822 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -1      0       1  12.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6:  14.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6:  14.76 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    12.96    00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.5   3127 3103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.93    00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.7   3127 3099   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 07 27.4510  2461248.9510  12.95  00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6
 92.05773 -70.43551 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0     -0       0  13.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6:  14.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6:  14.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 35428 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 35428 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4370.0440 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 789.4767 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1750.3534 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 546.1074 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1807.3837 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 552.1071 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.400535 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.011 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-27T05:48:49.9384637' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-27T10:48:49.9384637' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61248.450577986 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-27T10:48:59.8424789' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61248.4506926159 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999796077203 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -10.0001522138163 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.1316666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 187.292777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38582229105475 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 37.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits :) Spent 0.773789 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-07-27T05:49:34.8007175' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-07-27T10:49:34.8007175' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61248.451097222 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-07-27T10:49:44.7047579' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61248.451211852 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999796007823 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -10.0001522383766 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.1119444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 187.5525 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38627947825899 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 64.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 37.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits :) Spent 0.798858 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 33257.220075 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21556.5, right_median=24803.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.95069373 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00760 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5GkzW3c71Y Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.unoOoByd33 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bqehPb4gkF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qep6Zi70Ej Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Loaded 4222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.417100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.417100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.73 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.0195 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2778 to -4.6540 deg Loaded 4222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1519 out of 1541 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 1541 out of 1896 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits (aperture=6.7) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5331 to -4.3611 deg Loaded 4519 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2424 out of 2445 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2445 out of 2964 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits (aperture=6.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.5 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 2.9 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 2.9 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 14.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5GkzW3c71Y (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=1896 Got 1896 stars (including 1700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1896 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0195 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 352.0195 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0194 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 352.0194 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=246 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.unoOoByd33 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=164, bad_region=0, passed=2964 Got 2964 stars (including 2800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2964 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6375 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1031) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=241 n_q2=210 n_q3=261 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bqehPb4gkF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, bad_region=0, passed=3935 Got 3935 stars (including 3642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6380 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6377 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=948 robust_rms=12.553 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=948 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=948 robust_rms_before=1.131 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=239 n_q2=241 n_q3=232 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Qep6Zi70Ej (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=0, passed=3870 Got 3870 stars (including 3565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3870 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1601, gap 8.1601 to 351.6380 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6377 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=948 robust_rms=12.408 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=948 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=948 robust_rms_before=1.116 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.306 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=236 n_q2=241 n_q3=234 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.103 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.206 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.091 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.051 reference average sigma_overall=0.3525 worst_q_ratio=1.1545 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21129_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 21129_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    10.29    00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.3   1944 2337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Image size: 938.7'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:05.068 -10:00:31.53 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.636 -10:00:12.35 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.546 -10:00:39.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00760 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y7W14oXi9r Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QBx2LIIrwk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JhI9nTLMSS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I47gzt2xtW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Loaded 4235 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 12067 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.224100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.224100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.42 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9970 to 8.1581 deg, Dec -15.2876 to -4.6411 deg Loaded 4235 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3551 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 12067 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits (aperture=5.