This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 43 48.63 -22 02 41.2 11.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 43 48.57 -22 02 40.3 11.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3034 2461248.8034 12.99 21:00:46.04 -19:08:48.0
28.52462 -36.81391 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla 1 -2 2 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:00:46.04 -19:08:48.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:00:46.04 -19:08:48.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 00 46.04 -19 08 48.0 13.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3034 2461248.8034 13.82 21:36:47.00 -15:10:56.9
37.47457 -43.37105 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.653 Berenike -0 0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:36:47.00 -15:10:56.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:36:47.00 -15:10:56.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 36 47.00 -15 10 56.9 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3034 2461248.8034 13.80 21:09:13.95 -15:16:29.4
33.96582 -37.28506 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa -0 1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:09:13.95 -15:16:29.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:09:13.95 -15:16:29.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 09 13.95 -15 16 29.4 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3034 2461248.8034 13.84 21:02:05.64 -16:35:47.2
31.62833 -36.19736 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -1 1 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:02:05.64 -16:35:47.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:02:05.64 -16:35:47.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 02 05.64 -16 35 47.2 13.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461248.8034,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260727.3034 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 27.3034 2461248.8034 13.26 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5
27.19431 -39.94887 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" DH Cap
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 V 14.400 V 2452067.73600 0.469366000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 27.3034* 21 11 55.45 -21 09 41.5 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DH Cap,2461248.8034,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DH Cap 20260727.3034 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.80367924 27.07.2026 07:17:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10895
Objects passed selection criteria: 10852
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7806.75
Average stars matched: 7604.75 (97.4125 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 04:18:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
First image: 2461213.87164633 22.06.2026 08:55:00.243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Last image: 2461248.80367924 27.07.2026 07:17:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: unknown
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56409
Objects passed selection criteria: 56312
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45175.8
Average stars matched: 43040.8 (95.274 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jul 26 03:08:32 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-174-g9b7cb13a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 27 04:23:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461248.80308078
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tBvh72iSFg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RzBSZQngfW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CRNG35UzJX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QmAZWm5RTX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5682 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2615 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5682 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2615 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5635 out of 5835 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5835 out of 11414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.630200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.630200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5682 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2615 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5682 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2615 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5635 out of 5835 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5835 out of 11414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 11437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5678 to 328.4755 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5678 to 328.4755 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6412 deg
Loaded 6836 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5631 out of 5841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5841 out of 11437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
2.4 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tBvh72iSFg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=614, bad_region=0, passed=11414
Got 11414 stars (including 10788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=245 n_q2=228 n_q3=263 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RzBSZQngfW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=667, bad_region=0, passed=11437
Got 11437 stars (including 10761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits (swarp) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=248 n_q2=238 n_q3=241 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CRNG35UzJX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=4272
Got 4272 stars (including 3915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=9.161 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=943 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=943 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.289 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=276 n_q2=218 n_q3=259 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QmAZWm5RTX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=4297
Got 4297 stars (including 3928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=8.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=944 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=944 robust_rms_before=1.022 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best baseline 0.288 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=283 n_q2=217 n_q3=260 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.248
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.059
reference average sigma_overall=0.3115 worst_q_ratio=1.25
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 20748_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07484_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 07484_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:37.52 -16:10:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:20:00.527 -17:59:43.03
Second-epoch image center 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0320 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:19:55.993 -18:01:10.76
Second-epoch second image center 21:19:58.574 -18:01:34.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P7x8gYikNS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YmLBchazvj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LAsku2HgXC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8xFChykMNV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2619 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2619 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5267 out of 5898 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5898 out of 59473 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.494300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.494300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5476 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2619 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5476 to 328.4756 deg, Dec -23.2619 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6862 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5267 out of 5898 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5898 out of 59473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 63472 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5477 to 328.4992 deg, Dec -23.2704 to -12.6108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5477 to 328.4992 deg, Dec -23.2704 to -12.6108 deg
Loaded 6884 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5215 out of 5893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5893 out of 63472 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
2.3 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
15.3 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.P7x8gYikNS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=3554, bad_region=0, passed=59441
Got 59441 stars (including 55821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=247 n_q2=226 n_q3=251 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YmLBchazvj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits 856.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits'
This WCS solution (swarp) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3770, bad_region=1, passed=63451
Got 63451 stars (including 59589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=251 n_q2=238 n_q3=230 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LAsku2HgXC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=878, bad_region=0, passed=29358
Got 29358 stars (including 28448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=266 n_q2=220 n_q3=267 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8xFChykMNV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=874, bad_region=1, passed=29667
Got 29667 stars (including 28745 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=269 n_q2=222 n_q3=263 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-16-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-27_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_021751_TTUQ1b1x1_724079_rEOFyjPp/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:41:40.37 -19:38:37.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:59:51.92 -18:37:11.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:46:41.72 -19:39:21.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:52:41.71 -13:52:24.1: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:12:29.35 -15:25:56.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:48:22.78 -21:42:33.6: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:14:25.40 -15:05:24.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:13:00.69 -20:54:48.8: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:53:15.94 -15:16:13.9: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:39:27.56 -16:39:37.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:59:51.92 -18:37:11.6: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:12:29.35 -15:25:56.9: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:14:25.40 -15:05:24.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:13:00.69 -20:54:48.8: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:51.92 -18:37:11.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2915 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:46:41.72 -19:39:21.5: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:41:40.37 -19:38:37.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:29.35 -15:25:56.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4363 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:52:41.71 -13:52:24.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:53:15.94 -15:16:13.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:25.40 -15:05:24.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0771 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:48:22.78 -21:42:33.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:00.69 -20:54:48.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1622 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:41.72 -19:39:21.5: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8470 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:40.37 -19:38:37.9: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9378 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.71 -13:52:24.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5887 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:15.94 -15:16:13.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5614 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:22.78 -21:42:33.