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.6382 to 8.1600 deg, Dec -15.5533 to -4.2658 deg Loaded 4569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3571 out of 3656 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3656 out of 15752 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits (aperture=5.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 2.7 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 1.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 1.9 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 2.7 pix wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 13.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 14.2 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Y7W14oXi9r (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=343, bad_region=0, passed=12062 Got 12062 stars (including 11705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12062 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1581, gap 8.1581 to 351.9970 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9970 through 0 to 8.1585, gap 8.1585 to 351.9970 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=231 n_q2=241 n_q3=225 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.QBx2LIIrwk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=467, bad_region=2, passed=15750 Got 15750 stars (including 15264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15750 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6382 through 0 to 8.1600, gap 8.1600 to 351.6382 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6375 through 0 to 8.1604, gap 8.1604 to 351.6375 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1031) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=236 n_q2=213 n_q3=254 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JhI9nTLMSS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=723, bad_region=6, passed=23871 Got 23871 stars (including 23084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23871 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5873 through 0 to 8.1744, gap 8.1744 to 351.5873 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5869 through 0 to 8.1747, gap 8.1747 to 351.5869 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=240 n_q2=239 n_q3=234 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.I47gzt2xtW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=902, bad_region=6, passed=23760 Got 23760 stars (including 22809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23760 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5875 through 0 to 41.8023, gap 41.8023 to 351.5875 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 490 (Dec -15.6 to 7.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23582 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5871 through 0 to 41.8024, gap 41.8024 to 351.5871 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 490 (Dec -15.6 to 7.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=236 n_q2=238 n_q3=237 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 23:32:08.82 -09:46:26.8: 12.73 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:57.1: 11.90 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:14:03.35 -11:28:47.4: 11.64 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6: 14.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:57.1: 11.98 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 23:32:08.82 -09:46:26.8: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:57.1: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6656 delta=-0.72 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:08.82 -09:46:26.8: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1648 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:14:03.35 -11:28:47.4: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:03.35 -11:28:47.4: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1786 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 23:39:56.64 -10:56:17.9: 13.08 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:25:42.17 -14:08:12.1: 13.43 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:19:37.37 -14:53:35.2: 13.30 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:26:15.18 -15:03:47.1: 13.52 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 23:39:56.64 -10:56:17.9: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:54.3: 13.47 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:56.64 -10:56:17.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3506 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:29:06.39 -14:08:37.2: 13.75 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:25:42.17 -14:08:12.1: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:42.17 -14:08:12.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0632 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:19:37.37 -14:53:35.2: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:26:15.18 -15:03:47.1: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:37.37 -14:53:35.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1895 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.18 -15:03:47.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2137 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:54.3: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:29:06.39 -14:08:37.2: 13.91 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:35.59 -14:35:54.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1012 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:06.39 -14:08:37.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.2418 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:25:02.71 -14:59:15.8: 13.48 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:29:42.04 -13:59:58.1: 13.23 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:25:02.71 -14:59:15.8: 13.79 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:30:20.27 -13:49:27.6: 13.59 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:02.71 -14:59:15.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2082 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:05.6: 13.61 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:29:42.04 -13:59:58.1: 13.54 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:24:59.77 -14:24:03.4: 13.65 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.04 -13:59:58.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2840 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:29:19.50 -14:46:28.8: 13.60 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:30:20.27 -13:49:27.6: 13.79 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:20.27 -13:49:27.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2458 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:05.6: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:24:59.77 -14:24:03.4: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:51.30 -14:37:05.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2154 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:59.77 -14:24:03.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3814 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:29:19.50 -14:46:28.8: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:19.50 -14:46:28.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2404 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:30:40.56 -13:24:14.6: 13.51 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:12:31.59 -14:02:09.4: 13.52 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:30:40.56 -13:24:14.6: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:40.56 -13:24:14.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2291 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:12:31.59 -14:02:09.4: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:31.59 -14:02:09.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3342 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:26:57.64 -14:40:52.3: 13.73 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:30:22.57 -12:35:35.4: 13.05 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_05-28-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0425_stack1.fits at 00:26:56.64 -14:40:51.7: 13.64 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:26:56.64 -14:40:51.7: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:26:57.64 -14:40:52.3: 13.38 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-09_05-22-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_stack1.fits at 00:30:22.57 -12:35:35.4: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:56.64 -14:40:51.