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0151 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:39:27.56 -16:39:37.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:27.56 -16:39:37.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3022 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:36:51.98 -22:44:20.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:51:00.75 -17:30:10.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:46:24.47 -21:44:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:48:15.09 -16:29:53.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:33:44.31 -13:43:45.9: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:07:35.44 -19:05:30.0: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:36:51.98 -22:44:20.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:51.98 -22:44:20.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2056 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:51:00.75 -17:30:10.8: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:46:24.47 -21:44:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:24.47 -21:44:21.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:00.75 -17:30:10.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3781 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:33:44.31 -13:43:45.9: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:01:27.71 -16:51:16.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:44.31 -13:43:45.9: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9253 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:07:35.44 -19:05:30.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:48:15.09 -16:29:53.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:35.44 -19:05:30.0: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9877 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:15.09 -16:29:53.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3962 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:05.10 -12:43:45.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:08.37 -16:48:26.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2851 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:01:27.71 -16:51:16.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:27.71 -16:51:16.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4632 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:02:41.51 -19:15:48.0: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:04:47.51 -17:10:33.0: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:41:43.33 -19:46:54.5: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:39:42.77 -20:39:55.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:00:46.04 -19:08:48.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:55:43.75 -17:05:53.5: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:06:47.66 -20:11:08.6: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:04:47.51 -17:10:33.0: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:47.51 -17:10:33.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4590 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:02:41.51 -19:15:48.0: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:31:30.73 -21:59:38.2: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:41.51 -19:15:48.0: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9076 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:41:43.33 -19:46:54.5: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:39:42.77 -20:39:55.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:43.33 -19:46:54.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7104 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:42.77 -20:39:55.6: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5676 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:13:40.18 -14:39:06.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:00:46.04 -19:08:48.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:06:47.66 -20:11:08.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:47.66 -20:11:08.6: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9956 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:55:43.75 -17:05:53.5: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:43.75 -17:05:53.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9902 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:31:30.73 -21:59:38.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:30.73 -21:59:38.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8933 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:13:40.18 -14:39:06.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:40.18 -14:39:06.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9140 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:14:00.37 -20:04:27.9: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:58:02.71 -15:09:00.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:04:29.55 -18:43:15.9: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:27.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:59:28.51 -20:25:49.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 20:58:08.82 -16:40:36.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:14:21.27 -13:51:53.8: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:58:02.71 -15:09:00.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:02.71 -15:09:00.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0529 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:14:00.37 -20:04:27.9: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:04:29.55 -18:43:15.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:00.37 -20:04:27.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1242 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:29.55 -18:43:15.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2340 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:27.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:27.6: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0741 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:59:28.51 -20:25:49.8: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:33:29.24 -13:26:51.9: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:28.51 -20:25:49.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2510 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 20:58:08.82 -16:40:36.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:08.82 -16:40:36.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2558 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:14:21.27 -13:51:53.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:21.27 -13:51:53.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2653 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:33:29.24 -13:26:51.9: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:29.24 -13:26:51.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1892 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:36:47.00 -15:10:56.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:02:05.64 -16:35:47.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:09:13.95 -15:16:29.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0396_stack2.fits at 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:36:47.00 -15:10:56.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:02:05.64 -16:35:47.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:09:13.95 -15:16:29.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_03-55-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0397_stack2.fits at 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:11:55.45 -21:09:41.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2434 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77482.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76974_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76974_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76976_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76976_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76978_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76978_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76979_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76979_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76980_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76980_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76981_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76981_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76982_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76983_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76983_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76984_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76984_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76988_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76988_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76989_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76989_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76991_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76991_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76993_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 76993_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77061_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77061_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77142_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 77142_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77151_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77151_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77212_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77212_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77276_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77276_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:06.01 -16:50:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77296_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77296_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77324_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77324_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77337_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77337_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77348_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77348_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77394_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77435_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77435_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77447_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77447_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:15.88 -19:51:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77482_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 77482_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77486_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77486_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77493_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77493_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77497_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77497_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77504_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77504_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77514_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77514_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77534_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77534_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77555_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77555_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77556_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77556_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77569_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77569_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77634_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77638_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77676_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 77676_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77847_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 77847_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77851_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 77851_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77861_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 77861_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09356_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 09356_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57947_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 57947_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-27_02-17-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