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2342 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:57.64 -14:40:52.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3815 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:22.57 -12:35:35.4: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2889 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24339.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24309_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24309_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.16    23:32:08.79 -09:46:26.9   8946 3359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.18    23:32:08.85 -09:46:26.6   8946 3354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24312_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24312_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    12.69    23:43:36.29 -07:55:56.7   7313 2115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.64    23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.4   7313 2111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24314_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24314_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    12.18    00:14:03.34 -11:28:47.3   2662 3965   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.18    00:14:03.36 -11:28:47.4   2662 3961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24317_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24317_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    10.26    00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.3   1944 2337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24318_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24318_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    10.92    00:06:45.12 -11:56:37.7   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24320_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24320_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.46    00:10:59.51 -12:27:57.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24321_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24321_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.66    23:54:21.80 -07:26:47.4   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24322_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24322_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.69    23:55:31.60 -07:30:36.7   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24323_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24323_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.57    00:07:57.17 -14:45:37.6   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24324_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.59    23:55:51.45 -13:53:28.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24326_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24326_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.67    00:24:35.97 -07:35:38.8   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24328_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24328_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    11.97    23:55:17.80 -13:38:20.7   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24329_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 24329_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 24332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.82    23:42:20.72 -09:54:28.5   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24338_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24338_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.88    00:10:28.14 -06:02:09.0   3371 0708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits **** FOUND 00:10:28.14 -06:02:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 24339_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24340_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24340_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    12.98    00:29:40.32 -05:20:20.8   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24341_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 Preparing report for the candidate 24341_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.26    00:07:55.18 -06:44:15.0   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24354_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24354_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.32    23:38:01.10 -10:38:33.2   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24356_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.33    00:19:16.77 -06:38:52.8   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24359_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24359_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.29    23:39:56.64 -10:56:17.7   7721 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.43    23:39:56.64 -10:56:18.0   7721 3962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.08    00:25:42.22 -14:08:12.8   0856 5503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.05    00:25:42.13 -14:08:11.4   0856 5498   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24362_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24362_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.13    00:21:42.18 -14:03:38.9   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24364_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24364_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.18    00:19:37.37 -14:53:34.7   1734 5996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.20    00:19:37.37 -14:53:35.7   1735 5992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24365_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24365_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.17    00:26:15.15 -15:03:46.6   0749 6066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.27    00:26:15.21 -15:03:47.6   0748 6062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24367_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24367_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.11    00:30:35.57 -14:35:53.9   0114 5764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.09    00:30:35.60 -14:35:54.7   0114 5759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.22    00:29:06.35 -14:08:37.5   0348 5491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.27    00:29:06.43 -14:08:36.9   0348 5487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24371_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24371_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.20    00:25:02.77 -14:59:16.1   0930 6026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.22    00:25:02.64 -14:59:15.5   0930 6021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24373_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24373_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.22    00:29:42.05 -13:59:57.5   0263 5401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.37    00:29:42.04 -13:59:58.6   0263 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.23    00:30:20.27 -13:49:27.7   0172 5291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.27    00:30:20.28 -13:49:27.6   0172 5286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24377_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.23    00:25:51.29 -14:37:05.4   0820 5796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.20    00:25:51.32 -14:37:05.8   0820 5792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24379_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24379_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.24    00:29:19.48 -14:46:29.4   0299 5877   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.25    00:29:19.52 -14:46:28.2   0299 5872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24380_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24380_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.27    00:24:59.72 -14:24:03.4   0954 5668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.63    00:24:59.82 -14:24:03.4   0954 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24382_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24382_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.34    00:12:31.56 -14:02:09.5   2806 5520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.33    00:12:31.61 -14:02:09.3   2806 5516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.26    00:30:40.53 -13:24:14.5   0132 5032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.20    00:30:40.59 -13:24:14.7   0132 5028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24388_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24388_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.30    00:26:57.66 -14:40:53.2   0654 5830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.51    00:26:57.62 -14:40:51.4   0654 5825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24390_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24390_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.30    00:30:22.54 -12:35:35.8   0197 4539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.28    00:30:22.60 -12:35:34.9   0197 4535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 The candidate 24391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 07 27.45069    2461248.95069    13.29    00:26:56.63 -14:40:51.5   0656 5829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-48-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0358.fits Discovery image 2   2026 07 27.45121    2461248.95121    13.19    00:26:56.65 -14:40:52.0   0656 5825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_055126_TTUQ1b1x1_3870686_6OzPyLKB/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_05-49-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6 ################################################################################### 00:01:23.84 -14:20:28.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:54:15.42 -05:04:47.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:05:24.52 -14:18:07.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:11:14.43 -10:00:44.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461248.95069373 -observatory V36 07:10:01.99 +19:08:23.4 Mercury (1.1mag) 11:19:48.32 +04:42:28.3 Venus (-4.2mag) 05:14:46.98 +23:03:38.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:32:16.14 +19:19:44.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:49.18 +03:21:22.8 Saturn (0.7mag) 04:10:10.12 +20:52:52.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:39.76 +00:17:23.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:29:16.95 -23:25:25.8 Pluto (14.4mag) 18:41:52.66 -27:29:29.1 Moon (-12.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jul 27 07:51 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461248.95069373: 08:32:11.74 +19:20:03.1 Io (6.0mag) 08:32:08.72 +19:20:15.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:32:09.01 +19:20:11.0 Ganymede (5.5mag) 08:32:42.61 +19:17:56.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:30:07.07 +19:12:13.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:32:20.78 +19:19:25.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:29:31.58 +19:13:05.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:36:13.95 +19:04:57.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:36:12.59 +19:27:37.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:42.41 +03:20:58.9 Titan (8.5mag) 00:56:47.60 +03:21:32.6 Rhea (9.8mag) 00:56:26.68 +03:18:43.6 Iapetus (11.2mag) 00:57:04.44 +03:21:00.9 Hyperion (14.5mag) 00:56:27.04 +03:16:09.4 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jul 27 07:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461248.95069373: 18:21:28.76 -28:05:18.5 JWST 18:28:04.42 +20:18:41.7 Chandra 11:25:39.50 -60:40:48.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jul 27 07:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461248.95069373 -observatory V36 02:59:27.36 +16:18:02.9 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:06:35.94 -34:38:28.0 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:42:34.94 -68:30:53.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:06:26.77 +32:45:21.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:05:09.47 +30:39:07.4 16.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:47:57.11 +32:00:04.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:31:20.12 +26:43:41.6 16.7mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:10:45.38 +29:00:16.9 16.9mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:20:58.59 +05:14:12.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:09.78 -11:51:42.8 17.8mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:26:49.24 +67:02:55.3 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 16:01:54.79 -11:48:43.3 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:31:34.38 +66:42:31.3 18.0mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:54:23.00 +30:49:05.9 15.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:09:37.60 +15:36:02.9 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:18:36.81 +42:04:36.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:27:20.58 +48:13:27.1 17.7mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:05:15.19 -13:11:12.3 15.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:48:02.43 +26:11:39.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:25:05.16 -14:38:16.1 17.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:17:04.38 +21:36:07.9 17.4mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:51:40.55 +03:04:53.0 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:13:08.41 +78:45:11.4 17.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:01:20.36 +45:53:03.7 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:37:27.61 +07:09:50.2 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:43:59.54 -22:06:42.6 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:22:10.80 -02:42:55.3 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:24:03.22 +31:19:36.4 17.9mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:43:34.17 +08:29:33.2 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:53:35.49 -05:07:51.9 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:08:18.20 +20:44:04.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 02:47:20.71 +12:39:48.0 16.5mag 88P/Howell 07:24:39.73 +29:06:12.3 16.0mag 93P/Lovas 03:34:16.32 +12:21:45.7 17.9mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:17:21.05 +31:10:29.5 16.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 08:50:18.49 +28:30:38.5 15.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:20:35.47 -05:40:45.2 17.0mag 124P/Mrkos 05:18:45.17 +21:08:48.9 16.2mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:07:50.53 +19:22:40.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 08:11:22.82 +13:06:07.5 17.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:21:27.94 -19:47:25.5 16.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 06:34:40.81 +36:48:54.4 15.6mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:47:17.04 +28:56:43.7 13.2mag 169P/NEAT 02:19:44.41 +09:04:51.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:36:57.92 -09:16:45.1 17.4mag 235P/LINEAR 20:31:11.03 -52:22:05.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 02:47:54.23 +20:00:23.9 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 06:29:30.54 +37:43:43.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:07:33.85 +04:24:09.4 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:50:07.33 +18:56:11.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:18:10.49 +37:45:51.6 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Jul 27 07:51 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-26eg 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jul 27 07:51 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jul 27 07:51 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:52:02.226 -02:27:22.89 AT 2026uce 2026-07-09.34 22.1261 22:46:33.362 -04:06:56.17 AT 2026ucd 2026-07-09.34 22.7186 22:56:54.106 -10:42:50.84 AT 2026ucc 2026-07-09.34 22.2051 22:53:25.731 -02:38:45.64 AT 2026ucb 2026-07-09.35 22.3845 20:21:20.446 -12:55:24.01 AT 2026uca 2026-07-09.24 22.8887 23:17:51.308 -00:47:18.69 AT 2026ubz 2026-07-09.38 21.8767 22:50:38.435 -08:50:23.60 AT 2026uby 2026-07-09.34 22.2275 22:47:24.698 -06:06:23.35 AT 2026ubx 2026-07-09.34 23.256 22:56:00.968 -11:40:11.78 AT 2026ubw 2026-07-09.34 22.1585 23:24:42.862 +02:16:46.36 AT 2026ubv 2026-07-09.41 22.7993 22:45:14.951 -12:30:44.06 AT 2026ubu 2026-07-07.42 23.0269 21:48:25.112 -16:15:06.82 AT 2026ubt 2026-07-07.42 22.6297 22:49:23.723 -15:30:28.94 AT 2026ubs 2026-07-07.41 23.1172 22:47:25.707 -13:21:20.99 AT 2026ubr 2026-07-07.42 22.9851 22:48:27.713 -14:51:00.69 AT 2026ubq 2026-07-07.41 23.5158 22:55:15.603 -17:20:52.24 AT 2026ubp 2026-07-07.41 22.73 00:01:17.781 -03:06:59.77 AT 2026ubo 2026-06-30.36 21.0986 23:48:53.692 +00:34:05.28 AT 2026ubn 2026-06-30.37 21.2974 23:55:47.866 +01:29:21.94 AT 2026ubm 2026-06-30.37 22.7418 23:56:07.829 -00:07:55.59 AT 2026ubl 2026-06-30.36 22.5755 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Jul 27 07:51 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C